作者: admin

  • Authorities Investigating Claims Businessmen May Be Importing Guns

    Authorities Investigating Claims Businessmen May Be Importing Guns

    During parliamentary debate on a landmark 2026 firearms amendment bill, Antigua and Barbuda Prime Minister Gaston Browne has publicly revealed an active investigation into unconfirmed allegations linking one to two high-profile local business leaders to illegal firearms trafficking into the twin-island nation.

    The announcement came as Browne outlined the government’s ongoing work to map out smuggling routes and shut down the supply of illegal weapons that pose a growing threat to national security. “We understand that there are one or two prominent businessmen who may be involved in the importation of guns,” Browne confirmed to members of the House of Representatives. He was quick to add that the intelligence pointing to their involvement remains uncorroborated, with law enforcement still working to gather additional evidence to verify the claims.

    Browne declined to release any identifying details about the accused businessmen, the industries they operate in, or specific information about the allegations. He also confirmed that no arrests or formal charges have been filed in connection with this investigation, as of the parliamentary debate. No independent evidence supporting the allegations was presented during the parliamentary session, and no additional official details about the probe have been made public in subsequent disclosures.

    The prime minister used the reveal to frame a broader policy push, arguing that law enforcement and policymakers must shift focus beyond low-level offenders caught in possession of illegal weapons, to target the kingpins and facilitators who coordinate smuggling operations into the country. “Everything is on the table” when it comes to protecting national security, Browne stated, emphasizing the government’s commitment to taking aggressive action against the illegal firearms trade.

    He also referenced a prior high-profile smuggling case to underscore the need for harsher sentencing. In that previous case, an individual Browne described as a personal friend, who had once been shortlisted as a potential candidate for Browne’s ruling Antigua Labour Party, was convicted of smuggling guns and ammunition and received only a one-year prison sentence. Browne argued that this lenient sentence highlighted the urgent need for revised penalties that are harsh enough to deter would-be traffickers. Under the proposed Firearms (Amendment) Bill 2026, convicted offenders will face significantly harsher sentences, including substantially longer prison terms for repeat offenders, covering a wide range of offenses from illegal public carry to unauthorized import, export, and transshipment of firearms.

  • Illegal Gun Possession Will Carry Minimum 15-Year Prison Term Under New Bill

    Illegal Gun Possession Will Carry Minimum 15-Year Prison Term Under New Bill

    A sweeping overhaul of Antigua’s firearms legislation is moving forward in Parliament, with the Firearms (Amendment) Bill 2026 introducing drastically harsher mandatory minimum penalties for individuals convicted of illegal firearm and ammunition possession. Attorney General Sir Steadroy “Cutie” Benjamin laid out the revised sentencing framework to the House of Representatives on Monday, framing the bill as a direct governmental response to a rising tide of gun-related violence that has shaken public confidence in community safety.

    Under the proposed legislation, the penalties for illegal firearm possession are split by the type of conviction. For cases handled through summary conviction, offenders will face between five and 10 years behind bars. For more severe cases that result in conviction on indictment in the High Court, the bill enshrines a mandatory minimum 15-year prison sentence – a sharp increase from current sentencing guidelines.

    Benjamin told lawmakers that the stricter penalties come in response to widespread criticism that existing sentences have failed to deter gun crime, and that the government is determined to send an uncompromising message to anyone involved in the illegal firearms trade. “If you commit the crime, you do the extended time,” he stated, emphasizing the need for substantially longer sentences to disrupt illegal gun activity.

    The attorney general pointed to a string of high-profile violent incidents to justify the legislative change, including the recent Bathlodge shooting that left a pregnant young woman dead, a 13-year-old boy with severe facial gunshot wounds, and a third person injured. He added that public anxiety over gun violence has reached new heights, noting that his office phone has been constantly ringing with constituents sharing their fears about growing insecurity.

    The bill expands tougher sentencing to a range of other firearms-related offences as well. For unauthorised carrying of a gun or ammunition in designated public spaces, summary convictions will carry five to 10 years in prison. Benjamin referenced a recent incident at a political rally where shots were fired, causing attendees to flee in panic, as an example of why public space protections need to be strengthened. “We are not going to allow Antigua to become a gangster place,” he said.

    Other penalties laid out in the bill include 15 to 30 year prison terms for conviction on indictment of illegal sale or transfer of firearms or ammunition. The same sentence range applies to individuals caught possessing a firearm with the intent to endanger life or cause serious bodily harm.

    Benjamin acknowledged that mandatory minimum sentencing has drawn criticism from legal and advocacy circles, but defended the policy as a necessary emergency measure to address the current gun violence crisis. To address concerns about unjust outcomes, the bill includes a carve-out for exceptional cases: if a court finds a mandatory minimum sentence is clearly excessive or unfair, it can still issue the statutorily required sentence but attach a public certificate outlining its concerns, clearing the way for the defendant to file an appeal against the sentence.

    As of the attorney general’s introduction of the bill, parliamentary debate on the Firearms (Amendment) Bill 2026 is ongoing in the House of Representatives, with lawmakers set to consider amendments and a final vote in the coming days.

  • Police investigate murder of 40-year-old Justus Leo

    Police investigate murder of 40-year-old Justus Leo

    Authorities in Castries have opened a full homicide probe after a 40-year-old local man was discovered dead from multiple gunshot wounds in the Bexon district of the city Saturday night. The victim has been identified as Justus Leo, a resident of the Belaire New Development area.

    The Saint Lucia Royal Police Force’s Criminal Investigations Department first received an official report alerting them to the shooting at approximately 8:55 p.m. Responding officers rushed to the scene, where they located Leo with multiple gunshot injuries across his body. A practicing medical professional on site formally declared the 40-year-old dead shortly after arrival.

    As law enforcement continues to piece together what led to the fatal shooting, official proceedings have been scheduled for a post-mortem examination at a future date to confirm the official cause and manner of death. Investigators have not yet released details about potential suspects or motives, and the case remains an active open investigation.

    Police are now calling on members of the public with any information connected to the incident, no matter how small it may seem, to step forward to assist the investigation. Tips can be submitted directly to the Criminal Investigations Unit via phone at either 456-3770 or 456-3817. For community members who wish to remain anonymous, information can also be shared by calling the dedicated Crime Hotline at 555, or through the RSLPF Crime Hotline mobile application, which is available for download on the Google Play platform.

  • Minimum Five Years in Prison Proposed for Openly Carrying Firearm in Public Place

    Minimum Five Years in Prison Proposed for Openly Carrying Firearm in Public Place

    The government of Antigua and Barbuda is pushing forward sweeping changes to the nation’s firearms legislation, with a key proposal introducing stiff 5 to 10-year prison sentences for anyone caught openly carrying an unauthorised gun or ammunition in designated public spaces. Attorney General Sir Steadroy “Cutie” Benjamin laid out the new penalty framework during parliamentary debate on the 2026 Firearms (Amendment) Bill, clarifying that the harsher punishment will only apply to individuals convicted via summary proceedings who do not hold legal authorization to carry weapons — a group that excludes active police officers, members of the national Defence Force, and other explicitly exempted parties. Benjamin used a recent high-incident to underscore the urgent need for the reform, referencing a political gathering held near the Parliament building that ended in chaos after multiple gunshots rang out, forcing attendees to flee for safety. He emphasized that the administration is taking an uncompromising stance against the proliferation of illegal weapons in public spaces, drawing a clear line in the sand against rising gang-related violence. “We are not going to allow Antigua to become a gangster place,” Benjamin stated firmly to parliamentary members. The new mandatory sentencing range for unlawful public carry is just one component of a broader suite of revisions to the country’s firearms laws, which collectively seek to ramp up penalties across all categories of gun-related crime. Under the proposed changes, the most severe firearm-related offenses will now carry maximum prison sentences of up to 30 years, marking a significant escalation from current punishment levels.

  • Saint Lucia earns Olympiad chess medals in Uzbekistan

    Saint Lucia earns Olympiad chess medals in Uzbekistan

    The 46th edition of the Chess Olympiad, one of the most prestigious global team events in competitive chess, has drawn to a close in Samarkand, Uzbekistan, and one small Caribbean nation has left the tournament with a historic collection of accolades that put their program on the international chess map. For seven days, more than 200 national teams gathered at the city’s Silk Road International Exhibition Centre to compete across open and women’s divisions, vying for medals and ranking advancement against the world’s top amateur and professional chess players.

    For Team Saint Lucia’s men’s squad, the tournament delivered a breakthrough that no player from the nation had ever achieved before: a bronze medal finish in their group. Placed in Category E following the first three rounds of competition based on pre-tournament rankings, the five-player roster of Candidate Master Kaieem Elizee, Sixtus Gabriel, Daniel Nunez, Justin James, and Arvin Nicholas navigated a tight competitive bracket to outperform expectations.

    The team’s path to the podium included hard-fought early setbacks that tested their resilience: a narrow 2.5-1.5 opening round loss to Curaçao, followed by a 3.5-0.5 defeat at the hands of South Sudan in round two. Rather than letting the early losses derail their momentum, the squad rallied to secure three critical match wins that propelled them into the bronze medal position. They claimed a dominant 3.5-0.5 victory over Grenada, edged out Palau 2.5-1.5 to advance, and capped their run with another 2.5-1.5 win against Cameroon in the bronze medal match. Only Qatar, who took gold, and The Bahamas, the silver medallists, finished ahead of Saint Lucia in the Category E standings.

    Saint Lucia’s women’s team also turned in an impressive performance, marked by significant progress for the growing national program. The squad notched a series of standout wins, headlined by a 4-0 shutout of Guinea in the fifth round, alongside solid victories over Chad and Djibouti that showcased the depth of talent developing in the country’s women’s chess community.

    Beyond the team achievements, multiple Saint Lucian players earned individual honors and career milestones at the event. Justin James, one of the men’s team key contributors throughout the tournament, officially secured the title of Candidate Master for his strong play. Daniel Nunez similarly rose to the occasion in high-stakes matches, holding off Palau’s Santiago Tan Jr to claim his own Candidate Master title.

    Women’s squad standout Chelsea Wahid also delivered a career-best performance. Competing as a Woman Candidate Master, Wahid scored six points across her nine games, and sealed her Woman FIDE Master norm with a clinical, match-clinching victory over Haiti’s WCM Merisina Cadeau, marking a major step forward in her competitive career. Photos of the team’s achievements were credited to FIDE Americas, the governing body for chess across the Pan American region.

  • Bloemenhulde voor Janey Tetary

    Bloemenhulde voor Janey Tetary

    On September 27, 2026, the Cultural Union of Suriname (CUS) held a national commemoration to celebrate the life, lifelong struggle, and enduring legacy of Janey Tetary, a 19th-century contract labor leader and symbol of resistance against colonial exploitation. The event opened with a floral tribute at Tetary’s monument in Paramaribo, followed by a historical documentary screening at the NSHI Ballroom exploring her trailblazing story. Organizers emphasized that the commemoration is not only a moment to reflect on the past, but also an opportunity to connect Tetary’s values of courage and justice to contemporary struggles for equality.

    Born around 1856 in Moniar, Patna, in what was then British India (modern-day India), Tetary faced immense hardship from a young age. Divorced in early adulthood, a status that carried severe social and economic stigma for women in that era, she was lured to Suriname by recruiters’ promises of high-wage work abroad. In 1880, she arrived with her 10-year-old son to work as an indentured contract laborer on the Zorg en Hoop plantation along the Commewijne River.

    On the plantation, Tetary earned the nickname “Begum,” meaning “noble woman,” for her relentless advocacy for better working and living conditions for fellow indentured workers. She openly challenged the abuse of women by their partners, protected vulnerable workers from exploitation, and prioritized support for pregnant laborers who were forced to complete grueling field work alongside managing household duties and childcare.

    By 1884, the brutal conditions on Suriname’s plantages had reached a breaking point. Recruiters had promised workers a daily wage in India, but once they arrived in the colony, pay was restructured to a task-based system that left workers earning far less, with no pay at all if they failed to complete their punishing daily quotas. In September 1884, tensions boiled over into open rebellion. On September 24, a group of workers led by Tetary attacked a white colonial official with canes. When colonial authorities deployed soldiers to arrest the organizers, hundreds of workers armed with canes, bottles, and machetes organized to resist, with women fighting side-by-side with men under Tetary’s leadership.

    Colonial commanders ordered a sniper to eliminate the rebellion’s leader. On September 26, 1884, as Tetary prepared to throw a mud-filled bottle at advancing soldiers, she was shot in the back of the head at point-blank range. She died two days later at just 28 years old. Six other indentured workers were also killed in the crackdown, and all seven were buried in an unmarked plot on the Zorg en Hoop plantation. The rebellion was crushed, but Tetary’s legacy as a fighter for justice lived on in oral history.

    For more than a century, Tetary’s story was largely erased from official Surinamese history books, part of a broader pattern of colonial historical erasure. That began to shift in 2017, when a bronze statue of Tetary was unveiled on the grounds adjacent to the Presidential Palace in Paramaribo. The monument replaced a bust of Barnet Lyon, the colonial official held responsible for ordering Tetary’s killing.

    The unveiling of the statue was widely hailed as a landmark moment in Suriname’s ongoing decolonization process. Then-Vice President Ashwin Adhin called the moment “a milestone in the process of full decolonization, particularly the decolonization of our thinking.” He accused colonial powers of “gross historical falsification” for covering up for 130 years that Tetary was shot dead while leading a peaceful protest for better working and living conditions on Lyon’s explicit orders. Sculpted by artist George Ramjiawansingh, the statue depicts Tetary with a raised hand gripping the neck of a bottle, capturing her defiant spirit and unyielding courage.

    In recent years, Tetary’s legacy has gained recognition far beyond Suriname’s borders. In the Netherlands, which controlled Suriname as a colony until 1975, multiple public spaces have been named in her honor, including Janey Tetarypad in Scheveningen, The Hague. City officials in The Hague noted that naming public spaces after figures from former Dutch colonies helps build a more inclusive society and creates a more accurate reflection of shared national history. Streets have also been named for Tetary in Amsterdam and Rotterdam, part of a growing continental movement to confront colonial and enslavement histories, and honor contributions from communities long erased from mainstream historical narratives.

    The Cultural Union of Suriname has long played a central role in advancing research on Tetary’s life and preserving her legacy for future generations. In his 2017 annual address, then-Surinamese President Desi Bouterse thanked the CUS and other partner organizations for their research and advocacy to “rectify this important chapter of history and immortalize it with this statue.”

    With Sunday’s 2026 commemoration, the CUS continues that mission. CUS leadership noted that the event’s dual focus on reflecting on the past and connecting to the present underscores that the values Tetary fought for – courage, dignity, justice, and the willingness to stand up for marginalized people – remain just as relevant today as they were in 1884.

  • “This Flight Never Happened”: Guatemala Denies Military Aircraft Entered Belize’s Airspace

    “This Flight Never Happened”: Guatemala Denies Military Aircraft Entered Belize’s Airspace

    Diplomatic tensions flared on the floor of the 81st United Nations General Assembly this week, as Guatemala issued a sharp rebuttal to Belize’s accusation that one of its military aircraft illegally entered Belizean airspace earlier this month.

    The dispute traces back to September 18, 2026, when Belize’s Ministry of Defense confirmed that an unauthorised Guatemalan military jet entered its national airspace, noting the aircraft had disabled its transponder during the incursion. Belizean Prime Minister John Briceño brought the alleged incident before the UNGA during his scheduled address to the assembly on Saturday, pushing the long-running territorial dispute between the two Central American nations into the global spotlight.

    Within hours of Briceño’s remarks, Guatemala’s official delegation delivered a categorical rejection of the claim. In a formal statement released from the UNGA chamber, Guatemalan representatives denied any such overflight ever occurred, saying: “This flight never happened at all times.”

    Beyond outright denial, Guatemala has taken steps to push for an independent probe into the conflicting claims. The country announced it will formally request the Organization of American States’ regional monitoring body to launch a full investigation into the incident, adding it is prepared to turn over all relevant flight records and even make the aircraft in question available for inspection to clear its name.

    Guatemala’s delegation also hit back at Belize’s decision to raise the issue at the UN General Assembly, accusing the neighboring country of leveraging the longstanding territorial dispute for domestic political gain by spreading false information in a global diplomatic forum. The statement called the move a “flagrant violation of the 2005 agreement” between the two nations, arguing it erodes progress made on confidence-building measures designed to de-escalate border tensions.

    Guatemala further emphasized that the territorial dispute between the two countries is already scheduled for adjudication by the International Court of Justice, making the UNGA an inappropriate venue to raise unilateral claims. The delegation reaffirmed Guatemala’s longstanding commitment to abiding by the ICJ’s final ruling in good faith. Scheduled hearings for the ICJ’s examination of the full territorial, insular and maritime border case are set to begin in February 2027, bringing a long-running regional conflict closer to a formal legal resolution.

  • Customs Officer Threatened at Belize’s Western Border

    Customs Officer Threatened at Belize’s Western Border

    On the morning of September 28, 2026, the discovery of a menacing handwritten sign at Belize’s busy western border crossing triggered an immediate security alert and launched a full-scale law enforcement investigation, according to official statements from Belize’s Ministry of Home Affairs. The direct threat specifically named Luis Betancourt, the recently appointed Assistant Comptroller of Customs who oversees operations at the border crossing. Written in Spanish, the sign read “Jefe de Aduana, te vas o te mueres. X Betancourt,” which translates to “Customs chief, you leave or you die. X Betancourt.”

    Betancourt, a 25-year veteran of the Belize Customs Department, only assumed his new post leading western border operations in August 2026, less than two months before the threatening message was found. Law enforcement teams have not yet identified any suspects or confirmed a motive for the incident, and are working to trace who placed the sign at the border location.

    Rear Admiral Elton Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of Belize’s Ministry of Home Affairs, confirmed to reporters that investigative teams are pursuing multiple leads in the case. “At this early stage of the probe, there remains a great deal of uncertainty around the incident,” Bennett explained in an official briefing. “Investigators are actively canvassing the border area, conducting interviews with local residents and border personnel, and reviewing all available surveillance camera footage to gather as much intelligence as possible.”

    In response to the targeted threat against a senior border official, cross-agency security coordination at the western border has been significantly ramped up. Additional security protocols have been implemented across the crossing to protect personnel and maintain border integrity as the investigation moves forward. Local law enforcement and national security officials have pledged to provide updates as new details emerge, and the public is being asked to share any relevant information that could assist the probe.

  • Archbishop Emeritus Robert Rivas Dies

    Archbishop Emeritus Robert Rivas Dies

    Across the Caribbean, the global and regional Catholic community is in mourning following the Sunday, September 27, 2026 passing of the Most Reverend Robert Rivas, O.P., Archbishop Emeritus of Castries. The Diocese of St. John’s-Basseterre has been among the first church institutions to publicly honor the life and legacy of the beloved church leader, extending its deepest condolences to all those affected by his death.

    Bishop Robert Llanos, the full body of clergy serving under the diocese, and lay Catholic community members have joined brothers and sisters across the wider global Church in sharing grief over the archbishop’s death. For decades, Rivas built deep connections with Catholic communities across the Caribbean, earning a reputation for humble, dedicated service that touched countless lives.

    In a formal statement released following the announcement of his passing, the Diocese of St. John’s-Basseterre highlighted Rivas’ lifelong commitment to lifting up and serving the Catholic Church across the Caribbean region. Before stepping into emeritus status, Rivas held the senior post of Archbishop of Castries, the capital of the Caribbean island nation of Saint Lucia, where he led the local archdiocese through years of growth and community outreach.

    “We give thanks to God for a life given so generously in service to the Church throughout the Caribbean, and we hold his family, his Dominican brothers, and the clergy and faithful of the Archdiocese of Castries close in our prayers,” the diocese shared in its public message. Closing the statement, the diocese added a final prayer honoring Rivas: “May he rest in the peace and light of Christ.”

  • Government Releases U.S. Proposal and Antigua and Barbuda Counter-Proposal on Third-Country Nationals

    Government Releases U.S. Proposal and Antigua and Barbuda Counter-Proposal on Third-Country Nationals

    In a move aligned with its core commitment to governmental transparency, the Government of Antigua and Barbuda has publicly released both the United States’ proposed operating procedures for potential transfers of third-country nationals removed from U.S. territory and Antigua and Barbuda’s formal counter-proposal, ahead of tabling both documents before the nation’s House of Representatives. Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs Sir Steadroy Benjamin will officially lay the two texts before parliament, opening the process to full public and legislative oversight.

    This ongoing discussion forms part of a broader diplomatic push by the United States to negotiate similar transfer arrangements with nations across the globe, including multiple member states of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM). To date, some CARICOM nations have finalized such agreements, while others remain in active discussion like Antigua and Barbuda, which is approaching the talks with a strict focus on protecting its national sovereignty, public security, domestic legal framework, public finances, and core national interests. As of the public announcement, no final agreement has been reached between the two governments, with negotiations continuing in line with Antigua and Barbuda’s stated terms.

    The United States’ original proposal outlines a framework for transfers under a planned 2025 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), setting eligibility criteria that excludes unaccompanied minors under 18, citizens of Antigua and Barbuda, and individuals with criminal records beyond U.S. immigration violations. The U.S. draft proposes a monthly transfer cap of 7 individuals, notes that neither government is obligated to commit financial resources to the initiative, but states the U.S. will explore available foreign assistance funds and plans to compensate a competent international organization for support services, with no costs to fall on Antigua and Barbuda. The proposal also requires a 5-day advance notice of transfers with full biometric, medical, and background information for all proposed individuals, and designates V.C. Bird International Airport as the reception point.

    In contrast, Antigua and Barbuda’s counter-proposal builds in layered safeguards to prioritize national control and protect public interests, starting with a non-binding framework that explicitly confirms no final transfer may proceed without the prior, express written approval of Antigua and Barbuda’s government for every individual case. The counter-proposal tightens eligibility restrictions, barring all individuals under 18 (not just unaccompanied minors), restricting eligible nationalities primarily to CARICOM member states excluding Haiti, plus Brazil and Colombia, and requiring all proposed individuals hold valid unexpired passports with a confirmed realistic pathway for eventual return or onward resettlement. Additional exclusions apply to individuals with serious unaccommodatable medical conditions, vulnerable groups requiring specialized care without pre-approved cost coverage, and individuals with outstanding legal barriers to transfer from the U.S.

    On transfer volume caps, Antigua and Barbuda’s framework sets a maximum of 7 total transfers per three-month period – a hard ceiling, not a mandatory quota – with an additional restriction that no new transfers may proceed if 7 or more previously transferred individuals remain in the country, unless Antigua and Barbuda explicitly grants an exception. The counter-proposal also strengthens financial safeguards, requiring binding written confirmation that the U.S. will cover 100% of all costs associated with transferred individuals, from accommodation and medical care to administrative and security expenses, from arrival through departure or until the individual secures an independent lawful status in Antigua and Barbuda, ensuring no burden falls on local taxpayers. The text opens the door for the International Organization for Migration (IOM) to provide support services, but makes any IOM participation conditional on separate arrangements approved by Antigua and Barbuda’s government, with a requirement that alternative funding arrangements must be in place if IOM support is unavailable.

    Procedural changes in the counter-proposal extend the advance notice period for proposed transfers to 10 business days, requiring the U.S. to provide a full suite of detailed information including full health assessments, asylum and protection claim history, proof of the individual’s written willingness to transfer, and confirmation of all legal processes in the U.S. have been exhausted. All transfers must be processed under Antigua and Barbuda’s domestic immigration law, with a clear stipulation that the arrangement is for temporary transit only, not permanent resettlement, and no transferred individual gains an automatic right to permanent residence, asylum, or work authorization. The U.S. is required to fund and facilitate all eventual return or onward placement of transferred individuals, with financial obligations remaining in place even if talks conclude or transfers are suspended.

    Crucially, the counter-proposal grants Antigua and Barbuda the unilateral right to immediately suspend all future transfers if concerns arise related to national security, public health, capacity constraints, financial burdens, natural disasters, or public emergencies. It also requires a joint review of the arrangement after either the first five transfers or six months of implementation, whichever comes first. The Antigua and Barbuda government emphasizes that full sovereign authority to approve or reject any proposed individual remains exclusively with the nation, in every case.

    In its public statement, the government reiterated that it values its longstanding bilateral relationship with the United States and remains committed to constructive negotiations, but any final agreement must align with Antigua and Barbuda’s domestic laws, limited national capacity, and core national interests, while guaranteeing dignified treatment for all affected individuals in line with international law. By releasing both documents publicly and tabling them in parliament, the government has fulfilled its commitment to open governance, and pledges to continue updating parliament and the public as negotiations progress.