The United Nations Security Council convened an emergency session on Thursday amid escalating diplomatic tensions between the United States and Iran regarding the handling of recent civil unrest within Iranian territories. The session, requested by the U.S., revealed sharply divided positions among global powers concerning appropriate international response mechanisms.
U.S. Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz asserted that Washington maintains “all options on the table” to address reported violence against protesters in Iran, reiterating President Donald Trump’s support for what he termed “the brave Iranian people.” This stance followed earlier presidential statements suggesting potential intervention supporting demonstrators, though Trump subsequently adopted a more measured position, noting decreased violence and denying plans for large-scale executions.
Iran’s Deputy UN Ambassador Gholamhossein Darzi delivered a sharp rebuttal, characterizing American statements as “lies, factual distortions, and a deliberate disinformation campaign” designed to conceal alleged U.S. involvement in instigating unrest. Darzi warned that any direct or indirect aggression against Iran would trigger a “decisive, proportional, and lawful response,” emphasizing this constituted legal reality rather than mere threat.
Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia criticized the U.S. motive for convening the session, accusing Washington of attempting to justify “brutal aggression and interference in the domestic affairs of a sovereign state” while pursuing regime change through military means. He urged American leadership and allied nations to reconsider their approach.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres appealed for maximum restraint during this sensitive period, encouraging all parties to avoid actions potentially leading to additional casualties or broader regional escalation. Danish Ambassador Christina Markus Lassen emphasized the Iranian people’s repeated demonstrations demanding improved living conditions, calling upon Tehran’s government to peacefully respond to its citizens’ expressed will.
The emergency meeting concluded without consensus, reflecting persistent geopolitical divisions while underscoring the international community’s growing concern regarding potential escalation pathways in the already volatile region.