A significant controversy has erupted in St. Vincent and the Grenadines as reinstated public sector workers accuse the newly elected New Democratic Party (NDP) administration of failing to fulfill campaign promises regarding salary bonuses. The government faced intense criticism Thursday night after remaining silent on allegations that hundreds of recently reinstated employees received substantially reduced payments instead of the full bonuses pledged during last year’s election campaign.
Multiple public servants have reported receiving merely EC$166.67 instead of the promised EC$2,000, while others obtained EC$125 rather than the anticipated EC$1,500. Approximately 100 workers reinstated under the NDP’s policy appear most severely affected, receiving only one-twelfth of the committed amounts according to documents obtained by iWitness News.
The dispute centers on a January 26, 2026 government memorandum—issued just three days after officials publicly announced bonus payments—stipulating that public sector workers who hadn’t worked the entire previous year were ineligible for full bonuses. This directive directly contradicts Prime Minister Godwin Friday’s administration’s previous commitments to fully reinstate all benefits for workers terminated under the previous government’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
Over 500 public servants lost their positions in November 2021 under the Unity Labour Party (ULP) administration for refusing COVID-19 vaccination. The NDP had campaigned explicitly on reinstating these workers with full benefits, aligning with High Court Justice Esco Henry’s March 2023 ruling that declared the vaccine mandate illegal and unconstitutional.
Justice Henry’s landmark decision had emphasized that terminated workers “remain entitled to hold those respective offices” and should receive “full pay and all benefits due and payable to them.” The ruling specifically mandated compensation for constitutional breaches including interest at 6% annually.
The current administration maintains it upholds Justice Henry’s ruling despite the Court of Appeal’s subsequent overturning of the decision, which has now been appealed to the Privy Council in London. Attorney General Louise Mitchell previously stated at a January 23 press conference that 92 of 100 returning workers had been placed in positions and would receive full benefits.
Reinstated workers now report that government departments are treating their service as interrupted rather than continuous, directly contravening both court rulings and campaign promises. Mitchell had previously emphasized that government policy required full compliance with reinstatement commitments, stating: “The policy is for the persons to return to work full with their benefits intact. Everyone in a position that affects the implementation of that policy must adhere with that.”
The growing discontent among public servants highlights the challenges facing the two-month-old administration in reconciling political promises with bureaucratic implementation, raising questions about the government’s ability to deliver on its commitment to rectify what it had condemned as unjust treatment of public employees.









