标签： Jamaica

Nearly 21 years after it first broke ground in 2004, a National Housing Trust (NHT) residential development project in Jamaica marked a major milestone Wednesday, with 34 fully serviced lots formally handed over to beneficiaries at the Cherry Gardens Housing Development in Kitson Town, St Catherine. Speaking as the keynote speaker at the handover ceremony, Prime Minister Dr Andrew Holness framed the multi-decade delay not just as an infrastructure planning issue, but as a stark illustration of deep-rooted productivity challenges holding back national development.

Holness explained that while missing sewage infrastructure and other unaddressed supporting utilities directly extended the project timeline, the delay exposed a broader systemic cultural problem: even with strong initial planning, public project implementation in Jamaica remains glacial. He noted that Jamaicans often hold a unique cultural perspective that conflates length of process with quality of work, a mindset that has embedded itself in how the country manages public affairs.

“When we compare our actual achievements against our full national potential, we have to admit that while we have accomplished much, we could have achieved far more,” Holness told attendees. “There is a long-held view in our bureaucracy that if a project does not take years to complete, it cannot have been done properly.”

The prime minister argued that Jamaica’s bureaucratic culture has for generations prioritized rigid adherence to process over delivery of tangible results, a legacy of the colonial era that continues to slow the rollout of critical public assets including housing. “We were left with a bureaucratic mindset that hides behind regulations and procedural checks, because we have been taught not to trust our own judgment,” he explained. “Currently, our system only frames a lack of process as corruption; the failure to deliver outcomes that citizens need is not held up as a failure at all. That has to change. We need to reframe success around what is actually delivered to the Jamaican people, not just how many boxes are checked.”

Holness emphasized that boosting productivity across both the public and private sectors is non-negotiable if Jamaica wants to speed up development of all types, including much-needed residential projects. His critical remarks came alongside praise for the NHT and its private partner Preview Limited for finally delivering this phase of the Cherry Gardens development, which forms one segment of a larger 193-lot master project supported by the NHT’s interim financing programme. To date, the NHT has retained 80 lots for public beneficiaries, 47 of which were already handed over prior to Wednesday’s ceremony, with the 34 lots transferred this week marking the completion of that segment.

Under the NHT’s financing model, the agency provides up to 100% concessionary-rate financing to private developers, on the condition that developers pass those savings on to low- and middle-income home buyers via reduced lot and home prices. Holness acknowledged that the NHT has made major strides in expanding access to housing finance, including offering mortgage rates between 0% and 2% for a large share of low-income borrowers. However, he warned that Jamaica’s housing crisis has shifted: the primary challenge is no longer lack of access to financing, but a chronic shortage of housing supply to meet growing consumer demand.

Holness explained that ongoing government and NHT efforts to expand financing access without a matching increase in available housing units have inadvertently driven up residential prices across the market. “We keep increasing the amount borrowers can access to buy homes, and we create special preferences for public servants and young buyers to help them get a foot on the property ladder,” he noted. “But what we’ve found is that the more we expand access to financing, the more prices climb. That’s purely a matter of supply and demand: there simply are not enough homes being built to meet the demand we’ve created.”

To address this systemic mismatch, Holness announced that the NHT and national government are rolling out a new comprehensive master planning framework designed to unlock unused developable land and speed up housing delivery across the country. The centerpiece of this new approach is the Greater Innswood strategic plan, led by the NHT, which will coordinate integrated development across existing and new communities in St Catherine by resolving long-standing infrastructure gaps that have stalled residential projects for decades.

Holness said the plan will directly target the core constraints that have historically delayed or blocked development approvals: inadequate road networks, poor drainage systems, unreliable water access, and missing sewage infrastructure. Once fully implemented, the master plan is projected to unlock thousands of new housing units across the Greater Innswood area, with multiple pre-identified projects already lined up that will deliver more than 3,000 new residential units in the near term.

Closing his address, Holness stressed that a national cultural shift to prioritize productivity and outcome-focused governance is essential for Jamaica to meet its development goals and deliver public projects far more efficiently. “Right now, our system only cares if every ‘i’ is dotted and every ‘t’ is crossed – we call that good governance, and we ignore if people never get the road or the home they were promised,” he said. “We need to tie the performance of administrators, executives and ministers directly to whether citizens get the tangible outcomes that improve their lives. Effort must equal outcome, and we must measure success by delivery. This shift is the only path that will let Jamaica deliver 34 lots in far less than 21 years going forward.”

A heated public exchange of criticism between former president and 2024 election winner Donald Trump and Pope Leo has stirred significant anger among segments of U.S. Catholics, a critical voting demographic that backed Trump in last year’s presidential race, with many arguing the American leader has crossed a line in his personal attacks on the pontiff.

The conflict between the two leaders has spilled across multiple high-stakes policy areas, from immigration policy to tensions surrounding Iran and the ongoing Middle East war. Most recently, Trump delivered an unprecedented rebuke by labeling the Chicago-born pontiff “weak” — marking the first time a sitting U.S. president has launched such a direct personal attack on a sitting pope. Pope Leo has publicly stated he has a moral obligation to speak out against armed conflict, a stance that has put him directly at odds with Trump’s hawkish foreign policy positions.

Among the most controversial incidents that sparked public outrage was a since-deleted AI-generated image posted by Trump that depicted the former reality TV star and real estate developer in a frame that framed him as a Jesus-like figure. Outside a New York City church Friday, 88-year-old retired classics professor Jim Supp told AFP that Trump’s attempt to question the theological perspective of an ordained priest was “totally ridiculous.” “There are certain things in life not to joke about,” Supp said, echoing broader frustration among Catholic voters who see the post as a disrespectful provocation. For 68-year-old retired advertising executive John O’Brian, the circulation of the image amounted to outright blasphemy for followers of Christianity.

Pope Leo later addressed the risks of unregulated artificial intelligence misuse in the wake of the post, though he stopped short of directly naming Trump in his comments.

For decades, sitting U.S. presidents have intentionally avoided openly criticizing popes out of respect for the large and politically influential U.S. Catholic electorate. Even as he won the 2024 presidential election with majority support from Catholic voters, Trump has abandoned this longstanding norm, launching blunt public attacks that have created new political vulnerabilities for the Republican Party ahead of November’s upcoming midterm elections — even among the party’s more conservative Catholic base.

Anthony Clark, a 26-year-old policy fellow at an anti-abortion organization who describes Trump as a “very good president” with strong policy intentions, acknowledged that the commander-in-chief often acts imprudently when discussing sensitive, divisive topics. “But I think that intentions aren’t everything, and I think he can be imprudent at times in what he says or in the way that he approaches especially controversial topics,” Clark told AFP outside a Catholic basilica in Washington D.C.

While popes have traditionally steered clear of overt involvement in U.S. domestic partisan politics, Pope Leo’s willingness to stand his ground against Trump has earned him admiration from some Catholic voters. “I’m really glad that Pope Leo stood his ground when he said he’s not afraid of the administration,” 22-year-old Carolina Herrera said in Washington. “You should not mess with the pope, no matter what, don’t mess with him.”

Though Trump was raised Presbyterian, has been married three times, and rarely attends formal religious services, he has closely aligned himself with the Christian conservative movement since entering politics. Christian right leaders have openly praised Trump for delivering their top policy priority: rolling back the nationwide constitutional right to abortion, a change made possible by the three Supreme Court justices he appointed during his first term in office.

Even in deep-red Texas, a Republican stronghold where Christian conservatism dominates state politics, reactions to the public feud remain divided. At a midday mass in Houston, some attendees criticized both leaders for their public confrontation. “I don’t think either of them are acting the way they should be acting,” said Ann, a 72-year-old white woman who declined to share her last name. She added that the pope has been “very harsh on America,” arguing that Jesus’s teachings did not bar national leaders from protecting their citizens and sovereign borders.

For 67-year-old Latino Houston resident Manuel, the top priority remains ending the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, and he called for both leaders to set aside their differences. “Because right now, this is mainly about peace. We need peace in the Middle East,” he said.

Nearly two months after Category 5 Hurricane Melissa swept across Jamaica’s affected regions on October 28, 2025, Jamaica’s Minister of Labour and Social Security Pearnel Charles Jr has raised sharp allegations of political manipulation surrounding the island’s multi-billion dollar national hurricane shelter recovery initiative. Speaking at the weekly post-Cabinet press briefing held at Jamaica House in St Andrew on Wednesday, Charles Jr claimed that a large share of the 9,958 households classified as sustaining “no significant damage” during post-storm damage assessments are being weaponized as political pawns by bad actors to incite unwarranted calls for unqualified grant assistance.

In his address to reporters, Charles Jr urged disaster-affected Jamaicans not to allow themselves to be co-opted for political gain, reaffirming a core eligibility rule for the government’s flagship Shelter Recovery Programme: households that have already received any form of recovery support do not qualify for additional benefits under the initiative, regardless of unsubstantiated claims to the contrary.

Following the destructive passage of Hurricane Melissa, official assessment teams from the Ministry of Labour completed damage surveys across more than 113,000 affected households, a figure confirmed by the ministry’s new real-time digital tracking system. Final classification broke down damage into four tiers: 17,826 households recorded severe damage, 42,586 major damage, 41,079 minor damage, and 9,958 no significant damage.

The national Shelter Recovery Programme, which is administered by the Ministry of Labour, was designed to streamline post-disaster recovery efforts, eliminate redundant support, and restore safe living conditions for all storm-impacted families across Jamaica. The initiative integrates multiple support pathways: targeted cash assistance, government and non-government partner-led home repairs, relocation support, and connections to long-term housing solutions. Its core grant-based component is the Restoration of Owner or Occupant Family Shelters (ROOFS) programme, which allocates verified grants based on official damage assessments: eligible households receive JMD $75,000 for minor damage, $200,000 for major damage, and $500,000 for severe damage. Backed by an initial $10 billion government allocation, ROOFS prioritizes recovery support for vulnerable groups including seniors, people with disabilities, and households that suffered the most extreme storm damage.

Charles Jr told reporters that bad actors have deliberately mixed factual information with exaggeration and false claims to spread public confusion about eligibility requirements. He stressed that households categorized as either “no damage” or “no significant damage” do not meet the threshold for any grant under ROOFS or the broader Shelter Recovery Programme, and that duplicate benefits will not be approved under any circumstances. “The non-negotiable core principle of this programme is one benefit per household across the entire Shelter Recovery Programme, not just per component,” he explained. “If you have already received government-led repairs, for example from the Jamaica Defence Force (JDF) fixing your damaged roof, you cannot also access a cash grant through ROOFS, and vice versa.”

Charles Jr specifically called out political actors who are spreading misinformation to already-supported households, telling them they are owed cash grants despite already receiving in-kind repair support. “Most of the public agitation we are seeing right now comes from people who know the rules, but they are deliberately misleading families whose roofs have already been fixed to stir up anti-government sentiment,” he added.

While the minister acknowledged that the new digital assessment and tracking system, rolled out for the first time for this recovery effort, has encountered some early operational challenges, he pushed back against ongoing claims about unresolved cases that have already been addressed. He noted that community and political leaders should not continue to frame resolved issues as ongoing problems to incite public anger.

Speaking directly to Members of Parliament and other public figures who have raised individual case concerns publicly, Charles Jr said that all named cases shared so far have already been reviewed by his ministry. “To protect the integrity of our recovery process, I can confirm that every person named has already had their case processed, and we have full records of who has received their benefit,” he stated, warning against attempts to defraud the recovery programme.

He emphasized that the new digital system, which processes assessment data in real time, makes systemic manipulation far more difficult than past recovery efforts. “The digital innovation we have put in place gives us full, transparent access to all data, and our ongoing reconciliation process cross-checks every claim to eliminate duplication. If anyone has a legitimate concern, instead of raising it publicly to agitate — which you have a right to do — we ask that you share the details with our team directly so we can resolve the issue,” Charles Jr added.

The ROOFS programme has already begun disbursing benefits to qualified beneficiaries, with a formal grant handover ceremony held on January 30 at the Ministry of Labour and Social Security’s Santa Cruz, St Elizabeth office. The event saw Prime Minister Dr Andrew Holness present a grant cheque to beneficiary Chevanese Myrie, in attendance with Agriculture Minister Floyd Green and Charles Jr.

During an global launch event held in New York on Wednesday, the World Bank Group officially unveiled Water Forward, a landmark cross-institutional platform designed to tackle growing global water insecurity, and named Jamaica one of just 14 inaugural ‘first mover’ countries selected to pioneer the initiative’s goals. Jamaican Minister of Water Matthew Samuda, who represented his nation at the launch, has celebrated the designation as a major milestone for the country’s decades-long fight against water scarcity. The Water Forward initiative brings together the World Bank, a coalition of multilateral development banks, global development finance institutions and sector stakeholders to deliver coordinated policy reform, targeted financing and cross-sector partnership. Its core mission is to expand access to reliable water infrastructure, strengthen climate resilience against extreme weather events including droughts and floods, and improve water security for 1 billion people across the globe by 2030 — outcomes that the World Bank identifies as foundational to inclusive job creation and long-term economic development. In an interview with the Jamaica Observer following the launch, Samuda emphasized that Jamaica’s inclusion as a first mover is far more than a symbolic designation: it confirms the country’s standing as a committed leader in addressing its domestic water challenges. Through its submission of a national ‘Water Compact’ to the initiative, Samuda explained, Jamaica has sent a clear signal to the World Bank, its global partner network and international financial markets that ending water scarcity is a top policy priority for the current government. ‘This should reassure every Jamaican that our government understands the full scale of this crisis, and how it harms local communities and household livelihoods,’ Samuda said. ‘We are committed to leveraging every global partnership Jamaica has built to resolve this long-standing issue as quickly as possible.’ The groundwork for this collaboration was laid more than two years ago, when the Jamaican government first engaged the World Bank to develop a comprehensive national plan for the water sector. Samuda noted that Jamaica’s first mover status grants the country priority access to the World Bank’s extensive technical expertise and substantial financing pools. A full project roadmap with clear implementation timelines will be released to the public in the near future, with the first five-year phase of the program already finalized to kick off. Critically, the Water Forward initiative aligns seamlessly with the Jamaican government’s 2019 National Water Sector Policy, which shares the 2030 target of delivering universal access to safe, reliable and affordable drinking water and adequate sanitation across the country. The 2019 policy is built on the framework of Integrated Water Resources Management, which prioritizes sustainable stewardship of water resources to advance national social development, economic growth, and environmental protection. Key priorities under the policy include protecting and restoring aquifers, watersheds and natural water sources from both point-source pollution, such as industrial discharge and untreated wastewater, and non-point-source pollution such as agricultural nutrient runoff. The initiative does call for a targeted review of Jamaica’s current water sector regulatory framework, a step Samuda confirmed is already overdue and will advance the government’s existing policy goals. Later this month, Samuda is scheduled to deliver an update on Jamaica’s water security strategy and policy roadmap during the sectoral debate in Jamaica’s House of Representatives, where he will share additional details with lawmakers and the public.