标签： Belize

A diplomatic clarification has emerged following the circulation of an online statement attributed to the ‘Solidarity Group of Belize and Venezuela’ that condemned alleged actions against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The Venezuelan Embassy in Belize disseminated the declaration, which characterized recent developments as “an attack and capture” constituting “a flagrant violation of international law and fundamental human rights.” The group further described reported casualties as “crimes against humanity.” The statement highlighted decades of bilateral cooperation, specifically referencing the Petrocaribe energy initiative, Operación Milagro healthcare program, and various educational and housing projects that have benefited Belize. It notably referenced Prime Minister John Briceño’s 2022 visit to Caracas as evidence of continuing cooperation across trade, tourism, and energy sectors. However, Belize’s Foreign Minister Francis Fonseca, when contacted by News 5, stated he had not seen the statement and was unfamiliar with the group. In a separate interview on January 7th, Fonseca articulated Belize’s official stance, emphasizing concern over democratic principles in Venezuela. “We’re very concerned whenever there’s any erosion of fundamental principles,” Fonseca stated, adding that Belize is engaging international partners to support a peaceful, people-led resolution in Venezuela that respects constitutional order and self-determination.

In a significant geopolitical development, former U.S. President Donald Trump has reignited his administration’s controversial campaign to acquire Greenland, asserting American control over the autonomous Danish territory as essential to national security. Through his Truth Social platform on January 14th, Trump declared the island “vital” to his proposed “Golden Dome” air and missile defense system, stating that “anything less” than U.S. control would be “unacceptable.”

The push comes amid high-level diplomatic engagements, with Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio meeting with officials from both Denmark and Greenland. Both governments have firmly rejected Trump’s overtures, with Greenland’s Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt unequivocally stating: “Greenland does not want to be owned by, governed by or part of the United States.”

Internal estimates from U.S. officials familiar with planning suggest the acquisition could cost between $500 billion and $700 billion—exceeding half of the Pentagon’s annual budget. Despite the staggering price tag, a senior White House official confirmed that Rubio has been directed to develop a purchase proposal as a “high priority” initiative.

The situation has triggered diplomatic repercussions beyond U.S.-Danish relations. China responded through Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning, cautioning against using other countries “as a pretext” to pursue interests in Greenland. Mao emphasized that “China’s activities in the Arctic are aimed at promoting peace, stability, and sustainable development” and that all countries’ rights to conduct lawful Arctic activities “should be fully respected.”

Meanwhile, Denmark has strengthened its military presence in Greenland in coordination with NATO allies, while protests have erupted in Copenhagen with demonstrators chanting “Greenland is for Greenlanders” outside the U.S. embassy. The territory already hosts a small U.S. military base under a 1951 agreement, but Trump maintains that without American control, Russia or China would eventually dominate the region, vowing “one way or another, we’re going to have Greenland.”

In a significant shift in immigration policy, the United States Department of State has announced the indefinite suspension of immigrant visa processing for applicants from 75 countries, effective January 21, 2026. This sweeping measure comes as federal authorities initiate a comprehensive reassessment of visa approval procedures nationwide.

The policy change, formally communicated through the Department’s official social media channels, cites concerns over disproportionate welfare utilization by migrants from the affected nations. “The State Department will pause immigrant visa processing from 75 countries whose migrants take welfare from the American people at unacceptable rates,” the statement declared. “The freeze will remain active until the U.S. can ensure that new immigrants will not extract wealth from the American people.”

Among the impacted nations are Somalia, Haiti, Iran, and Eritrea—countries whose immigrants, according to the statement, “often become public charges on the United States upon arrival.” The Department emphasized its commitment to preventing exploitation of American public assistance systems, asserting that “the generosity of the American people will no longer be abused.”

This development follows stricter enforcement guidelines distributed to U.S. embassies and consulates worldwide in November 2025. The diplomatic cable mandated intensified screening protocols under existing “public charge” provisions within immigration law. Consular officers received instructions to deny visas to applicants demonstrating potential dependence on public benefits based on multiple criteria including health status, age, financial stability, English language proficiency, and potential requirements for long-term medical care. Previous utilization of government assistance programs or institutionalization may also result in application denial.

The comprehensive list of affected countries spans multiple continents and includes nations from Afghanistan to Yemen, with significant representation from African, South Asian, Middle Eastern, and Latin American regions. Other notable countries subject to the suspension include Brazil, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Guatemala, Iraq, Jamaica, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Russia, Sudan, Syria, and Uzbekistan.

In a significant political development, United Democratic Party Leader Tracy Panton has established firm conditions regarding the proposed BTL telecommunications deal while confirming a high-level meeting with business magnate Lord Michael Ashcroft. The opposition party asserts it will not support any public acquisition that materially affects public interest or creates monopolistic market conditions.

The meeting between Panton, UDP Chair Sheena Pitts, and Ashcroft—whose Waterloo Group Charitable Trust holds a commanding 77% stake in telecommunications provider Smart—represents a strategic move by the opposition to position itself as a government-in-waiting. Panton characterized the discussion as transparent dialogue necessary for responsible governance.

Addressing monopoly concerns, Panton drew parallels to existing utility monopolies in electricity and water services, acknowledging that small market economies sometimes necessitate single providers due to population size constraints. However, she maintained the UDP’s unequivocal opposition to telecommunications monopolization that could harm public interests.

In a revealing development, Panton disclosed that BTL’s chairman has subsequently sought emergency meetings with opposition figures—a move she characterized as reactive rather than proactive. The UDP leader framed her engagement with all investors as essential preparation for national leadership, emphasizing her right to determine appropriate meeting schedules and venues as the prospective prime minister.