标签： Belize

In a groundbreaking decision, the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) has ruled that Belize Telemedia Limited (BTL) must pay severance benefits to all former employees, regardless of their retirement status. This landmark case, decided on November 5, 2025, marks a significant victory for ten retirees who argued that severance pay is a legal right under the Labour Act, even after receiving pension benefits. The CCJ’s ruling overturns BTL’s long-standing practice of substituting severance with pension benefits, a policy the company had implemented since the 1990s. Senior Counsel Eamon Courtenay, who represented the retirees, explained that the case involved three categories of employees: those who resigned, those who retired voluntarily, and those who reached the mandatory retirement age of fifty-five. Initially, the Court of Appeal had ruled that only those who resigned were entitled to severance, but the CCJ’s unanimous decision extends this right to all retirees. The court emphasized that severance is a statutory entitlement that cannot be waived or replaced by pension benefits. This ruling sets a precedent for labor rights in the Caribbean and ensures that employees are fairly compensated upon leaving their jobs.

In a landmark ruling on November 5, 2025, the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) reinforced the rights of workers under Belize’s Labor Act, emphasizing that severance pay cannot be replaced by pension benefits. The case centered on Belize Telecommunications Limited (BTL), which had ceased paying severance to employees since 1994-95, arguing that its pension scheme fulfilled the obligation. The court, however, ruled that severance is a distinct entitlement earned through service, not contributions, and must be paid regardless of pension arrangements. This decision underscores the Labor Act’s role as social justice legislation aimed at protecting workers, not employers’ financial interests. BTL is now required to compensate affected employees, with costs awarded to the appellants. Eamon Courtenay, SC, a prominent attorney, highlighted that pension plans must account for severance benefits, ensuring workers receive both entitlements. This ruling sets a precedent for labor rights in Belize and reaffirms the importance of severance as a fundamental worker protection.

In a landmark development, Belize Telemedia Limited (BTL) employees, both current and former, may now be entitled to severance pay despite their participation in pension schemes that previously excluded such benefits. Senior Counsel Eamon Courtenay highlighted the significant challenge this poses for BTL and other companies, as they must retroactively assess years of service and calculate severance entitlements for employees upon retirement or resignation. This ruling extends to former employees who only received pension benefits, potentially allowing them to claim severance pay retroactively. The judgment, which could have a ripple effect across Belize, raises critical questions about how companies will adapt and what this means for workers nationwide. Courtenay emphasized that companies with pension schemes lacking severance provisions must now accrue severance benefits from the start of employment, ensuring compliance with the Caribbean Court of Justice’s (CCJ) decision. This development underscores a pivotal shift in employee rights and corporate obligations in Belize.

A once-promising partnership to develop a luxury jungle retreat in Belize has devolved into a bitter legal battle, raising questions about financial transparency and accountability. The project, Howler Jungle House and Cabanas, was initiated by Dr. Sade Thompson, an American investor, in collaboration with Belizean couple Kenny and Shanna Williams. The venture aimed to create high-end accommodations for tourists seeking to experience Belize’s natural beauty. However, the dream quickly turned sour as costs ballooned and allegations of financial mismanagement emerged. Initially, Dr. Thompson was quoted $80,000 for a two-bedroom unit, but the price escalated to $124,000 without clear justification. Despite receiving detailed invoices, Thompson and her partners grew suspicious of where their funds were allocated. Attorney Andrew Bennett, representing the Williamses, countered that the investors received exceptional value for their money, citing the property’s eco-friendly features and prime location. The dispute deepened as Thompson revealed additional expenses, including rent and contractor fees, which were not initially disclosed. Consultant Jazmynn Tillett, brought in to assess the situation, accused the Williamses of exploiting the investors and failing to provide accountability. The conflict has now escalated to legal action, with both sides disputing ownership and financial control. The case highlights the challenges of cross-border investments and the importance of clear agreements in business partnerships.