标签： Bahamas

A fiery parliamentary budget debate has ignited sharp political tension in the Bahamas over the reliability of the nation’s power grid, after widespread weekend blackouts left thousands of residents without electricity and sparked accusations of government mismanagement from opposition lawmakers.

At the center of the conflict is Energy Minister JoBeth Coleby-Davis, who defended the preparedness of Bahamas Power and Light (BPL) to meet peak summer energy demand across the archipelago on Wednesday, pushing back against criticism from Long Island Member of Parliament Andre Rollins. Rollins, an opposition lawmaker, has accused the minister of intentionally misleading Parliament after days of outages that left Bahamians dealing with sweltering heat without power.

Coleby-Davis outlined detailed capacity projections for the country’s major population centers to counter the opposition’s claims. She told Parliament that BPL is projecting a peak summer demand of 300 megawatts (MW) for New Providence, the country’s most populous island, where the utility currently holds 340MW of installed generation capacity. That figure is set to rise to 385MW by the end of the current month. For Abaco, peak demand is forecast at 27MW, against an existing installed capacity of 36MW, while Eleuthera is expected to see a peak of 20.5MW against a current 24MW capacity that will grow to 26.5MW by the end of July and 29MW in August. Grand Bahama, meanwhile, is projected to hit a record peak demand of 60MW this summer, up from 56MW in 2023, and Coleby-Davis confirmed that sufficient generation capacity has been secured to meet that need.

The minister acknowledged growing public frustration over recent service interruptions, but emphasized that most current outages are a temporary side effect of BPL’s ongoing major infrastructure modernization project across New Providence. She explained that during construction work, circuits that normally split energy loads are forced to operate on single circuits, creating excess strain on the grid that increases the risk of unexpected outages. Comparing the project to a residential renovation, she noted that while careful planning can reduce customer inconvenience, it is impossible to eliminate all disruptions when rebuilding critical infrastructure while still maintaining active service.

Crews have been working around the clock to balance grid stability and urgent modernization work, she added, pointing out that BPL has no incentive to allow extended outages, as the company loses revenue every minute power is unavailable. Coleby-Davis also pushed back against claims that the current grid challenges are unique to the Bahamas, noting that multiple U.S. states and Canadian provinces are currently grappling with similar grid stress driven by extreme summer heat waves. While she stressed that this context does not excuse the Bahamas’ service issues, it demonstrates that the problem is a widespread challenge for jurisdictions navigating rising summer temperatures and aging energy infrastructure.

But Rollins rejected the minister’s explanation, arguing that the widespread outages prove the government is failing to deliver reliable energy. He highlighted that over the past weekend, some communities across New Providence remained without power for more than 24 hours, leaving residents stuck in dangerous heat. He also called attention to an “embarrassing” blackout that disrupted Cat Island’s annual rake and scrape cultural festival, arguing that the repeated service failures are a sign of regression, not progress, under the current government’s leadership. “We are regressing under the leadership of the member for Elizabeth,” Rollins told Parliament, drawing support from other opposition lawmakers.

The exchange comes as BPL proceeds with a multi-million dollar upgrade program intended to resolve longstanding grid reliability issues across the Bahamas. While the government frames the current disruptions as temporary growing pains on the path to a more stable energy system, the opposition has seized on public anger over the outages to ramp up pressure on the administration ahead of future political contests.

A top Bahamian corrections official has issued a public apology to the nation’s female population after making gender-biased remarks that sparked fierce backlash from political leaders and women’s advocacy groups, including widespread demands for his resignation.

Doan Cleare, Commissioner of the Bahamas Department of Correctional Services, made the controversial comments during an official induction ceremony for the department’s 81st recruit cohort. In his remarks, Cleare claimed that female correctional recruits would face immediate dismissal for even a single mistake, while male recruits would be granted more leniency. He justified this double standard by arguing that qualified male candidates are far more difficult to recruit to the service.

The incendiary comments quickly drew public outrage, prompting an immediate rebuke from National Security Minister Myles LaRoda, who addressed the controversy in the country’s House of Assembly. LaRoda confirmed that he had summoned Cleare to his office to address the incident, after which the commissioner submitted a formal written apology to both the minister’s office and the permanent secretary of the Ministry of National Security.

In his public apology issued yesterday, Cleare acknowledged that his comments were “inappropriate and caused offence”. He emphasized that his words were never intended to demean, disrespect, or discriminate against women, noting that “as a public servant, I have always held women in the highest regard and deeply appreciate their invaluable contributions to public service, nation-building, and the advancement of our society.”

Cleare added that he has worked alongside many “outstanding” women throughout his decades-long career, and has long respected their “professionalism, leadership and commitment”. He admitted that his remarks do not align with the core values, professional standards, and guiding principles of the Ministry of National Security, his own department, or the Bahamian government at large.

Taking full responsibility for the lapse in judgment, Cleare acknowledged that as a senior leader and public official, he is required to communicate with professionalism, respect, and sensitivity in every public statement. “I offer my profound and heartfelt apology,” he said. “I sincerely regret the offence my remarks caused and acknowledge the disappointment and concern they may have occasioned.”

Cleare’s apology came in response to mounting pressure from across the political and advocacy spectrum. Lisa Bostwick-Dean, president of women’s advocacy group Women United and a former senator, was among the most prominent voices calling for Cleare to step down immediately. Loretta Butler-Turner, a former leader of the Bahamian Opposition, said she was “appalled” by the comments and demanded that Cleare formally retract his statement. Michela Barnett-Ellis, the Member of Parliament for Killarney, described the commissioner’s remarks as “deeply concerning” and pressed LaRoda in Parliament to launch an investigation into whether the biased comments reflected actual disciplinary and termination practices within the correctional system.

LaRoda confirmed that the permanent secretary will meet with Cleare later this week to hold further discussions on the incident. He also noted that Cleare had claimed the comments were made in jest, but added that he had reminded the commissioner that his senior public position gives all of his statements significant weight that requires careful consideration.

A tense exchange unfolded in the Bahamas’ House of Assembly on Wednesday, as Cabinet member JoBeth Coleby-Davis delivered an unapologetic defense of her reputation, pushing back against repeated heckling from opposition lawmakers tied to a controversial U.S. court indictment.

The confrontation erupted midway through Coleby-Davis’ address during the annual national budget debate, when opposition legislators interjected from their bench to raise questions about the unsealed indictment that has dominated political discourse in Nassau in recent weeks. In a bold rebuke, the incumbent MP for the Elizabeth constituency pushed back against the innuendo, emphasizing that she has never been named as a subject of interest in any U.S. court filings connected to the case.

Coleby-Davis framed the opposition’s attacks as a long-running pattern of personal smears that date back to her first term in office, recalling that similar attempts to undermine her credibility failed to sway voters during the most recent general election. “These some of the blows they throw last term, and the Bahamian people in Elizabeth even more voted for me,” she told the chamber.

She recounted her first electoral victory, when she defeated the opposition Free National Movement (FNM)’s sitting chair by more than 300 votes as a relatively unknown political newcomer, despite months of unsubstantiated attacks on her character. “For four and half years, they throw blows, lies, all kind of things on my character, but I know the God I serve,” she said, adding that her faith carried her through the sustained criticism and helped secure her re-election.

In a final challenge to the opposition, Coleby-Davis issued an open invitation for the FNM to field any candidate of their choosing against her in the next general election, making clear that the latest controversy has done nothing to intimidate her. “Ain’t nothing got me scared,” she reiterated to the chamber.

The indictment controversy has become a major flashpoint in 2024’s budget debate, with opposition lawmakers consistently using procedural and debate time to press the governing Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) administration for greater transparency and faster action over the matter. Coleby-Davis’ forceful defense marks the most high-profile pushback from a PLP legislator tied to the ongoing controversy to date.

In a speech during the House of Assembly debate on the 2026/2027 national budget, J. Leo Ferguson, the recently elected Free National Movement (FNM) MP for the MICAL constituency, has publicly expressed growing frustration over the slow pace of progress in the southern Bahamian island group he represents. Comprising Mayaguana, Inagua, Crooked Island, Acklins and Long Cay, MICAL has long grappled with systemic energy and infrastructure challenges that Ferguson says continue to hold back residents and economic growth.

Ferguson highlighted that nearly all power across the constituency is generated by expensive diesel, leaving local households and small businesses facing some of the highest electricity rates in the entire Bahamas. Daily unplanned power outages are a persistent reality, forcing low-income families to choose between basic necessities and basic comfort, while sky-high energy costs have choked off potential private investment and prevented existing local businesses from expanding.

While the MP threw his support behind the national government’s planned policy to roll out solar microgrids across the Bahamas’ Family Islands — a solution he called practical to cut reliance on costly diesel generation, reduce household utility bills, and boost energy resilience during hurricane season — he pressed for faster implementation. MICAL is already included on the government’s list of communities set to receive the renewable energy systems, but Ferguson demanded clarity on when residents will actually see tangible results, arguing the initiative is needed urgently, not years down the line.

Beyond renewable energy, Ferguson outlined a range of additional economic and community benefits that expanded solar infrastructure could unlock for MICAL. Cheaper energy would lower operating costs for small local businesses, support the growth of the constituency’s burgeoning eco-tourism sector, and create new local jobs through training programs for solar panel installation and maintenance, he said.

The first-term MP also turned his attention to the long list of unfulfilled infrastructure promises made to MICAL in previous national budgets. While he acknowledged that the current budget allocates planned funding for key projects including road repairs, clinic upgrades, airport modernization, drainage improvements and new administrative buildings, he noted that dozens of previously announced projects across the constituency remain either unfinished or have yet to break ground.

Speaking on behalf of MICAL residents, Ferguson rejected the idea of empty political promises, echoing the words of his predecessor V Alfred Gray to urge the government: “fix it.” He called for urgent investments in a wide range of community-critical infrastructure, including reinforced seawalls, improved docking facilities, upgraded fishing stations, enhanced public water systems, more reliable telecommunications services, and upgraded hurricane shelters to protect residents during storm season.

Ferguson also raised two longstanding local employment issues: delayed contract payments to small local government contractors, and the large number of long-term temporary contract workers in the constituency who have never been granted permanent, pension-eligible positions in public service.

To further stimulate economic growth and retain local population, Ferguson laid out a series of additional policy proposals. He called for targeted tax relief on essential consumer goods, the creation of a VAT-free trade zone for the southern Bahamian islands, expanded technical and vocational training programs through the Bahamas Technical and Vocational Institute (BTVI), and increased government support for the constituency’s core local industries: traditional fishing, general tourism and eco-tourism.

Ferguson closed by emphasizing that targeted investment in improved infrastructure and lower energy costs is critical to reversing steady population decline across MICAL’s islands. By expanding opportunity and lowering the cost of living, the government can give residents a tangible reason to stay in their home communities rather than relocating to more developed islands, he argued, urging the government not to write off MICAL as a region to abandon, but to recognize it as a place worthy of long-term investment.

A firestorm of public and political backlash has swept The Bahamas after Correctional Services Commissioner Doan Cleare made inflammatory remarks revealing a deliberate double standard for male and female recruits, prompting a rare public rebuke from the country’s National Security Minister and growing demands for his resignation.

The controversy ignited this week during a signing-on ceremony for the department’s new 81-person Squad A recruit cohort. Speaking to the incoming class, Cleare told new female trainees that a single misstep would result in immediate termination. In contrast, he noted that he would attempt to “massage” underperforming male recruits into compliance, justifying the softer approach by citing a widespread shortage of qualified male applicants for correctional roles. He also added that the department had adjusted its planned recruit gender ratio from an original 70 men/30 women split to 60 men/40 women after external pressure, framing the change as an unwanted concession.

News of the comments spread rapidly, drawing swift condemnation from across the political spectrum and women’s advocacy groups. By Thursday, National Security Minister Myles LaRoda delivered an extraordinary public reprimand of Cleare, a senior public official under his portfolio, during a sitting of the House of Assembly. LaRoda confirmed he had summoned Cleare to his office immediately after learning of the discriminatory remarks, and that Cleare had since sent a written apology to both the permanent secretary of the department and the minister himself.

Cleare has defended his comments by claiming they were made in jest during a casual interaction with recruits, but that explanation has done little to defuse tensions. LaRoda made clear that the commissioner’s position carries inherent public weight, and even offhand remarks that endorse gendered treatment have no place in Bahamian public institutions. “We strongly disagree with those words that was used and that there’s no place in our country where a leader could feel comfortable in saying that females, in particular, would be treated differently from males, especially when it comes to institutions that have been dominated by males,” LaRoda told parliament.

LaRoda also pushed back against the idea that gendered double standards are acceptable in modern Bahamian governance, pointing to the growing number of women holding senior leadership positions across the country’s public sector. He noted that every female government Member of Parliament holds a full Cabinet post, the Speaker of the House is a woman, the Royal Bahamas Police Force is led by a female commissioner, the Royal Bahamas Defence Force counts a woman as its deputy commodore, and Cleare’s own department has three female assistant commissioners.

Political leaders have echoed the minister’s condemnation, with many going further to call for formal investigation and leadership change. Killarney MP Michela Barnett-Ellis described the comments as “deeply concerning”, and called on LaRoda to launch an inquiry into whether the commissioner’s stated double standard is already reflected in existing discipline and termination practices across the prison system. Barnett-Ellis emphasized that Bahamian employment law, specifically Section 6 of the Employment Act, explicitly bans gender discrimination, requiring all employment decisions to be rooted in conduct, competence and performance rather than gender. She rejected the core logic of Cleare’s approach, arguing that women should not face harsher standards simply because more women apply, and men should not get special treatment just because fewer qualified men apply.

Former Opposition Leader Loretta Butler-Turner said she was “appalled” by the comments, and warned that the remarks contradict decades of progress toward gender equality in The Bahamas. “In 2026, Bahamian women should not be told they are held to a harsher standard than their male counterparts,” she said. “Our suffragettes fought generations for equality, and the laws of our Bahamas guarantee equality for all citizens in the workplace. There must be one standard of discipline, one standard of accountability, and one standard of opportunity.” She added that the comments are far more than a minor misstep, calling them a direct affront to the legacy of Bahamian women’s rights activists, and demanded that Cleare immediately retract the statements or face formal action.

Women United, a prominent Bahamian women’s advocacy organization, joined the call for Cleare’s resignation, with president and former senator Lisa Bostwick-Dean leading the charge. Bostwick-Dean acknowledged that Cleare’s underlying concern about declining numbers of qualified men entering law enforcement, nursing, education and trade fields is a valid issue to discuss, but argued that his framing and proposed policy response was inappropriate, discriminatory and demeaning. “Given that he has publicly declared that he will apply a different — more forgiving — standard to male recruits while reserving a zero-tolerance approach for women, he has demonstrated that he can no longer lead a mixed-gender squad with impartiality,” Bostwick-Dean said. She noted that Cleare’s open admission of intent to discriminate not only destroys trust and lowers morale among the women already serving in the department, but also exposes the entire Department of Corrections to major legal risk from wrongful termination claims. Alongside calling for his resignation, Women United is demanding a full independent investigation into the department’s recruitment policies and practices.

Women’s rights activist Alicia Wallace added that the comments risk undermining ongoing efforts to expand opportunities for women in traditionally male-dominated public sectors. She suggested that rather than doubling down on the comments, Cleare should openly explain the root of his concerns about gender balance in recruitment, so that policymakers and stakeholders can work to address the issue systematically without resorting to discriminatory policies.

Moving forward, LaRoda confirmed that the permanent secretary of the National Security Ministry will meet with Cleare this week to discuss the controversy in depth, and that the minister will join those talks to ensure all public concerns about gender discrimination are fully examined.

A heated political clash has erupted in The Bahamas’ House of Assembly after Speaker Patricia Deveaux rejected opposition efforts to table court documents connected to damning U.S. federal drug trafficking allegations targeting an anonymous Bahamian politician, dismissing the claims as baseless, malicious gossip amid accusations the governing party is covering up a scandal that threatens the nation’s legislative integrity. The confrontation unfolded mid-budget debate, when Opposition Leader Michael Pintard pressed the governing administration to break its silence on explosive allegations included in a U.S. court filing that references only the unidentified figure as “Politician One.”

Per the filing, this unnamed Bahamian politician held a meeting inside the Parliament building in October 2024 with an undercover Drug Enforcement Administration source and a drug pilot to negotiate a $30 million cocaine shipment. The politician in question is the same unindicted co-conspirator referenced in a November 2024 indictment handed down by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, a leading federal jurisdiction renowned for prosecuting high-profile transnational narcotics trafficking, organized crime, and public corruption cases.

Pintard argued that the gravity of the allegations made parliamentary action unavoidable, noting the claims threaten not just the reputation of the legislative body, but the international standing of The Bahamas as a whole. “Something of that magnitude that could affect the reputation, not just of the Parliament, but by extension the country, it warranted a discussion, it warranted at least a statement,” Pintard said. “The fact that it hasn’t been done has moved us now to raise that question, at what point will a matter of that magnitude be addressed?”

Foreign Affairs Minister Fred Mitchell pushed back against the opposition’s push to raise the matter on the parliamentary floor, arguing the chamber is not the appropriate venue to address unproven criminal claims. He pointed to a recent protest by opposition Free National Movement members who wore name tags reading “I’m not Politician One,” dismissing the stunt as a political stunt based on an unvetted document originating from a foreign court. “It is untested. It is prejudicial, and it holds no place in this Parliament,” Mitchell said. “And if you want to engage in public gossip, that’s your business.”

Speaker Deveaux, who represents the Bamboo Town constituency, ultimately ruled against allowing the documents to be tabled, drawing a clear distinction between Parliament’s core lawmaking mandate and the investigatory role of law enforcement agencies. She emphasized that the House exists to debate and pass legislation that improves the lives of Bahamian citizens, and that any unproven criminal allegations should be forwarded directly to police for investigation rather than discussed in the legislative chamber.

“Here is where we debate, and we pass legislations and laws for the betterment of people,” Deveaux said. “I have Bamboo Town to care for, okay, and while I care about what goes on in the country, I am not allowing frivolous gossip or malicious gossip that they said happened in the Parliament. Of course, I care if it happened in the Parliament, but where are the facts? Where’s the truth behind it?” Deveaux instructed opposition members to submit any evidence they hold to national police, and only revisit the matter in Parliament once the law enforcement process has concluded.

Unlike many unremarkable legal filings, these allegations come in one of the U.S.’s most high-profile federal court districts, whose prosecutors regularly handle transnational criminal cases of national importance. While an indictment itself does not constitute proof of guilt, data from the federal judiciary shows that acquittals in U.S. federal criminal cases are extremely rare: Pew Research Center analysis found that fewer than 1% of defendants in federal criminal cases were acquitted at trial in fiscal year 2022, with the vast majority of cases resulting in convictions through guilty pleas.

Deveaux reaffirmed that she would revisit the matter if concrete evidence is brought forward, but refused to entertain unsubstantiated speculation in the House, adding that her priority remains advancing policy that serves Bahamian residents. In a lighthearted jab amid the tense exchange, she also pushed back against any implicit speculation that she could be the unnamed politician in question. “So my thing about who’s MP-one, well, if y’all didn’t know, I carry the name MP-one on my plate, so I’m not politician one but I am MP-one so I hope y’all ain’t talking about me,” Deveaux said. “So, if y’all have any information that we can put to rest this gossip, take it to Central Police Station, or we will have you escorted, and you could sit with the Commissioner of Police.”

Nearly three and a half years after a coroner’s jury ruled 31-year-old Azario Major was unlawfully killed by law enforcement, three police officers charged in his death will face a judge-only trial starting September 14. The high-profile case, which has already been marred by repeated delays and public outcry, took another procedural turn this week as Justice Guillimina Archer-Minns formally set the new trial date for Sergeant Antonio Sweeting (badge number 2825), Sergeant Jamal Johnson (badge number 3039), and Sergeant Deangelo Rolle (badge number 3726). The trial was originally slated to kick off last week, but it was rescheduled to accommodate the defense’s long-held request for a bench trial, rather than one decided by a jury.

The fatal incident dates back to December 26, 2021, when Major was shot and killed inside his vehicle parked outside a local bar on Fire Trail Road. Since that day, Major’s family has waged a sustained public campaign for accountability, repeatedly speaking out against lengthy procedural delays and emphasizing that they have yet to see justice delivered for their loved one more than three years after his death.

Defense counsel Keevon Maynard argued on behalf of the three officers that a trial overseen solely by a judge would deliver a fairer outcome for his clients. Maynard explained that a judge would center the proceedings strictly on applicable law and verified evidence, insulating the decision from the widespread public attention and emotional pressure that have surrounded the case since the shooting. This request builds on prior legal challenges to the original Coroner’s Court inquest process. During that inquest, the officers contended that the intense saturation of media and public commentary around Major’s death created unfair prejudice that biased the jury toward its unlawful killing finding.

That challenge to the coroner’s verdict ultimately reached Justice Franklyn Williams, who issued a ruling on the matter in March 2024. Justice Williams declined to throw out the Coroner’s Court’s original finding, but he acknowledged that the widespread public discourse around the case—including organized social media campaigns, news commentary, media interviews, a dedicated advocacy website, and a podcast focused on Major’s death—created significant public pressure. Multiple voices in these spaces repeatedly called for the immediate indictment of the three officers, which Justice Williams noted could have impacted the jury’s final decision. Even so, the justice ruled that the challenge to the verdict was not properly framed for the application brought by the defense. He also rejected a separate complaint that the Coroner’s Court mishandled a constitutional challenge the officers filed during the inquest, noting that the officers had failed to exhaust all available legal remedies before bringing their request to set aside the verdict.