标签： Antigua and Barbuda

ST. JOHN’S, Antigua — Antigua and Barbuda Prime Minister Gaston Browne has officially recorded his long-held public position in support of chemical and surgical castration for repeat serious sexual offenders during a parliamentary address this week, bringing the controversial proposal back into the center of national policy debate over criminal justice reform.

Speaking on Monday during parliamentary deliberations on the Firearms (Amendment) Bill 2026, which formed part of a broader discussion on crime rates and sentencing reform, Browne told assembled lawmakers that current penalties are insufficient to deter repeated acts of severe sexual violence, arguing that more aggressive measures are necessary to protect vulnerable communities.

“I’m an advocate of chemical castration,” Browne stated openly during the debate, as he outlined proposed changes he hopes to see integrated into upcoming sexual offenses legislation. Going a step further, the prime minister added that for the most hardened offenders, including serial rapists, surgical castration should also be put on the table as an available sentencing option.

This is not the first time Browne has publicly backed the proposal: earlier this month, he first raised the idea of castration as an option specifically for repeat child sex offenders, framing it as a complementary measure to lengthier prison sentences. That initial announcement drew immediate pushback from legal experts across the region, including prominent Grenadian criminal defense attorney Jerry Edwin, who condemned the policy as “barbaric” and a disingenuous “political stunt” designed to score cheap political points ahead of any upcoming electoral contests.

Despite the criticism, Browne has stood firm in his defense of the proposal, reiterating this week that the measure deserves serious legislative consideration as an option for judges handling repeat sexual offender cases. Monday’s parliamentary address marks a key milestone in the debate, as it formalizes Browne’s position on the official legislative record at a time when parliament is considering a sweeping package of harsher criminal penalties across multiple offense categories.

In his remarks, Browne argued that lengthy prison sentences alone cannot fully address the risk that recidivist sexual offenders pose to the public, and that policymakers have a responsibility to consider all evidence-based options that reduce the likelihood of future victimization. He also used the opportunity to renew criticism of what he views as excessively lenient sentencing for serious sexual crimes currently, emphasizing that parliament has a democratic duty to strengthen sentencing guidelines for these offenses.

It is important to note that the prime minister’s comments do not mean that castration as a criminal penalty has been passed into law. Rather, his remarks signal his public support for adding these options to the statute book as part of forthcoming amendments to sexual offending legislation.

Browne has consistently stressed that any castration measure he supports would be carefully structured under law, applied only to repeat offenders convicted of the most severe sexual offenses. His renewed statement in parliament confirms that the proposal remains an active part of the government’s broader ongoing review of how Antigua and Barbuda penalizes repeated acts of serious sexual violence.

During parliamentary debate on a landmark 2026 firearms amendment bill, Antigua and Barbuda Prime Minister Gaston Browne has publicly revealed an active investigation into unconfirmed allegations linking one to two high-profile local business leaders to illegal firearms trafficking into the twin-island nation.

The announcement came as Browne outlined the government’s ongoing work to map out smuggling routes and shut down the supply of illegal weapons that pose a growing threat to national security. “We understand that there are one or two prominent businessmen who may be involved in the importation of guns,” Browne confirmed to members of the House of Representatives. He was quick to add that the intelligence pointing to their involvement remains uncorroborated, with law enforcement still working to gather additional evidence to verify the claims.

Browne declined to release any identifying details about the accused businessmen, the industries they operate in, or specific information about the allegations. He also confirmed that no arrests or formal charges have been filed in connection with this investigation, as of the parliamentary debate. No independent evidence supporting the allegations was presented during the parliamentary session, and no additional official details about the probe have been made public in subsequent disclosures.

The prime minister used the reveal to frame a broader policy push, arguing that law enforcement and policymakers must shift focus beyond low-level offenders caught in possession of illegal weapons, to target the kingpins and facilitators who coordinate smuggling operations into the country. “Everything is on the table” when it comes to protecting national security, Browne stated, emphasizing the government’s commitment to taking aggressive action against the illegal firearms trade.

He also referenced a prior high-profile smuggling case to underscore the need for harsher sentencing. In that previous case, an individual Browne described as a personal friend, who had once been shortlisted as a potential candidate for Browne’s ruling Antigua Labour Party, was convicted of smuggling guns and ammunition and received only a one-year prison sentence. Browne argued that this lenient sentence highlighted the urgent need for revised penalties that are harsh enough to deter would-be traffickers. Under the proposed Firearms (Amendment) Bill 2026, convicted offenders will face significantly harsher sentences, including substantially longer prison terms for repeat offenders, covering a wide range of offenses from illegal public carry to unauthorized import, export, and transshipment of firearms.

A sweeping overhaul of Antigua’s firearms legislation is moving forward in Parliament, with the Firearms (Amendment) Bill 2026 introducing drastically harsher mandatory minimum penalties for individuals convicted of illegal firearm and ammunition possession. Attorney General Sir Steadroy “Cutie” Benjamin laid out the revised sentencing framework to the House of Representatives on Monday, framing the bill as a direct governmental response to a rising tide of gun-related violence that has shaken public confidence in community safety.

Under the proposed legislation, the penalties for illegal firearm possession are split by the type of conviction. For cases handled through summary conviction, offenders will face between five and 10 years behind bars. For more severe cases that result in conviction on indictment in the High Court, the bill enshrines a mandatory minimum 15-year prison sentence – a sharp increase from current sentencing guidelines.

Benjamin told lawmakers that the stricter penalties come in response to widespread criticism that existing sentences have failed to deter gun crime, and that the government is determined to send an uncompromising message to anyone involved in the illegal firearms trade. “If you commit the crime, you do the extended time,” he stated, emphasizing the need for substantially longer sentences to disrupt illegal gun activity.

The attorney general pointed to a string of high-profile violent incidents to justify the legislative change, including the recent Bathlodge shooting that left a pregnant young woman dead, a 13-year-old boy with severe facial gunshot wounds, and a third person injured. He added that public anxiety over gun violence has reached new heights, noting that his office phone has been constantly ringing with constituents sharing their fears about growing insecurity.

The bill expands tougher sentencing to a range of other firearms-related offences as well. For unauthorised carrying of a gun or ammunition in designated public spaces, summary convictions will carry five to 10 years in prison. Benjamin referenced a recent incident at a political rally where shots were fired, causing attendees to flee in panic, as an example of why public space protections need to be strengthened. “We are not going to allow Antigua to become a gangster place,” he said.

Other penalties laid out in the bill include 15 to 30 year prison terms for conviction on indictment of illegal sale or transfer of firearms or ammunition. The same sentence range applies to individuals caught possessing a firearm with the intent to endanger life or cause serious bodily harm.

Benjamin acknowledged that mandatory minimum sentencing has drawn criticism from legal and advocacy circles, but defended the policy as a necessary emergency measure to address the current gun violence crisis. To address concerns about unjust outcomes, the bill includes a carve-out for exceptional cases: if a court finds a mandatory minimum sentence is clearly excessive or unfair, it can still issue the statutorily required sentence but attach a public certificate outlining its concerns, clearing the way for the defendant to file an appeal against the sentence.

As of the attorney general’s introduction of the bill, parliamentary debate on the Firearms (Amendment) Bill 2026 is ongoing in the House of Representatives, with lawmakers set to consider amendments and a final vote in the coming days.

The government of Antigua and Barbuda is pushing forward sweeping changes to the nation’s firearms legislation, with a key proposal introducing stiff 5 to 10-year prison sentences for anyone caught openly carrying an unauthorised gun or ammunition in designated public spaces. Attorney General Sir Steadroy “Cutie” Benjamin laid out the new penalty framework during parliamentary debate on the 2026 Firearms (Amendment) Bill, clarifying that the harsher punishment will only apply to individuals convicted via summary proceedings who do not hold legal authorization to carry weapons — a group that excludes active police officers, members of the national Defence Force, and other explicitly exempted parties. Benjamin used a recent high-incident to underscore the urgent need for the reform, referencing a political gathering held near the Parliament building that ended in chaos after multiple gunshots rang out, forcing attendees to flee for safety. He emphasized that the administration is taking an uncompromising stance against the proliferation of illegal weapons in public spaces, drawing a clear line in the sand against rising gang-related violence. “We are not going to allow Antigua to become a gangster place,” Benjamin stated firmly to parliamentary members. The new mandatory sentencing range for unlawful public carry is just one component of a broader suite of revisions to the country’s firearms laws, which collectively seek to ramp up penalties across all categories of gun-related crime. Under the proposed changes, the most severe firearm-related offenses will now carry maximum prison sentences of up to 30 years, marking a significant escalation from current punishment levels.

In a move aligned with its core commitment to governmental transparency, the Government of Antigua and Barbuda has publicly released both the United States’ proposed operating procedures for potential transfers of third-country nationals removed from U.S. territory and Antigua and Barbuda’s formal counter-proposal, ahead of tabling both documents before the nation’s House of Representatives. Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs Sir Steadroy Benjamin will officially lay the two texts before parliament, opening the process to full public and legislative oversight.

This ongoing discussion forms part of a broader diplomatic push by the United States to negotiate similar transfer arrangements with nations across the globe, including multiple member states of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM). To date, some CARICOM nations have finalized such agreements, while others remain in active discussion like Antigua and Barbuda, which is approaching the talks with a strict focus on protecting its national sovereignty, public security, domestic legal framework, public finances, and core national interests. As of the public announcement, no final agreement has been reached between the two governments, with negotiations continuing in line with Antigua and Barbuda’s stated terms.

The United States’ original proposal outlines a framework for transfers under a planned 2025 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), setting eligibility criteria that excludes unaccompanied minors under 18, citizens of Antigua and Barbuda, and individuals with criminal records beyond U.S. immigration violations. The U.S. draft proposes a monthly transfer cap of 7 individuals, notes that neither government is obligated to commit financial resources to the initiative, but states the U.S. will explore available foreign assistance funds and plans to compensate a competent international organization for support services, with no costs to fall on Antigua and Barbuda. The proposal also requires a 5-day advance notice of transfers with full biometric, medical, and background information for all proposed individuals, and designates V.C. Bird International Airport as the reception point.

In contrast, Antigua and Barbuda’s counter-proposal builds in layered safeguards to prioritize national control and protect public interests, starting with a non-binding framework that explicitly confirms no final transfer may proceed without the prior, express written approval of Antigua and Barbuda’s government for every individual case. The counter-proposal tightens eligibility restrictions, barring all individuals under 18 (not just unaccompanied minors), restricting eligible nationalities primarily to CARICOM member states excluding Haiti, plus Brazil and Colombia, and requiring all proposed individuals hold valid unexpired passports with a confirmed realistic pathway for eventual return or onward resettlement. Additional exclusions apply to individuals with serious unaccommodatable medical conditions, vulnerable groups requiring specialized care without pre-approved cost coverage, and individuals with outstanding legal barriers to transfer from the U.S.

On transfer volume caps, Antigua and Barbuda’s framework sets a maximum of 7 total transfers per three-month period – a hard ceiling, not a mandatory quota – with an additional restriction that no new transfers may proceed if 7 or more previously transferred individuals remain in the country, unless Antigua and Barbuda explicitly grants an exception. The counter-proposal also strengthens financial safeguards, requiring binding written confirmation that the U.S. will cover 100% of all costs associated with transferred individuals, from accommodation and medical care to administrative and security expenses, from arrival through departure or until the individual secures an independent lawful status in Antigua and Barbuda, ensuring no burden falls on local taxpayers. The text opens the door for the International Organization for Migration (IOM) to provide support services, but makes any IOM participation conditional on separate arrangements approved by Antigua and Barbuda’s government, with a requirement that alternative funding arrangements must be in place if IOM support is unavailable.

Procedural changes in the counter-proposal extend the advance notice period for proposed transfers to 10 business days, requiring the U.S. to provide a full suite of detailed information including full health assessments, asylum and protection claim history, proof of the individual’s written willingness to transfer, and confirmation of all legal processes in the U.S. have been exhausted. All transfers must be processed under Antigua and Barbuda’s domestic immigration law, with a clear stipulation that the arrangement is for temporary transit only, not permanent resettlement, and no transferred individual gains an automatic right to permanent residence, asylum, or work authorization. The U.S. is required to fund and facilitate all eventual return or onward placement of transferred individuals, with financial obligations remaining in place even if talks conclude or transfers are suspended.

Crucially, the counter-proposal grants Antigua and Barbuda the unilateral right to immediately suspend all future transfers if concerns arise related to national security, public health, capacity constraints, financial burdens, natural disasters, or public emergencies. It also requires a joint review of the arrangement after either the first five transfers or six months of implementation, whichever comes first. The Antigua and Barbuda government emphasizes that full sovereign authority to approve or reject any proposed individual remains exclusively with the nation, in every case.

In its public statement, the government reiterated that it values its longstanding bilateral relationship with the United States and remains committed to constructive negotiations, but any final agreement must align with Antigua and Barbuda’s domestic laws, limited national capacity, and core national interests, while guaranteeing dignified treatment for all affected individuals in line with international law. By releasing both documents publicly and tabling them in parliament, the government has fulfilled its commitment to open governance, and pledges to continue updating parliament and the public as negotiations progress.

During parliamentary debate on the 2026 Firearms Amendment Bill, a senior Antigua and Barbuda lawmaker has sounded a urgent warning over a growing public safety threat on the island of Barbuda, linking a recent surge in home break-ins to the relocation of recently released prison inmates from Antigua.

Trevor Walker, the Member of Parliament for Barbuda, told lawmakers that a growing number of individuals who have completed custodial sentences for criminal offenses in Antigua have relocated to the smaller sister island, and many are legally required to check in regularly with local law enforcement. Walker noted that on any given day, three to four of these former inmates are required to sign in at the Barbuda police station, a pattern that he says has coincided with a sharp uptick in property crime across the island.

Where once break-ins were a rare occurrence, Walker stated that Barbuda now faces at least one home invasion every week, a trend that has upended the island’s historically quiet, low-crime way of life. To illustrate the severity of the issue, Walker shared details of a recent break-in at a property owned by a relative of his wife, who resides permanently in the United States. He told lawmakers that the intruder did not just steal valuables from the vacant home, but appeared to have begun occupying the property as if it were their own. Local police launched an investigation into the incident, Walker confirmed, and identified the primary suspect as a repeat offender with a prior criminal charge on record.

Despite his deep concern over rising crime, Walker was quick to highlight the exceptional work of the Barbuda-based police force, offering specific public praise for Inspector Ogaro, the island’s lead law enforcement officer. Walker described Ogaro as the most proactive and effective inspector he has seen assigned to Barbuda in his tenure in office, noting that the inspector personally leads regular patrols of high-traffic areas including the island’s port and airport, and directly intervenes when he observes open illegal activity.

To further strengthen local law enforcement capacity, Walker has formally called on the national government to deploy additional police vehicles to Barbuda, a move that would allow officers to respond faster to emergency calls and expand the scope of their patrols across the island.

The concerns raised by Walker have formed the backbone of his strong support for the 2026 Firearms Amendment Bill, which introduces tougher regulations and penalties for firearm-related and violent crime across Antigua and Barbuda. The lawmaker stressed that he holds a zero-tolerance stance for the armed robberies, shootings, and homicides that have impacted Antigua in recent years, and emphasized that Parliament carries a constitutional and moral responsibility to address rising crime head-on to protect Antigua and Barbuda’s reputation as a safe jurisdiction for residents and visitors alike.

Walker also publicly disclosed that he is a licensed firearm holder, and affirmed that he will exercise his legal right to defend himself, his family, and his property from any criminal intruder. Closing his remarks, Walker urged his fellow parliamentarians to approach the national crime crisis with the gravity it demands, saying, “This crime thing is really serious.”

As parliamentary debate opened this week on the landmark Firearms (Amendment) Bill 2026, Antigua and Barbuda’s opposition leader Jamale Pringle has delivered a nuanced call for a holistic, multi-pronged response to the nation’s growing gun violence crisis, arguing that harsher prison sentences alone cannot reverse rising criminal activity.

Pringle opened his address to the House of Representatives on Monday affirming his backing for stringent punishment for individuals who commit serious violent offenses using illegal firearms. “There’s no doubt that persons who commit serious crimes with firearms should face the full extent of the law,” he told lawmakers. But he immediately pushed back against framing the sentencing reforms in the bill as a standalone “saving grace” for the country’s security challenges, warning that deep-rooted social and systemic drivers of crime cannot be addressed through punishment alone.

One of the most alarming trends Pringle highlighted is the steadily declining age of individuals involved in serious gun-related crime, a shift he said points to a much broader, unaddressed social crisis. “The age group is getting younger and younger,” he noted, arguing that this trend demands proactive intervention rather than only reactive punishment after crimes are committed.

While Parliament moves to extend sentences to keep convicted firearm offenders behind bars for longer periods, Pringle argued that equal priority must be given to cutting off the supply of illegal guns at the source and preventing at-risk youth from entering criminal activity in the first place. He raised pointed questions about the effectiveness of past government commitments to boost policing, border surveillance, and forensic investigative capabilities, specifically calling out gaps in the nation’s forensic infrastructure. Pringle asked whether Antigua and Barbuda’s national forensic laboratory is fully operational, or if critical evidence still must be shipped overseas for analysis — a delay that can undermine successful prosecutions.

He also drew attention to a major gap in post-seizure investigation: after law enforcement seizes illegal weapons, little public information is provided about efforts to trace the guns back to their smuggling networks. Pringle emphasized that tracing every recovered firearm is a critical step to “plug the holes” in border security and dismantle the transnational trafficking rings that supply illegal guns to Antigua and Barbuda. To address this gap, he called for the establishment of a dedicated firearm tracing unit within the Royal Police Force of Antigua and Barbuda, if one does not already exist, with a mandate to trace every seized weapon from the person caught in possession back through the entire supply chain to the original manufacturer. He also urged deeper collaboration with regional and international law enforcement agencies to target these transnational networks, and called for investment in stronger detection capabilities at Customs to stop illegal guns from entering the country in the first place.

Beyond investigative and border enforcement reforms, Pringle stressed that even the strongest legislation is useless if law enforcement agencies lack the resources to catch and prosecute offenders. “If you cannot catch the criminal, this bill serves no purpose,” he said, referencing longstanding complaints from police about resource shortages and arguing that sustained, adequate investment in enforcement agencies is non-negotiable for any gun crime strategy to work. Echoing the government’s own public position that border security is a core pillar of countering gun crime — which recently led the Cabinet to approve the purchase of specialized detection dogs for the country’s ports — Pringle noted that the effectiveness of new sentencing rules depends entirely on the resources allocated to enforce them. “If we’re just going to pass this to deal with the people who we catch with firearms and there’s no effort in going after the persons who are importing these firearms into Antigua and Barbuda, we’re wasting time in here,” he said. “The ultimate goal must be to ensure that firearms are not imported into Antigua and Barbuda.”

To address the social roots of rising youth involvement in crime, Pringle called for major new investment in community infrastructure that gives young people positive alternatives to loitering on street corners, where they are far more likely to be exposed to criminal recruitment and activity. He argued that reducing gun violence requires tackling the underlying social conditions that push people into crime, rather than only responding after offenses have been committed. He also called for comprehensive reform of the country’s prison system, noting that current facilities often leave incarcerated people worse off than when they entered, with little focus on rehabilitation that can reduce recidivism. Additionally, he raised urgent concerns about rising hard drug use among young people and its damaging impacts on mental health, calling for systemic investigation into the root causes of the crisis.

In closing, Pringle emphasized that the Firearms (Amendment) Bill should be treated as one component of a broad national strategy, not a complete solution to the country’s gun crime problem. Notably, his position overlaps with key parts of the governing administration’s stated approach: the Cabinet has previously acknowledged that enforcement alone cannot address the social conditions driving youth violence, and has identified families, schools, faith institutions, community groups, and social service agencies as key partners in prevention efforts. The Firearms (Amendment) Bill is just one part of a wider package of government measures to respond to rising gun violence, with the administration saying the legislation will strengthen sentencing rules while being paired with increased investment in policing, investigative, and forensic capabilities.

In a charged parliamentary address Monday, Antigua and Barbuda Prime Minister Gaston Browne delivered broad criticism of criminal defense attorneys and members of the national judiciary, tying his claims directly to a sweeping new legislative push to clamp down on firearm-related crime through harsher, mandatory minimum sentencing.

Speaking during ongoing debate in the House of Representatives over the Firearms (Amendment) Bill 2026, Browne opened his remarks by repeating long-held complaints that the region’s sentencing framework has grown far too lenient for violent and repeat offenders, arguing that lax punishment is putting public safety at risk. He claimed that too many defense attorneys prioritize the interests of their accused clients and their own financial gain over community safety, opening a broader rebuke of the legal profession.

The prime minister referenced an uncorroborated complaint he said was brought to his attention by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), alleging that a single unnamed defense attorney had attempted to undermine ongoing prosecutorial work. He offered no identifying information about the attorney, no concrete context for the alleged conduct, and confirmed that no charges or convictions have been filed against the individual. Browne added he had instructed the DPP to pursue disciplinary or legal action if the attorney engages in similar behavior again.

Expanding his criticism to attorneys who have publicly pushed back against his past attacks on the judiciary, Browne claimed without evidence that a number of these critics are themselves engaged in corrupt practice. He argued that many defense attorneys support lenient sentencing simply because it benefits the clients they represent, a position that he says puts private interest ahead of public good.

Browne’s criticism of lenient sentencing is not new. In recent weeks, he has repeatedly argued that short custodial sentences for serious violent and repeat offenses are driving a cycle of crime across the region. Just last week, he went public with claims that the Caribbean judiciary has settled into what he called a “lenient sentencing orthodoxy” that erodes public safety. Back in August, he requested the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court’s chief justice launch an independent review of sentencing practices for firearm offenses, violent crime, and repeat offending, with a scope that also includes examination of charging practices, prosecution protocols, bail policies, remand procedures, and rehabilitation programs.

On Monday, he extended his critical remarks directly to the judiciary, while attempting to preempt accusations of threatening judicial independence. “I respect judicial independence and do not want conflict among the branches of government,” Browne told lawmakers, “but judicial independence should not prevent Parliament from legislating tougher sentences.”

He explained that the core goal of the 2026 amendment bill is to deliberately curtail judicial sentencing discretion, a power the government says has been repeatedly abused to hand down overly lenient punishments across the Caribbean. “We do accept that to ensure justice, that they must have some discretion,” Browne said, “but Parliament has come specifically to curb that discretion” because of persistent abuse.

The prime minister emphasized that the executive, legislative and judicial branches hold separate constitutional mandates, but all share a core common objective: protecting public safety. He pushed back against what he described as unreasonably short sentences for serious firearm offenses, calling out 10-month, one-year, and two-year sentences that conflict with what lawmakers have repeatedly signaled is the intended severity of punishment for these crimes. The new legislation is designed to codify Parliament’s expectation for harsher punishment in clear, binding terms.

Under the proposed reforms, specified firearm offenses will carry mandatory minimum sentences of five years when heard in Magistrates’ Court and 15 years when heard in the High Court, while the maximum penalty for some offenses will be raised to 30 years. The bill does carve out a narrow exception for exceptional circumstances, where judges may deviate from the statutory minimum if imposing that minimum would be manifestly unjust, unreasonable, or excessive. Any judge who uses this exception would be required to formally document and certify their reasoning for departing from the mandatory minimum, a transparency measure Browne says adds accountability to the process.

The prime minister stressed that the government is not seeking to impose disproportionate punishments, but rather to correct what he frames as the far greater problem of disproportionately lenient sentences that fail to protect the public. “This intervention is necessary to protect the public and reduce repeat offending,” he said of the mandatory minimum framework.

In addition to the sentencing reforms, the Browne administration has already taken steps to strengthen prosecutorial capacity. Cabinet has previously approved the recruitment of up to five new attorneys to join the DPP’s prosecution team, alongside funding for specialized prosecutor training and scholarships for two sitting police officers to complete legal studies before joining the DPP’s office.

Debate on the Firearms (Amendment) Bill 2026 remains ongoing in the House of Representatives, with no final vote scheduled as of Monday’s proceedings.

In a bold policy shift announced on Monday during parliamentary debate over sweeping firearms legislation, Prime Minister Gaston Browne of Antigua and Barbuda outlined plans to strengthen the country’s crime response by targeting naturalized citizens convicted of serious offenses. The new measure, already approved by the Cabinet, will allow the government to revoke citizenship granted through naturalization after offenders complete their prison sentences, followed by immediate deportation.

Browne made the announcement while speaking in the House of Representatives about the 2026 Firearms (Amendment) Bill, a piece of legislation designed to introduce harsher mandatory sentences for gun-related crimes. Opening his remarks, the prime minister emphasized that all foreign residents and naturalized citizens are expected to abide by the nation’s laws, noting that immigration authorities already operate under standing orders to deport non-citizen felons once their sentences are finished. Now, the government intends to extend this enforcement framework to cover people who have gone through the naturalization process to become citizens.

Initially referencing the policy as applying to “heinous crimes,” Browne later clarified that the revocation power will apply to any serious crime committed by naturalized citizens. “Those who naturalise and become citizens and commit crimes, certain crimes in this country, cannot commit any serious crime in this country. We will revoke citizenship and deport them,” he stated during the parliamentary session. The prime minister stressed that his appearance during the debate was intended to publicly notify communities, particularly immigrant populations, of the new regulation that has already been formalized by the Cabinet. “That decision has been taken by the Cabinet already, and I’m sensitising the public, especially our immigrants, because they must know the reason behind it,” he added.

To counter any perception that the policy targets immigrant groups, Browne highlighted the inclusive track record of his administration, pointing to past government amnesty programs that allowed thousands of undocumented immigrants to regularize their immigration status and ultimately pursue citizenship. “We’re not targeting immigrants,” Browne said, noting that his government has long maintained an open and accommodating approach to immigrant communities. “Where they become a threat to public safety, we are duty bound to do whatever is necessary to keep this country safe,” he explained, adding that citizenship revocation will remain a core tool in the government’s crime prevention strategy, alongside the existing routine deportation of convicted non-citizens.

The policy announcement came as part of the government’s broader push to combat rising crime and violence across the twin-island nation. The 2026 Firearms (Amendment) Bill at the center of the parliamentary debate proposes mandatory minimum prison sentences for a range of firearms offenses: five-year minimum sentences for cases heard in the Magistrates’ Court, 15-year minimums for cases tried in the High Court, and maximum penalties of up to 30 years for the most severe offenses. Browne told parliament that violent crime, particularly offending involving young people, has emerged as one of the most pressing challenges facing Antigua and Barbuda, and that solving the crisis requires coordinated action from government, law enforcement agencies, households, and all segments of civil society. Debate on the firearms bill is ongoing in the House of Representatives as legislators work to advance the government’s public safety agenda.