In the aftermath of St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ 2025 general election, one of the most striking shifts in the nation’s political landscape has gone largely underexamined: the growing disconnect between a group of self-styled reform advocates who campaigned for regime change, and their inability to adjust to the reality of democratic governance after their preferred party took power.
博客
-

Bronto Somohardjo: Ik blijf mijn grondwettelijke taken uitvoeren
Amid an ongoing legal process initiated by Suriname’s Public Prosecution Service, Bronto Somohardjo, faction leader of the Surinamese political party Pertjajah Luhur and sitting member of the National Assembly, has publicly reaffirmed his commitment to fulfilling the constitutional duties entrusted to him by voters. In an exclusive interview with local outlet Starnieuws, Somohardjo made clear that he has no intention of stepping away from his role as a people’s representative.
Under Suriname’s constitution, clear rules govern the process through which a National Assembly member may lose their seat, Somohardjo noted. Elected directly by the Surinamese people, he holds a constitutional mandate he says he takes with the utmost seriousness, and he plans to continue carrying out all responsibilities tied to the post. The lawmaker stressed that the allegations currently being raised by the Public Prosecution Service stem from his previous tenure as a government minister, not his current role as an elected people’s representative.
According to Somohardjo, the National Assembly has not issued a finding of guilt against him. Instead, the body only voted to clear the way for the Public Prosecution Service to continue its legal process. He reminded the public that in Suriname’s constitutional democracy, final determination of guilt or innocence rests exclusively with the judiciary, not legislative bodies. In line with his commitment to ongoing service, Somohardjo confirmed he will be present for the start of parliamentary budget deliberations scheduled for the same day he gave the interview.
“The Surinamese people can count on me to keep showing up for work,” he said. “I was not elected to run from responsibility; I was elected to represent the people, especially during challenging times.”
Somohardjo also drew attention to a perceived double standard in how similar cases have been handled by the legislature. He pointed out that when current National Assembly Speaker and former Vice President Ashwin Adhin was formally indicted while serving as a sitting parliamentarian, no question was ever raised about whether Adhin should forfeit his Assembly seat. “That is precisely why it is important that comparable situations receive comparable treatment,” he argued.
The lawmaker closed by reiterating his core principle: the Surinamese constitution must be applied equally to every citizen, regardless of position or political affiliation. For his part, he says his full focus remains on carrying out his constitutional duties, advancing deliberation of the national budget, and advancing the interests of the Surinamese people who elected him — a mandate he intends to honor through the full course of his term.
-

Maceo and Che Guevara: The rebellion of never surrendering
Across the sweep of history, chance often weaves together remarkable threads of shared destiny. For the Cuban people and much of Latin America, the annual arrival of June 14 is no random date on the calendar: it marks the shared birthday of two of the region’s most iconic revolutionary leaders, born 83 years apart and thousands of kilometers apart, who now hold a place of honor in the pantheon of Latin American independence.
Antonio Maceo, born in 1845 in San Luis, Santiago de Cuba, and Ernesto “Che” Guevara, born in 1928 in Rosario, Argentina, never crossed paths in life. Yet their ideological visions and life trajectories converged on the same core goal: a fully free, sovereign Cuba, and a politically and economically united Latin America free from foreign interference.
Though the two men came from drastically different material backgrounds, their upbringings equally forged the unyielding character that would define their revolutionary work. Maceo was born to small mixed-heritage farmers – a Venezuelan father and Cuban mother – who raised 12 children and instilled in them a deep love for their land and a fierce hatred of the colonial institution of slavery. Che, by contrast, grew up in a comfortable, intellectual middle-class Argentine household, surrounded by books and progressive thought. His father, Ernesto Guevara Lynch, held deeply progressive political views, while his mother Celia de la Serna nurtured his critical thinking, introducing him to the work of Karl Marx and Pablo Neruda from a young age.
Neither man inherited leadership; they earned their standing through deliberate choice and consistent action. At just 23 years old, Maceo joined Cuba’s Ten Years’ War against Spanish colonial rule in 1868. With no prior military training or rank, his raw courage and sharp tactical mind allowed him to rise quickly through the ranks to become lieutenant to revolutionary general Máximo Gómez. Multiple battle wounds, and his iconic refusal to accept a compromised surrender deal with Spanish forces at the Protest of Baraguá, cemented his reputation as the “Bronze Titan,” a leader who never wavered in his commitment to independence until he fell in battle in December 1896 at the age of 51, machete still in hand.
For Che, a trained doctor, his revolutionary convictions were forged on the road during his famous cross-continental motorcycle trip with friend Alberto Granados, where he witnessed firsthand the systemic poverty and exploitation that plagued working people across Latin America. He would go on to join the Cuban liberation struggle from 1956 to 1959, rising from serving as the doctor on board the Granma expedition yacht to commander of the Rebel Army, leading the decisive, legendary battle for Santa Clara that sealed the revolution’s victory. After the revolution, he carried his fight for global liberation to other regions of the world, first in Africa and then to Bolivia, where he was killed in 1967 at just 39 years old, rifle still at his side.
Across more than a century, the overlapping values of Maceo and Che stand as a mirror held through time, reflecting a shared unwavering commitment to revolutionary principle. Maceo famously declared, “I understand no other word than freedom,” while Che wrote, “Our freedom and its daily sustenance are the color of blood and are filled with sacrifice.” Three core principles united the two leaders across their different eras: leadership by example, unwavering internationalism, and absolute rejection of any negotiation or mediation with colonial and imperial enemies.
Both men fought on the front lines alongside their troops, sharing the same hunger, danger and hardship without claiming special privilege. Maceo fought first for Cuban independence, and his commitment to regional liberation extended to supporting the independence struggles of Santo Domingo and Puerto Rico. Che, who traveled to Cuba from his native Argentina carrying the experience of continental poverty, rejected the idea that national solidarity ends at a border. He became Cuban by choice, by sacrifice and by the struggle for liberation, and carried the revolutionary fight to the Global South, holding fast to his conviction that “humanity is the homeland of man.” Even when cornered by enemy forces in Bolivia’s Quebrada del Yuro, facing execution at the hands of Bolivian Rangers backed by the CIA, he remained unflinching, telling his executioners, “Calm down and aim well. You are going to kill a man.” Though his body was mutilated after death, his image and ideology have spread across every continent, inspiring new generations of activists.
Today, as Cuba faces an intensifying U.S. economic blockade, as global media campaigns work to distort and caricature the legacy of Latin American revolutionaries, and as political discourse increasingly frames compromise and resignation as “maturity,” the parallel lives and shared values of Maceo and Che emerge as both a reminder of what is possible and a call to action. Their lives prove that true greatness is measured not by wealth or power, but by the justice of the cause for which one is willing to fight and die.
-

AK-47 assault rifles smuggled through wharves for Venezuelan gang members
Two major illegal weapons seizures in less than a month have put Guyana’s national security and border control systems under intense scrutiny, after a total of 33 US-manufactured AK-47 assault rifles were intercepted by law enforcement, with the cache traced to maritime smuggling through the country’s unmonitored wharves for transnational criminal gangs. The most recent bust occurred on the night of June 11, when officers recovered 23 rifles from a vehicle in Schoonard, on the West Bank of Demerara. The earlier seizure, in late May, netted 10 additional assault rifles in Berbice.
Senior security sector sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, have confirmed that all weapons were shipped into the country via unsearched commercial maritime cargo, hidden inside barrels, crates and containerized vehicles that slipped past routine customs checks. The country currently lacks the specialized scanning technology required to detect hidden illegal weapons in incoming shipments, though officials note that the scanners have already been procured and are en route to Guyana.
Authorities have publicly released little information about the ongoing investigation. When contacted by Demerara Waves Online News for details on the motives behind the smuggling operation, Home Affairs Minister Oneidge Walrond stated only that assessments are ongoing and the investigation remains active. Her advisor, former Home Affairs Minister Robeson Benn, declined to provide on-the-record comment, but acknowledged that the presence of unregulated high-powered firearms in the country is a constant cause for concern for all Guyanese people. “Guyanese always have to be concerned when guns are being pushed around,” Benn told the outlet.
Deputy Police Commissioner Wendell Blanhum, head of the Guyana Police Force’s Criminal Investigations Department, has previously confirmed that the 23 rifles seized in June were manufactured in the United States. Senior officials have not yet publicly confirmed the intended end users of the weapons, or whether the smuggling was tied to political motives, a plot targeting senior law enforcement figures, or large-scale arms trafficking. The anonymous source, however, outlined the most widely held working theory among investigators: the weapons were smuggled for Venezuelan gang operatives, who were set to move the cache across the border to accomplice networks.
Investigators believe the assault rifles are ultimately intended to protect illegal gold mining operations in the cross-border region, where gang activity has surged amid tightened firearms restrictions in Venezuela. When asked whether the notorious Venezuelan transnational gang Tren de Aragua is actively expanding its operations into western Guyana through this smuggling network, the senior official confirmed that investigators believe this to be the case.
Multiple arrests have been made in connection with the two seizures. A 28-year-old Venezuelan man, Jonathan Gans, who resides in Grove, East Bank Demerara, was taken into custody on the night of the June bust as he attempted to flee the Schoonard search site. A 40-year-old local businessman, Randy Jagdeo, surrendered to police on June 14 alongside his legal counsel after a wanted bulletin was issued for him and a third suspect, Orlando Gabriel. Three Guyanese nationals were also arrested following the May seizure in Berbice.
Guyana’s small opposition party, the Alliance For Change (AFC), has publicly criticized the ruling government for its decision to withhold key details of the investigation from the public. In a statement released Sunday evening, the AFC noted that while law enforcement’s success in intercepting the cache is a positive outcome, the smuggling attempt exposes major systemic gaps in the country’s border and import control frameworks. “The incident highlighted broader concerns about the movement and circulation of illegal firearms within the country,” the party said.
The AFC emphasized that Guyanese citizens have a right to full transparency about how the high-powered weapons entered the country, who facilitated the smuggling ring, and whether any regulatory or legal failures allowed the shipment to slip into the country. The party added that news of the 33-rifle cache has sent major alarm across the country over public safety, with many residents questioning how many more illegal weapons may have already entered circulation and fallen into the hands of criminal networks and unauthorized groups.






