分类： society

The Trinidadian government’s sudden decision to double the quarterly toll for maxi-taxis utilizing the Priority Bus Route (PBR) has ignited widespread criticism from both transportation operators and commuters. Effective January 1, the toll surges from $300 to $600—a move implemented without prior consultation or warning via Legal Notice No. 475 on December 22.

This toll adjustment, unchanged since 1988, arrives amid broader governmental efforts to enhance revenue streams and enforce traffic regulations through increased fines and duties. However, the abrupt nature of the hike has drawn sharp rebuke for its poor timing and lack of stakeholder engagement.

In response, maxi-taxi drivers are contemplating fare increases, potentially raising short-drop fares from $5 to $8—a shift that has alarmed daily commuters already grappling with inflationary pressures. The move threatens to exacerbate living costs and contradicts governmental claims of sensitivity to public welfare, particularly following October’s reduction of super gasoline prices by $1 per liter.

Critics argue that the toll hike lacks justification without corresponding improvements in infrastructure. Facilities such as City Gate in Port of Spain—described as outdated, insecure, and plagued by vagrancy and pollution—remain in deplorable condition. The terminal fails to meet basic accessibility standards for older adults and persons with disabilities, undermining any promise of enhanced services.

Furthermore, questions arise regarding the allocation of the increased toll revenue. If directed to the Public Transport Service Corporation (PTSC), which manages related infrastructure, the hike might be palatable. Yet, no commitments to maintenance or upgrades have been disclosed.

The decision also echoes past conflicts: fifteen years ago, the Privy Council ruled in favor of maxi-taxi drivers in a dispute over PTSC fees, with millions in damages still owed as of 2024. This historical precedent underscores the risks of imposing changes without dialogue or consensus.

Unless the UNC-dominated Parliament annuls the legal notice, the toll increase will proceed, potentially igniting further dispute and hardship. The government is urged to reconsider its approach, balancing fiscal objectives with equitable public policy.

Residents of Mt Hope experienced severe water service disruptions throughout the Christmas holiday period, highlighting systemic failures in the Water and Sewerage Authority’s (WASA) customer service and communication protocols. The crisis began precisely at 6:00 AM on Christmas morning when water supply was completely terminated without prior notification to paying customers.

Service restoration proved inconsistent and inadequate, with water returning briefly around 2:00 PM on Boxing Day only to be disconnected again at approximately 6:00 PM after merely trickling for most of the four-hour window. The pattern continued on December 27th with minimal water flow from 6:00 AM until 11:00 AM. As of 12:15 PM on December 28th, residents remained without reliable water service despite their status as paying customers.

The utility’s information systems failed completely during the crisis. WASA’s official website showed no service interruption notices for the affected area, while customer service representatives answering the 800-LEAK helpline could provide no explanation for the service failure or estimated restoration timelines.

The authority’s Corporate Communications Department, currently under Kristy Ramnarine-Bakr’s leadership, faced sharp criticism for its apparent absence during the holiday emergency. The situation has raised serious questions about WASA’s management approach toward its customers, with residents reporting feeling ‘treated like scum’ by the organization’s leadership.

Writer Linus F Didier, in a public letter to the editor, specifically called upon WASA Chairman Roshan Babwah, Acting CEO Dain Maharaj, and Acting Director of Customer Care Ellen Lewis to emulate the TT Electricity Commission’s (T&TEC) customer service standards and operational protocols. The comparison underscores growing public frustration with WASA’s service delivery model and its apparent disregard for customer communication during utility emergencies.

Sagicor Financial Services demonstrated its ongoing dedication to community enrichment and youth empowerment through its seasonal Making A Giant Impact in Children (MAGIC) program during the 2025 holiday period. The initiative formed a crucial component of the corporation’s broader corporate social responsibility framework, which prioritizes meaningful community investment and youth development.

Company volunteers organized special Christmas celebrations at two key institutions: Wesleyan Children’s Home and St James Police Youth Club. At the children’s home, Sagicor staff hosted an afternoon of festive activities and games, creating joyful interactions and lasting memories for the residents. Each child received individually tailored gifts aligned with their personal interests, alongside seasonal treats and tokens. The home’s management expressed profound gratitude for Sagicor’s sustained partnership and support.

The outreach continued at the St James Police Youth Club, where Sagicor volunteers arrived with Santa Claus—making a dramatic entrance in a vibrant red pickup truck rather than traditional sleigh. The event generated laughter and genuine connection as team members distributed presents to all children while emphasizing values of positive engagement and personal development.

Asha Nabbie, Vice President of Marketing and Communications for Southern Caribbean, emphasized the strategic importance of these initiatives: “The St James Police Youth Club plays a critical role in nurturing discipline, leadership and social responsibility among young people. Our annual Christmas programs demonstrate Sagicor’s commitment to creating positive change, bringing joy and belonging during this special season.”

The MAGIC initiative reflects Sagicor’s institutional philosophy that corporate responsibility extends beyond financial services to active community participation and support for future generations.

A Trinidadian family’s four-year wait for their government-subsidized home culminated in a shocking discovery on December 29 when they found strangers decorating and preparing to occupy their Housing Development Corporation (HDC) property in Riverside South, Corinth. The couple, who requested anonymity, immediately contacted law enforcement after being alerted by concerned neighbors about unauthorized activity at their townhouse unit.

Upon arrival with police, the family discovered their allocated home had been altered with installed curtains and wall modifications. Officers encountered three women occupying not only their unit but two adjacent properties as well. Law enforcement directed the unauthorized occupants to vacate immediately and secured the premises, though official charges remain unconfirmed.

This incident occurred amidst controversial public statements from HDC Chairman Feeroz Khan regarding potential regularization of squatters in vacant state housing. Housing Minister David Lee subsequently distanced himself from these remarks, claiming no knowledge of such initiatives.

The affected family had initially paid their down payment in November 2020, enduring a protracted administrative process that required repeated document submissions and valuation updates. During this period, their unit’s cost escalated from $600,000 to $750,000 TT dollars. Their perseverance included significant personal sacrifice, including the loss of their vehicle during flood conditions while attending a mandatory HDC meeting.

Following the break-in, the family urgently visited HDC offices with police documentation. After tense negotiations, officials provided keys under a rent-to-own arrangement despite outstanding paperwork. The unit transferred with existing utility debts totaling approximately $595 TT dollars, which the family accepted to secure immediate occupancy.

The emotional toll was profound, with the husband experiencing uncharacteristic rage and the wife describing overwhelming heartbreak. They emphasize their decision to publicize this ordeal aims to highlight vulnerabilities faced by legally allocated homeowners amid ambiguous housing policies. The family now occupies the property continuously as a preventive measure against further occupation attempts.