分类： politics

HAVANA – Cuba commenced solemn ceremonies on Thursday to honor 32 military personnel reportedly killed during what authorities describe as a “criminal attack” by the United States against Venezuela. The remains arrived at José Martí International Airport where an official military reception was held.

The procession traveled along Rancho Boyeros Avenue to the Ministry of the Revolutionary Armed Forces headquarters, with citizens lining the route to pay respects to the fallen combatants. Starting at 10:00 a.m., the public was permitted access to view the remains at the ministry building.

Additional commemorative events are scheduled throughout the country. On Friday morning, Havana residents will gather at the José Martí Anti-Imperialist Tribune to initiate the “March of the Fighting People,” symbolizing national solidarity. Simultaneous tribute ceremonies will occur in all provincial capitals at 9:00 a.m., followed by burials in local pantheons for fallen defenders at 4:00 p.m.

The Cuban government has declared 2026 as the “Year of the Centennial of Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro Ruz,” adding historical significance to the ceremonies. Official statements honored the soldiers as heroes who fell defending Venezuela’s Bolivarian Republic, though the United States government has not officially commented on the alleged incident.

The coordinated national observances represent one of Cuba’s most significant military commemorations in recent years, highlighting ongoing geopolitical tensions in the region.

Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez has categorically stated that his government maintains no diplomatic negotiations with United States authorities beyond technical discussions regarding migration matters. The First Secretary of Cuba’s Communist Party Central Committee made these declarations through official channels on January 13, 2026.

President Díaz-Canel clarified that while Cuba remains open to substantive dialogue with successive U.S. administrations, including the current government, such discussions must be grounded in specific principles. These include mutual respect for sovereign equality, adherence to international law standards, reciprocal benefits without internal interference, and unequivocal recognition of Cuban independence.

The Cuban leader presented a detailed critique of the longstanding economic embargo, characterizing it as an extreme and continuously tightening policy fundamentally disconnected from the Cuban diaspora population in the United States. He attributed migration patterns primarily to the failed U.S. policy approach and special provisions within the Cuban Adjustment Act.

Díaz-Canel further asserted that Cuban-Americans have become victims of shifting migration policies and what he termed ‘the betrayal of Miami politicians.’ Despite these tensions, the president emphasized Cuba’s continued compliance with existing bilateral migration agreements.

Historical context indicates, according to the president, that sustainable progress in Cuba-U.S. relations requires foundation in international legal frameworks rather than strategies of hostility, economic coercion, or political threats. The statements represent Cuba’s most recent positioning regarding the complex bilateral relationship with its northern neighbor.

In a significant escalation of geopolitical tensions, the United States administration has issued a stark ultimatum to Cuba amid broader regional instability following recent military operations against Venezuela. President Donald Trump has employed inflammatory language suggesting military action as a probable option, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio presented Havana with a political demand: either transition to what he termed a “real economy” and alter its political system, or face intensified blockade measures and unprecedented pressure.

This aggressive posture represents a dramatic departure from diplomatic norms, with Washington employing tactics including threats against sovereign nations, presidential kidnappings, and military interventions that fundamentally undermine established international relations frameworks. The administration appears to have abandoned conventional diplomatic pretenses, openly acknowledging its intention to economically strangle the Cuban people rather than maintaining previous rhetoric about democracy and human rights.

Historical parallels emerge to the Reagan era, when similar threats were met with resolve by Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro, who advocated unwavering firmness as the only appropriate response. Contemporary Cuban leadership appears to be embracing this same philosophy, indicating they will confront, resist, and ultimately defeat whatever challenges the U.S. imposes across any domain of conflict.

Analysts suggest these aggressive maneuvers may reflect desperation from a declining power attempting to reassert hegemonic control through fear amid internal domestic crises, potentially pushing global stability to the brink.