分类： politics

In a surprising political reversal, former Attorney General Grenville Williams has publicly endorsed the New Democratic Party’s constituency development fund proposal—a policy his own Unity Labour Party vehemently opposed during its 25-year administration. Williams, who unsuccessfully contested the South Leeward seat in the November 27 general election, made his recommendations through a detailed Facebook post just days after the ULP’s electoral defeat.

The defeated candidate urged newly appointed Prime Minister Godwin Friday to enact two landmark legislations within his first 90 days in office: an integrity commission requiring full financial disclosure from all politicians, and the formal establishment of the constituency development fund that would allocate resources to MPs for local projects. Williams specifically referenced Jamaica’s integrity framework and St. Lucia’s development fund as exemplary models.

This endorsement represents a significant political paradox given that Williams served as attorney general from October 2022 until November 2025 under the ULP government, which consistently blocked both initiatives despite previous campaign promises. The NDP had advocated for the development fund for over fifteen years, facing strong opposition from former Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves who argued it would create duplication and accountability issues.

The development fund became a particular point of contention when opposition member Carlos James Leacock—now Deputy Prime Minister—accused the ULP of secretly implementing similar measures despite public denouncements. Leacock had previously vowed not to serve in any NDP government that failed to establish the fund.

Williams, who lost to NDP’s Nigel Stephenson by 1,266 votes, extended congratulations to his former opponent and offered to share his six-point development plan for South Leeward, emphasizing his commitment to national interest above partisan politics.

In a stunning political reversal, St. Vincent and the Grenadines has witnessed a dramatic shift in governance as the New Democratic Party (NDP) secured a decisive 14-1 victory over the previously dominant Unity Labour Party (ULP) in recent general elections. This electoral outcome marks the conclusion of Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves’ two-decade leadership and inaugurates the era of Prime Minister Godwin Friday.

The campaign period revealed sharply contrasting strategies between the competing parties. The NDP executed a policy-forward campaign emphasizing substantive proposals, while the ULP relied heavily on fear-mongering tactics, personal attacks against opposition leadership, and attempts to incite political violence. This approach ultimately backfired spectacularly, alienating even their traditional support base.

Beyond mere campaign missteps, the ULP’s defeat culminated from years of accumulating controversies. Their administration faced numerous allegations including systematic political victimization, COVID-19 vaccine mandate mishandling, and several high-profile sexual scandals involving party figures. These factors gradually eroded public trust in the long-governing party.

The election captured unprecedented regional attention, with diaspora Vincentians mounting vigorous get-out-the-vote initiatives and neighboring Caribbean nations closely monitoring the political drama. The contest earned recognition as the most captivating electoral event in the nation’s recent history, rivaled only by the landmark 2001 election that initially brought the ULP to power.

Journalist Christina Katrina Smith, drawing from her experience documenting Caribbean politics, observes the deeply entrenched tribal nature of Vincentian political culture. The pervasive ‘red versus yellow’ dichotomy has fractured communities, families, and workplaces, creating an environment where political neutrality becomes virtually impossible. Media outlets face automatic categorization based on perceived partisan leanings, complicating objective reporting.

The central question emerging from this political transition is whether genuine reconciliation can overcome generations of partisan division. While the NDP has pledged inclusive governance focused on elevating living standards and transcending partisan politics, opposition elements already express concerns about potential political victimization under the new administration.

This transformation represents more than a simple change in government—it offers a critical examination of Caribbean democracy’s nature and the dangers of unquestioning party allegiance. As the nation progresses beyond the Gonsalves era, the fundamental challenge remains: when will national interest finally supersede partisan loyalty in St. Vincent and the Grenadines?

In a significant judicial rebuke, the High Court has invalidated the controversial 2023 appointments of Deborah Charles as Clerk of the House of Assembly and Simone Williams-Huggins as Deputy Clerk. The ruling represents another legal setback for the recently ousted Unity Labour Party (ULP) administration.

Presiding Justice Cybelle Cenac-Dantes delivered the landmark judgment on Thursday, upholding Celena McDonald’s challenge against the Public Service Commission’s (PSC) appointment decisions. The court determined that the appointments were fundamentally unlawful, unreasonable, and procedurally flawed.

The judicial review revealed that the PSC acted unfairly and unlawfully by bypassing McDonald for the Clerk position while improperly selecting Williams-Huggins as Deputy Clerk instead of the qualified candidate. Crucially, the court found that the Commission violated established principles of selection and promotion, specifically Regulation 19 of the PSC Regulations.

Further compounding the procedural failures, the PSC neglected to advertise the vacant positions of Clerk and Deputy Clerk, thereby breaching Regulation 18 and undermining the fundamental principle of transparency in public service appointments.

The legal challenge, supported by the Public Service Union with representation from attorney Shirlan “Zita” Barnwell for McDonald, exposed the deeply politicized nature of the appointments. Charles, a former ULP senator and parliamentary secretary who had contested general elections in 2015 and 2020, assumed the Clerk role after Nicole Herbert’s retirement from public service.

The constitutional controversy emerged prominently during a July 13, 2023 parliamentary session when then-Opposition Leader Godwin Friday (now Prime Minister) raised substantive objections. Friday cited Constitutional Section 35, which explicitly designates the Clerk’s office as a non-partisan public service position, unlike the Speaker’s role which may accommodate partisan members.

Friday articulated profound concerns regarding Charles’ recent partisan history, noting that her transformation from active political combatant to impartial parliamentary official strained credibility. The opposition leader emphasized that the appointment would inevitably diminish trust in the Clerk’s office among opposition members and potentially compromise parliamentary functionality.

In response, then-Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves accused Friday of verbal abuse toward Charles and defended the appointments by citing historical precedents of politically active individuals assuming constitutional offices. This defense ultimately failed to persuade the judicial authorities.

The ruling continues a pattern of High Court decisions favoring the Public Service Union against the previous administration, highlighting systemic issues in governance during the ULP’s 25-year tenure.

Newly elected Prime Minister Godwin Friday has revealed a complete absence of communication with his predecessor, Ralph Gonsalves, since assuming office following the November 27 general elections. Speaking to journalists outside the Administrative Complex on Monday, PM Friday expressed hope that this silence would be broken to ensure governmental continuity despite their strained political relationship.

The communication breakdown dates back to August 2021 when Gonsalves sustained a head injury during protests in Kingstown. The former prime minister attributed this incident to then-Opposition Leader Friday, creating a rift that has persisted through the transition of power.

Emphasizing the institutional nature of governance, Friday articulated his philosophy of governmental continuity: “It’s not a reinvention when a new administration takes office. This is about passing the baton while maintaining the same fundamental responsibilities. We must move beyond perceived divisions between past and present administrations.”

The Prime Minister referenced historical precedent, noting that former Prime Minister Sir James Mitchell had engaged in transitional discussions with Gonsalves following the 2001 elections, particularly regarding critical issues like European Union seafood export bans.

This context gains significance as Gonsalves, now reduced to being the sole elected representative of his Unity Labour Party, recently announced he would assume the role of Opposition Leader. In his first post-election comments on Star Radio, Gonsalves expressed expectations for “the usual courtesies and privileges” afforded to former prime ministers.

In response to these remarks, PM Friday indicated he would treat the Opposition Leader’s office with constitutional respect rather than political favoritism: “The Office of the Leader of the Opposition isn’t a political party creation but a constitutional position requiring adequate resources and respect to function effectively within our governance structure.”