On this year’s observance of National Teachers’ Day in the United States, educator and social commentator Wayne Campbell has published an opinion piece challenging the hollow performative celebration of educators and calling for urgent, systemic action to address the collapsing status and working conditions of the teaching profession.
作者: admin
-

What VAT on digital services means for Grenadians
As the Caribbean island nation of Grenada moves closer to rolling out a formal Value Added Tax (VAT) regime for digital services, stakeholders across the business and consumer sectors are seeking clarity on how the new policy will reshape the local digital economy.
Digital services covered by this amendment span a wide range of widely used platforms, from video streaming giants like Netflix and music streaming service Spotify to business communication tools such as Zoom, and e-learning platforms like Coursera, along with global e-commerce offerings from providers including Amazon. Both individual consumers and local businesses rely on these services daily, making the tax change relevant to nearly all segments of Grenadian society.
Contrary to common misperception, the amendment does not introduce an entirely new tax on digital services. Under Grenada’s existing Value Added Tax Act, most services are already subject to VAT, with only specific exemptions outlined in Schedule IV of the legislation. What the new rule does is eliminate long-standing regulatory ambiguity by formally codifying how digital services should be taxed, bringing outdated tax law in line with the fast-growing modern digital economy.
For developing economies like Grenada, tax policy frequently struggles to keep pace with rapid technological innovation, creating compliance gaps that allow significant revenue to leak out of the local economy to foreign jurisdictions. The digital services sector has been one of the largest areas of this uncollected revenue, making targeted reform a logical and urgent policy priority. Capturing a share of revenue from this fast-expanding sector not only boosts government income but also helps anchor digital economic activity within Grenada’s domestic fiscal framework.
While the reform will inevitably lead to higher costs for some consumers and businesses, these changes need to be evaluated against the broader long-term economic benefits the policy is designed to deliver. For domestic digital service providers already operating and paying VAT within Grenada, the amendment will not bring major changes to their existing tax obligations. The most significant shifts apply to local businesses that purchase digital services from non-resident foreign providers: under the new rules, a reverse charge mechanism will be implemented, meaning the consuming business rather than the foreign supplier is responsible for remitting VAT. This will increase compliance burdens and operational costs for affected businesses, costs that may ultimately be passed through to end consumers.
Despite these near-term cost increases, the reform creates significant opportunities for the local digital sector by leveling the competitive playing field. Foreign digital providers currently hold an unfair price advantage over local providers because they do not collect VAT on their services. By eliminating this advantage, the policy is expected to encourage greater local innovation, attract new domestic investment, and support the expansion of Grenada’s homegrown digital services industry.
That said, the current draft of the legislation leaves a number of critical questions unaddressed that risk undermining the policy’s effectiveness. Most notably, the bill does not specify a dedicated VAT rate for digital services or set a revenue threshold for mandatory registration, creating avoidable regulatory uncertainty. This directly contradicts a core principle of sound tax policy: clear, predictable rules are a prerequisite for widespread compliance and smooth implementation.
Critics may argue that Grenada is moving forward with this reform too soon, but broader global trends show delaying action would carry greater risks. As national economies around the world become increasingly digitized, adopting clear tax frameworks for digital services has become a standard fiscal necessity. Without putting the appropriate regulatory structure in place now, Grenada risks falling behind international norms, allowing continued revenue leakage and forcing future policymakers to respond to crises rather than shaping the digital economy proactively.
Legitimate concerns raised by stakeholders cannot be dismissed, however. If the government sets an excessively high VAT rate for digital services, it could create incentives for the growth of unregulated underground activity, drive increased tax avoidance and even open the door to widespread tax evasion. To balance revenue goals and consumer protection, policymakers should consider a carefully calibrated, potentially reduced rate that minimizes the burden on end users while still meeting the policy’s core objectives.
Enforcement and monitoring capacity represent another major hurdle. Grenada already faces long-standing challenges in tracking and measuring service-based economic activity, particularly cross-border digital transactions. Without robust supporting infrastructure — including standardized government digital VAT invoicing systems and enhanced cross-border digital tracking tools — the amendment may fail to reach its full potential. This raises a critical unresolved question: does Grenada’s tax authority currently have the institutional capacity to effectively monitor and enforce compliance for cross-border digital services, or will the entire system rely mostly on unenforced taxpayer self-assessment?
Public awareness and education are also key to the reform’s success. Most Grenadian consumers and many small business owners already have limited understanding of existing VAT rules. Introducing the new amendment without a targeted public education campaign could lead to widespread misinformation, unintentional non-compliance, and unnecessary penalties for stakeholders who do not understand their new obligations — a particularly high risk for the complex reverse charge mechanism.
All consumers and businesses that purchase digital services from non-resident providers are advised to proactively familiarize themselves with the requirements of the reverse charge system, as non-compliance can lead to steep, avoidable fines and additional costs. It is also widely expected that local banks and other financial institutions will be called on to take a greater role in supporting compliance by tracking cross-border digital service payments.
Despite these open questions and challenges, the amendment delivers a key benefit by establishing clear formal rules for digital services, eliminating the regulatory uncertainty that has existed for decades. The proposed framework is broadly scoped and has the potential to be robust, but its ultimate success will hinge on effective implementation, strong enforcement, and the rapid adoption of supporting regulations to fill the gaps in the current draft.
Since the bill remains silent on critical details such as the minimum transaction value that requires provider VAT registration, analysts assume the general provisions of the existing VAT Act will apply to digital services by default. This default approach, however, could introduce unnecessary complexity into the new regime, and further legislative or administrative clarification will almost certainly be needed to clear up confusion.
As the policy continues to evolve through the implementation phase, sustained, inclusive dialogue between policymakers, local business associations, and consumer groups will be essential to ensure the final system is fair, effective, and responsive to the needs of all Grenadian stakeholders. This analysis was contributed by The Tax Experts. NOW Grenada does not take responsibility for contributor opinions and content, and invites reports of any abusive content.
-

Several buildings affected by another early morning fire in Roseau
Roseau, the capital city of Dominica, is grappling with its second devastating urban fire in less than three months after an early morning blaze on Wednesday, May 6, tore through a cluster of downtown structures along Great Marlborough Street and Upper Lane. Deputy Fire Chief Matthew Prosper confirmed that the inferno destroyed between eight and nine local buildings, counting several high-profile commercial and professional properties among the losses. Affected sites include the law offices of local attorney Joshua Francis, the multi-use French Connection Building, and the popular local eatery Family Restaurant, alongside other smaller businesses. Prosper emphasized that the blaze has left a stark financial and community void, calling the destruction a major loss for the entire Roseau area.
In a public statement posted to his social media channels shortly after the fire broke out, Francis shared his shock at the damage to his practice. “This morning I was alarmed that HAJ LAW offices, my offices—two floors—were compromised by fire,” Francis wrote, adding that formal damage assessments would be conducted once authorities clear the site for inspection. As of Wednesday afternoon, official investigations into the cause and origin of the latest blaze remain ongoing.
This incident comes on the heels of a separate large-scale fire that rocked Roseau’s commercial district just two months prior, on Monday, March 2, 2026. That earlier blaze on King George IV Street also destroyed multiple businesses and forced the permanent closure of one of the country’s most prominent pharmacies. Deputy Chief Prosper confirmed the 2026 March fire damaged Jolly’s Pharmacy, the adjacent Fitness University gym, a local retail store operated by Chinese owners, and a neighborhood bar. Despite the extensive damage from that incident, Prosper publicly commended responding fire crews for their rapid, effective action, which stopped the fire from spreading to adjacent blocks and prevented even greater destruction. “The fire officers did a very, very good job in confining the fire,” Prosper told local outlet DBS Radio in comments following the March incident. Even with the successful containment, Prosper warned at the time that the total financial impact of that first blaze on the city’s business community would be substantial.
-

Escazú in the Caribbean: Turning commitments into action
By Michelle Brathwaite, Regional Representative of the UN Human Rights Office for the Caribbean Community
In April 2024, The Bahamas etched its name into regional environmental governance history as it welcomed delegates and stakeholders from across Latin America and the Caribbean for the fourth Conference of the Parties (COP4) to the Escazú Agreement. This gathering marked the very first time the landmark treaty’s official conference has been hosted in the Caribbean, a timing that could not be more critical for a small island region that finds itself on the unenviable front lines of three converging crises: accelerating climate change, catastrophic biodiversity decline, and rapidly growing unsustainable development pressures.
The Escazú Agreement stands as a defining regional pact that enshrines three core environmental rights: guaranteed access to environmental information, meaningful public participation in environmental decision-making, and fair access to justice for communities harmed by environmental harm. At its foundation, the treaty addresses critical questions: how are environmental and development decisions made, which communities get a seat at the table, and how are human rights protected when economic development and ecological protection intersect. For small island and coastal Caribbean states, where natural ecosystems are uniquely fragile and local communities rely directly on marine, coastal and terrestrial resources for their livelihoods and survival, these foundational principles are non-negotiable for long-term sustainable development.
Of the 19 nations across the Americas that have fully ratified the agreement to date, half are Caribbean countries: Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, St Kitts and Nevis, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines, and Trinidad and Tobago. This broad regional participation reflects a growing, shared commitment across the Caribbean to upholding transparency, inclusive participation, institutional accountability, and targeted protection for environmental human rights defenders. Brathwaite called on the remaining Caribbean nations that have not yet ratified or joined the agreement to follow the lead of these 10 states and commit to its binding principles.
The urgency of full regional adoption and implementation of the Escazú Agreement is impossible to ignore. Climate change is supercharging the intensity of tropical storms, expanding the reach of coastal flooding, and driving steady, irreversible sea-level rise that threatens to displace entire coastal communities across the region. Ongoing biodiversity collapse undermines the Caribbean’s most critical economic sectors — tourism and fisheries — eroding food security and pushing thousands of vulnerable livelihoods to the brink. At the same time, demand for large-scale development projects continues to grow, and the policy choices made today will shape whether the region’s development trajectory builds community resilience and inclusive growth, or deepens systemic inequality and irreversible ecological damage.
These pressing challenges took center stage at an official side event hosted by the UN Human Rights Office for the Caribbean alongside the main COP4 negotiations. Speakers from civil society, the private sector, government, and Indigenous and local community groups held open discussions about the binding human rights obligations of national governments and the shared environmental responsibilities of private companies operating in the region. A single clear consensus emerged from these talks: any community that will be affected by an environmental or development decision must receive early, full information about the project and have the opportunity to contribute meaningfully to the final decision.
This requirement is not only a binding international human rights obligation — it is also proven sound policy. When frontline communities are excluded from decision-making, infrastructure and development projects often face widespread public resistance, costly delays, and permanent erosion of public trust in government and industry. When inclusive participation is genuine and occurs early in the planning process, final policy and project decisions are stronger, environmental and social risks are better anticipated and managed, and long-term outcomes are far more economically and ecologically sustainable. Even with this clear consensus, significant implementation barriers remain: broader public education and awareness are still needed across the region to inform communities, governments, and businesses of the protections and opportunities the Escazú Agreement provides.
One of the treaty’s most groundbreaking provisions is Article 9, which establishes binding protections for environmental human rights defenders. Across the Caribbean, individual activists and local community groups work tirelessly to protect critical ecosystems and defend the rights of frontline communities, often operating with very limited financial and institutional support and facing significant personal risk. Intimidation, harassment and reprisals against activists who raise legitimate environmental concerns directly violate international human rights law, run counter to the binding commitments Caribbean governments have made under the Escazú Agreement, and erode the core principles of inclusive participation and public trust that COP4 participants reaffirmed during the conference.
Brathwaite emphasized that regional governments must take immediate action to ensure environmental and human rights defenders can carry out their critical work safely, free from intimidation and violence. Similarly, private companies operating across the Caribbean have a responsibility to ensure that their operations — whether directly or through suppliers and partners in their global value chains — do not contribute to threats, criminalization, or retaliation against activists who raise environmental concerns.
The UN Human Rights Office for the Caribbean remains fully committed to supporting regional governments as they implement the agreement, offering targeted capacity-building programming and expert technical assistance on upholding access to environmental information, expanding meaningful public participation, guaranteeing access to environmental justice, and integrating human rights-centered approaches into all national environmental action.
Hosting COP4 in The Bahamas served as a powerful reminder to the global community that the Caribbean is far more than a region defined by climate vulnerability: it is a leading voice in global environmental governance and human rights-centered climate action. With sustained cross-regional cooperation and unwavering political will, the Escazú Agreement can help the Caribbean deliver on its vision of inclusive, participatory development that protects the fundamental human right to a healthy environment for current and future generations.
*Disclaimer: NOW Grenada is not responsible for the opinions, statements or media content presented by contributors. In case of abuse, click here to report.*
-

Headless, mutilated body found
A week-long search for a missing community member in the quiet coastal community of Icacos took a tragic turn on Thursday, when a multi-agency search team recovered a dismembered body from the area’s dense wetland swamps. The search operation, which brought together volunteer hunters and specialized police units, was launched after 50-year-old Indar Rampersad, a local coconut picker who had lived alone in the area for years, was reported vanished after neighbors had not seen him for nearly seven days.
The grim discovery was the result of coordinated efforts between the volunteer Hunters Search and Rescue Team, headed by veteran search coordinator Vallence Rambharat, and three specialized police divisions: the police Air Support Unit, the South Western Division Task Force, and local Cedros Police officers. According to official police briefings, the recovered body was found with its head severed from the torso. The victim was found shirtless and barefoot, and the corpse had been deliberately concealed under a layer of freshly cut grass before being located by searchers.
Shortly after the body was located at approximately 2:00 p.m. local time, Rambharat confirmed the find in a public social media post timestamped 2:03 p.m., noting that the body was uncovered during the active search for Rampersad. Law enforcement officials moved quickly to contact Rampersad’s next of kin following the discovery, and are now working with family members to complete a formal positive identification of the remains.
When reached for comment by local outlet the Express Thursday evening, an anonymous member of Rampersad’s family shared new details about the missing man’s life in Icacos. The relative confirmed that Rampersad was officially reported missing to police Monday evening, after local residents grew concerned when he failed to appear at his regular coconut selling route. A well-known figure in the small community, Rampersad made his living harvesting coconuts that local buyers would purchase to process into coconut oil, and neighbors began asking after him when he stopped showing up to sell his stock.
The relative explained that Rampersad lived a solitary life, residing alone in an abandoned property near the local district health centre. He never married and had no children, and was the only person currently reported missing from the Icacos community. He also shared identifying markers that will help investigators confirm whether the body found is that of Rampersad: the missing man has no tattoos, lacks an official birth certificate, and lost one of his fingers in a decades-old boat accident, when the digit was crushed and severed during a work outing.
Commenting on the details of the discovery, the relative noted that the black long pants and black belt found on the body matched clothing that Rampersad regularly wore. Echoing the police description of the scene, he added that the location of the find was a remote Icacos swamp, and the concealment of the body under cut grass suggests foul play. “Somebody kill (the person) because they say the body cover down with grass,” the relative told the Express.
As of Thursday evening, investigators from the Homicide Bureau of Investigations Region Three have taken over the case. Officials have not yet confirmed a potential motive for the killing, and many key details of the disappearance and death remain unconfirmed as the formal identification process and crime scene investigation move forward.





