Paraguay zet afzettingsprocedure tegen president Peña voort na bankcrisis

On November 5, 2026, sitting Paraguayan President Santiago Peña made a surprise public announcement in Asunción that he would step down from his post, framing the decision as a voluntary measure to preserve national stability, safeguard social peace, and protect the country’s democratic institutional framework. He also issued a formal apology to the Paraguayan public for any shortcomings during his presidential tenure, delivering the statement just hours before the national legislature was scheduled to open formal debates on a pending impeachment motion against him.

Peña’s bid to exit office immediately was swiftly rejected by Paraguay’s bicameral Congress, which voted unanimously to press ahead with the full impeachment process instead of accepting his voluntary resignation. The lower Chamber of Deputies passed the motion with a historic 78-0 unanimous vote, while the Senate also formally approved moving the proceedings forward, scheduling a mandatory appearance for Peña to testify before the upper legislative chamber on November 6. A previously scheduled joint session of both houses that was meant to vote on formal acceptance of Peña’s resignation failed to reach the required quorum after members of his own ruling Colorado Party walked out en masse, leaving the body unable to ratify his departure from office.

The political crisis that triggered the entire sequence of events traces back to the sudden collapse of Ueno Bank, Paraguay’s major digital financial institution that served roughly 3 million customers – nearly half of the country’s 6.5 million total population – and held approximately $850 million in public funds, including resources from government agencies, pension schemes, and public health funds. A regulatory audit by Paraguay’s central bank uncovered severe, systemic irregularities at the lender: high-risk, improperly approved loans to firms linked directly to the bank’s owners, and falsified accounting that incorrectly logged non-qualifying expenses as formal assets. After the central bank adjusted Ueno’s books to reflect real figures, the institution’s actual equity was found to be less than 50% of the legally mandated minimum capital requirement, prompting regulators to seize control of the bank and initiate formal liquidation proceedings. The collapse left millions of ordinary customers temporarily locked out of their savings accounts, payment services, and routine banking access, with retired pensioners who received their benefits via Ueno hit particularly hard by the disruption.

Allegations against Peña center on accusations of insufficient regulatory oversight of Ueno and potential conflict of interest, stemming from his previously undisclosed shareholdings in Grupo Vázquez, the parent holding company that owned Ueno Bank. Peña has repeatedly denied any unlawful conduct, stating that he fully divested all his shares in the group back in March 2025 and had no direct operational involvement in the digital bank’s management. Critics and investigators, however, argue that improper, unvetted placements of public and pension funds into Ueno occurred under Peña’s watch, and that government regulatory bodies may have deliberately suppressed information about the bank’s mounting problems long before its collapse became public.

Peña’s political standing had already been severely eroded in the weeks leading up to his attempted resignation, as dozens of influential figures within his own Colorado Party withdrew their public support. Even former president Horacio Cartes, one of the most powerful kingpins within the ruling party, publicly endorsed impeachment, arguing that the party could not tolerate the loss of public, private, and pensioner funds tied to the bank’s failure.

Paraguay’s attorney general has formally opened three separate criminal investigations, focused on regulatory supervision failures over Ueno, the mismanagement of the bank’s collapse, and the questionable placement of public funds into the institution. Peña has publicly committed to full cooperation with all ongoing probes. A critical detail at stake in the impeachment process is Peña’s potential eligibility for a lifetime senate seat, a constitutional privilege granted to former Paraguayan presidents that comes with robust legal immunity from prosecution; if he is convicted via impeachment, he will lose access to this status and its associated protections, leaving him fully exposed to potential criminal charges filed by public prosecutors.

To mitigate public harm from the bank’s collapse, the Paraguayan government has rolled out emergency measures to accelerate reimbursement for affected depositors, activating a national deposit guarantee scheme that will process claims within five working days, with maximum coverage of roughly $36,000 per account holder. Central bank officials confirm that this threshold will cover 100% of the account balances for approximately 97% of Ueno’s former customers. Parallel criminal probes targeting Ueno’s leadership have already resulted in 27 bank executives and associated parties facing formal charges including breach of fiduciary duty and attempted fraud; a judge has ordered six top executives, including bank founder Miguel Vázquez and president Juan Manuel Gustale, to be held in pre-trial detention, while two other senior figures have been placed under house arrest.