A significant development has emerged in the ongoing investigation into the 2014 assassination of State Prosecutor Dana Seetahal, with defense attorney Criston J. Williams asserting that Minister of Defense Wayne Sturge’s parliamentary statement about prior police intelligence was accurate. Williams contends that law enforcement agencies received advanced warnings about a credible threat against Seetahal’s life before her May 2014 murder but failed to take adequate protective measures.
Williams, representing murder accused Rajaee Ali, has presented compelling evidence through correspondence with former Police Commissioner Erla Harewood-Christopher and Director of Public Prosecutions Roger Gaspard. In these December 2024 letters, Williams detailed how the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service (TTPS) and its affiliated agencies were alerted by the Strategic Services Agency (SSA) about the impending danger to Seetahal’s life. Despite this intelligence, the TTPS allegedly neglected to deploy available resources that could have prevented the tragic outcome.
The defense attorney further challenges the integrity of the digital evidence presented against his client, highlighting concerns about potential manipulation of metadata obtained through the Interception of Communications Act. Williams has simultaneously questioned the thoroughness of the investigation, suggesting alternative theories including possible involvement of transnational drug organizations. He references statements from former Commissioner Gary Griffith and US Assistant Secretary of State William Brownfield indicating DEA collaboration in the investigation and potential connections to drug trafficking networks using Caribbean transit routes.
The TTPS has declined Freedom of Information Act requests for comprehensive evidence disclosure, citing concerns about prejudicing ongoing court proceedings. Similarly, the DPP’s office has remained unresponsive to Williams’ inquiries about alternative investigation avenues, prompting judicial intervention to address these transparency concerns. Williams emphasizes that while sensitive information requires protection, states must maintain transparency regarding investigative procedures and findings to ensure accountability and prevent impunity.