Dominica Bar Association reaffirms confidence in CCJ after leaked emails reveal internal contention

A growing regional controversy sparked by the unauthorized leak of confidential internal judicial correspondence has prompted the Dominica Bar Association (DBA) to publicly reaffirm its unwavering confidence in the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), the Caribbean’s apex regional judicial body.

The controversy erupted in August, when private communications between CCJ President Justice Winston Anderson and other sitting judges were leaked to the public. The documents exposed long-simmering internal disagreements over a range of administrative issues, including a proposed revision to the court’s judicial dress code and broader institutional operating practices. Beyond procedural debates, the correspondence included formal allegations questioning Anderson’s management of judicial panel assignments and other core court governance functions. The situation intensified after Jamaica’s Nationwide Radio published remarks attributed to Trinidadian Justice Peter Jamadar, who was quoted describing the court’s internal working environment as “increasingly toxic.”

In response to the allegations, Justice Anderson has issued a formal rejection of all claims, while strongly condemning the breach of court confidentiality that allowed private communications to enter the public sphere. Following the leak, multiple leading regional legal organizations—including the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) Bar Association and the Organisation of Commonwealth Caribbean Bar Associations (OCCBA)—have publicly called for full, independent investigations into both the security breach that enabled the leak and the substantive concerns raised in the disclosed correspondence, according to reporting from the Guyana Chronicle.

Against this tense regional backdrop, the DBA released a detailed public statement addressed to the people of Dominica aiming to ease growing public uncertainty about the court’s integrity. In the statement, the association emphasized that internal administrative disagreements among judicial officers do not equate to a systemic failure of the CCJ’s core judicial function, and doubled down on its longstanding support for the regional court.

The DBA acknowledged that the leak and subsequent reporting have naturally sparked concern, skepticism, and uncertainty among the Dominican public and across the Caribbean. It framed the internal friction exposed by the leak as a normal feature of large human institutions, rather than a sign of irreversible structural collapse. “Conflict and disagreement are integral to human institutions. Robust internal debates, far from being a sign of structural failure, are an essential component of growth and, at times, self-correction,” the statement read.

The association also noted that the unauthorized disclosure of uncontextualized confidential communications is deeply regrettable, as it often fuels unsubstantiated speculation and sensationalized media coverage that distorts public understanding. It stressed that despite the administrative disagreements, the CCJ remains fully committed to its core mandate of delivering impartial, independent justice, and that the court’s commitment to the rule of law remains untarnished.

Dominica is one of the founding pioneering nations that acceded to the CCJ’s appellate jurisdiction in fulfillment of regional treaty obligations, and the DBA highlighted the court’s 20-plus year track record of delivering internationally respected jurisprudence across the Caribbean. “A leaked administrative challenge in over twenty years of distinguished operation does not dismantle a legacy built on legal brilliance, accessibility, and uncompromising fairness,” the statement added.

Joining regional legal bodies in calling for accountability, the DBA outlined three core priorities moving forward: first, it backs the OCCBA’s call for thorough investigations into the court’s data security protocols and internal administrative practices to strengthen transparency and prevent future breaches; second, it commits to expanding public legal education initiatives for Dominican citizens to demystify court operations and build long-term public trust; third, it reaffirms the legal community’s role as independent guardians of the court’s transparency and institutional independence.

Concluding the statement, the DBA emphasized that the CCJ is a Caribbean-created institution built on the sovereign will of regional nations. It urged the Dominican public to look past sensationalized media coverage, and reaffirmed that the court remains fully capable, independent, and steadfast in its commitment to serving Caribbean communities.