A prominent Trinidadian businessman and his wife have hit a legal roadblock in their bid to secure release from police custody, after the High Court dismissed their habeas corpus application earlier this week, amid an ongoing investigation into allegations of conspiracy to commit murder.
The case centers on Dominic Hadeed, a well-known local businessman, and his spouse Genevieve Hadeed, who were taken into police custody following the execution of court-approved search warrants at multiple properties linked to the couple, carried out by officers from the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service’s Special Branch. Issued on June 24 by Master Valene Guerra-Abraham under Section 5 of the 2011 Administration of Justice (Indictable Proceedings) Act, the search warrants explicitly authorized law enforcement to seize and forensically examine a broad spectrum of electronic devices and stored digital data tied to the conspiracy probe.
The investigation itself is being conducted under Section 5(a) of the Offences Against the Person Act, Chapter 11:08, which criminalizes conspiracy to commit murder as an indictable offence. Separate warrants for each spouse laid out the specific locations to be searched: Genevieve Hadeed’s properties at #2 Orange Grove Estate in Trincity and #47 Western Circle in Westmoorings, while Dominic Hadeed’s locations were #1-3 Golden Grove Road in Piarco and #23 Pine Avenue, Bayshore in Westmoorings, plus the Blue Waters offices in Orange Grove. Officers were granted permission to enter the premises at any time, seize all relevant devices, extract stored data, and submit the collected evidence to the High Court for review.
Per the terms of the warrants, police were authorized to seize every type of digital device, including smartphones, laptops, tablets, external hard drives, portable flash drives, and physical paper documents. The scope of the data extraction covered all potentially relevant information: communication logs, stored messages, photographs, voice notes, audio and video recordings, closed-circuit television footage, text messages, GPS location history, and application-specific data. A handwritten inventory attached to subsequent court documents confirms law enforcement seized a range of devices, including multiple Apple iPhones, Samsung handsets, Apple laptops, iPads, a Dell Latitude laptop, multiple flash drives, and a full computer processing unit from the searched locations.
Representing the couple, senior counsel Faris Al-Rawi filed the habeas corpus application with the High Court, attaching copies of the executed search warrants to his supporting affidavit. Al-Rawi’s core legal argument centered on the claim that the Hadeeds were arrested during the execution of standard search warrants tied directly to the conspiracy to murder investigation, not under the 2026 Emergency Powers Regulations. He contended that the police’s subsequent use of emergency powers to extend the couple’s detention was legally invalid. “The Applicants were not arrested or detained under Regulation 13(1) of the Emergency Powers Regulations, 2026, nor under those Regulations at all. They were arrested in the execution of ordinary search warrants in respect of the offence of conspiracy to murder, which is not an offence against the said Regulations. The only basis advanced by the Respondent for the continued detention of the Applicants appears to be the Emergency Powers Regulations, which do not apply to the Applicants,” Al-Rawi stated in his affidavit.
After hearing initial arguments, Justice Frank Seepersad ruled to dismiss the habeas corpus application seeking immediate release of the couple from custody. However, the judge issued a formal directive to Police Commissioner Allister Guevarro to deliver official clarification on whether the Hadeeds are currently being held under a Preventive Detention Order (PDO). The next stage of the legal proceeding has been scheduled for a virtual hearing to be held at 9 a.m. the following day, as the court works to resolve the dispute over the lawfulness of the couple’s detention.