标签： Trinidad and Tobago

In a sharply critical New Year’s address, Movement for Social Justice (MSJ) political leader David Abdulah delivered a sweeping condemnation of Trinidad and Tobago’s two dominant political parties, accusing both the ruling United National Congress (UNC) and opposition People’s National Movement (PNM) of fundamental governance failures.

Abdulah characterized 2025 as a historically significant year marked by consequential elections in both Trinidad and Tobago and the United States. He expressed deep concern about the international political climate, particularly referencing Donald Trump’s return to power and the subsequent Project 2025 initiative, which he described as promoting “an ultra right-wing agenda rooted in white supremacy and the aggressive rewriting of historical narratives through executive overreach.”

The MSJ leader elaborated on global implications, stating this agenda represents “imperialism on steroids” characterized by resource exploitation tactics, unilateral tariff impositions contravening WTO regulations, visa revocation threats, illegal sanctions, and the resurgence of gunboat diplomacy.

Domestically, Abdulah presented a detailed electoral analysis, noting that the PNM suffered a catastrophic collapse in public support during the April general election. The party’s vote count plummeted by over 100,000 ballots from 322,180 in 2020 to merely 220,160 in 2025. He attributed this dramatic rejection to the PNM’s alleged arrogance in governance, its adherence to neoliberal economic policies that disproportionately favored the wealthy, and specific controversial actions including the closure of Petrotrin refinery and mass worker retrenchments.

While acknowledging the UNC’s electoral victory under Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s leadership, Abdulah highlighted concerning democratic metrics. Despite securing 26 of 41 parliamentary seats (68% representation), the UNC coalition garnered only 350,734 votes representing approximately 30% of electoral support amid a record-low 54% voter turnout—the poorest participation rate since the 1971 ‘No Vote’ campaign.

The opposition leader criticized the new government for exhibiting concerning tendencies reminiscent of its predecessor, citing Prime Minister Persad-Bissessar’s characterization of Trinidad as “a lawless dump” and abrupt reversals of longstanding foreign policy positions. While acknowledging some positive developments including stakeholder consultations on scrap iron regulations, refinery restart committees, and settled wage negotiations, Abdulah noted troubling patterns of insufficient consultation with maxi-taxi associations and Carnival stakeholders, and what he termed “a new manifestation of prime ministerial power.”

Abdulah concluded that neither major party demonstrates capacity for the fundamental transformation required—a shift from top-down governance to participatory democracy and economic reconstruction that benefits all citizens rather than select elites. He called for emergence of a new mass movement capable of challenging the status quo, citing growing civic engagement around peace vigils, Palestinian solidarity, and global liberation movements as promising indicators of potential change.

A disturbing housing controversy has emerged in Trinidad following revelations that squatters attempted to occupy a government-subsidized home weeks before the legitimate owners were scheduled to receive their keys. The incident occurred at a Housing Development Corporation (HDC) townhouse in Riverside South, Corinth, near San Fernando, where a family with children had already made substantial payments toward the property.

The concerned couple, who have chosen to remain anonymous, filed an official police report on December 29 after being alerted that unauthorized individuals were inside their designated home and preparing to move in. This development has sparked a significant political confrontation regarding housing policy and property rights under the current administration.

Housing Minister David Lee initially responded to the situation on December 31, stating he would investigate the matter through HDC channels. However, the incident quickly escalated into a broader political debate when former housing minister Camille Robinson-Regis revealed that following the April 28 general election, the HDC had implemented a policy to ‘regularize squatters currently occupying HDC properties without permission.’

Robinson-Regis condemned this approach as fundamentally flawed, arguing that it represents governmental laziness and a problematic shortcut to addressing housing shortages. She highlighted the contradiction in government simultaneously condemning lawlessness while officially sanctioning illegal occupation of state properties.

The former minister connected this policy to Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s recent characterization of Trinidad and Tobago as ‘a lawless dump’ during her defense of increased traffic fines. Robinson-Regis also referenced previous instances of political interference in housing matters, noting that Oropouche East MP Dr. Roodal Moonilal, now Energy Minister, had previously called for HDC to halt evictions by claiming those being removed were political targets of the PNM.

The controversy raises serious questions about ministerial oversight at HDC and whether current housing policies maintain the necessary standards of fairness, transparency, and respect for the rule of law that should govern public housing distribution.

In a dramatic escalation of legal tensions, attorneys representing businessman Danny Guerra have issued an ultimatum to Trinidad and Tobago’s state of emergency review tribunal, demanding a ruling on his preventive detention by 4 PM on January 2nd. The legal team warned that tribunal members should resign if they fail to comply, threatening immediate emergency relief proceedings in the High Court.

In a sharply worded January 1st letter addressed to the tribunal and copied to Chief Justice Ivor Archie, lead attorney Nerisa Bala delivered a scathing indictment of the tribunal’s performance. She accused the body of fundamentally failing its constitutional mandate to protect liberty during emergencies and presiding over procedural delays that constitute arbitrary detention.

The constitutional crisis stems from Guerra’s November 20, 2025 detention under emergency powers. Despite invoking his right to review under Regulation 5 of the Emergency Powers Regulations on November 27th, the process has been marred by multiple procedural failures according to the legal filing.

Bala detailed a pattern of institutional breakdown: the hearing was scheduled nearly three weeks after filing, violating constitutional due process requirements. When Guerra’s original counsel became unavailable, the tribunal denied rescheduling requests without explanation, forcing last-minute legal representation changes. Most significantly, the Minister of Homeland Security failed to meet the mandatory seven-day deadline for providing detention grounds, with the tribunal taking no enforcement action.

The procedural irregularities continued during proceedings. Defense submissions weren’t provided to the tribunal chairman beforehand, necessitating adjournment. Despite previous non-compliance, the minister’s counsel received six additional days to respond while Guerra remained detained. As of January 1st, nine days had passed since final submissions without determination.

Bala emphasized the constitutional stakes: ‘The framers understood emergency powers posed real liberty risks, hence creating an independent tribunal to review detentions. This tribunal has failed that mandate spectacularly.’ She argued the delays ‘undermine public confidence in justice administration during emergency.’

Guerra faces allegations of leading an organized crime group involved in arms trafficking, money laundering, and illegal quarrying. A detention order signed by Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander also references an alleged plot to assassinate a government minister.

The current state of emergency, declared on July 18th and extended twice, is scheduled to end in January. This case tests the balance between emergency powers and fundamental rights, with the legal team asserting the tribunal’s actions have ’emptied the right to liberty of any content.’

The Tobago People’s Party (TPP) has launched a comprehensive strategic roadmap for the island’s development, presenting both a four-year action plan and a visionary 20-year framework extending to 2045. Party leader Farley Augustine unveiled the blueprint during a January 1st event at Uptown Fascinators Pan Theatre in Scarborough, characterizing it as a people-centered approach to governance.

The plan outlines ambitious digital transformation goals, targeting 70% efficiency for the Tobago House of Assembly (THA) by 2035 and 95% by 2045 through comprehensive digitization of government systems. Augustine emphasized the critical need to reduce transaction times and shift Tobago’s business landscape toward digital operations, noting that cash-only businesses are limiting their growth potential.

Economic objectives include establishing a minimum wage of $5,500 by 2027 and implementing minimum five-year contracts for “10 days” workers. The TPP aims to achieve a GDP per capita of US$10,000 by 2035 and US$20,000 by 2045, primarily through public-private partnerships.

Tourism represents a cornerstone of the development strategy, with targets of 6% economic contribution by 2030 and 8% by 2035. Augustine called for a 25% increase in long-stay visitors by 2030 and 60% growth in short-stay visitors by 2035, highlighting the need for at least 1,500 four-star or five-star hotel rooms on the island. The party is currently engaging with luxury hotel chains including Marriott and Hilton while emphasizing community tourism, eco-tourism, and sports tourism—all while maintaining environmental protections and opposing beach privatization.

Food security initiatives include $100,000 grant funding for farmers aged 35 and younger, while infrastructure development will receive $600 million in annual investment for road improvements, including specific projects at Darrel Spring boardwalk, Turpin Bend, and a new transit hub in Scarborough.

Augustine contrasted the TPP’s detailed blueprint with the PNM’s “Big Bold Red Deal,” asserting that his party provides concrete implementation strategies rather than mere objectives. The plan specifically addresses job creation with targeted sectors identified for generating over 8,000 employment opportunities.

The blueprint framework encompasses five strategic areas: overall development philosophy, social contract, strategic policy agenda, grand vision and priorities, and implementation logic. Augustine described the document as essential reading for all stakeholders—from engineers to construction workers—emphasizing that everyone must work from the same plan to build “a brighter Tobago where every child has the opportunity to self-actualize.”

In a blistering condemnation of current leadership, Opposition Senator Dr. Amery Browne has characterized Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar as the most deficient leader in Trinidad and Tobago’s political history. During a December 30 press conference at the Opposition Leader’s Office in Port of Spain, Browne asserted that no previous administration has experienced such rapid public disengagement within its first eight months.

Browne presented a comparative analysis of Persad-Bissessar’s current performance against her predecessors, including former prime ministers ANR Robinson, Patrick Manning, Dr. Keith Rowley, UNC founder Basdeo Panday, and Dr. Eric Williams. He maintained that even during their most challenging periods, these leaders provided superior governance to what the nation currently experiences.

The senator particularly criticized the Prime Minister’s diplomatic approach, noting that her administration has diminished Trinidad and Tobago’s international standing through unprecedented attacks against Caribbean Community (Caricom) partners and other regional heads of state. Browne highlighted concerning patterns of government ministers employing deplorable language and launching personal attacks against family members of foreign leaders, describing these developments as a significant deterioration of diplomatic standards.

Addressing communication deficiencies, Browne revealed that the Opposition Leader has repeatedly requested the Prime Minister to articulate her governmental vision and policy directions through proper channels. Instead, Persad-Bissessar has predominantly relied on social media platforms, selective WhatsApp communications, and irregular responses to individual journalists rather than conducting structured press conferences.

The senator questioned the Prime Minister’s pre-election promise that citizens would find themselves ‘in a happier place’ within six months of her administration. He contrasted her communication style with that of former Prime Minister Dr. Keith Rowley, who faced criticism for conducting excessive but regular media engagements.

Browne further challenged Persad-Bissessar’s description of Trinidad and Tobago as a ‘lawless dump’ populated by people of ‘sub-par intelligence,’ warning that governance through insult and innuendo inevitably alienates the population. He noted that the current administration has experienced the most rapid loss of public support in the nation’s history.

The senator also expressed concern about the international repercussions of the Prime Minister’s rhetoric, noting that Trinidad and Tobago nationals occupying senior positions throughout the Caribbean region experience professional unease and trepidation when their leader attacks regional partners, potentially affecting their careers and family stability.