标签： Saint Lucia

The Micoud South constituency, traditionally a bastion of the United Workers Party (UWP), is set to witness a fiercely contested general election as the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) unveils its latest candidate, Dr. Shanda Harracksingh. A medical professional and native of Micoud, Harracksingh was officially introduced on October 5, 2025, at the Micoud Playing Field. The event reportedly drew one of the largest crowds in the SLP’s recent history, signaling a potential shift in voter sentiment. Harracksingh faces a formidable opponent in Allen Chastanet, the UWP’s political leader and current Member of Parliament for the constituency. Since 1997, Micoud South has remained under UWP control, largely due to the enduring legacy of the late Sir John Compton. In her inaugural address, Harracksingh acknowledged the challenges ahead but emphasized the need for change. She criticized Chastanet for his prolonged absence from the constituency, declaring, “We have given him several chances. It is time to turn the page. No more excuses. It is time for change.” Harracksingh outlined her vision for the constituency, focusing on elderly care, agricultural development, and infrastructure improvements. She pledged to establish an elderly care center, enhance road access for farmers, and promote agro-processing initiatives. “I am a daughter of the soil,” she asserted, “and I will deliver for this community.” As the election season heats up, Micoud South emerges as a critical battleground, testing whether voters will remain loyal to the UWP or embrace the SLP’s message of renewal.

Over the past 28 years, the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) has held power for 18 years, yet the nation’s progress remains stunted. Critical sectors such as infrastructure, agriculture, tourism, healthcare, and national security have languished under SLP’s governance. The southern region, in particular, has been systematically neglected, perpetuating poverty and dependency. SLP’s reliance on short-term handouts, exemplified by the failed Youth Economy initiative, has left the youth disillusioned and without sustainable opportunities. In contrast, the United Workers Party (UWP) governed for only ten years, a period marked by unprecedented challenges. From Hurricane Dean in 2007 to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, UWP navigated multiple crises while maintaining economic stability, paying salaries, and ensuring the continuity of essential services. Under UWP’s leadership, significant infrastructure projects, including the development of road networks, were realized, fostering commerce and tourism. UWP’s 20/20 Vision Plan emphasized systemic empowerment across agriculture, education, and infrastructure, contrasting sharply with SLP’s focus on temporary fixes. The record is clear: SLP’s prolonged governance has yielded minimal progress and growing insecurity, while UWP’s tenure, despite adversity, delivered tangible development and hope for Saint Lucia’s future.

The ongoing discourse on free movement within the Caribbean has intensified, with Barbados and three other nations spearheading efforts toward full implementation. However, this ambitious initiative raises critical questions about whether the process aligns with its lofty promises. The journey toward regional integration began in 1965 with the establishment of the Caribbean Free Trade Association (CARIFTA), aimed at fostering economic ties by reducing trade barriers. This evolved into the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) in 1973, formalized by the Treaty of Chaguaramas, which sought deeper integration across labor, services, capital, and policy coordination. The CARICOM Single Market and Economy (CSME), introduced in 2001, further advanced these goals by enabling the free movement of skilled workers and businesses across member states. Despite these strides, the CSME’s implementation, now 24 years old, remains fraught with inefficiencies. While CSME travelers can enter partner countries without work permits, their passports are stamped to prohibit employment, forcing many to navigate lengthy regularization processes. One applicant reported spending over four weeks securing necessary documentation, during which they were unable to earn income or contribute to the host country’s economy. These delays not only burden travelers but also deprive recipient countries of immediate economic benefits. Challenges extend beyond employment, with difficulties in transferring funds and accessing essential services further complicating regional integration. To address these issues, experts suggest conducting surveys of early travelers to identify pain points and inform policy adjustments. Additionally, establishing a centralized communication system between countries could enhance transparency and coordination. Streamlining subsidiary processes, such as bank account creation and insurance registration, would also alleviate the hardships of inter-island travel. With thoughtful planning and execution, the free movement initiative can achieve its potential, fostering greater regional unity and prosperity.

As geopolitical tensions between the United States and Venezuela intensify, Caribbean nations, led by Saint Lucia, are rallying for dialogue and reaffirming the region’s status as a ‘Zone of Peace.’ During his address at the United Nations General Assembly, Saint Lucia’s External Affairs Minister, Alva Baptiste, emphasized the importance of diplomacy and peaceful resolution of conflicts, particularly referencing the 2014 declaration by Latin American and Caribbean leaders that established the region as a peace zone under the principles of the UN Charter. Baptiste expressed concern over the escalating tensions between Venezuela and the US, urging both nations to avoid violence. He also highlighted the need for a peaceful resolution to the Venezuela-Guyana border dispute and called for an end to the US embargo on Cuba. Additionally, Baptiste underscored the role of small nations in advocating for non-violent diplomacy and addressing regional crises, such as the ongoing turmoil in Haiti. CARICOM leaders, including Barbados’ Prime Minister Mia Mottley and St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves, echoed these sentiments, warning against unilateral militarization and stressing the importance of regional stability. Meanwhile, Trinidad and Tobago’s Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar offered conditional support for US military operations in the Caribbean, citing a reduction in crime as a positive outcome. Back in Saint Lucia, Police Commissioner Verne Garde emphasized the importance of strengthening border security to combat illegal trafficking, while maintaining regional collaboration with neighboring nations. The collective call for peace comes amid recent confrontations between the US and Venezuela, including accusations of illegal incursions and military strikes in the Caribbean Sea.

The Israeli government has officially confirmed the signing of the first phase of a ceasefire agreement with Hamas, marking a significant step toward ending the prolonged conflict in Gaza. The war, which has claimed the lives of over 67,000 Palestinians over two years, has seen intense negotiations culminating in this pivotal deal. The agreement was finalized in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, on the morning of October 9, following three days of rigorous discussions, as reported by Israeli government spokesperson Shosh Bedrosian. This initial phase aligns with U.S. President Donald Trump’s 20-point plan to resolve the conflict. Key provisions include the release of the remaining Israeli captives in Gaza—20 of whom are believed to be alive—within 72 hours, in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. Additionally, Israel is required to withdraw its troops to a mutually agreed-upon line. The ceasefire is set to take effect 24 hours after Israel’s Cabinet ratifies the agreement, expected later this evening. Once the 24-hour period concludes, the 72-hour window for the captives’ release will commence. However, the Israeli spokesperson clarified that Palestinian leader Marwan Barghouti will not be part of the prisoner exchange, a decision likely to provoke discontent among Palestinians. Furthermore, Israel will retain control over more than half of Gaza despite the troop withdrawal stipulated in the deal.