标签： Cuba

In a significant political transition for the Gaza Strip, a newly established committee of Palestinian technocrats has commenced its governance duties, marking the imminent dissolution of the Hamas-led administration. Nabil Shaath, a prominent figure in this transition, outlined the government’s strategic vision during an exclusive interview with Cairo News Channel from the Egyptian capital.

Shaath detailed that the foundational blueprint for Gaza’s recovery is the comprehensive Egyptian reconstruction project, which received formal approval at an Arab summit convened last year. He emphasized the committee’s legitimate mandate, stating, ‘Our committee is entirely Palestinian, elected by its people and its national forces with the primary objective of achieving a decent life for the populace as rapidly as possible.’

A central pillar of the new governance framework is the establishment of lasting peace. Shaath explicitly articulated this commitment, noting, ‘We are profoundly interested in implementing measures that ensure wars do not return to the Gaza Strip or the wider Arab region.’ This objective is deemed critical given the extensive human cost of the recent conflict, which has resulted in the deaths of more than 71,000 Palestinians according to the statements made.

Addressing the profound societal disruption, Shaath affirmed an immediate and critical priority: the return of Gazan children to formal education. He highlighted that these children have endured an two-year interruption in their schooling due to the prolonged war, a situation the new governing body is determined to rectify urgently. This shift in governance represents a pivotal new phase for the territory, focusing on stabilization, large-scale revitalization, and the restoration of normalcy for its inhabitants.

In a significant political development, senior Palestinian leader Fattouh has formally endorsed a newly established body, expressing his full support and commitment to its success. The announcement positions this entity as a unifying force, receiving backing from across the entire spectrum of Palestinian political factions and parties.

The composition of the body is notably technocratic, drawing specialists from diverse sectors to address the complex challenges facing Palestinian governance. This move occurs alongside the critical transition into the second phase of a ceasefire agreement in the Gaza Strip, a development welcomed by the Palestinian National Council (PNC) chairman despite ongoing daily Israeli military strikes in the region.

Emphasizing the geopolitical indispensability of Gaza, Fattouh declared the territory an inseparable component of a future Palestinian state, asserting that no just political resolution to the conflict can be achieved without its inclusion. This stance was echoed by Hamas, the governing authority in Gaza since 2007, which characterized the formation of the new body as a pivotal step toward solidifying the fragile ceasefire and averting a return to the devastating hostilities. The conflict has resulted in a catastrophic humanitarian toll, with over 71,000 fatalities reported in Gaza.

In a significant diplomatic development, Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto and Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani have articulated Rome’s nuanced position on Arctic geopolitics following a high-level meeting at Villa Madama. While explicitly affirming Italy’s recognition of Danish sovereignty over Greenland, the government simultaneously declared its opposition to deploying Italian troops to the region in response to escalating tensions.

The cornerstone of Italy’s approach is a comprehensive strategic framework focused on security cooperation, scientific research, and sustainable development in the High North. Originally formulated in 2025, this policy document has undergone substantial revisions, expanding by approximately fifty pages to address emerging challenges. Official statements cited growing concerns over Washington’s perceived territorial ambitions regarding Greenland, characterizing these developments as a “clear threat” to regional stability.

This updated assessment directly informs Italy’s decision to abstain from participating in “Arctic Resistance,” a Danish-proposed military operation designed to counter potential American maneuvers. Despite several European allies, notably France, pledging support for this initiative, Rome maintains that its contributions will align strictly with its multilateral obligations within NATO and the European Union.

The Italian government emphasizes that Arctic stability constitutes a fundamental component of broader European security architecture and directly impacts the Atlantic Alliance’s strategic interests. Consequently, Italy intends to pursue a calibrated approach—enhancing defensive capabilities through diplomatic channels and research partnerships while avoiding direct military entanglements that could exacerbate tensions.

In a significant strategic maneuver, approximately fifteen French military personnel have been deployed to Danish territory, a region increasingly viewed as the critical Arctic gateway and a zone abundant with natural resources. This initial deployment represents the vanguard of a broader military commitment, with French President Emmanuel Macron pledging to augment this presence imminently through additional naval, air, and land assets.

The operation, though currently low-profile, is integrated within the broader European ‘Arctic Endurance’ mission, which is formally scheduled to conclude shortly. Downplaying the significance of the initial troop numbers, Alice Rufo, the French Minister Delegate for Veterans Affairs and second-in-command at the Ministry of Defense, emphasized the strategic message over mere numerical strength. In a public statement on Franceinfo, Rufo articulated that the core objective is the ‘effect produced’ during such exercises, clarifying that France’s intent is not to intimidate but to unequivocally demonstrate its resolve and commitment to safeguarding European interests in a region of growing importance.

This European mobilization occurs against a backdrop of renewed and heightened geopolitical interest in the Arctic. The deployment can be interpreted as a direct response to escalating pressures from other global powers. Notably, since his return to the White House, U.S. President Donald Trump has aggressively prioritized the acquisition of Greenland, a vast island territory of Denmark. To advance this ambition, the Trump administration has recently intensified its rhetoric, citing a spectrum of justifications that include perceived strategic threats from China and Russia in the region, as well as underscoring vital U.S. national security interests, such as maintaining early warning systems for potential missile threats.

The Spanish government has declared a position of deliberate caution regarding the potential acquisition of Greenland by the United States, opting to withhold a definitive stance until a comprehensive European assessment is complete. Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares, in televised remarks, emphasized that Madrid’s official response is contingent upon achieving a “well-defined understanding of the situation” through ongoing coordination with fellow European nations.

Minister Albares highlighted that the prevailing sentiment among Greenland’s population is a desire to maintain its current sovereign status under Denmark, with a transfer of sovereignty to the U.S. not being a considered option. This aligns with prior comments from Spanish Defense Minister Margarita Robles, who similarly urged prudence while confirming the matter remains under active evaluation by authorities.

Acknowledging the broader continental concern, Albares confirmed a series of diplomatic engagements are already underway. Spain is actively consulting with European partners to exchange intelligence and align perspectives on the geopolitical implications of U.S. President Donald Trump’s openly stated ambitions to acquire Greenland, which he has suggested could occur “one way or another,” including by purchase or force.

European capitals are reportedly viewing these developments with significant apprehension. The potential annexation of a vast Arctic territory from a NATO ally is perceived as a move that could fundamentally alter the strategic balance and integrity of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in its present form. Albares concluded that once all critical information is synthesized from these multilateral discussions, Spain and its partners will proceed with making concrete diplomatic decisions.

Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel delivered a forceful condemnation of United States foreign policy during commemorations honoring 32 Venezuelan combatants killed in recent conflicts. Speaking before the Anti-Imperialist Tribune, the head of state characterized recent US actions as confirmation of imperialism’s predatory nature.

The president articulated that Cuba’s anti-imperialist stance emerged not by default but as a direct response to imperialist aggression. “The Cuban people are not anti-imperialist by default; imperialism made us anti-imperialist,” Díaz-Canel stated before the assembled audience.

He further predicted that such actions would galvanize global opposition, noting that violations of international norms would inevitably push the world toward anti-imperialist positions. The Cuban leader emphasized the critical importance of national unity, drawing historical parallels between solidarity and political victory.

“All the victories of the Cuban people are associated with the strength of unity,” Díaz-Canel reflected. “Historical patterns demonstrate that division led to defeat while unity consistently produced triumph.” The president cautioned that external adversaries recognize this dynamic and actively seek to disrupt Cuban solidarity through various means.

Díaz-Canel characterized current US threats as consistent with longstanding policies advocated by American “war hawks” across multiple administrations, suggesting a persistent pattern of aggression that transcends individual US presidential terms.

Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani has publicly endorsed Oman’s diplomatic initiatives aimed at de-escalating tensions between Iran and the United States. This endorsement followed a detailed phone briefing from Omani officials regarding their recent high-level discussions in Tehran with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.

Minister Tajani formally expressed Italy’s appreciation for Oman’s mediating role in the ongoing regional crisis, emphasizing Rome’s support for continued diplomatic efforts. The Italian government specifically hopes these mediation channels will facilitate broader dialogue addressing critical issues, including Iran’s nuclear program, ultimately contributing to enhanced regional security and stability.

In response to the volatile security environment, Minister Tajani convened an urgent meeting in Rome with key security officials. This included Italy’s Ambassador to Tehran, regional diplomatic mission heads, and representatives from the Defense Ministry and intelligence agencies. The high-level briefing focused on implementing comprehensive monitoring of the rapidly evolving security situation across the Middle East.

A primary outcome of the meeting was the reaffirmation of citizen safety as Italy’s utmost priority. Italian officials reiterated previous advisories urging all nationals to evacuate Iran immediately due to mounting security concerns. The discussions also addressed operational security for approximately 900 Italian military personnel stationed throughout the region, including significant deployments in Iraq (500 troops) and Kuwait (400 troops). Precautionary defense measures have been activated to ensure their protection amid rising instability.

The current crisis stems from widespread protests that erupted in Iran’s Grand Bazaar on December 28, which resulted in numerous casualties. Iranian authorities maintain that these demonstrations are externally orchestrated, specifically accusing the United States and Israel of instigating the unrest.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry has issued a stern warning regarding Japan’s evolving security posture, expressing grave concerns over its potential impact on regional stability. Spokesperson Guo Jiakun articulated Beijing’s position that international cooperation must not compromise peace in the Asia-Pacific region.

Citing historical precedents, Guo invoked Japan’s wartime atrocities during World War II, specifically referencing the invasion of the Philippines, crimes committed against civilian populations and Allied forces, and the assassination of Chinese diplomatic personnel. The spokesperson emphasized the critical importance of remembering this history to prevent the repetition of such transgressions.

Guo further noted that Japan’s current security policies have drawn consistent criticism from Southeast Asian nations and the broader international community. Contrary to exercising restraint, Tokyo is actively pursuing military expansion and engaging in lethal weapons exports, actions that Beijing interprets as clear indicators of remilitarization efforts.

The Chinese spokesperson called upon peace-loving nations to collectively oppose the resurgence of Japanese militarism, positioning this stance as essential for maintaining regional stability and upholding the post-war international order. The statement reflects growing tensions in East Asia as Japan continues to reinterpret its security constraints amid increasing geopolitical challenges.