标签： Cuba

A coalition of international voices has sharply criticized what they characterize as an unprecedented interventionist escalation by the United States government against Venezuela’s leadership. The coordinated response follows reports of operations targeting Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores, which multiple organizations have denounced as an illegal kidnapping attempt designed to destabilize the legitimately constituted government of the Bolivarian Republic.

Central to the condemnation is the assertion that these actions represent an extrajudicial application of force that undermines international norms. The movement argues that Washington’s operations seek to effectively decapitate Venezuela’s democratic institutions through means that circumvent established legal frameworks.

Amid the widespread criticism, Salvadoran legislator Claudia Ortiz of the center-right Vamos party offered a more nuanced perspective. While not defending the Maduro government, Ortiz questioned the methodological implications of such operations, emphasizing that “the challenge for the region is not only to combat organized crime, but to do so without making the exception the rule or weakening the rule of law.” The parliamentarian, quoted extensively in El Mundo, further expressed concerns about the United States exercising power without democratic constraints, warning that “without active institutions, no democracy can withstand the pressure” of such approaches.

The political condemnation has been amplified by social and popular movements across El Salvador. Multiple labor unions have aligned with statements from the World Federation of Trade Unions, which contends that Washington’s true objective centers on gaining control over Venezuela’s substantial oil reserves. This economic interpretation of geopolitical motives has gained traction among critical voices.

Adding to the chorus of disapproval, three significant organizations—the Antifascist International El Salvador Chapter, the Operation Solidarity Network, and Mission Miracle—have jointly reaffirmed their rejection of the operations against Venezuela’s leadership. These groups have characterized the actions as violations of national sovereignty that establish dangerous precedents for international relations in the Western Hemisphere.

A prominent Chinese Latin America specialist has condemned recent United States actions against Venezuela’s leadership as a violation of international legal standards that establishes a concerning historical precedent. Dr. Sun Yanfeng, Director of the Institute of Latin American Studies at the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, characterized Washington’s operation as another instance of the U.S. elevating its domestic legislation above established international law.

In an exclusive interview with The Paper, Dr. Sun criticized the American justification for the action, noting that the U.S. relied solely on its own judicial orders and narcotics trafficking allegations under domestic statutes without presenting internationally verifiable evidence. The analyst emphasized that fundamental principles of international relations—specifically the sovereign equality of nations and the prohibition against interference in internal affairs—explicitly forbid the extraterritorial application of national laws against sitting heads of state.

The expert drew parallels to a historically significant event from 1989, when United States military forces invaded Panama and apprehended its leader on similar drug-related charges. Dr. Sun described this earlier intervention as establishing a ‘dangerous precedent’ that now appears to be repeating itself in the Venezuelan context.

Beyond the surface-level narcotics enforcement narrative, Dr. Sun identified broader geopolitical motivations behind Washington’s actions. He asserted that the operation serves strategic American objectives aimed at diminishing Venezuela’s influence as a regional actor that frequently opposes U.S. policies while maintaining close diplomatic and economic ties with both China and Russia.

This development represents what the analyst considers the first direct U.S. intervention in Latin America during the 21st century, occurring shortly after the implementation of Washington’s newly updated national security strategy. The timing suggests a potential shift in American foreign policy approach toward the region that could have significant implications for international relations and regional stability.

In a firm declaration of diplomatic principles, Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) has articulated its unwavering stance on Venezuela’s political sovereignty amid growing international tensions. Party spokesman Omer Celik utilized social media platform X to communicate the AKP’s position, emphasizing that political sovereignty resides exclusively with the Venezuelan people and that his party rejects any initiatives compromising state sovereignty.

Celik’s statement established that the AKP’s approach to Venezuelan affairs is fundamentally grounded in respect for international legal frameworks and the democratic will of populations. The spokesman recalled that both Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the AKP have consistently championed legitimate state sovereignty and territorial integrity as cornerstone principles of their political philosophy and international engagements.

The declaration comes in response to recent developments that saw the Venezuelan government issue a formal statement on Saturday condemning what it characterized as US aggression aimed at appropriating the country’s strategic natural resources, including its substantial petroleum reserves and mineral wealth. Caracas asserted that these actions represent a deliberate campaign to undermine Venezuela’s political autonomy and economic independence.

Venezuela’s government simultaneously announced its reserved right to employ legitimate self-defense measures to protect its citizens, territorial boundaries, and national independence. The South American nation additionally called for international solidarity in condemning what it perceives as foreign aggression, seeking broader global support against external pressure campaigns.

The AKP’s reaffirmation of these principles signals Turkey’s continuing commitment to a foreign policy that prioritizes state sovereignty above geopolitical alignments, maintaining consistency with Ankara’s historical positions on international law and non-interventionist principles.

The Chinese government has issued a forceful condemnation of United States military operations in Venezuela, characterizing Washington’s actions as a severe breach of international legal standards and fundamental principles governing international relations. In an official statement released through its Foreign Ministry, Beijing expressed profound consternation regarding what it termed ‘reckless use of force’ against the sovereign nation of Venezuela and its leadership.

The diplomatic communiqué emphasized China’s deep concern over the reported detention and coerced deportation of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his spouse, demanding immediate guarantees for their physical security and personal wellbeing. The Asian nation further called for the prompt and unconditional release of the Venezuelan head of state and his wife.

Beijing’s position maintains that such military interventions directly contravene the established purposes and principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter. The Chinese statement characterized American conduct as ‘hegemonic behavior’ that not only infringes upon Venezuela’s national sovereignty but also potentially destabilizes regional peace and security throughout Latin America and the Caribbean.

China has urged the United States to pursue resolution of bilateral differences with Venezuela exclusively through diplomatic channels and peaceful negotiations rather than military confrontation. The escalating situation has attracted concentrated attention from international media outlets, with extensive coverage of the developments unfolding in the South American nation where sovereignty violations and executive kidnapping allegations have created diplomatic upheaval.

Spanish legal and political organizations have issued strong condemnations of U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent actions regarding Venezuela, characterizing them as violations of established international legal frameworks. The Progressive Union of Prosecutors (UPF) formally expressed deep concern over Trump’s Venezuela policies, asserting they represent a fundamental breach of international law standards.

Igor Zulaika, Head of Politics and International Relations for the Basque political party EH Bildu, escalated the criticism by accusing Trump of actively seeking to ‘destroy international law’ following Saturday’s military action in Venezuela. Zulaika further warned of potential intervention risks in European politics, specifically suggesting Trump might attempt to influence upcoming European elections in favor of far-right movements.

The diplomatic tensions manifested locally in Bilbao, where demonstrators gathered outside the Venezuelan Consulate shortly before Zulaika’s statements. The Basque representative characterized Trump’s actions as implementing an ‘imperialist plan’ against Venezuela’s sovereignty.

Glenna del Valle Cabello, Venezuelan Consul in Bilbao, responded to the escalating situation by calling for nationwide mobilization to counter what she described as ‘imperianist aggression’ against her country.

Broad political consensus against Trump’s Venezuela policy emerged across Spain’s left-wing political spectrum. The United Left, Podemos, and Sumar parties joined major labor unions including Workers’ Commissions and UGT in condemning both the reported kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, and the White House’s announcement regarding overseeing Venezuela’s democratic transition. The coordinated statements reflect deepening European concerns about U.S. foreign policy approaches in Latin America.

In a significant diplomatic development, South Korean President Lee is scheduled to undertake his first state visit to China in nearly nine years from January 4-7. The landmark trip follows the recent bilateral summit held in Gyeongju just two months ago, signaling a renewed commitment to enhanced cooperation between the two Asian nations.

The official itinerary includes high-level talks with Chinese leadership in Beijing during the initial phase of the visit (January 4-6), followed by engagements in Shanghai on January 6-7. According to diplomatic sources from Seoul, the agenda encompasses comprehensive discussions on multiple fronts including supply chain collaboration, investment opportunities, digital economy initiatives, environmental cooperation, and joint efforts against transnational criminal activities. Several memoranda of understanding are anticipated to be signed during the visit.

South Korean officials emphasized that the primary objective of this diplomatic mission is to reinforce the strategic partnership framework and establish more robust political dialogue channels between the two countries. The timing of the visit holds particular historical significance as it coincides with commemorative events honoring Kim Gu’s 150th birthday and the centenary of the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea’s establishment. President Lee’s itinerary includes a symbolic visit to the former site of the Korean Provisional Government in Shanghai, underscoring the historical connections between the two nations.

This state visit represents a crucial step in revitalizing diplomatic relations and addressing mutual concerns while exploring new avenues for economic and strategic collaboration in the region.

In a striking condemnation of US foreign policy, prominent Dominican theologian and intellectual Frei Betto has characterized American interventions in Latin America as “imperialist terrorism” and “crimes against humanity.” During an exclusive interview with Prensa Latina, the renowned author of “Fidel and Religion” delivered a comprehensive critique of historical US involvement in regional regime changes.

Betto articulated that such aggressive actions constitute severe violations of sovereignty and independence across Latin American and Caribbean nations. The intellectual provided a detailed historical account of American-backed operations that resulted in the deposition, disappearance, or death of democratically elected leaders throughout the region.

The theologian cited numerous case studies, beginning with Jacobo Árbenz, Guatemala’s democratically elected president who was overthrown in a 1954 coup orchestrated by the White House. Árbenz subsequently died under suspicious circumstances—officially recorded as accidental drowning—during his exile in 1971.

Betto further documented a pattern of interventionism, noting that in the same year as the Guatemala coup, the United States facilitated the establishment of a military dictatorship in Paraguay. This was followed by systematic dismantling of democratic institutions across the continent: Brazil (1964), Argentina (1966 and 1976), Bolivia (1966 and 1971), Uruguay, and most notably Chile in 1973.

The analysis extended to include the cases of Chilean President Salvador Allende, Panama’s progressive leader Omar Torrijos, and Maurice Bishop, the elected prime minister of Grenada in 1979. Concluding his assessment with a powerful declaration of solidarity, Betto exclaimed: “Long live the people of Venezuela!”

In a significant diplomatic exchange, Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev has conveyed formal congratulations to Cuban leadership commemorating Liberation Day, the Caribbean nation’s pivotal national holiday. Through an official message transmitted via Prensa Latina news agency, Mirziyoyev articulated heartfelt felicitations to both President Miguel Díaz-Canel and the Cuban populace, underscoring the deepening rapport between the two governments.

The Central Asian leader expressed unwavering confidence that ‘practical cooperation ties between our nations will persistently broaden, advancing the mutual interests of our amicable peoples.’ This statement signals a deliberate commitment to fortify international partnerships beyond traditional geopolitical blocs.

Mirziyoyev specifically emphasized collaborative initiatives designed to elevate the comprehensive partnership into a new developmental phase. The strategic enhancement encompasses multiple sectors including economic collaboration, agricultural modernization, public health coordination, and cultural-humanitarian engagement. This multidimensional approach reflects contemporary diplomatic trends favoring diversified bilateral cooperation.

Concluding his diplomatic correspondence, the Uzbek head of state extended personal wishes for President Díaz-Canel’s wellbeing and professional success in governing responsibilities. The message culminated with aspirations for Cuba’s peaceful development and national prosperity, symbolizing the cordial nature of inter-state relations despite geographical separation.

In a significant escalation of border security measures, Colombia’s Administrative Department of the Presidency (DAPRE) has announced the deployment of 30,000 military personnel to its frontier with Venezuela. The decision emerged from high-level governmental meetings where Director Angie Rodriguez outlined a comprehensive strategy addressing both humanitarian and security concerns.

The substantial military mobilization, described as part of a ‘comprehensive and coordinated response plan,’ will prioritize regions deemed critically vulnerable. The Armed Forces have been placed on high alert status to address potential security challenges while safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Concurrently, the Colombian government is implementing preventative measures aligned with its ‘Lasting Solutions for Victims’ public policy framework. This initiative involves resource allocation and preparation of comprehensive support systems for Colombian communities affected by border region migration dynamics.

Of particular significance is the government’s consideration of declaring an Economic Emergency to address potential impacts from regional migration patterns. Such a declaration would provide exceptional tools enabling swift and efficient response mechanisms to the evolving situation.

The official statement concluded with expressions of unanimous support for President Gustavo Petro and firm rejection of what it characterized as unfounded accusations against the administration.