标签： Cuba

The United States’ recent threats against Venezuela represent a disturbing repetition of historical patterns of imperial aggression across Latin America. This contemporary geopolitical crisis evokes painful memories of December 20, 1989, when US forces invaded Panama, resulting in civilian casualties in El Chorrillo neighborhoods, widespread bombings, and the eventual capture of Manuel Noriega.

The current justification for intervention follows familiar pretexts, with threatening rhetoric extending beyond Venezuela’s borders to encompass all of “Our America”—a term encompassing Latin American nations. The US government continues to arrogate itself the right to violate sovereign nations and kidnap foreign leaders while flouting international law, despite generating global protests and mixed international reactions.

Historical parallels abound. Simón Bolívar’s prophetic warning that the United States appeared “destined by Providence to plague America with misery in the name of freedom” resonates profoundly today. The current administration’s triumphalist rhetoric promising “freedom” through military intervention echoes previous justifications used against Iraq, Syria, and Libya—nations targeted for their resources by what the author characterizes as a “decadent and desperate empire.”

Particularly troubling are statements from certain Venezuelan and Cuban expatriates who celebrate aggression against their homelands or eagerly anticipate similar military actions against Cuba. Many of these individuals reside either in their countries of origin or within the United States itself, displaying what the author condemns as shameful annexationist desires.

The article invokes José Martí’s 1889 “Madre América” speech, delivered before the Pan-American Conference in New York, where he addressed Latin American immigrants living in the United States. Martí urged these communities to maintain pride in their heritage and serve their nations despite geographical displacement, warning against assimilationist tendencies and the naive belief that the US would generously bestow freedom and wealth upon Latin America.

Martí recognized two types of expatriates: those who coldly transfer allegiance to their new country while secretly wiping away “the last drops of mother’s milk,” and those who proudly maintain ties to their origins. From the latter, the author demands rejection of aggression, respect for sovereignty, protection of families, and resistance against economic or residency pressures that might compel them to betray their homelands.

The piece concludes that saving Venezuela equates to saving all of Latin America, humanity, and the principles of peace, sovereignty, and justice for all peoples threatened by imperial domination.

In a solemn demonstration of solidarity, Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez led senior government officials in signing the Condolence Book at the Venezuelan Embassy in Havana on Tuesday, honoring those who perished defending Venezuela’s sovereignty. The ceremony, which began on January 9th, has drawn numerous Cuban authorities, diplomats, and citizens paying respects to the fallen.

President Díaz-Canel’s inscription captured the revolutionary spirit that binds the two nations: ‘Honor and glory to our heroes. Fatherland or Death! We shall overcome! Always onward to victory!’ His message expressed profound grief and outrage over what he described as ‘the vile and criminal attack on sister Venezuela’ resulting in the abduction of President Nicolás Maduro Moros and First Lady Cilia Flores.

The Cuban leader delivered a revolutionary eulogy, extending ‘genuine and heartfelt condolences’ to both Venezuelan citizens and the 32 Cuban combatants who sacrificed their lives. He framed their sacrifice as a defense not only of Venezuela but of Cuba and the broader Latin American-Caribbean region.

Díaz-Canel explicitly invoked the legacy of foundational figures, declaring renewed loyalty ‘to the legacy of our heroes, Fidel and Chávez’ in confronting ‘threats from the Yankee empire.’ The ceremony featured unanimous expressions of fraternity from Cuba’s highest leadership, including National Assembly President Esteban Lazo Hernández, Prime Minister Manuel Marrero Cruz, and Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla.

The event underscored the deep institutional ties between the two nations, with attendance from Emilio Lozada García of the Central Committee’s International Relations Department and Venezuelan Ambassador to Cuba Orlando Maneiro Gaspar.

HAVANA – Cuba commenced solemn ceremonies on Thursday to honor 32 military personnel reportedly killed during what authorities describe as a “criminal attack” by the United States against Venezuela. The remains arrived at José Martí International Airport where an official military reception was held.

The procession traveled along Rancho Boyeros Avenue to the Ministry of the Revolutionary Armed Forces headquarters, with citizens lining the route to pay respects to the fallen combatants. Starting at 10:00 a.m., the public was permitted access to view the remains at the ministry building.

Additional commemorative events are scheduled throughout the country. On Friday morning, Havana residents will gather at the José Martí Anti-Imperialist Tribune to initiate the “March of the Fighting People,” symbolizing national solidarity. Simultaneous tribute ceremonies will occur in all provincial capitals at 9:00 a.m., followed by burials in local pantheons for fallen defenders at 4:00 p.m.

The Cuban government has declared 2026 as the “Year of the Centennial of Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro Ruz,” adding historical significance to the ceremonies. Official statements honored the soldiers as heroes who fell defending Venezuela’s Bolivarian Republic, though the United States government has not officially commented on the alleged incident.

The coordinated national observances represent one of Cuba’s most significant military commemorations in recent years, highlighting ongoing geopolitical tensions in the region.

Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez has categorically stated that his government maintains no diplomatic negotiations with United States authorities beyond technical discussions regarding migration matters. The First Secretary of Cuba’s Communist Party Central Committee made these declarations through official channels on January 13, 2026.

President Díaz-Canel clarified that while Cuba remains open to substantive dialogue with successive U.S. administrations, including the current government, such discussions must be grounded in specific principles. These include mutual respect for sovereign equality, adherence to international law standards, reciprocal benefits without internal interference, and unequivocal recognition of Cuban independence.

The Cuban leader presented a detailed critique of the longstanding economic embargo, characterizing it as an extreme and continuously tightening policy fundamentally disconnected from the Cuban diaspora population in the United States. He attributed migration patterns primarily to the failed U.S. policy approach and special provisions within the Cuban Adjustment Act.

Díaz-Canel further asserted that Cuban-Americans have become victims of shifting migration policies and what he termed ‘the betrayal of Miami politicians.’ Despite these tensions, the president emphasized Cuba’s continued compliance with existing bilateral migration agreements.

Historical context indicates, according to the president, that sustainable progress in Cuba-U.S. relations requires foundation in international legal frameworks rather than strategies of hostility, economic coercion, or political threats. The statements represent Cuba’s most recent positioning regarding the complex bilateral relationship with its northern neighbor.

In a significant escalation of geopolitical tensions, the United States administration has issued a stark ultimatum to Cuba amid broader regional instability following recent military operations against Venezuela. President Donald Trump has employed inflammatory language suggesting military action as a probable option, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio presented Havana with a political demand: either transition to what he termed a “real economy” and alter its political system, or face intensified blockade measures and unprecedented pressure.

This aggressive posture represents a dramatic departure from diplomatic norms, with Washington employing tactics including threats against sovereign nations, presidential kidnappings, and military interventions that fundamentally undermine established international relations frameworks. The administration appears to have abandoned conventional diplomatic pretenses, openly acknowledging its intention to economically strangle the Cuban people rather than maintaining previous rhetoric about democracy and human rights.

Historical parallels emerge to the Reagan era, when similar threats were met with resolve by Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro, who advocated unwavering firmness as the only appropriate response. Contemporary Cuban leadership appears to be embracing this same philosophy, indicating they will confront, resist, and ultimately defeat whatever challenges the U.S. imposes across any domain of conflict.

Analysts suggest these aggressive maneuvers may reflect desperation from a declining power attempting to reassert hegemonic control through fear amid internal domestic crises, potentially pushing global stability to the brink.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has reaffirmed her nation’s longstanding diplomatic relationship with Cuba, emphasizing that bilateral ties transcend political party affiliations in both countries. The statement came during a press engagement where Sheinbaum addressed questions regarding potential oil shipments to Cuba and broader geopolitical dynamics.

President Sheinbaum highlighted that Mexico consistently opposed the United States’ economic blockade against Cuba from its inception, establishing a historical precedent for diplomatic solidarity. “The Mexico-Cuba relationship is historic,” Sheinbaum stated on December 22. “Mexico was the only country that opposed the blockade imposed by the United States from the outset. Therefore, regardless of the political party in power, there has always been a Mexico-Cuba relationship.”

The comments followed Sheinbaum’s recent telephone discussion with former US President Donald Trump, wherein the Republican figure announced intentions to initiate ground operations against cartels. This development occurs against a backdrop of escalating US aggression toward Venezuela and continued threats against Cuba and other nations.

Sheinbaum elaborated on the multidimensional cooperation between Mexico and Cuba, citing energy collaboration and frequent diplomatic exchanges spanning decades. These interactions have persisted irrespective of changing political leadership in Washington, demonstrating the resilience and continuity of Mexico-Cuba relations despite external pressures.

The Mexican leader’s remarks directly addressed inquiries about sustaining oil exports to Cuba, which continues to endure a comprehensive economic, commercial, and financial embargo imposed by Washington over sixty years ago. Experts universally recognize this embargo as the primary impediment to Cuba’s economic development and international integration.

A prominent international solidarity movement has issued a forceful condemnation of United States policies toward Cuba, characterizing recent US government declarations as “fascist” attempts to undermine Cuban self-determination. The organization expressed unwavering support for Cuba’s sovereignty and endorsed calls by Cuban intellectuals and artists to resist perceived threats from Washington.

The movement specifically endorsed the Cuban Chapter of the Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Humanity’s position regarding escalating tensions between the two nations. In its comprehensive statement, the group reaffirmed its steadfast commitment to defending Cuba’s sovereign rights and national integrity.

Beyond mere condemnation, the movement issued a broad mobilization appeal to Colombian civil society, urging social organizations, labor unions, artistic communities, student groups, and the general public to unite in defense of Cuba. The solidarity platform specifically acknowledged gratitude for Cuba’s “tireless struggle to achieve peace” in Colombia, highlighting the island nation’s historical role in regional conflict resolution.

The statement concluded with a historical reference to Cuban revolutionary leader Fidel Castro, whose centennial year is currently being commemorated. Invoking Castro’s “absolute conviction and faith in victory,” the movement drew inspiration from Cuba’s 1961 victory at the Bay of Pigs (known as Giron in Cuba) as motivation to resist what it termed “the barbarity that surrounds us.”

This development follows earlier condemnation from Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel, who characterized recent US government statements as immoral. Responding to remarks attributed to former US President Donald Trump, Diaz-Canel questioned America’s moral authority to criticize Cuba, asserting that “those who turn everything into a business, even human lives, have no moral authority to point the finger at Cuba in any way.” The Cuban leader reaffirmed his nation’s readiness to defend itself against external pressure.

A Cuban publication has issued a stark warning against what it characterizes as imperialist and fascist tendencies within the United States government, asserting that these developments represent a grave threat rather than isolated extremist rhetoric. The analysis presents a comprehensive indictment of current U.S. foreign policy under the Trump administration, drawing direct historical parallels to fascist regimes.

The publication contends that recent evidence demonstrates the American government, facing multiple domestic crises including the Epstein scandal, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) controversies, and declining international credibility, is adopting Hitler-like tactics to divert attention from internal problems. This strategic shift occurs against the backdrop of what the article identifies as the irreversible emergence of a multipolar world order.

Emphasizing Cuba’s sovereign rights, the text accuses the Trump administration and Senator Marco Rubio of consistently disregarding established international legal frameworks. The article further develops its critique through an extended metaphor, comparing U.S. imperialism to a ‘predatory dog’ that attacks with ‘brutal rage’ at the slightest perception of weakness in other nations.

From this perspective, the publication argues that American foreign policy treats populations in developing nations and economically disadvantaged communities as expendable assets in geopolitical calculations. In response to what it terms the current administration’s ‘genocidal and aggressive course,’ the Cuban chapter of the Network in Defense of Humanity (REDH) has issued a mobilization call. The organization urges intellectuals, artists, and social movements worldwide to unite in solidarity and strengthen defensive alliances to protect national sovereignty against perceived American aggression.

The international literary community has rallied behind Venezuela following what prominent writers describe as an unlawful U.S. intervention resulting in the abduction of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores. A powerful declaration endorsed by Venezuelan intellectuals condemns the operation that precipitated significant human casualties and material devastation.

This coordinated statement, backed by the World Poetry Movement, emphasizes the global poetry community’s firsthand experience with Venezuela’s peaceful and democratic character. The document celebrates Venezuela’s participatory democracy framework, anchored by a constitution ratified through overwhelming popular mandate in 1999. It highlights the nation’s robust electoral systems and recently revitalized community participation mechanisms as evidence of its democratic legitimacy.

The author categorically refutes ideological justifications for foreign aggression, identifying economic motives—specifically Venezuela’s substantial natural resource wealth—as the true driver behind international stigmatization. The statement contextualizes current hostilities within a historical pattern of external interference affecting Venezuelan leaders across the political spectrum.

Despite ongoing threats to national sovereignty, the writer affirms the constitutional continuity of the Venezuelan state through the establishment of an interim presidency, presenting this as a testament to the nation’s resilience against external pressures.