标签： Belize

On November 26, 2025, the Belize Territorial Volunteers (BTV) set out on a mission to the Sapodilla Cayes, a region of significant national importance currently under scrutiny at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The group’s objective was to educate Belizeans about the ecological and cultural value of these cayes. However, their journey took an unexpected turn when they stumbled upon an illegal Guatemalan gillnet in Belizean waters. The discovery was prompted by a suspicious bottle floating in the area, which led the team to the nearly 400-foot-long net. The BTV promptly retrieved and destroyed the gillnet, which was located approximately four miles west of Hunting Caye, an area that includes a Belize Coast Guard base and a ranger station. Unconfirmed reports suggest that enforcement patrols in the region may have been reduced to avoid escalating tensions with Guatemalan fishers, especially as ICJ hearings are ongoing this week. This incident highlights the ongoing challenges in protecting Belize’s maritime boundaries and resources.

Guatemala has made a final appeal to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to intervene in the ongoing sovereignty dispute between Belize and Honduras over the Sapodilla Cayes. The Central American nation argues that its long-standing territorial claim could be significantly impacted by the Court’s eventual ruling. The request was presented during a morning session at the Peace Palace in The Hague, presided over by ICJ President Judge Iwasawa. This marks Guatemala’s second round of oral arguments under Article 62 of the ICJ Statute. Representing Guatemala, Sir Michael Wood emphasized that the country’s legal interests are at stake, as a ruling favoring either Belize or Honduras could prejudice Guatemala’s claim. Wood dismissed Honduras’s objections as lacking legal reasoning and being repetitive, asserting that the case is a clear example of when Article 62 applies. Guatemala clarified that it is not seeking to introduce a new dispute with Honduras or reopen its existing case with Belize but aims to protect its legal claim over the cays. Honduras had previously argued that Guatemala’s intervention is unnecessary, given the ongoing Belize-Guatemala case. However, Wood countered that this is irrelevant, as the focus should be on whether Article 62’s conditions are met. Guatemala also refuted Honduras’s reliance on Article 59, which prevents ICJ rulings from binding third states, stating that a judgment can still affect a state’s legal interests without being binding. The country highlighted that the Belize-Honduras case introduces a new dimension to the territorial dispute, necessitating its intervention to address new legal arguments and documents. Guatemala’s Agent, Ambassador Ana Cristina Rodríguez Pineda, concluded by stressing that intervention would not only safeguard Guatemala’s interests but also assist the Court in reaching a more informed decision. The Court will continue hearings with Belize and Honduras presenting their arguments on Guatemala’s request.

Belize is making headlines as it urges the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to conduct back-to-back hearings on two significant territorial disputes. These cases, involving Guatemala and Honduras, could potentially redefine Belize’s borders and have far-reaching implications for sovereignty, security, and national identity. The first case, initiated in 2019, addresses Guatemala’s longstanding claims over Belizean land and maritime territories. The second, filed in 2022, focuses on the Sapodilla Cayes in the Gulf of Honduras, contested by both Belize and Honduras. Belize’s Special Envoy, Ambassador Assad Shoman, emphasized the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently to avoid delays and redundancy. He suggested that the ICJ hear the Guatemala/Belize case first, followed closely by the Belize/Honduras case, to streamline proceedings and minimize repetition. This strategic approach aims to ensure a comprehensive resolution of all territorial claims against Belize, reinforcing its position on the global stage. The outcomes of these cases could significantly impact regional diplomacy and Belize’s future, making this a pivotal moment in the nation’s history.

Belize has taken a proactive stance at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), urging the court to expedite and coordinate hearings on two intertwined territorial disputes. The first involves Guatemala’s longstanding claim over Belizean territory, while the second centers on Honduras’ recent assertion of rights over the Sapodilla Cayes. Notably, Honduras only raised its claim in 1981, following the collapse of the Heads of Agreement talks between the UK and Guatemala. Despite this, Honduras has largely left its claim dormant and chose not to intervene in the ongoing Guatemala-Belize case. Belize’s legal team, led by Ben Juratowitch, KC, argues that holding the hearings back-to-back would allow the ICJ to address both disputes comprehensively, potentially leading to a complete resolution. However, questions remain about how overlapping arguments and Honduras’ push for traditional fishing rights might complicate the proceedings. Belize and Guatemala have found common ground on several points, including the timing of Honduras’ claim and its lack of intervention. The ICJ’s approach will be crucial in determining whether Belize’s strategy succeeds in achieving a clear and final resolution.