On the occasion of Trinidad and Tobago’s 64th Independence anniversary, the head of the National Council of Indian Culture (NCIC) Dr. Surujdeo Mangaroo has issued an urgent, respectful appeal to Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar to bring back the country’s dormant Race Relations Committee as a proactive tool to defuse growing intercommunal tensions.
Delivering his feature address at the Independence Rainbow Dance Festival held at NCIC Nagar in Chaguanas on Saturday, Mangaroo outlined a clear mandate for the restored body: it would be tasked with investigating racial bias complaints, fostering open cross-community dialogue, rolling out public education programs focused on inclusion, and drafting policy recommendations to strengthen bonds between the nation’s diverse ethnic and cultural groups.
Mangaroo pushed back against potential criticism, noting that reinstating the committee should not be interpreted as an admission of systemic national failure. Instead, he framed it as a deliberate, responsible act of governance that prioritizes long-term social cohesion over short-term political convenience. “We cannot wait until tensions become crises before we begin the work of reconciliation. Prevention is wiser than repair,” he emphasized.
A core requirement for the new committee, Mangaroo stressed, is full independence from partisan political control. To build public trust, the body must be accessible to all citizens, and its work guided by core principles of fairness, mutual respect, and protection of every individual’s dignity. He argued that a properly structured, sufficiently resourced committee would create a permanent, safe national platform where representatives from civil society, religious groups, cultural institutions, educational bodies, youth organizations, and political parties can gather to address divisive issues in a constructive, solution-focused way.
Reflecting on the meaning of Independence in the plural, multi-ethnic nation of Trinidad and Tobago, Mangaroo argued that the annual celebration goes far beyond symbolic acts of flag-raising and anthem-singing. It is, he said, an ongoing collective commitment to building a society where every citizen feels respected, fairly represented, fully included, and rooted in a shared sense of belonging and security.
Trinidad and Tobago’s cultural and ethnic diversity is not an inconvenient problem to be managed, Mangaroo noted — it is one of the country’s greatest national assets. He added that distinct communities can maintain their unique cultural identities while coming together for shared national celebrations, a dynamic that is not division, but unity in practice.
The NCIC president did not shy away from criticizing recent political rhetoric, pointing out that some politicians have deliberately chosen to stoke division rather than promote unity, believing that intercommunal separation will advance their own partisan political interests. This approach, he said, encourages citizens to view one another as opponents rather than fellow countrymen. While it may deliver temporary electoral gains, it erodes the foundation of the nation over time.
“No political agenda should be built upon the deliberate separation of the people of Trinidad and Tobago. No election victory can justify the damage caused when communities are turned against one another. No politician should use race, religion or culture as a tool for political manipulation,” Mangaroo stated.
The Independence Rainbow Dance Festival that hosted Mangaroo’s announcement brought together performing artists from across the country, showcasing a rich mix of cultural traditions: African and Indian folk dances, Arabic-inspired movement, African drumming, tassa drumming, steelpan performances, and collaborative rhythm sets. Mangaroo highlighted that the event itself embodied the unifying power of culture, at a time when political rhetoric often pulls communities apart.
“On this stage, we see the beauty of our diversity brought together in one shared national space,” he said, adding that cultural events like the festival do more than entertain — they create welcoming spaces where people can meet, share experiences, learn from one another, and build mutual appreciation. For Mangaroo, cultural institutions have a critical role to play in celebrating difference, exchanging knowledge, and strengthening shared national belonging.
Mangaroo stressed that the work of advancing national unity is not the responsibility of the government alone. It requires active participation from every sector of society: parents must teach children that cultural difference is not a threat, media outlets must avoid language that inflames racial suspicion, cultural organizations must prioritize cross-community collaboration, politicians must reject the exploitation of identity for electoral gain, and individual citizens must refuse to be manipulated into mutual hostility.
Reaffirming the NCIC’s ongoing commitment to building a united, inclusive nation, Mangaroo said the organization will continue to use culture as a bridge between communities, promote cross-group understanding, speak out against discrimination and prejudice, and counter political division. “We will continue to work with all citizens, who believe that our differences should become a source of strength rather than conflict,” he said.
“As we celebrate Independence, let us remember that Trinidad and Tobago belongs to all of us. Let this festival send a clear message: our diversity is not our weakness but our strength,” he added.
A Brief History of the Race Relations Committee
The Race Relations Committee has a long, intermittent history in Trinidad and Tobago. It was first established in the early 1990s, and operated from 1991 to 1995 before being disbanded. Then-Prime Minister Patrick Manning re-launched the body in August 2003, with its inaugural official meeting held at the government’s Whitehall headquarters on August 15 of that year.
Ahead of that first 2003 meeting, Manning told reporters that the core purpose of the committee was to open sustained dialogue between communities, because much of the animosity and acrimony in race relations stemmed from mutual misunderstanding of different groups’ positions. The 2003 iteration of the committee included prominent cross-community leaders: then-Sanatan Dharma Maha Sabha general secretary Sat Maharaj, Emancipation Support Committee representative Pearl Eintou Springer, Muslim Coordination Council representative Yacoob Ali, and academic Prof Selwyn Cudjoe.