博客

  • Corporal pleads not guilty to sexual misconduct charges

    Corporal pleads not guilty to sexual misconduct charges

    After nearly a four-year gap in military judicial proceedings, the Trinidad and Tobago Defence Force (TTDF) has launched its first court-martial at its Chaguaramas-based headquarters, centered on a reserve corporal facing two distinct military misconduct charges connected to alleged sexual wrongdoing.

    The unidentified service member made his initial appearance before Judge Advocate Captain (Naval) Zin-Mark King on Tuesday, where he was formally read the two charges laid against him and entered a not guilty plea to both counts. The first accusation falls under Section 73 of the nation’s Defence Act, which prohibits the ill-treatment of junior-ranking personnel by senior service members subject to military law. The statute explicitly outlines that any service member convicted of striking or otherwise abusing a more junior subordinate can face up to two years of imprisonment if found guilty by court-martial, alongside less severe alternative penalties.

    The second charge the corporal faces is Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Military Discipline, a violation laid out in Section 77 of Chapter 14:01 of the Defence Act. This charge carries a matching maximum sentence of two years imprisonment upon conviction, with other potential disciplinary outcomes including rank demotion, involuntary forfeiture of earned pay, and military detention.

    During the opening session of the proceeding, the judge granted a request from prosecution teams to amend the official charge report against the accused. Following this action, defense counsel Kirk Cumberbatch submitted a formal motion for an adjournment of the proceedings, which was also approved by the judge. The court-martial is scheduled to resume its proceedings on August 27, when both sides will continue to present their cases and move forward with the judicial process.

  • Gonzales: Manning on ‘dangerous path’

    Gonzales: Manning on ‘dangerous path’

    A simmering internal conflict within Trinidad and Tobago’s ruling People’s National Movement (PNM) boiled over into a formal public rebuke this week, after party chairman Marvin Gonzales issued a stark warning to San Fernando East Member of Parliament Brian Manning for dragging intra-party tensions into the public sphere. The standoff, which pits Manning against the leadership of his own constituency’s executive committee, has triggered formal party processes and raised the prospect of disciplinary action against the sitting MP if he continues to defy party norms.

    The dispute first erupted last week, when Manning took to his public Facebook page to air unreserved criticism and concerns about Patricia Alexis, chair of the San Fernando East Constituency Executive. Within days, the national PNM leadership issued an initial rebuke on Thursday, urging Manning to cease public discussion of internal party business. Not to be outdone, the constituency executive itself responded via Facebook, pushing back against Manning’s allegations and defending its record.

    As the public back-and-forth stretched into the weekend, top PNM leadership called an urgent press conference at the party’s Port of Spain headquarters, Balisier House, on Monday to formally address the growing rift. The full slate of senior party leadership was in attendance: vice-chairman Dr. Amery Browne, lady vice-chairman Dr. Nyan Gadsby-Dolly, deputy political leaders Colm Imbert and Sanjiv Boodhu, and general secretary Foster Cummings, signaling the gravity the party placed on the confrontation.

    Gonzales told reporters that party leaders had made a good-faith attempt to resolve the dispute behind closed doors on Sunday, hosting a meeting with the San Fernando East Constituency Executive. While Manning received a formal invitation to participate in the mediation-focused gathering, he was notably absent from the talks. “Sunday evening at 5 p.m. the leadership of the party under the directive of honourable political leader met in San Fernando with the executive of the San Fernando East constituency. The Member of Parliament was invited and unfortunately, he was not present at that meeting,” Gonzales confirmed. He added that members of the constituency executive expressed profound distress over the public airing of the conflict, with many reporting that they felt their professional reputations and personal standing had been damaged by Manning’s public accusations. “Many of them were hurt on how the entire fiasco and how this issue is being played out in the public domain,” Gonzales said.

    The party chairman outlined the formal timeline for resolving the conflict: an internal inquiry into the dispute between Manning and Alexis is expected to wrap up by Friday, after which the PNM central executive will convene on Saturday to review the panel’s findings. From there, the party’s general council will take up the matter in strict accordance with the PNM’s constitution.

    Gonzales stressed that the PNM has long-standing, codified procedures for resolving internal disagreements, and that public name-calling and reputation attacks have no place in the party’s governance framework. “It is not a kangaroo court where these things are ventilated, where accusations are hurled in the public domain to destroy people’s character and to destroy professional reputations. These are not the ways we handle matters,” he said. Addressing Manning directly, Gonzales issued a clear warning: “Mr. Manning is going down a very dangerous path.” He urged the MP to pause, reflect, and allow the party’s internal processes to move forward without further public interference. “It is not good for the interest of the People’s National Movement and we are asking him to allow good sense to prevail and to do some introspection and some self-reflection while the party undertake its processes to resolve these matters, to please conduct himself in a disciplined format,” Gonzales added.

    When it comes to potential consequences, Gonzales confirmed that the party already has received formal complaints from aggrieved members that could trigger a disciplinary investigation into Manning’s conduct. He explained that disciplinary action cannot be initiated unilaterally by party leadership; instead, it must be activated by a formal complaint from a registered PNM member, after which an official inquiry is held to determine if there are grounds for sanction. “My understanding is that members are so aggrieved and so concerned at this time that we have already started receiving complaints that we will have to perhaps conduct investigations,” Gonzales said. “It is a process but it is not one that the leadership triggers. It is one that once a complaint is received from any member then there is a process for an enquiry to determine whether or not there is any grounds for disciplinary action.”

    Vice-chairman Dr. Amery Browne echoed Gonzales’ warning, urging Manning to reverse course and respect the party’s constitutionally mandated processes. “The course that you have chosen is not a wise course in these circumstances particularly when these matters are currently being addressed and under consideration, on the very organs of the PNM, mandated to treat with them in this (PNM) constitution as we speak,” Browne said. He added: “So, as a colleague as we all are, it is a word of advice. A word of advice to think again, to respect the processes, deliberations, actions, discussions, decisions, the central executive of the party of which you are a member, the general council of the party of which you are a member, the democratic processes of the People’s National Movement and avoid any unnecessary action and deflection and worst of all, any temptation to play the same cards in the public space that members of the UNC Government play every single day.”

    Browne also pushed back against speculation that PNM political leader Pennelope Beckles has been absent or uncommitted to resolving the dispute, confirming that Beckles is actively overseeing the process while adhering to the party constitution. He noted that the political leader does not hold unilateral authority to remove elected constituency executives, a power reserved for party bodies under the organization’s governing document. “These processes are not taking place without dedicated and concerned leadership from our duly appointed leader. There are those who feel that a political leader is some sort of emperor, they could remove an executive, they could remove a chairman. It does not work like that,” Browne said. “Again, the party has a constitution to whom the political leader must be beholden as well.”

    When contacted by local media outlet the Express for comment on the party’s rebuke Monday evening, Manning declined to make any additional public statements on the dispute.

  • MORE LOTTO WON’T WORK

    MORE LOTTO WON’T WORK

    A heated debate has emerged in Trinidad and Tobago’s gaming industry over a proposed plan from the National Lotteries Control Board (NLCB) to add a third weekly Lotto draw, with industry leaders and local booth operators holding starkly opposing views on the potential impacts of the change. The discussion was triggered after NLCB chairman Ken Emrith revealed over the weekend that the regulatory board was actively considering launching the additional draw to reshape its weekly Lotto offering. The president of the Electronic Lotto Agents Association of Trinidad and Tobago, Allen Campbelle, has emerged as the most prominent critic of the plan, arguing that the policy will fail to deliver the increased revenue the NLCB is targeting.

    Campbelle explained that consumer participation in Lotto is driven almost entirely by the size of the jackpot, rather than how often draws are held each week. “Having three draws on Lotto wouldn’t create an increase in sales for the NLCB,” he stated. “The motivation in the Lotto is not the number of days — it’s the quantum of the jackpot that attracts gamblers.” Beyond failing to lift total revenue, Campbelle warned that an extra weekly draw would actually cannibalize sales of the NLCB’s other existing gaming products, leaving the board with no net gain in overall income. The proposal also offers no benefits to licensed Lotto agents, he added, directly rejecting claims that more frequent draws would boost agent earnings.

    Not all stakeholders share Campbelle’s skepticism, however. Erica Holder-Ali, the owner of a Tunapuna Lotto booth that just sold a winning $24 million Quick Pick ticket over the weekend, says she welcomes the idea of a third weekly draw. Fresh off celebrating the high-profile win at her El Dorado Road location, Holder-Ali argued that an extra draw would draw more casual participants into Lotto play overall. Her booth is already viewed as a local community hub, with a history of producing big wins including a prior prize in the Big Ride game. The recent $24 million jackpot has already cemented its reputation as a “lucky spot,” and Holder-Ali says more players are already expected to visit to take their chance at a win. She noted that her own sales have historically risen alongside growing jackpots, as more players are motivated to buy tickets when potential payouts climb.

    Beyond opposing the third draw, Campbelle says the NLCB should refocus its efforts on a far more impactful issue plaguing the local gaming industry: unregulated illegal gambling. He claims that cracking down on illegal Play-Whe operations would deliver far larger revenue gains for the NLCB than adding an extra draw. Campbelle revealed that his association previously served on an NLCB illegal gaming committee, and based on data collected during that work, the group estimates illegal gambling generates roughly $23 billion annually in unreported activity that siphons revenue away from the regulated market.

    Campbelle also aired longstanding grievances about the NLCB’s engagement with licensed agents. He said the association has compiled a list of critical concerns about the state of the local gaming industry, but the NLCB has refused to schedule a meeting after requesting that the association submit its full membership records. Campbelle contends that the organization is not a union, and therefore has no obligation to turn over that internal information to the NLCB.

  • Murder victim’s brother charged with another man’s murder

    Murder victim’s brother charged with another man’s murder

    Nearly two months after 34-year-old St. Lucian national Troy Casley was fatally shot in a shooting incident in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines that also left two other people injured, law enforcement officials have filed murder charges against a second suspect, a man whose own brother was killed in a separate 2022 mass shooting.

    The Royal Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Police Force announced Monday that 24-year-old Jarell Phillips, a resident of Redemption Sharpes, has been formally charged with Casley’s murder, as well as two additional counts of attempted murder connected to the June 23, 2026 shooting.

    The attack that claimed Casley’s life took place in the Great House area of Lowmans Hill. The two attempted murder charges stem from gunshot wounds suffered by 22-year-old Shamel John of Lower Questelles and 33-year-old Nashon Simmons of Campden Park during the same incident.

    Jarell Phillips is not the first suspect to face charges in the case. Back in July, police arrested 21-year-old Delroy Harry, a laborer who lives in Lowmans Hill, and charged him with the same offenses: one count of murder for Casley’s death and two counts of attempted murder for John and Simmons’ injuries.

    In an official statement released Tuesday, the RSVGPF emphasized that the filing of criminal charges marks a key procedural step in the ongoing investigation and subsequent judicial process. The police force reminded the public that all individuals facing criminal charges are legally presumed innocent unless and until prosecutors prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. Investigations into the shooting remain active and ongoing, authorities confirmed.

    The case has an added layer of context: Jarell Phillips is the younger brother of Jerroy Phillips, a 27-year-old man also known by the street names “Steppy” and “Jayjay,” who was killed in a mass shooting in Redemption Sharpes back on November 5, 2022. That 2022 attack left three other people wounded, and 30-year-old laborer Lorenzo “Scene” DeShong, also from Redemption Sharpes, later died of his injuries at Milton Cato Memorial Hospital. Jerroy Phillips had a prior criminal record: he earned his first conviction for a burglary offense in 2021, before going on to face charges for a series of more severe violent crimes, including kidnapping and armed robbery.

    Police are now calling on any member of the public with additional information that could help advance the investigation into Casley’s killing to contact the RSVGPF through tip lines 457-1211, 456-1810, or their local nearest police station. All information provided will be kept strictly confidential, authorities confirmed. In their statement, the RSVGPF reaffirmed its commitment to conducting thorough, comprehensive investigations and bringing individuals who face evidence-supported criminal charges before the courts to answer for alleged offenses.

  • Police brass tie promotion to morale and crime fight

    Police brass tie promotion to morale and crime fight

    Amid growing public pressure to curb a persistent wave of gun violence, senior leadership of the Royal St. Vincent and the Grenadines Police Force (RSVGPF) has announced sweeping changes to the agency’s promotion system, tying future advancement directly to measurable performance, individual merit, and acceptance of greater accountability. The reform plan was unveiled by top officials during a Thursday press conference focused on the country’s ongoing gun violence crisis, framing the policy shift as a core step to boost officer morale and strengthen the national crime-fighting effort.

    Newly appointed Acting Commissioner of Police Trevor “Buju” Bailey used the public appearance to confirm a recent round of senior leadership changes within the force, including the elevation of Acting Deputy Commissioner Junior Simmons and Acting Assistant Commissioner Brenton Smith to their current roles. Bailey also revealed that additional promotions across lower ranks will be announced in the coming days, but emphasized that these advancements should not be treated as celebratory milestones.

    “Three days into this role, I can already feel the gravity of the responsibility this position carries,” Bailey told reporters. “Where I once contributed as a member of a leadership team, I now hold the accountability for this entire force. The public expects nothing less than our best work to end this crime wave, and I am committed to delivering that.” He stressed that promotions are not ceremonial rewards for tenure, but a call to greater service that must translate to tangible improvements in public safety outcomes. The acting commissioner called on every rank-and-file and senior officer to renew their commitment to crime reduction, urging a collective refocus on operational effectiveness.

    Smith, who retains oversight of human resources for the force, expanded on the need for systemic change to the promotion process, addressing long-running internal concerns about unfair advancement practices. He explicitly called for an overhaul of existing criteria, arguing that promotions have for too long relied on seniority and other non-transparent factors rather than proven capability.

    “Advancement has always been one of the most critical issues for officer morale across the force,” Smith explained. “We have to change how we promote people. Elevation must go to those who show merit, put in the hard work, demonstrate commitment, and master the details of their work. That change alone will do wonders for how officers feel about their careers and their place in this organization.”

    Beyond the promotion structure, Smith also tied systemic reform to broader officer welfare and work-life balance, noting that the force is currently conducting a comprehensive manpower audit to assess current deployment and align officers’ skills with the roles where they are most needed. He confirmed the audit is on track to wrap up within seven days, and will help leadership create more balanced workloads that give officers adequate time with their families while optimizing operational capacity. This alignment of skills to roles, Smith argued, will reinforce the new merit-based system by creating a clear, transparent path where strong performance directly leads to advancement.

    The push for promotion reform comes at a time when the RSVGPF is facing heightened public and political scrutiny over its response to rising gun crime. Leadership has already rolled out a series of operational changes to address the crisis, including increased visible patrols, zoned community policing, new investments in forensic technology, and deeper cross-regional law enforcement cooperation. Alongside these operational shifts, officials are working to rebuild public trust by strengthening internal discipline, improving professional standards, and expanding community engagement initiatives. Reformers say that overhauling the promotion process to prioritize merit will not only boost internal morale but also help the force deliver on its public safety commitments to the people of St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

  • Gov’t halts live cattle exports as Bruce pushes abattoir plan

    Gov’t halts live cattle exports as Bruce pushes abattoir plan

    St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ new administration has formally suspended all exports of live cattle and other livestock to neighboring Grenada, Agriculture Minister Israel Bruce has announced, framing the move as a critical first step to shore up domestic food security, protect local livelihoods, and crack down on systemic praedial larceny across the country’s agricultural sector.

    In an interview with NBC Radio, Bruce explained that the country is currently not positioned to sustain cross-border live animal shipments, noting that priority must be given to securing stable domestic supply chains, safeguarding downstream small businesses, and enforcing stricter controls against livestock theft that has plagued local farmers for years. The suspension directly responds to long-running complaints from butchers, small food entrepreneurs, and local producers, and aligns with the government’s broader agenda to build a modern, regulated abattoir, upgrade national meat quality standards, and eliminate widespread farm theft.

    “I am squarely of the view that we are not in the best position at this moment to get involved in or to continue the practice of shipping live animals across to Grenada,” Bruce stated. “There is now a halt on that programme.”

    The practice of exporting live cattle to Grenada was first launched by the previous Unity Labour Party administration, and continued even as local industry stakeholders repeatedly raised alarms over its impact on domestic beef availability, particularly during peak demand periods. Bruce, who took office as part of the newly elected New Democratic Party government in November, acknowledged that unregulated live exports have created cascading disruptions across St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ entire local meat supply chain.

    To illustrate the harm of the prior policy, Bruce cited the experience of small burger vendors who sourced product from a popular butcher based in Gun Hill. That butcher relied on a consistent inflow of local cattle to serve his own customers, including clients on the island of Mustique. Once live exports reduced the number of cattle available for local slaughter, the butcher lost access to enough animals to fulfill his orders, forcing him to exit the Mustique market and leaving small dependent vendors without reliable income.

    This case, Bruce argued, demonstrates how poorly managed live exports can undermine local enterprise and food security when domestic production levels are already limited. “This is not something that I believe that we could sustain at this point in time,” he added.

    In place of unprocessed live exports, the ministry is advancing a new abattoir-centered development model that is designed to guarantee consistent, high-quality meat for local consumers, while creating a framework for future regulated exports of processed meat to regional and international markets. The planned abattoir will also support stronger traceability systems to combat livestock theft, and reinforce the viability of the local livestock economy and organized producer groups.

    Bruce told listeners he has already held productive consultations with the national Butchers’ Association, and most recently met with the Cattle Farmers and Producers Association of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (CFPA), where the suspension of live shipments to Grenada was a central topic of discussion.

    “An abattoir is not just a facility where we bring the animals for slaughter,” Bruce said. “It is a facility that will guarantee us standards of the meat that goes out into the marketplace for local consumption, and, if we verge into the regional and international market, it will be a facility that helps us to support our own production on the ground.”

    He added that the regulated slaughter process required by the new abattoir will also severely disrupt illegal livestock theft networks: by centralizing legal slaughter and sales, it will become far harder for thieves to offload stolen animals to legitimate buyers. “It will threaten praedial larceny,” Bruce noted.

    The minister confirmed that a formal proposal for the new abattoir will be submitted to Cabinet for review in the coming weeks, as the cornerstone of the government’s planned livestock sector restructuring.

    The pause on live exports is just one component of a broader, multi-pronged government strategy to tackle persistent praedial larceny, a problem that Bruce said has steadily eroded farmer livelihoods across the country. He disclosed that ongoing inter-ministerial talks are underway between the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of National Security to speed up full implementation of the existing Praedial Larceny Act, which he said has been poorly enforced for years.

    The government is also currently waiting on input from a local private sector firm on specialized farm monitoring technology and equipment that can help identify and track thieves operating on agricultural lands. Additionally, a new national traceability law, which will first apply to livestock and later be expanded to crop production, is currently under review by the Attorney General’s office. The legislation will enable full tracking of animals through every stage of the supply chain, eliminating the grey market that allows stolen livestock to be sold illegally.

    Bruce emphasized that the rising rate of farm theft across the country is rooted in weak enforcement of existing regulations, not a lack of policy. “One of the fundamental challenges that we have … is that the thievery that is happening on your farms is because there has been a slacking or a lacking of the enforcement of the praedial larceny act,” he said.

    The minister reiterated his election campaign promise to crack down on agricultural crime, telling listeners: “I told the thieves during the election campaign that with a New Democratic Party government elected and myself being appointed Minister of Agriculture, I will make restless the praedial larcenists. The journey has begun.”

    Once the new abattoir and national traceability system are fully implemented, Bruce said, the reforms will protect both law-abiding farmers and legitimate meat traders by closing off illegal markets for stolen animals: “the thief will have nobody to sell the stolen animals to.”

  • The school year will begin on September 1st, adjusted to the country’s conditions

    The school year will begin on September 1st, adjusted to the country’s conditions

    As Cuba prepares to kick off the 2026-2027 academic year across all education tiers on September 1, education officials are rolling out localized, flexible strategies to keep learning continuous amid widespread national challenges, including persistent energy shortages and resource limitations that have disrupted daily life for Cuban families.

    During an inspection tour of pre-term preparation work across the country, Cuban Minister of Education Naima Trujillo Barreto confirmed that institutional and community stakeholders are working collectively to deliver a “dignified and sustainable” school year, prioritizing the core educational needs of children and adolescents within the bounds of available local resources.

    Reports from the Cuban News Agency (ACN) quote the minister stressing that one-size-fits-all approaches cannot work in the current context. Instead, education leaders are calling for innovative, adaptive solutions customized to the unique conditions of each school, neighborhood, municipality, and province. This approach ensures that existing resource constraints do not undermine the delivery of efficient, high-quality teaching and learning.

    The core challenge extends far beyond classroom walls, as systemic obstacles including fuel scarcity, unreliable transportation, frequent power outages, limited basic supply chains, and material shortages have directly impacted household stability. Education authorities have responded by developing context-appropriate alternative frameworks that keep teaching activities on track while accounting for regional variation in conditions.

    Higher education institutions across Cuba will also launch their 2026-2027 academic calendar on September 1, building on successful decentralized, territory-focused organizational models tested during the previous semester. For the upcoming term, all enrollment processes—including new student registration, readmission for returning learners, and enrollment renewal—will be administered locally at students’ places of residence. Students may complete these procedures either in person or online, aligned with the digital and personnel resources available at each university, Municipal University Center (CUM), and Municipal University Branch (FUM).

    University coursework will combine blended and distance learning structures. In-person instruction will be scheduled when local conditions allow, prioritizing daytime students, and classes can be hosted at a range of local sites beyond main university campuses, including CUMs, FUMs, and regional production and service entities. Blended programs plan to host in-person gatherings at least once per month, while fully distance learning courses will continue to operate under their established structures.

    The aligned strategies for both K-12 general education and post-secondary higher education share a single core mission: preserving uninterrupted access to education through increased organizational flexibility and more intentional, efficient use of limited existing resources. Rejecting uniform policies that fail to account for divergent local conditions, the new framework centers local needs in all organizational decisions.

    The upcoming school term will require coordinated extra effort from teachers, students, families, and local government authorities. Lead education agencies emphasize that their end goal is not just to avoid an interruption to the educational process amid current challenges, but to build a reorganized system that is responsive to the specific context of every Cuban community.

  • Column: De rechtsstaat kan niet met reces

    Column: De rechtsstaat kan niet met reces

    A strong rule of law is not built on empty rhetoric about judicial independence. It is reinforced when the judiciary has enough qualified judicial officers, those officers can carry out their work free from external pressure, and the state guarantees proper working and compensation conditions. At a moment when tensions between branches of government are already running high in Suriname, an entirely avoidable crisis is now looming over the expansion of the country’s judicial system.

    Fifteen new judges have already been selected from a pool of 75 applicants. After completing a costly, rigorous RAIO training program, these candidates are fully prepared to assume their judicial duties. They have even been assigned to court rosters for sessions scheduled to begin in October. However, their formal presidential appointment has not been finalized, and no definitive agreement has been reached on their compensation packages.

    These new judges are urgently needed to strengthen Suriname’s overstretched judiciary, cut through crippling case backlogs, and reduce unsustainable workloads for sitting judges. Vice President Gregory Rusland informed the National Assembly that he signed the official notification letter on July 30 to clear the way for preparations to deploy the new judges starting in October, a move that suggested the process was nearly complete. But the critical presidential decree required to formalize their appointments has not yet been issued.

    Simultaneously, Suriname’s parliament is debating a proposed amendment to the Judicial Financial Provisions Act, which aims to overhaul the country’s controversial existing system of base salaries, periodic pay increases, and benefits. While all parties agree that reform is necessary, negotiations have stalled over the exact structure of the new compensation framework. Ideally, clarity on this issue would have been reached before the 15 new judges were selected and trained, leaving candidates to wonder what financial terms they will face when they start their judicial careers.

    Proposed base salaries for the new judges range from 60,000 to 80,000 Surinamese dollars, a figure that does not include additional benefits and allowances that make up total income. Even so, the base salary level matters. Society expects judges to uphold independence, integrity, legal expertise, and impartiality; they are granted the power to rule on citizens’ freedom, property, and fundamental human rights. A fair, dignified employment status is a non-negotiable requirement for upholding these standards.

    This question of judicial compensation is particularly urgent as Suriname stands on the cusp of major oil and gas development. International energy companies, global financial institutions, top law firms, and other private sector actors are already competing to hire highly qualified Surinamese legal professionals. If the state invests significant public funds to select and train 15 skilled judges, but fails to offer them competitive, attractive employment terms, it should not be surprised if the private sector lures these new jurists away. That would leave public investment wasted and the judiciary still short of the judges it desperately needs.

    Time is running out fast. The National Assembly is scheduled to enter recess on September 3, and the original plan called for debating and passing the Judicial Financial Provisions Act amendment before recess begins. With the limited time remaining and ongoing negotiations still required to resolve disagreements, meeting that deadline looks increasingly unlikely. This creates a deeply problematic situation: 15 judges have been fully trained, the judiciary recognizes their urgent need, they are scheduled to start work in October and already assigned to court rosters, but their formal appointments and compensation terms remain unresolved.

    No one disputes that the excesses of the current compensation system need correction. The explanatory note to the proposed amendment explicitly states that the reform is intended to prevent the total compensation of senior magistrates from exceeding that of the President of the Republic. But correcting past excesses does not require swinging to the opposite extreme. A balanced middle ground is achievable: a fair, transparent compensation structure that matches the responsibility and independence of the judicial role, without letting periodic increments and benefits accumulate uncontrollably.

    The executive branch, parliament, and judiciary must break this deadlock immediately. This issue is not a suitable arena for political power games: too much is at stake for Suriname’s rule of law. If the 15 new judges are needed to start work in October, their appointments and employment terms must be finalized properly and on time.

    October is rapidly approaching, and the 15 trained candidates are ready to serve. All the preliminary procedural steps to add them to court rosters are complete, but disagreements over their starting terms continue to hold up the process. Much of the chaos surrounding leaked drafts and unsubmitted draft amendments ultimately boils down to disagreements over funding.

    But funding disagreements should not be allowed to prevent 15 urgently needed judges from taking office on time. Suriname’s rule of law is far too important to be put at risk over this avoidable impasse.

  • Fidel, maker of dreams and feats

    Fidel, maker of dreams and feats

    On August 25, 2026, Cuban state newspaper Granma published the full prologue written by Army General Raúl Castro Ruz, leader of the Cuban Revolution, for the forthcoming complete collection of *Selected Works of Fidel Castro Ruz* — Raúl’s elder brother, lifelong comrade-in-arms, and the undisputed leader of Cuba’s revolutionary movement. For Raúl, penning this introduction is not merely a literary task, but the highest honor of his life, a journey through decades of shared struggle that brings every moment alongside Fidel rushing back as if no time had passed at all.

    Raúl traces their bond back to their childhood together at La Salle School in Santiago de Cuba, when Fidel first emerged as his role model and lifelong mentor. It was Fidel who gave Raúl his first political text, Friedrich Engels’ *The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State*, and recommended further readings that clarified the questions shaping young Raúl’s emerging worldview. When Fidel graduated from law school, he encouraged their parents to let Raúl join him in Havana to continue his university studies, setting Raúl on the path that would define the rest of his life.

    In the early 1950s, Fidel first entered political life, running for a seat as a representative for Havana’s Cayo Hueso neighborhood, holding out hope that Cuba’s dire poverty and foreign domination could be transformed through constitutional channels. That hope collapsed with Fulgencio Batista’s coup d’état on March 10, 1952. Fidel immediately denounced the illegal power grab, filing an unconstitutionality motion with Havana’s Emergency Court and publishing the article *Revolution Not, a Coup* to expose the criminal nature of Batista’s regime, which would only worsen Cuba’s crisis. Months later, on the 100th anniversary of independence leader José Martí’s birth, Fidel led more than 1,000 disciplined young activists in the iconic March of the Torches, a public demonstration that announced the arrival of a new generation of revolutionary resistance.

    By that point, Fidel had already spent a year uniting progressive Orthodox youth into a cohesive underground movement, laying the groundwork for armed resistance. His famous framework — that “we need to start a small engine to help start the big one” — set the stage for the 1953 assault on the Moncada Barracks: the “small engine” that would ignite a nationwide popular uprising armed with weapons seized from the regime. As Raúl once noted, where Karl Marx described the Paris Commune as revolutionaries “ready to storm heaven,” the young rebels of Moncada, armed only with bird-hunting shotguns, “tried to take heaven by surprise.”

    After the assault failed, Batista’s dictatorship unleashed brutal repression against the newly formed July 26th Movement. The surviving rebels were convicted in show trials stripped of any constitutional guarantees; Fidel, recovering from injuries, was tried alone in a small room at Santiago de Cuba’s Saturnino Lora Hospital. There, he turned his trial defense into a searing indictment of the Batista regime, and his closing argument *History Will Absolve Me* became the foundational political program of the Cuban Revolution. Few could have imagined that the words of a prisoner, tried in secret to silence him, would one day become the guiding law of a new Cuban nation built for the working people.

    Twenty-two months into their imprisonment, popular pressure forced the dictatorship to offer amnesty — but Batista demanded the rebels renounce armed struggle to win release. Fidel refused outright, declaring from prison: “We do not want amnesty at the price of dishonor.” When an unconditional pardon was finally granted in May 1955, Fidel immediately set to work organizing a new clandestine resistance, educating the Cuban masses on the inevitability of revolutionary war. Mexico became the movement’s exile refuge, where the rebels lived in rough makeshift training camps, combining military drills with deep study of Cuban history and global political thought.

    In December 1956, honoring Fidel’s pledge of “be free or martyrs,” the rebels landed on Cuba’s coast aboard the yacht Granma. After days of harassment by Batista’s forces and a devastating defeat at Alegría de Pío, the surviving fighters regrouped with Fidel at Cinco Palmas, a remote outpost in the foothills of the Sierra Maestra. Just eight combatants remained, with only seven rifles between them. Yet Fidel, whose unshakable confidence in victory never wavered, declared simply: “Now we will win the war!” It was Fidel’s revolutionary genius that turned that ragged, exhausted group of fighters into the victorious Rebel Army that would topple Batista’s dictatorship. Raúl never ceased to admire Fidel’s courage, his ability to anticipate enemy strategy, and his bold vision for expanding guerrilla fronts across the island’s central and western regions, a plan he shared with Raúl in 1957 that proved decisive to the revolution’s eventual success.

    Fidel’s humanity and commitment to justice were as legendary as his military skill. No loss moved him deeper than the death of a comrade at the hands of the dictatorship; when dissident leader Frank País García was assassinated, Fidel railed, “What monsters! They don’t know the intelligence, the character, the integrity they have murdered!”

    Raúl emphasizes that Fidel combined rare gifts: he was both a brilliant military tactician and a visionary political leader, deeply rooted in the needs of the Cuban people. No account of the Rebel Army’s victorious campaign can ignore Fidel’s central role. During Batista’s 1958 Summer Offensive, a small, ragtag rebel force with inferior weaponry and no formal military backing defeated a government force 30 to 50 times larger in men and equipment. That victory, Raúl argues, stemmed entirely from Fidel’s wise leadership and his core conviction that ideas are the most powerful moral force in the world.

    Five years, five months, and five days after the Moncada assault, on January 1, 1959, the revolution won power — and from its earliest days, Fidel held firm to the promise he made at his 1953 trial: the revolution existed solely to serve the Cuban people. The new revolutionary government immediately reclaimed national sovereignty, which had been eroded by U.S. intervention since 1898, and implemented sweeping pro-popular reforms: rent cuts, reduced utility rates, affordable housing programs, and most transformative of all, the Agrarian Reform Law that broke up large landholdings and distributed land to the peasants who worked it. These measures, paired with the nationalization of foreign-owned corporations, cleared the path for Cuba’s socialist project, led unwaveringly by Fidel.

    Over the following decades, Fidel led Cuba through every turning point of its revolutionary history: he proclaimed the revolution’s socialist character in April 1961, and weeks later personally led Cuban forces to defeat a U.S.-backed invasion at the Bay of Pigs, handing Yankee imperialism its first major military defeat in Latin America. That same year, Cuba declared itself a territory free of illiteracy, a historic achievement delivered by Cuban youth answering Fidel’s call. During the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, Fidel demonstrated remarkable statesmanship defending the revolution’s core principles. In 1965, he oversaw the founding of the first Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba, and was elected First Secretary in recognition of his service. That same night, he read Che Guevara’s final farewell letter to the party, honoring Che as a symbol of the highest human values for all Cuban revolutionaries.

    Fidel dedicated his life to international solidarity and anti-imperialist struggle, fighting against colonialism, apartheid, and foreign domination, and advancing the emancipation and dignity of oppressed nations across the globe. His commitment to working-class power and proletarian internationalism remains a touchstone for Cuba’s revolutionary movement today. When the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc collapsed in 1989, Fidel warned of the coming turmoil but publicly affirmed that Cuba would never abandon the banner of socialism. When global commentators predicted Cuba’s revolution would collapse in the 1990s Special Period, Fidel’s leadership and his deep connection to the Cuban people allowed the country to preserve the core gains of the revolution, from universal healthcare to free education. Later that decade, when the United States launched a new aggressive offensive against Cuba, Fidel led a successful strategic counteroffensive to defend the revolution.

    Fidel refined Cuba’s doctrine of People’s War, building on Martí’s maxim that “trenches of ideas are worth more than trenches of stone,” deepening and expanding Cuban military theory more than any leader before him. His campaigns to win the return of six-year-old Elián González from the United States and the release of the Cuban Five imprisoned in the U.S. demonstrated his skill as a political strategist, his unwavering belief in Cuban unity, and his certainty that justice would prevail. He proved that even under the weight of a more than 60-year U.S. economic, commercial, and financial blockade, Cuba could make transformative progress in education, healthcare, culture, and cutting-edge fields like genetic engineering and biotechnology. He taught Cubans to turn limited resources into strength, to outthink superior military power with intelligence, and to never surrender their principles in the face of overwhelming force.

    Even as a staunch anti-imperialist, Fidel was willing to pursue dialogue and cooperation with the United States and other capitalist countries, rooted in mutual respect for Cuban sovereignty. He never failed to recognize the decency of the American people, and expressed solidarity with them during moments of crisis. On the global stage, he was a leading voice for Third World nations, defending global peace, the right to development, and denouncing imperialism, the global arms race, and the illegitimacy of unpayable Third World external debt. He transformed the Non-Aligned Movement into a powerful force for peace and conflict mediation, and was one of the earliest global leaders to warn that delaying action on climate protection would threaten the survival of the entire human species.

    As a revolutionary humanist who rejected personal wealth, Fidel lived his solidarity: he donated his own blood to disaster victims, led relief efforts for communities hit by hurricanes, floods, and earthquakes, and taught Cubans that solidarity means sharing what little you have, not just what you have in excess. He was a lifelong advocate for Latin American and Caribbean unity, and found a close comrade in Venezuelan leader Hugo Chávez, whose political potential he recognized long before Chávez became a global revolutionary icon. Together, they worked tirelessly to turn their shared vision of regional integration into reality.

    Even when his health declined in his later years, Fidel continued to share his wisdom with the Cuban people, working until his final days as a “soldier of ideas,” a researcher, and an advocate for sustainable food production for both people and animals. Fidel insisted that his memory never be used to build a cult of personality, Raúl recalls; the only proper monument to his work is continuing the struggle to make his vision a reality, under the unified leadership of the Communist Party of Cuba. He expressed unwavering confidence in Cuban youth, and left a legacy of personal example and unshakable will that empowers new generations to achieve what once seemed impossible. That legacy unites Cubans today, and forms an impenetrable bulwark against efforts to destroy the revolution.

    The *Selected Works of Fidel Castro Ruz* collected in 23 volumes brings together 690 texts: speeches, interviews, articles, reflections, prologues, and other materials, including some never before published or rarely seen. The final volume closes with a tribute to Fidel’s deep friendship with Chávez, whom Fidel called “the best friend the Cuban people ever had.” The collection demonstrates Fidel’s extraordinary gifts as a communicator: a profound, passionate orator who could captivate crowds of thousands. It stands as a critical piece of Cuba’s national historical memory, covering every pivotal event of the revolution, though Raúl acknowledges it cannot capture every word Fidel ever spoke. Even so, it will serve as an essential resource for generations to come to understand Fidel’s thought, life, work, and example, and it highlights how much more remains to be studied about the epic of the Cuban Revolution and its global impact. The team that compiled the collection credits the work as a masterclass in revolutionary thought, and Raúl notes that the next critical step is the publication of Fidel’s complete works by the Fidel Castro Ruz Center, an urgent project to preserve Cuba’s national historical memory.

    For current and future generations, Raúl writes, these works are an inexhaustible resource: they help explain the crises of the modern world, and provide a powerful weapon to defend Cuba, carrying forward the unyielding spirit of Cuban independence hero Antonio Maceo, who declared that any who try to seize Cuba will “reap the dust of its soil soaked in blood, if they do not perish in the struggle.”

    Closing the prologue, Raúl writes: “Infinite thanks, Fidel, for your teachings and example. With you, we reaffirm the commitment you instilled in us: Homeland or Death! We shall overcome! Always onward to victory!”

  • Parmessar: Behandeling wetswijziging rechterlijke macht vóór reces lijkt moeilijk haalbaar

    Parmessar: Behandeling wetswijziging rechterlijke macht vóór reces lijkt moeilijk haalbaar

    A planned overhaul of Suriname’s Judicial Branch Financial Provisions Act is facing growing delays, and is now increasingly unlikely to be finalized and voted on before the National Assembly enters its recess on September 3, according to the head of the country’s main opposition National Democratic Party (NDP).

    Rabin Parmessar, who leads the NDP parliamentary caucus and also chairs the special committee of rapporteurs overseeing the bill, told local outlet Starnieuws that while initial planning called for the full legislative process to wrap up before the recess break, ongoing discussions have revealed there is still far more work to be done to get the text right.

    Parmessar emphasized that any changes to this law, which governs the core framework for the judicial branch, must be handled responsibly, with full respect for the separation of powers between Suriname’s state institutions. With less than two weeks remaining before the recess begins, the timeline for advancing the bill before the break is now looking increasingly unfeasible.

    The holdup on the legislation carries tangible real-world consequences: 15 newly trained judges are ready to take their seats on the bench to ease existing caseload burdens across Suriname’s court system, and court administration has already assigned them to court sessions set to begin when the new judicial term opens in October. However, their formal appointment process remains incomplete, in large part because the salary regime that will apply to these new magistrates is still tied up in the proposed law changes.

    The candidates have already completed all required training, and their arrival is widely viewed as a critical step to address long-standing high workloads and expand judicial capacity to reduce case backlogs. The Council of Ministers has already signed off on their appointments, but the final presidential resolution formalizing their roles has not yet been issued, pending resolution of the salary framework question.

    At the heart of the legislative debate is the restructuring of judicial pay, a core component of the proposed amendments. The existing salary system has faced criticism in recent years over its structure of incremental pay increases and multiple allowances, which over time have driven total judicial compensation far higher than initial budget projections, creating long-term fiscal sustainability concerns.

    The revision proposal adjusts a range of percentage-based pay scales overhauls how incremental pay increases are structured, with the explicit goal of creating a new salary framework that is more financially manageable for the state budget. Until the law amendment is finalized, there remains no definitive clarity on which pay scheme will apply to the 15 incoming judges. While it remains legally possible to appoint the judges under current law, the unresolved compensation question has put the entire process on hold.