分类: politics

  • Cuba rejects US naval blockade of Venezuela

    Cuba rejects US naval blockade of Venezuela

    Cuban leadership has issued a forceful condemnation of the United States’ announced naval blockade against Venezuela, characterizing the move as a severe violation of international law and an escalation of hostilities against the Bolivarian government.

    President Miguel Diaz-Canel utilized social media platform X to deliver Cuba’s official position, stating unequivocally, “We strongly reject the naval blockade of Venezuela by the US government.” The Cuban head of state further emphasized Havana’s “firm support for President Nicolas Maduro, the Bolivarian and Chavista Revolution, and its Popular-Military Union.”

    The diplomatic offensive continued with Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla echoing the president’s sentiments on the same platform. Rodriguez expressed Cuba’s “full support for the statement published by the Venezuelan government,” which formally challenges and denounces the US measure. The foreign minister provided legal context to Cuba’s opposition, labeling the blockade “a grave violation of international law and an escalation of aggression against the Bolivarian government.”

    Rodriguez concluded with a reaffirmation of Cuba’s diplomatic stance, proclaiming “our full and unwavering support for the constitutional President Nicolas Maduro, the Bolivarian and Chavista Revolution, and its Popular-Military Union.” The coordinated messaging from both Cuba’s executive and diplomatic branches signals a unified front in opposition to US policy toward Venezuela and represents the latest development in ongoing tensions between Washington and the Caracas-Havana alliance.

  • Antigua in discussions with US on new immigration measure

    Antigua in discussions with US on new immigration measure

    The government of Antigua and Barbuda has initiated urgent diplomatic discussions with United States authorities following President Donald Trump’s executive order imposing visa restrictions on nationals from several CARICOM countries. The Caribbean nation finds itself included in the travel limitations due to concerns regarding its Citizenship by Investment (CBI) program.

    Ambassador Sir Ronald Sanders confirmed ongoing negotiations with the U.S. State Department, seeking clarification on visa statuses for citizens who obtained documentation prior to December 2025. The diplomatic efforts aim to address the specific concern raised by the Trump administration regarding historical absence of residency requirements within Antigua and Barbuda’s investment migration program.

    Prime Minister Gaston Browne expressed profound disappointment with the proclamation, asserting that the characterization of Antigua and Barbuda’s CBI program fails to reflect current legislative realities. Browne emphasized that over the past year, his administration has collaborated extensively with multiple U.S. government agencies to implement robust safeguards within the citizenship program.

    Substantial reforms have been enacted through comprehensive new legislation strengthening due diligence protocols, transparency measures, information-sharing mechanisms, and enforcement procedures. Most significantly, the updated laws now mandate a 30-day physical residency requirement as a strict condition for citizenship qualification—directly contradicting the U.S. administration’s stated rationale for the restrictions.

    Notably, U.S. State Department officials reportedly expressed surprise regarding the proclamation’s issuance, indicating possible internal coordination gaps within the American government. Prime Browne has committed to pursuing both diplomatic channels and direct correspondence with President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio to resolve the situation.

    The Trump administration’s executive order cites security concerns regarding CBI programs, arguing they could potentially enable individuals from restricted nations to circumvent travel limitations through citizenship acquisition. Historical susceptibility to identity concealment and financial evasion risks were additionally cited as justification for the policy implementation.

    Antigua and Barbuda values its longstanding relationship with the United States, which represents its most significant trading partner. The government has pledged to employ all available diplomatic means to preserve bilateral relations founded on mutual respect and accurate understanding of recently implemented immigration safeguards.

  • Wet Openbaarheid van Bestuur kent lange voorgeschiedenis

    Wet Openbaarheid van Bestuur kent lange voorgeschiedenis

    A significant political discourse has emerged in Suriname regarding the long-pending Wet Openbaarheid van Bestuur (WOB) or Law on Government Transparency, revealing a complex legislative history that predates current political claims. Contrary to recent assertions by VHP faction leader Asis Gajadien, historical records indicate the transparency legislation concept originated from Soewarto Moestadja during his tenure as Acting Minister of Home Affairs in the first Bouterse cabinet.

    The initial draft, developed in 2014, was formally submitted to Parliament in 2016. Moestadja, now an NDP member and former parliamentarian, disclosed that he had already prepared a preliminary version during the 2010-2015 governing period under then-Vice President Robert Ameerali. This early proposal underwent two deliberations in the Council of Ministers before its parliamentary submission.

    Political obstacles, particularly from the then-VHP opposition, prevented substantive discussion of the legislation until after the 2020 government transition. Following the political shift, the VHP—now part of the governing coalition—developed an alternative WOB concept. Moestadja emphasized that two distinct legislative proposals existed simultaneously, challenging Gajadien’s characterization of the initiative as solely his own.

    The VHP’s version also faced implementation challenges during the previous governing period. While parliamentary committees under Gajadien’s leadership attempted to advance the process through interactive sessions with civil society groups, progress stalled due to absenteeism among opposition members, particularly from the NDP.

    Expert assessment revealed substantial criticisms from consulted specialists and organizations including the Citizen Initiative, Surinamese Association of Journalists (SVJ), public administration expert August Boldewijn, and former Vice President Ameerali. The consensus indicated the proposal required comprehensive redesign. An evaluation by the regional Centre for Law and Democracy further confirmed deficiencies, noting insufficient scores on legal and democratic criteria.

    In January 2025, four months before the May 2025 elections, Gajadien submitted an amended version renamed the Wet Openbaarheid van Bestuursinformatie (Law on Transparency of Government Information). Moestadja contextualized this development within Suriname’s broader legislative challenges, noting that three labor laws he proposed as Labor Minister similarly remained unaddressed—even during NDP-led governments.

  • UPP concerned about US visa sanctions, blames government mismanagement of CBI Programme

    UPP concerned about US visa sanctions, blames government mismanagement of CBI Programme

    The United Progressive Party (UPP) has characterized recent US-imposed visa restrictions on Dominican nationals as a catastrophic failure of governance, accusing the administration of jeopardizing national security through inadequate management of the Citizenship by Investment (CBI) program.

    In a strongly-worded declaration, the opposition party asserted that President Donald Trump’s suspension of immigrant entry and restrictions on B-1, B-2, F, M, and J visas directly resulted from governmental negligence. The UPP maintains that despite official assurances of rigorous screening protocols, the administration prioritized economic gains over effective due diligence, ultimately compelling American authorities to designate Dominican passports as security liabilities.

    According to the party’s analysis, the repercussions extend far beyond diplomatic spheres, creating tangible hardships for citizens across multiple sectors. Students confront disrupted academic trajectories in American institutions, families experience heightened barriers to reunification, and business professionals face constrained international mobility. The UPP further warned that Dominica’s regional standing within the Caribbean community has been significantly compromised, potentially affecting future cooperation and economic opportunities.

    Characterizing the situation as a generational crisis, the opposition outlined a comprehensive recovery plan demanding full transparency regarding CBI program failures, immediate collaboration with US authorities to address security concerns, and substantial reforms to align vetting procedures with international standards. The party additionally called for establishing a bipartisan commission to investigate the program’s management and ensure accountability for those responsible.

    The UPP concluded that only through fundamentally reformed leadership committed to integrity could Dominica restore its international reputation, emphasizing that the nation’s future depends on urgent governmental accountability.

  • Government reinforces commitment to National Security with strong financial support for the financial year 2026

    Government reinforces commitment to National Security with strong financial support for the financial year 2026

    In a decisive move to strengthen national security capabilities, the Government of Saint Kitts and Nevis has announced substantial financial backing for security enhancements in its 2026 budget. Prime Minister and Finance Minister Dr. Terrance Drew unveiled the allocation during his December 16 budget presentation, emphasizing his administration’s dedication to citizen protection through strategic investments.

    The Ministry of National Security, Citizenship, and Immigration will receive $97.3 million in total funding, with resources directed toward three primary objectives: augmenting law enforcement capabilities, modernizing critical infrastructure, and implementing advanced security technologies. The comprehensive security package includes $84.1 million in recurrent expenditure alongside $3.2 million specifically designated for infrastructure development.

    Key initiatives encompass extensive refurbishment of police facilities, construction and upgrades for fire service operations, and procurement of essential equipment. Technological advancements will feature prominently through enhancements to closed-circuit surveillance networks, traffic management systems, and the National Security Technology Refresh Programme designed to modernize law enforcement infrastructure.

    Significant attention has been given to emergency response capabilities, with plans for demolishing and reconstructing the Basseterre Fire and Rescue facility. Simultaneously, Nevis will benefit from substantial fire service improvements including the acquisition of new firefighting apparatus and establishment of a second fire station to ensure adequate emergency coverage. The government will also implement specialized training programs to enhance the professionalism of Nevis firefighters.

    Prime Minister Drew characterized these measures as fundamental to maintaining public safety and national stability. “The safety and security of our citizens remain a top priority for this government,” he stated. “Through these strategic investments, we are reinforcing our commitment to law and order while ensuring our protective agencies are equipped to address contemporary and future challenges.”

    The administration asserts that these security enhancements will support the nation’s ongoing development while safeguarding community welfare across the federation.

  • Six days that shook the nation

    Six days that shook the nation

    On a cold December morning in 1975, approximately 2,000 delegates representing every sector of Cuban society gathered at Havana’s Karl Marx Theater, many wearing formal suits and ties for the first time. This historic assembly marked the commencement of the First Congress of the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) – a pivotal moment that would fundamentally shape the nation’s revolutionary trajectory.

    Sixteen years after overthrowing the Batista regime and a decade following the establishment of the initial Central Committee, Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro delivered a comprehensive report analyzing Cuba’s revolutionary journey. He proudly declared Cuba’s unique position as ‘Spain’s last colony in Latin America’ that had transformed into ‘the first socialist country in this hemisphere.’

    The address provided a meticulous historical account, tracing Cuba’s struggle from independence wars through the revolutionary period. Castro detailed how the United States, upon recognizing the Revolution’s determination to resist external pressure, initiated economic aggressions while recruiting and training mercenaries for sabotage operations and military actions.

    While acknowledging administrative and economic management shortcomings during the initial revolutionary decade, Castro emphasized that survival against imperialist subversion, military aggression, and relentless economic blockade had consumed the nation’s primary resources. ‘For years, we had to keep more than 300,000 men under arms to defend the country,’ he revealed.

    Despite these challenges, Castro highlighted Cuba’s extraordinary advancements across multiple fields, noting that these achievements were particularly remarkable given the context of sustained pressure from a powerful northern neighbor. The real significance, he stressed, lay in Cuba’s ability to resist reestablishment of ‘corrupt, exploitative, and oppressive systems’ while making substantial progress under exceptionally difficult circumstances.

    Over six intensive days (December 17-22, 1975), the Congress produced foundational documents including the Theses, Statutes, and Programmatic Platform of the PCC. Critical resolutions addressed cadre training policies, selection procedures, placement strategies, promotion systems, and improvement protocols, alongside Directives for economic and social development during the 1976-1980 five-year period.

    This landmark event initiated Cuba’s institutionalization process, which would subsequently manifest through a new political-administrative division, establishment of People’s Power organs, and ratification of the 1976 Socialist Constitution replacing the 1940 document.

    The Congress also addressed international solidarity efforts, particularly Cuba’s support for Angola’s MPLA against South African troops. Castro explicitly stated that Cuban involvement represented ‘a basic internationalist duty’ rather than pursuit of material resources: ‘We are not looking for oil, or copper, or iron, or anything at all. We are simply applying a policy of principles.’

    On December 22, hundreds of thousands of Cubans gathered at Revolution Square to endorse the Congress agreements in what Fidel characterized as the ‘People’s Congress’ – a demonstration of mass support that confirmed the revolutionary movement’s deep popular roots. He framed contemporary efforts as continuing ‘the humble inheritance of entire generations of Cubans who for more than a hundred years have fought for justice, freedom, and dignity.’

  • Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica respond as partial US travel restrictions set to take effect in the new year

    Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica respond as partial US travel restrictions set to take effect in the new year

    The United States has announced significant visa restrictions targeting multiple nations, including Caribbean counterparts Antigua and Barbuda and Dominica, citing national security concerns related to their Citizenship by Investment (CBI) programs. The policy shift, declared by the White House on December 16, 2025, will take effect January 1, 2026.

    This development represents an expansion of existing travel limitations, now encompassing twenty additional countries across Africa and the Caribbean. The restrictions specifically apply to B1/B2 business/tourist visas, F and M student visas, and J exchange visitor visas for applicants from these nations.

    According to the presidential proclamation, the measures aim to address perceived vulnerabilities in immigration vetting processes. The administration identified several systemic issues including inadequate document verification, unreliable criminal records, and insufficient birth registration systems in affected jurisdictions. Particular concern was directed toward CBI programs that allegedly enable identity concealment and bypass standard vetting protocols through non-residency requirements.

    Caribbean leaders have responded with both surprise and consternation. Antiguan Prime Minister Gaston Browne expressed ‘deep disappointment,’ asserting that recent legislative reforms have already implemented a mandatory 30-day physical residency requirement for citizenship applicants—directly contradicting the US administration’s stated concerns.

    Similarly, Dominican Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit highlighted his nation’s comprehensive CBI reforms enacted in October 2025, which established enhanced due diligence procedures, stricter financial transparency mandates, and an independent regulatory authority. Both governments have initiated diplomatic channels, dispatching envoys to Washington for urgent consultations regarding the implementation scope of these restrictions.

    The policy announcement has generated uncertainty among current visa holders and applicants from affected nations, with specific implications for educational exchanges, business travel, and diplomatic relations between the US and Eastern Caribbean states.

  • Parlementaire commissie wil OM spreken over initiatiefwet inrichting rechterlijke macht

    Parlementaire commissie wil OM spreken over initiatiefwet inrichting rechterlijke macht

    Suriname’s National Assembly has taken significant steps toward judicial reform with the establishment of a special parliamentary committee mandated to engage with the Public Prosecutor’s Office regarding proposed legislation on the structure of the judiciary. The committee, appointed during Monday’s administrative session, aims to initiate dialogue with judicial authorities as early as this week.

    Rabin Parmessar, leader of the National Democratic Party faction and appointed committee chair, currently oversees four distinct legislative proposals concerning judicial organization. Parmessar clarified that the decision to consult the Public Prosecutor’s Office stems from constitutional necessities rather than responding to Prosecutor General Garcia Paragsingh’s expressed concerns about the proposed laws. “This initiative reflects our shared commitment to properly establishing the judicial branch as a fundamental pillar of our separation of powers,” Parmessar stated.

    Both Parmessar and fellow NDP legislator Ebu Jones emphasized that parliamentary members maintain constitutional authority to propose legislation, noting that the Prosecutor General’s public criticism through media channels occurred prematurely and without proper procedural context. Jones highlighted the established parliamentary process for legislative proposals, which involves formal submission, committee appointment during administrative sessions, and consultation with relevant stakeholders before public deliberation.

    The current situation presents a unique circumstance where four separate committees—all chaired by Parmessar—will examine constitutional amendments and judicial restructuring proposals before they became public knowledge, somewhat accelerating the typical legislative timeline.

    In parallel developments, the National Assembly established additional committees for other legislative matters, including a committee for the Sustainable Nature Management initiative led by NDP parliamentarian Rossellie Cotino. The government has identified this legislation as crucial for policy implementation, particularly following Suriname’s recent securing of $20 million in commitments from Nordic countries and international environmental institutions during the latest UN assembly. These funds remain contingent upon strengthening the legal framework for environmental conservation.

    Notably, the proposed ban on online gambling has not yet received committee assignment as it was absent from the current session’s agenda. Jones has received assurances that this proposal will be prioritized during the next parliamentary administrative meeting.

  • STATEMENT: Ministry of Foreign Affairs on US visa sanctions

    STATEMENT: Ministry of Foreign Affairs on US visa sanctions

    The Commonwealth of Dominica has formally responded to the United States government’s recent imposition of partial travel restrictions targeting Dominican nationals. The White House disclosed this diplomatic decision on December 16, 2025, with implementation scheduled for January 1, 2026.

    In an official statement, Dominican authorities acknowledged potential concerns arising from this development while emphasizing their serious and urgent approach to the matter. The government has initiated high-level communications with the United States Embassy based in Bridgetown, Barbados, seeking comprehensive clarification regarding multiple aspects of the new measures.

    Diplomatic engagements focus on three primary objectives: determining the precise scope of restrictions, understanding the foundational rationale behind the implementation, and identifying specific consequences for Dominican travelers, international students, family members, and legitimate visa holders. The government has committed to protecting citizen interests through continued collaboration with American officials to resolve identified challenges.

    Transparency remains a priority throughout these diplomatic exchanges, with authorities pledging to provide accurate information to the public as developments occur. The government has promised subsequent updates once additional details are formally confirmed through diplomatic channels.

  • Dominica seeking ‘clarification’ on US travel restriction

    Dominica seeking ‘clarification’ on US travel restriction

    ROSEAU, Dominica – The Dominican government has initiated urgent diplomatic communications with United States authorities following President Donald Trump’s executive order imposing partial travel restrictions on its nationals. The December 16, 2025 proclamation, which becomes effective January 1, 2026, also targets citizens of Antigua and Barbuda and Haiti.

    In an official statement released Tuesday night, Dominica’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Business, Trade and Energy acknowledged the White House announcement while emphasizing its commitment to addressing concerns among Dominican citizens. The Roosevelt Skerrit administration has engaged US Embassy officials in Bridgetown, Barbados to obtain detailed clarification regarding the scope, rationale, and specific implications for Dominican travelers, students, and visa holders.

    President Trump’s executive order reinstates immigration policies from his first administration, citing national security concerns. The proclamation specifically identifies Citizenship-by-Investment (CBI) programs—which Dominica and Antigua and Barbuda operate—as creating vetting vulnerabilities. These programs grant citizenship to foreign investors without residency requirements, which US authorities claim enables individuals to conceal identities and evade travel restrictions.

    The Trump administration asserts that the measures are necessary to protect national security against potential terrorists, public safety threats, and those who might exploit immigration laws for malevolent purposes. The order suspends entry for immigrants and non-immigrants on B-1, B-2, B-1/B-2, F, M, and J visas from the affected Caribbean nations.

    Dominican officials have pledged continued cooperation with US authorities to address identified issues while protecting the interests of Dominican citizens. The government has committed to providing regular public updates as additional information becomes available.