分类： politics

In a historic parliamentary session, Opposition Leader Pennelope Beckles has affirmed her party’s unwavering support for Tobago’s developmental agenda during debates on the Tobago House of Assembly (Amendment) Bill, 2026. The PNM political leader emphasized her party’s longstanding commitment to advancing legislative measures that benefit all citizens of Trinidad and Tobago.

Addressing the House of Representatives on January 16, Beckles provided historical context, noting that discussions regarding Tobago’s greater autonomy have persisted for decades. She revealed that the People’s National Movement had conducted extensive consultations with Tobagonians over the years, culminating in the previous Tobago Self-Government Bill presented to Parliament in 2020.

Beckles addressed concerns raised by Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar regarding the discretionary powers granted to the THA Chief Secretary to expand secretarial positions within the assembly. The opposition leader clarified that such provisions were already incorporated within the 2020 legislation, indicating continuity between the previous and current bills.

While acknowledging that Tobago didn’t receive all requested resources during the PNM’s administration from 2015-2025, Beckles highlighted several completed projects demonstrating her party’s commitment, including the Southwest Tobago Wastewater Project, Hillsborough Dam, and acquisition of the Cove Industrial Estate.

The legislative process concluded with overwhelming bipartisan support, as the bill passed with 38 affirmative votes and no opposition or abstentions. This political consensus emerges following the Tobago People’s Party’s decisive 15-0 victory in the January 12 THA elections, which resulted in the PNM losing its sole representative seat for Darrel Spring/Whim.

Both government and opposition leaders extended congratulations to TPP political leader Farley Augustine on his electoral triumph and assumption of the Chief Secretary role.

In a politically charged statement during a United National Congress (UNC) media briefing on January 18, party PRO Dr. Kirk Meighoo asserted that the Trinidad and Tobago government’s policy formulation occurs at the opposition party’s headquarters in Chaguanas. The controversial remarks have ignited debate about the separation between party operations and governmental functions in the Caribbean nation.

Addressing journalists and online viewers at the UNC’s Mulchan Seuchan Road facility, Meighoo declared, “We are here at the UNC headquarters, which is where the policy of the government of TT has been formulated.” He characterized the UNC as “a national party open to all” with members “dedicated to making sure that everybody wins.”

When questioned about non-governmental UNC members participating in policy development, Meighoo affirmed this practice occurs through party committees and manifesto formation processes. He defended the arrangement as normal democratic practice, stating, “The UNC forms the government, we were voted in by the majority and this is how democracy works.”

The location and branding of government briefings have drawn public scrutiny, with observers noting the consistent use of UNC facilities and party banners rather than traditional government venues like the Red House or Diplomatic Centre in St. Ann’s. This departure from previous administrative practices has raised questions about the transparency and separation of party versus state activities in the current political landscape.

Meighoo further positioned the UNC as “the largest organisation in TT and perhaps the English-speaking Caribbean,” asserting the party’s continued central role in the nation’s democratic processes despite its official opposition status.

In a contentious parliamentary session, Trinidad and Tobago’s Defense Minister Wayne Sturge has vehemently denied opposition claims that the newly passed Law Reform (Zones of Special Operations) Bill 2026 would enable racial targeting. The legislation, approved 27-11 in the House of Representatives on January 18, establishes special security zones while simultaneously announcing the termination of the current state of emergency effective January 31.

Minister Sturge accused the Opposition PNM party of fabricating a ‘false narrative’ that Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar could unilaterally declare zones in PNM-controlled areas to target specific racial groups. He emphasized that any declaration of Zones of Special Operations (ZOSOs) requires consultation with both the Commissioner of Police and the Defense Force Chief of Staff, with a maximum duration of 180 days.

To counter racial bias allegations, Sturge detailed the composition of the National Security Council, highlighting that key members including Attorney General John Jeremie, Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander, and Works Minister Jearlean John are all ‘proud black’ officials. He further noted that Commissioner of Police Allister Guevarro and senior defense force commanders are predominantly of African descent.

‘The composition of the NSC should put to rest the divisive narrative that continues to be peddled,’ Sturge asserted during a news conference at UNC headquarters in Chaguanas. ‘Black and brown people are the majority in this country. This is not West Virginia, Kentucky, Mississippi.’

Opposition MP Keith Scotland argued the bill would infringe constitutional rights including freedom of movement, property enjoyment, and due process, warning against ‘replacing one extraordinary security measure with another.’

The legislation establishes social development components including a strategy committee to provide resources for vulnerable communities, aiming to create ‘equality of opportunity and social justice.’ Sturge defended the government’s elimination of make-work programs like the Unemployment Relief Programme, alleging they had funded criminal gangs.

The bill now moves to the Senate where it requires 19 votes for passage. The government holds 15 senate seats, with Sturge expressing confidence that at least four independent senators would support the measure.

The Trinidad and Tobago government has reached a landmark settlement to resolve a protracted compensation dispute with former private sugarcane farmers, concluding a decade-long legal battle stemming from the closure of Caroni (1975) Ltd during the Manning administration.

This resolution emerged from a High Court hearing where the Attorney General’s Office consented to an order addressing 256 claims filed by former farmers seeking enforcement of a Cabinet-approved compensation package from December 2014. The original agreement authorized a $130 million settlement package structured in three tranches to address the 2007 transition out of the sugar industry.

The compensation framework included an initial $27 million from European Union funds under the Sugar Protocol Programme, followed by $75 million upon receipt of 8 million euros from the EU in 2015, and a final $28 million payment in 2016. Despite receiving the European funds in 2015, the previous administration diverted the money into the Consolidated Fund for general government expenditure instead of compensating the farmers.

Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar, whose administration originally approved the compensation package, had pledged during the recent election campaign that a UNC government would honor the commitment. The matter was finally resolved before Justice Gobin on January 16, with the state agreeing to implement the outstanding payments.

Attorney Gerald Ramdeen, representing the former farmers, expressed appreciation for the resolution, stating: “I wish to thank the honorable prime minister and the attorney general for doing what should have been done ten years ago. The actions of the present Attorney General have brought ten years of discrimination by the PNM to an end.”

The settlement concludes years of legal challenges, including unsuccessful state appeals and a 2019 Court of Appeal decision that favored six former sugarcane farmers. The farmers had rejected a 2016 government offer of $84 million instead of the promised $130 million, choosing instead to pursue full compensation through the judicial system.