分类: politics

  • Trump posts first images of Maduro in handcuffs

    Trump posts first images of Maduro in handcuffs

    In a significant address from his Mar-a-Lago estate in South Florida, former President Donald Trump publicly commended a recent US-led military operation targeting Venezuelan leadership. The operation, which resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, was characterized by Trump as an extraordinary tactical success.

    Trump emphasized the operation’s flawless execution, specifically highlighting the absence of American casualties and the complete preservation of US military assets. “Witnessing the operation unfold was profoundly impressive—a display of military precision where not one American service member was lost and not a single piece of US equipment was compromised,” he stated, suggesting the full details might remain classified from public view.

    The former president detailed the substantial scale of the involvement, noting the deployment of numerous helicopters, aircraft, and personnel. His remarks framed the mission as a testament to US military capability and strategic planning, underscoring a high-stakes international intervention achieved with maximum operational efficiency and minimal risk to American forces.

  • US to “run” Venezuela- Trump

    US to “run” Venezuela- Trump

    In a dramatic escalation of tensions, United States President Donald Trump announced on Saturday that the US would assume direct administrative control of Venezuela to oversee a “safe transition” of power. This declaration came hours after Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife were captured and extracted from the country during a pre-dawn military operation involving missile strikes on multiple military installations in and around the capital.

    Addressing a press conference, President Trump stated that the United States would be “very strongly involved” in Venezuela’s crucial oil industry, signaling a significant shift in the nation’s economic control. “We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” Trump asserted, adding that the intervention aimed to prevent a recurrence of the political instability that has plagued Venezuela for years.

    The Maduros are reportedly being transported to New York where they will face indictment on unspecified charges. This development follows months of heightened tensions between the two nations, during which the US accused Maduro of involvement in drug trafficking and conducted more than twenty airstrikes in maritime areas near Venezuela since September—accusations that Maduro has consistently denied.

    In response to the intervention, Venezuela’s Defence Minister Vladimir Padrino Lopez declared that the country “will prevail … not negotiate … not give up.” The Venezuelan government has condemned the operation as an act of “military aggression” by Washington, claiming that both civilian and military installations across multiple states were targeted.

    The capture occurred despite Maduro’s indication just two days earlier that he was open to negotiating a deal with the US to combat drug trafficking, suggesting a rapid breakdown in diplomatic communications between the two nations.

  • WIN appeals for national unity to tackle threats from Venezuela after US strikes

    WIN appeals for national unity to tackle threats from Venezuela after US strikes

    In the wake of recent U.S. military actions that resulted in the ousting of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, Guyana’s principal opposition party We Invest in Nationhood (WIN) has issued a compelling call for national cohesion. The party, which secured 16 parliamentary seats in the September 2025 elections, cautioned that regime change in Caracas might unpredictably escalate existing tensions rather than alleviate them.

    WIN emphasized that Guyana continues to face sustained pressure and micro-aggressions stemming from Venezuela’s longstanding territorial claim over the Essequibo region. The party outlined multiple potential threats including increased cross-border movements, refugee influxes, retaliatory actions by Venezuelan operatives within Guyana, and heightened risks to citizens and critical infrastructure. These developments could particularly destabilize border and hinterland regions, creating both economic and security vulnerabilities.

    Highlighting recent security incidents, WIN referenced the simultaneous bombings of a police outpost and power facility earlier in 2025, for which three Spanish-speaking suspects remain at large. Additionally, the party recalled the tragic gas station explosion in Georgetown that involved both Venezuelan and Guyanese individuals.

    Rather than unilateral action, WIN urged the Irfaan Ali-led administration to engage in meaningful consultation with opposition forces through institutional mechanisms. The party specifically called for the immediate election of an Opposition Leader to activate the Parliamentary Oversight Committee on the Security Sector, arguing that comprehensive security policy review requires inclusive governance.

    WIN advocated for regional stability through diplomatic channels, international law, and mutual respect while stressing that domestic unity remains paramount. The party concluded that ‘national security is not a party matter’ but fundamentally ‘a Guyana matter,’ requiring transparent leadership and constitutional governance during this period of regional uncertainty.

  • Caribbean, World leaders react to US attack in Venezuela

    Caribbean, World leaders react to US attack in Venezuela

    International condemnation has swept across multiple continents following United States military operations in Venezuelan territory and the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores. The unprecedented intervention, which occurred on January 3, 2026, has triggered urgent diplomatic responses from nations worldwide warning of severe regional destabilization and violations of international law.\n\nCaribbean nations demonstrated immediate concern given their geographic proximity to Venezuela. Guyanese Prime Minister Dr. Irfaan Ali convened an emergency session with the Defence Board and national security apparatus, highlighting heightened alert status amid existing regional tensions. Trinidad and Tobago’s Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar explicitly distanced her nation from the military operations, emphasizing continued peaceful relations with Venezuela despite the unfolding crisis.\n\nOpposition Leader Pennelope Beckles of Trinidad and Tobago characterized developments as \”deeply troubling,\” reaffirming commitments to maintain the Caribbean as a \”Zone of Peace\” while expressing particular concern for civilian safety and Trinidadian nationals in Caracas.\n\nLatin American powers delivered forceful responses. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva condemned the bombings as crossing \”an unacceptable line,\” warning they established \”an extremely dangerous precedent for the entire international community.\” Mexican authorities issued firm condemnation of unilateral military action, urging immediate United Nations intervention to de-escalate tensions.\n\nEuropean leaders emphasized legal and humanitarian dimensions. European Commission Vice-President Kaja Kallas stressed that \”principles of international law and the UN Charter must be respected under all circumstances.\” European Council President António Costa called for de-escalation and resolution through proper legal channels, while Spanish officials confirmed their diplomatic personnel’s safety and offered support for peaceful solutions.\n\nRussia’s Foreign Ministry described the operation as \”an act of armed aggression against Venezuela\” lacking factual justification, though confirming no injuries among Russian citizens in Caracas.\n\nThe United States justified its actions through legal frameworks. Attorney General Pamela Bondi announced indictments against Maduro and Flores in the Southern District of New York, charging the Venezuelan leader with Narco-Terrorism Conspiracy, Cocaine Importation Conspiracy, and weapons-related offenses. Bondi characterized the operation as a \”highly successful mission\” ensuring the defendants would \”face the full wrath of American justice.\”\n\nVenezuelan Executive Vice President Delcy Rodríguez denounced the intervention as \”extremely serious military aggression\” and a \”flagrant violation of the UN Charter,\\” accusing Washington of attempting to seize Venezuela’s strategic resources while vowing resistance.

  • Prepare to screen, accommodate influx of migrants as a fallout from US airstrikes on Venezuela, APNU tells gov’t

    Prepare to screen, accommodate influx of migrants as a fallout from US airstrikes on Venezuela, APNU tells gov’t

    Guyana’s primary opposition coalition, A Partnership for National Unity (APNU), has issued an urgent advisory to the government regarding potential security and humanitarian consequences stemming from recent US military operations in Venezuela. The organization emphasized the critical need for immediate contingency planning to address a possible influx of displaced persons across the western border.

    APNU proposed a comprehensive four-point strategy that includes establishing designated reception zones at secure distances from the border area. These zones would require pre-positioned essential supplies including water, food, medical resources, and shelter materials. The opposition coalition specifically highlighted the necessity of implementing robust vetting mechanisms to prevent potential infiltration threats that could compromise national interests.

    While advocating for humanitarian response measures, APNU simultaneously called for strengthened security protocols and systematic registration procedures to ensure orderly management of any migration flow. The organization stressed that such measures must balance humanitarian concerns with national security requirements.

    President Irfaan Ali, responding to inquiries, acknowledged ongoing border monitoring efforts but noted he had not yet reviewed APNU’s specific recommendations. The President confirmed that Prime Minister Mark Phillips was currently engaged with defense and security personnel in border regions to assess preparedness in light of regional developments.

    APNU further recommended establishing a joint humanitarian task force incorporating multiple government agencies including the Civil Defence Commission, Guyana Defence Force, and relevant ministries. The opposition coalition also urged international engagement with organizations including CARICOM, UN refugee agencies, and the International Red Cross to secure potential logistical and financial support.

    Emphasizing the need for bipartisan cooperation, APNU offered legislative support, community network mobilization, and budgetary approval assistance to address what they characterize as a national emergency requiring unified response. The organization noted that while Guyana maintains its position on territorial matters through the International Court of Justice process, the current situation demands pragmatic humanitarian planning.

    Background context indicates significant prior migration from Venezuela, with official figures documenting approximately 40,000 legal Venezuelan residents in Guyana and unofficial estimates suggesting total numbers exceeding 100,000 individuals who have fled political and economic instability over the past decade.

  • Venezuela Denounces U.S. Military Action, Declares State of External Commotion

    Venezuela Denounces U.S. Military Action, Declares State of External Commotion

    The Venezuelan government has issued a formal declaration of a State of External Commotion across its entire territory following what it characterizes as unprecedented military aggression by the United States. According to an official statement released on January 3, 2026, U.S. forces allegedly conducted attacks against both civilian and military installations in Caracas and surrounding states including Miranda, Aragua, and La Guaira.

    President Nicolás Maduro has authorized the implementation of comprehensive national defense protocols in response to what Venezuelan authorities describe as a blatant violation of international law and the United Nations Charter. The government asserts that these actions represent not only an assault on Venezuelan sovereignty but also a direct threat to regional stability throughout Latin America and the Caribbean.

    Venezuelan officials have framed the alleged incursion as an attempt to seize control of the nation’s strategic resources, particularly its substantial petroleum and mineral reserves, while simultaneously attempting to force regime change through military means. The government maintains that such efforts will ultimately fail, citing historical resistance to foreign intervention.

    Notably absent from the Venezuelan statement was any acknowledgment of U.S. claims regarding President Maduro’s capture and removal from the country during overnight operations. This creates a significant discrepancy between the narratives presented by the two nations, with Caracas maintaining presidential authority and continuity of government operations despite Washington’s assertions to the contrary.

    The declaration of a State of External Commotion enables extraordinary measures to protect civilian populations, ensure the continued functioning of state institutions, and coordinate national response to what Venezuela characterizes as external aggression.

  • Maduro ousted

    Maduro ousted

    In a stunning escalation of its campaign against the Venezuelan government, the United States has executed a high-risk military operation that resulted in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and his subsequent transfer to New York to face criminal charges. The operation, which involved air strikes and special forces, culminated hours later with President Donald Trump declaring that the U.S. would assume temporary administrative control of the South American nation, explicitly stating an intent to harness its vast oil reserves for export.

    The dramatic events mark the most assertive U.S. effort at regime change since the 2003 Iraq war. According to military officials, the mission involved 150 aircraft and was planned over months of intelligence gathering on Maduro’s habits. General Dan Caine reported that Maduro and his wife surrendered without resistance, resulting in no U.S. casualties, though Trump later indicated ‘many’ Cuban members of Maduro’s security detail were killed.

    President Trump’s announcement from Mar-a-Lago outlined a vision for Venezuela’s future that notably bypassed the U.S.-backed political opposition. While opposition leader Maria Corina Machado declared ‘the hour of freedom has arrived,’ Trump expressed skepticism about her support, instead suggesting a potential working relationship with Maduro’s vice-president, Delcy Rodriguez—a proposal she immediately rejected, demanding Maduro’s release.

    The international response has been sharply divided. China condemned the operation, while European powers expressed concern over violations of international law, even as they acknowledged Maduro’s lack of legitimacy. Balkan nations and the UK offered support for the U.S. action. The United Nations Security Council is scheduled to meet to discuss the intervention, which UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres stated did not respect international legal standards.

    The situation in Caracas remains tense and uncertain, with the long-term U.S. commitment unclear. Trump indicated that American involvement would continue for an indefinite period, stating troops could be deployed and the U.S. would remain ‘until the proper transition can take place.’

  • IR expert: Trump cannot run Venezuela

    IR expert: Trump cannot run Venezuela

    International relations specialist Anthony Bryan has categorically rejected U.S. President Donald Trump’s assertion that the United States would directly govern Venezuela following the military extraction of President Nicolás Maduro. The operation, conducted by U.S. forces in the early hours of January 3rd, resulted in Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores being removed from a fortified compound in Caracas.

    During a press briefing at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Trump declared that the U.S. would assume control of Venezuela’s administration and leverage its substantial oil reserves for international trade. However, the President provided no detailed explanation regarding the mechanics of this proposed governance structure or the composition of any transitional administration.

    Bryan, who serves as co-chairman of the Caribbean Policy Consortium, countered through WhatsApp communications on January 4th that “Trump cannot run Venezuela. Maduro is gone but the power structure in Venezuela remains.” The expert emphasized that constitutional succession had already occurred with Vice President Delcy Rodríguez assuming the presidency following Maduro’s capture.

    Trump acknowledged that Rodríguez had been sworn in as interim leader and had engaged in discussions with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, indicating her cooperation. However, the President simultaneously expressed skepticism about Rodríguez or any Maduro administration figures retaining power long-term.

    The U.S. leader also cast doubt on exiled opposition figure María Corina Machado’s potential involvement in any interim government, questioning her domestic support and respect within Venezuela. Trump promised imminent announcements regarding American designees who would ensure the country’s proper management.

    This development follows Bryan’s November expressed hope for diplomatic resolution between the two nations—a prospect Trump now claims Maduro squandered through missed opportunities. The President additionally asserted that American energy corporations would enter Venezuela to rehabilitate infrastructure and generate national revenue, with promised reimbursements for those economically impacted under Maduro’s regime.

  • Pets, planes and a ‘fortress’

    Pets, planes and a ‘fortress’

    WASHINGTON, DC — In a meticulously orchestrated military operation codenamed ‘Absolute Resolve,’ United States forces successfully apprehended Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, culminating a months-long intelligence mission. President Donald Trump monitored the dramatic capture in real-time through a live video feed from his Mar-a-Lago resort.

    The operation, described by military officials as a masterpiece of precision planning, involved extensive surveillance of Maduro’s movements since August. Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Caine revealed that US intelligence agents had compiled exhaustive details about the Venezuelan leader’s daily routines, including his dietary habits, travel patterns, and even his pets.

    Preparation included constructing replica facilities to simulate Maduro’s compound and waiting for optimal conditions. Trump initially authorized the mission four days prior to execution but delayed for perfect operational alignment, including favorable weather patterns.

    The decisive moment arrived at 10:46 PM Washington time on Friday when Trump issued the final execution order with the words ‘Good luck and Godspeed.’ More than 150 aircraft participated in the mission, including fighter jets, reconnaissance planes, drones, and specialized helicopters that flew at mere 100 feet above ocean surface to avoid detection.

    US satellite and cyber capabilities disabled Venezuelan radar systems as forces approached Caracas. Despite encountering anti-aircraft fire that struck one helicopter (which remained operational), US forces overwhelmed Venezuelan defenses. The extraction team landed at Maduro’s fortified compound at 2:01 AM Caracas time, finding the leader attempting to reach a reinforced security chamber.

    Maduro and his wife surrendered without significant resistance and were transported to the USS Iwo Jima. Both face serious US charges related to drug trafficking and terrorism activities. The White House subsequently released imagery showing the captured leader blindfolded, handcuffed, and wearing hearing protection alongside a Nike tracksuit.

  • PM: TT will work with any Venezuelan leader chosen in free elections

    PM: TT will work with any Venezuelan leader chosen in free elections

    Trinidad and Tobago’s Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar has articulated a firm stance on Venezuela’s political turmoil, emphasizing that Venezuelan citizens must autonomously determine their leadership through democratic processes. This position emerged following the dramatic capture of former Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro by US military forces on December 3rd, who now faces narcotrafficking charges in American courts.

    In a written statement to Newsday on January 4th, Persad-Bissessar clarified that her administration would collaborate with any transition government provided it commits to conducting legitimate elections. “I support free and fair democratic elections,” she asserted. “I do not support any specific person or organization.” This declaration gains significance given her previous designation as persona non grata by the Maduro administration, where current disputed leader Delcy Rodríguez served as vice president.

    The Prime Minister additionally endorsed US military involvement in the region, noting its contribution to enhanced security for Trinidad and Tobago. Her comments arrive amid contradictory signals from Washington, where President Donald Trump initially endorsed Rodríguez’s leadership while simultaneously declaring American oversight of Venezuelan affairs, while dismissing opposition figure María Corina Machado as lacking popular support.

    Political analyst Dr. Indira Rampersad provided critical context, noting the extraordinary nature of political alliances while expressing skepticism regarding Rodríguez’s viability as leader. “Rodríguez remains fundamentally aligned with Maduro’s ideology and governance approach,” Rampersad observed. She characterized Trump’s endorsement as potentially impulsive and questioned its implementation mechanics.

    Rampersad anticipates significant challenges for Rodríguez, predicting her leadership would prove transient due to overwhelming public demand for genuine change. With approximately eight million Venezuelan migrants worldwide experiencing newfound stability, she suggests widespread resistance to returning to previous governance models. The academic emphasized that only internationally observed elections producing a democratically elected government would establish the legitimacy necessary for meaningful international engagement.