分类: politics

  • FNM confirms voucher distribution but denies vote buying

    FNM confirms voucher distribution but denies vote buying

    As the Bahamas prepares for its upcoming general election, a growing controversy over political voucher distribution has put both of the country’s major political parties under scrutiny, with questions mounting over whether the practice crosses into illegal vote-buying territory.

    Duane Sands, chairman of the Free National Movement (FNM), and Denalee Penn-Mackey, the party’s parliamentary candidate for the Southern Shores constituency, have publicly confirmed that their party has distributed grocery vouchers to constituents, a move that comes after prior allegations against the incumbent Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) over misuse of public funds for similar voter outreach.

    In an interview with reporters, Sands acknowledged that voucher purchases from local retail chain Super Value have risen across the political spectrum, with both the FNM and PLP accounting for the increased sales. “There’s nothing unique to any particular political organisation here,” he stated, drawing a nuanced but contested line between legal assistance and illegal electoral inducement. Under the country’s Parliamentary Elections Act, any gift or benefit offered to influence a voter’s choice is a criminal offense. Sands argued that the legality of the practice hinges entirely on intent: while providing food support to households facing food insecurity does not violate the law on its face, he admitted the practice is a “slippery slope” that carries significant potential for abuse.

    Sands stressed that even amid the controversy, he would continue assisting constituents facing crisis. “If you come to me today and say that you have no food in your house, I would do the best that I can in order to assist,” he said, noting that he does not have details on the total value or number of vouchers the FNM has acquired overall. He further drew a clear distinction between assistance funded by personal or private political donations and programs backed by public money, arguing that the latter case amounts to a clear violation of electoral law.

    The incumbent Davis administration, led by the PLP, has still not responded to explosive allegations made by Chris Lleida, chief executive officer of Premier Importers. Lleida claims that the Bahamian government, not the PLP as a party, covered the cost of more than $200,000 in gift vouchers distributed and signed by PLP election candidates and party officials. Sands called this a “clear-cut violation of the law” and argued that the entire controversy underscores the urgent need for sweeping national campaign finance reform.

    Penn-Mackey, for her part, confirmed that she began distributing vouchers in her constituency within the past week, but insisted that all costs are covered by her own personal funds, eliminating any comparison to the PLP’s public funds allegations. “That, along with my whole campaign, is run by my own personal money, so I don’t see how what the PLP has done as it relates to the money you’re spending from the public treasury ties into what I’m doing personally,” she said. The vouchers she distributes are valued at approximately $100 each.

    A long-time community philanthropist, Penn-Mackey pushed back against questions about her activities, noting she has provided community support and aid for years independent of her candidacy. “We give out food and vouchers every day. Is that vote buying? The people have a food problem where people come and they said, listen, we need some vouchers. I have no grocery in my house, so when we give them a voucher, is that vote buying?” she asked. Rejecting claims of a double standard between her actions and the allegations against the PLP, she added: “It’s not a double standard because if it’s coming from the public treasury and my vouchers are coming from my personal account, that’s not a double standard at all.”

    FNM leader Michael Pintard echoed the argument that assisting vulnerable constituents is a moral obligation regardless of election season, but warned that using public funds for aid that only intensifies or launches right before an election erodes public trust in the democratic process. “If somebody is in need, I don’t think you take an issue with the government, at least certainly me personally, if somebody is hungry they need food assistance, the government is not providing it, you ordinarily provide it, and this is what you’ve been doing, I think you have an obligation to help people who need help,” Pintard said. “That’s a general rule that certainly I’ve lived by all along in and out of political season. If somebody needs help, you help them.”

    Even so, Pintard acknowledged that introducing new or expanded assistance programs in the middle of an election cycle reasonably invites public suspicion. “It allows others, others who look on, to presume that it’s politically motivated,” he said. “There are a number of constituencies where persons know, beyond the shadow of doubt their people weren’t about doing, running any social assistance programme, have not provided a social safety net, and all of a sudden, they are offering them around election time. That’s what they’re saying about the government right now. All of a sudden, you just realise that my house was leaking, and you have not been involved in the last four and a half years. You came and did an assessment. Nothing happened until just now.”

    To date, the core rules governing electoral conduct in the Bahamas remain clear: offering, giving, or providing any money, gift, or material benefit to a voter with the goal of influencing their ballot selection is classified as a criminal offense under the Parliamentary Elections Act.

  • WATCH: Russell defends Brown Burke following parliamentary mace incident

    WATCH: Russell defends Brown Burke following parliamentary mace incident

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — A heated late-night debate over critical draft legislation has pushed parliamentary tensions to a boiling point, leaving Jamaica’s legislative body grappling with a public display of discord over how opposition lawmakers say their voices are being sidelined in key policy deliberations.

    The controversy unfolded Tuesday night inside Gordon House, Jamaica’s parliamentary building, during the clause-by-clause review of the National Reconstruction and Resilience Authority (NaRRA) Bill, a piece of legislation focused on national recovery and adaptive governance. As debate grew increasingly contentious, opposition Member of Parliament Angela Brown Burke made contact with the ceremonial mace, a centuries-old symbol of parliamentary authority. In response, Speaker Juliet Holness formally named and suspended Burke from the chamber. When Burke repeatedly refused to comply with orders to leave, parliamentary marshals were called to remove her, forcing an immediate pause to all legislative proceedings.

    In the wake of the confrontation, senior opposition lawmaker Kenneth Russell has broken his silence, framing the outburst as the inevitable outcome of a broken deliberative process that has left opposition representatives feeling shut out of negotiations on major bills.

    Russell confirmed that the opposition caucus does not condone Burke’s physical action, acknowledging her breach of parliamentary protocol was wrong. But he pushed back against framing the incident as an isolated act of insubordination, arguing the toxic, exclusionary environment inside the chamber created the conditions for the confrontation.

    “Honestly, the session has gotten to the point where we didn’t feel like we were being heard,” Russell explained. “We didn’t think it was fair. There wasn’t enough time allocated for us to hold the discussions we needed to have on behalf of the constituents we represent. She did what she did to get attention, to make sure our concerns were finally heard.”

    For opposition lawmakers, the frustration runs deeper than a single piece of legislation. Russell noted that the pattern of sidelining has left the caucus feeling cornered into taking more dramatic action to be heard. “We are working in an environment where we feel as though we have to push the limits,” he said. “We are here to represent our people. We are here to have our voices heard on issues that impact them, and when that isn’t possible, a bit of rebellion becomes necessary.”

    After the temporary halt, proceedings eventually resumed, with Prime Minister Andrew Holness calling on all lawmakers to reset, restore order, and uphold the institutional dignity of the Parliament as the review of the NaRRA Bill continued.

  • Auditor General’s Dept stretched thin

    Auditor General’s Dept stretched thin

    Jamaica’s top auditor has sounded the alarm over crippling personnel shortages that are blocking an immediate re-examination of recently recovered procurement documents from the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI), as overlapping high-stakes public sector audits stretch her department’s already thin resources to breaking point. Auditor General Pamela Monroe Ellis shared these constraints during a recent sitting of Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC), where lawmakers pressed for details on how her office would move forward after UHWI administrators announced the rediscovery of dozens of procurement files previously listed as missing.

    The controversy traces back to an earlier audit of UHWI’s procurement protocols, which flagged 51 contracts for which no supporting documentation could be produced during the initial review. That gap sparked widespread alarm over gaps in record-keeping, potential lapses in transparency, and possible non-compliance with national public procurement rules. During Tuesday’s committee sitting, UHWI Acting Chief Executive Officer Eric Hosin updated legislators: eight of the missing files, covering contracts valued at approximately $65 million, have been located in previously searched storage spaces, while another four contracts worth an estimated $35 million have had their documentation reconstructed from existing records.

    Following this update, PAC Chair Julian Robinson asked the Auditor General’s Department to outline its next steps, noting that the committee requires independent verification from the auditor general to confirm that the newly surfaced files are both complete and credible. Robinson also pushed for clarity on how the department will handle files that remain unaccounted for, and contracts that UHWI has now stated were canceled before execution.

    In her response, Monroe Ellis pushed back against the assumption that the rediscovery of files automatically resolves earlier concerns about procurement irregularities. She emphasized that any meaningful follow-up review would demand a full reassessment of every document, including rigorous checks to confirm authenticity, completeness, and alignment with procedural requirements. “I am not satisfied with just looking at a file to see that it exists. I would rather to have a more thorough audit done where I can have confidence about bona fides as well as accuracy,” she told the committee.

    Despite this commitment to rigorous oversight, Monroe Ellis made clear that an immediate review is not feasible, given that her department is already stretched thin by multiple ongoing major investigations. “I understand your desire to have some level of comfort and better particulars around this matter. But I really have to emphasise that I just do not have the manpower right now. We have other audits that we’re seeking to complete and it’s actually this audit team that is involved, and it will have a ripple effect,” she explained.

    The Auditor General added that the UHWI probe is just one component of a wider systemic audit of Jamaica’s entire public health sector, and that other major public audits have already been pushed back due to competing urgent national priorities. She specifically called out a post-Hurricane Melissa recovery spending audit that is currently consuming the bulk of her department’s audit capacity, and has already delayed a separate review of the Cornwall Regional Health Authority. “It is necessary for us to wrap those audits up to move on, which is why I’m asking for time to allow the team to complete their review of the Hurricane Melissa initiative, which is quite time-consuming, as well as the Cornwall Regional Hospital,” she said.

    Monroe Ellis’ testimony underscores the growing systemic pressure facing Jamaica’s national audit office, which is being forced to juggle a growing backlog of high-profile public interest investigations against a static ceiling on staffing and operational resources.

  • Henfield questions cost of London worker

    Henfield questions cost of London worker

    A sharp political dispute has erupted in the Bahamas over proposed foreign service reforms, with former Foreign Affairs Minister Darron Henfield publicly questioning the fiscal responsibility and policy logic of the Davis administration’s provisions, centered on a controversial high-cost junior posting in London.

    At the core of Henfield’s critique is a young male government employee assigned to the Bahamian mission in London, who he says drains more than $200,000 annually from public taxpayer funds. The former minister’s attack comes in direct response to current Foreign Affairs Minister Fred Mitchell’s push for the 2025 Foreign Service Act, legislation that would convert most contract-based diplomatic positions into permanent, pension-eligible roles and implement new protections to bar political dismissals of non-partisan staff.

    Mitchell has positioned the reforms as a critical modernization step for the Bahamas’ diplomatic corps, designed to end the decades-long pattern of mass job cuts for junior contract officers that followed the 2017 transition of government. But Henfield argues Mitchell’s framing is deliberately misleading, dismissing the narrative that incoming administrations recklessly purge foreign service staff as disingenuous. He insists that reviewing existing overseas staffing contracts and recalling unnecessary personnel is a standard, routine governance function, and that the current government’s rhetoric is stoking unneeded anxiety among both permanent public servants and contract workers across the foreign ministry.

    While Henfield says he supports job security for public employees in principle and rejects the “cannibalization” of staff rolls purely for political gain when new administrations take power, he accuses the current Progressive Liberal Party government of blatant hypocrisy. He points out that when the PLP returned to office, the administration itself dismissed dozens of workers—including young women and single mothers who were the primary earners for their households—despite now campaigning for sweeping job protection laws for diplomatic staff.

    Defending the staffing cuts his own administration implemented, Henfield explained that a comprehensive review of Bahamian overseas missions when he took office revealed severe budget pressures caused by bloated staffing levels left by the previous government. He said his team immediately found that most overseas posts were facing major budget shortfalls directly tied to unnecessary over-hiring, which was costing Bahamian taxpayers more than $1 million annually in wasteful spending.

    Among the most egregious examples, Henfield cited so-called liaison officer positions that paid over $150,000 per person annually for little more than greeting visiting Bahamian officials at airports and arranging basic travel logistics. He also raised longstanding concerns about the qualifications of many contracted overseas staff, noting multiple cases where diplomatic officers lacked even basic academic credentials required for their roles. In response, his administration recalled roughly seven employees that were deemed either unqualified or unnecessary, and redirected resources toward recruiting and training a new cohort of professional, qualified foreign service officers.

    Notably, despite his pointed criticism of the current government’s approach, Henfield stopped short of rejecting foreign service reform entirely. He acknowledged that his own administration had worked to advance similar structural updates to the diplomatic corps, and agreed that formalized foreign service regulations bring valuable benefits—including creating clear frameworks for disciplinary action and establishing formal systems to recognize outstanding service with awards and honors. His core objection remains to the permanent entrenchment of costly, unneeded postings that he says represent an unfair burden on Bahamian taxpayers, leaving open the question of whether future administrations will be forced to carry the financial weight of such politically connected contracts if the reforms pass.

  • Major pipe shipment arrives for Western Water Resilience Improvement Project

    Major pipe shipment arrives for Western Water Resilience Improvement Project

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — On a Wednesday inspection stop in Freeport, Montego Bay, St James, Jamaica’s Minister of Water, Environment and Climate Change Matthew Samuda reviewed pre-deployment potable water pipes and custom fittings earmarked for the groundbreaking first phase of the Western Water Resilience Improvement Project (WWRIP-1), a transformative infrastructure initiative aimed at shoring up water security across western Jamaica.

    According to an official government release published the same day, the first phase of the project carries a $170 million price tag, and centers on the design and installation of 65 kilometers of new ductile-iron potable water transmission mains. These purpose-built pipelines will replace the most vulnerable segments of the region’s aging water network, tackling long-standing systemic issues that have plagued communities and businesses for decades: crumbling outdated infrastructure, sky-high non-revenue water losses that waste millions of gallons of treated water annually, and growing pressures from accelerating climate variability.

    Minister Samuda clarified that the first phase’s $170 million investment is only the initial chunk of the full program, which will total $450 million in infrastructure spending across all phases. He framed the cross-cutting initiative as far more than a standard utility upgrade, calling it a core nation-building effort and a generational investment that will open new avenues for economic activity and entrench long-term social stability for decades to come.

    WWRIP-1 represents a massive technical and logistical undertaking, developed explicitly to lock in long-term water access for the four parishes that make up western Jamaica. The project is designed to boost interconnected hydraulic systems and expand storage capacity, ensuring the region’s water infrastructure can structurally keep pace with the rapid economic and tourism growth that has positioned western Jamaica as a key driver of national economic output.

    Three critical water transmission corridors will be upgraded concurrently under the first phase. The work includes major renovations to the existing Martha Brae and Great River Water Treatment Plants, as well as the construction of a brand-new water treatment facility in Roaring River, Westmoreland.

    The new transmission pipelines installed under the project will range from 500 to 800 millimeters in diameter, a size upgrade that will dramatically increase the transmission capacity of the Northwest Interconnected Water System. To cut down on environmental disruption and reduce the amount of private and public land that needs to be acquired for the work, project planners have intentionally aligned all new pipeline routes with existing highway and road corridors.

    Samuda highlighted that the National Reconstruction and Resilience Authority (NaRRA) is the optimal governing body to deliver the complex project on an accelerated timeline, noting that the authority’s structure allows it to deliver the required infrastructure within the 20-month target delivery window. He stressed that without the expanded executive authority enshrined in NaRRA’s founding legislation, the government would fail to deliver the project Jamaican citizens need, derailing plans to put the country on a sustainable path of growth, help residents achieve their long-term goals, and secure national prosperity.

    The full project is structured as a multi-year works order contract aligned with the Jamaican government’s long-term fiscal planning framework, with the first phase scheduled for completion by the 2026–2027 fiscal period. VINCI Construction Grands Projets is leading implementation on behalf of the National Water Commission (NWC), working in close coordination with the National Environment and Planning Agency (NEPA), National Works Agency (NWA), and Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) to safely manage construction activities across high-traffic urban centers and popular tourism zones.

  • Call for regional push towards renewable energy

    Call for regional push towards renewable energy

    Against a backdrop of skyrocketing global oil prices fueled by ongoing conflict in the Middle East, a top Cayman Islands official has issued a urgent call for Caribbean countries to abandon their long-standing reliance on expensive imported fossil fuels and pivot toward the region’s abundant untapped renewable energy resources.

    Cayman Islands Finance and Economic Development Minister Rolston Anglin, who also holds the education and training portfolio, delivered the call Tuesday during the opening ceremony of the Organization of Caribbean Utility Regulators (OOCUR) 2026 Conference, which is being hosted this year at Jamaica’s Ocean Coral Spring Resort in Trelawny. The conference, running through May 1 under the theme “Navigating Caribbean Regulatory Challenges: Opportunities, Innovations and Collaborations,” brings together regional policymakers and energy regulators to address pressing sectoral challenges.

    Anglin pointed out that Caribbean nations have depended on imported fossil fuels for generations, leaving household budgets and national economies extremely vulnerable to every swing in global commodity prices. “This dependence is a vulnerability we have accepted as permanent. It is not,” he told attendees, highlighting that the region is naturally endowed with high-potential renewable resources—from abundant sunlight and steady winds to geothermal energy—that have yet to be developed at a large scale.

    Beyond environmental benefits, Anglin framed the shift to renewables as a critical economic and national security priority for the region. “The raw materials for transformation are here. What is required now is the regulatory architecture to unlock investment, protect consumers, ensure grid stability, and attract the partnerships needed to move from ambition to reality,” he said, adding that regional energy regulators hold consequential leverage to drive this transition.

    Speaking on behalf of Jamaican Prime Minister Dr Andrew Holness, Minister without Portfolio Andrew Wheatley, who oversees science, technology and special projects, outlined Jamaica’s ongoing progress in building out alternative energy capacity. To accelerate the shift away from fossil fuels, Jamaica has cut import taxes on electric vehicles to boost adoption of clean mobility, and is scaling up solar photovoltaic systems paired with battery storage as a core renewable energy strategy.

    Wheatley noted that private investment in residential and commercial solar systems has grown in Jamaica, driven by both cost-saving incentives and rising public awareness of climate change risks. He echoed Anglin’s assessment that persistent heavy dependence on imported fossil fuels has left Caribbean nations with some of the world’s highest electricity prices, squeezing both household finances and business competitiveness. He also reiterated a longstanding regional point: while Caribbean countries contribute a tiny fraction of global greenhouse gas emissions, they bear the brunt of climate change impacts, most notably through increasingly powerful and destructive hurricane seasons.

    Anglin emphasized that cross-border and cross-stakeholder collaboration is the foundation of successful regional energy transition. He called on fellow regional government leaders across all jurisdictions represented at the conference to strengthen partnerships with independent energy regulatory bodies, incorporate their on-the-ground expertise into policy design, and provide these institutions with the funding, clear mandates, and political backing they need to operate effectively.

    Organizations such as OOCUR, he added, offer an invaluable platform for cross-border knowledge sharing that regional policymakers should actively leverage to accelerate progress. Anglin also highlighted a critical gap holding back the transition: many regional governments, including his own in the Cayman Islands, have not yet recognized the full economic value of well-resourced, technically skilled independent energy regulators. Underfunding or sidelining these institutions, he warned, slows broad national development and prevents the region from unlocking the full economic and environmental potential of its renewable energy endowments.

  • JLP condemns Brown Burke for touching Parliament’s mace

    JLP condemns Brown Burke for touching Parliament’s mace

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — A fiery parliamentary dispute has erupted in Jamaica following an extraordinary incident during a debate on critical hurricane recovery legislation, with the ruling Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) issuing a harsh rebuke of opposition Member of Parliament Angela Brown Burke. The controversy stems from Brown Burke’s physical contact with the ceremonial mace during a Committee of the Whole House sitting convened to review clauses of the National Reconstruction and Resilience Authority (NaRRA) Bill.

    In an official press statement released Wednesday, the JLP emphasized that interfering with the mace during parliamentary proceedings constitutes a flagrant violation of the legislature’s Standing Orders, qualifying as overt disorderly conduct. Across all Commonwealth parliamentary systems, the JLP noted, the act of touching or tampering with the ceremonial mace during an official committee sitting is recognized as a severe breach of parliamentary privilege and long-standing procedural etiquette. Standard protocol for such a violation, the party added, typically warrants immediate suspension, expulsion from the parliamentary chamber, and potential further disciplinary action.

    The ceremonial mace, the JLP explained, stands as a tangible symbol of the inherent authority of the Speaker of the House and the Jamaican Parliament as a whole. Any deliberate interference with the object is therefore legally and procedurally classified as contempt of Parliament, a serious charge against any sitting legislator.

    The controversy does not end with the mace incident, according to the ruling party. After Speaker Juliet Holness named Brown Burke for her conduct and issued an order suspending her for the remainder of the sitting, the MP initially refused to comply with the directive to leave the chamber. This act of defiance, the JLP confirmed, represents a second distinct breach of parliamentary Standing Orders.

    Senator Abka Fitz-Henley, JLP Communication Chairman, framed the incident as an unacceptable attack on the integrity of parliamentary business. “MP Brown Burke’s conduct in disrupting the sitting of the House of Representatives is unacceptable and a disgrace,” Fitz-Henley said in the statement. “Her action was a clear attempt to disrupt the business of the Parliament, which was in the process of treating with a Bill, which is crucial to assist Jamaicans to recover from the devastating impact of Hurricane Melissa.”

    Fitz-Henley also extended criticism to Brown Burke’s colleagues in the opposition People’s National Party (PNP), accusing the party of enabling the disorder. When the order to expel Brown Burke was issued, PNP MPs stood between the opposition legislator and parliamentary officials to block her departure from the chamber. The ruling party spokesman called this collective action proof that the PNP cannot be trusted to conduct the nation’s public business in a responsible, appropriate manner. He also took aim at PNP leader and opposition chief Mark Golding, arguing that Golding’s failure to immediately intervene to force Brown Burke to comply with procedural rules was entirely consistent with the party’s pattern of poor conduct.

    The incident capped off a chaotic late-night session at Jamaica’s Gordon House, the seat of the country’s parliament, deepening partisan tensions ahead of further consideration of the NaRRA Bill.

  • Grand Cay BPL bills wiped ahead of vote

    Grand Cay BPL bills wiped ahead of vote

    Weeks before the Bahamas’ upcoming general election, hundreds of residents on Grand Cay in Abaco have woken up to a life-changing change: their long-accumulated electricity debt balances have been cleared entirely to zero. The sweeping debt relief comes days after Prime Minister Philip Davis made a campaign-focused visit to the hurricane-ravaged island, where he promised residents he would address their crippling billing crisis that has lingered for years.

    For long-time resident Jeremy Albury, the relief wiped out $13,500 in accumulated debt that had hung over his head since Hurricane Dorian hit the region in 2019. Fellow resident Barry Albury summed up the overwhelming joy of many in the community, saying “I felt like it was Christmas in April.” Screenshots of local community group chats shared across the island show widespread celebration, with dozens of residents joking that the holiday season had arrived months early alongside the unexpected debt cancellation.

    But the sudden, last-minute intervention has immediately drawn sharp questions from critics and residents alike, who question whether the policy is a pre-election tactic to sway voter turnout rather than a long-overdue fix for a systemic problem. Under the Bahamas’ Parliamentary Elections Act, providing gifts, cash or other benefits to voters with the goal of influencing their ballot choice is a criminal offense, a regulation that is expected to draw increased scrutiny in the wake of this announcement.

    In an official statement defending the move, the Davis administration framed the debt cancellation as a resolution to a decades-old billing crisis sparked by overlapping disasters. The government explained that normal billing and collection operations were completely upended after Hurricane Dorian tore through Abaco, and subsequent disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic compounded the problem. During that period, residents faced widespread financial hardship, limited access to in-person banking services, and strict travel and business restrictions that made paying bills nearly impossible for many. The administration also noted that under the previous government, residents were explicitly told they would not be required to pay their accumulated balances during the emergency period, but system administrators continued to add the charges to resident accounts anyway.

    After reviewing the issue, the government determined that the ballooning balances were entirely the result of circumstances outside of consumers’ control. To resolve the crisis, the state will absorb all eligible outstanding balances through an offsetting agreement with national utility provider Bahamas Power and Light, placing no financial burden on affected residents. Officials described the move as part of a broader pledge to fix unfinished problems inherited from the previous administration, rather than an election-year stunt.

    This debt relief effort comes on the heels of a separate recent report from The Tribune that revealed the Bahamian government, not the ruling Progressive Liberal Party, funded more than $200,000 in gift certificates distributed to Abaco residents via local distributor Premier Importers, according to the company’s chief executive. To date, the Davis administration has not issued any formal response to those claims, with Communications Director Latrae Rahming only confirming that the prime minister would address reporters at a future, unannounced date.

    Local residents confirm that the massive electricity bills first began accumulating after Hurricane Dorian destroyed much of Abaco’s infrastructure, when routine billing stopped entirely and unpaid charges compounded over the years. Some residents reported seeing total balances exceed $60,000, a sum far out of reach for most low-income households on the island. During a town hall meeting with Grand Cay residents last week, Davis acknowledged the crippling burden the debt placed on the community, promised to clear the balances and committed to delivering additional housing renovation supplies to the area.

    Jeremy Albury, who has helped distribute the new housing supplies to residents, confirmed the prime minister kept his promise ahead of schedule. “So said, so done,” he said, adding that “The supplies are stuff to renovate a lot of people’s homes. More stuff coming on Wednesday.” Residents estimate the total cost of clearing all outstanding electricity bills across Grand Cay and nearby Moore’s Island exceeds $500,000.

    While hundreds of eligible residents have welcomed the relief, not everyone is convinced of the policy’s good intentions. Grand Cay resident Steven Russell called the move an obvious election tactic designed to shore up support for ruling party candidates in a competitive constituency. “Everybody knows it’s a tactic because they know Cornish did not represent his constituency well,” he explained, referring to incumbent Member of Parliament Kirk Cornish. “They know that and they know which areas they are in trouble. That’s why they up in Abaco, they sharing like $200 gift certificates.”

    Another local resident, Maxwell, said the last-minute relief does little to make up for years of neglect from the national government. “That can’t really do nothing after five or six years,” he said.

    Grand Cay, a small island community that is home to just over 500 permanent residents, has struggled for years with substandard core infrastructure, including unreliable electricity, clean water access and telecommunications service. The constituency is widely seen as a competitive race in the upcoming general election, making any last-minute voter outreach particularly high-stakes for both major political parties.

  • US Supreme Court weighs ending protected status of Haitians, Syrians

    US Supreme Court weighs ending protected status of Haitians, Syrians

    On Wednesday, the deeply divided U.S. Supreme Court convened to hear legal challenges to the Trump administration’s 2019 order to revoke Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, for hundreds of thousands of Haitian and Syrian migrants currently residing in the United States. The high-stakes case has far-reaching ramifications for more than one million TPS beneficiaries from a dozen additional nations who now face the threat of mass deportation.

    Created as a humanitarian protection program, TPS shields eligible migrants from deportation and grants them work authorization, granted exclusively to people who cannot safely return to their home countries due to active armed conflict, natural disaster, or other extraordinary, life-threatening crises. Haitian nationals first gained TPS eligibility in 2010, after a magnitude 7 earthquake killed more than 200,000 people and leveled much of the country’s critical infrastructure. More than a decade later, the Caribbean nation remains mired in systemic extreme poverty, widespread gang-related violence and kidnapping, chronic political collapse, and a shattered healthcare system that prompted the U.S. State Department to issue a Level 4: Do Not Travel advisory for all American citizens. Syria obtained TPS in 2012 at the outbreak of its ongoing devastating civil war, which has left the country fragmented and unsafe for returning civilians.

    As part of his broader hardline immigration agenda, former President Donald Trump made a 2016 campaign pledge to remove millions of undocumented migrants from the U.S., and made dismantling the longstanding TPS program a central policy priority. Since taking office, his administration revoked TPS protections for migrants from 12 countries beyond Haiti and Syria, including Afghanistan, Myanmar, Somalia, Venezuela, and Yemen.

    During Wednesday’s arguments, Solicitor General John Sauer, representing the Trump administration, told the court that the Department of Homeland Security’s TPS termination decision falls under executive authority and is not eligible for judicial review. Sauer argued that barring courts from reviewing such policy choices prevents inappropriate “judicial micromanagement” of executive-led foreign policy, and added that Trump’s past controversial remarks about Haiti were being taken out of context. He claimed the president’s comments, in which he referred to Haiti and other African nations as “shithole countries” and expressed a preference for migrants from Norway over Haiti, were referencing “problems of crime, poverty and welfare dependency” rather than expressing racial bias.

    Counsel for the Haitian and Syrian TPS holders pushed back forcefully against the administration’s arguments, arguing that unsafe conditions in both home countries remain unchanged, and that the TPS cancellation was driven at least partially by explicit racial animus. Ahilan Arulanantham, an attorney for the Syrian TPS petitioners, emphasized that the case centers on “the power to mass expel people who have done nothing wrong to countries that remain unsafe.” Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor echoed this concern during questioning, directly referencing Trump’s reported comments about Haiti to question whether discriminatory intent motivated the policy.

    Early indications from the court’s ideological split suggest the six-member conservative majority leans toward siding with the Trump administration’s position, while the court’s three liberal justices appear ready to oppose the move. A final ruling from the court will set a binding precedent that shapes the future of TPS for all beneficiaries across the country.

  • Pintard calls for arrests over $200k gift certificates

    Pintard calls for arrests over $200k gift certificates

    A brewing political scandal in the Bahamas has put the ruling Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) administration under intense scrutiny, after opposition Free National Movement leader Michael Pintard launched a scathing accusation that the Davis government broke national law by diverting public funds to distribute Hurricane Dorian relief gift certificates branded with PLP election candidates’ names. Pintard has labeled the action “egregious” and is calling for formal criminal charges to be filed against those responsible.

    The controversy stems from an earlier Tribune report that confirmed the Ministry of Finance covered the cost of gift certificates distributed to residents of Abaco, designated as post-Hurricane Dorian disaster relief, which bore the signatures of sitting PLP candidates and party officials. Chris Lleida, chief executive officer of Premier Importers – the entity that issued the vouchers – confirmed the distribution was carried out at the explicit request of the Ministry of Finance. Records show the total value of the distributed vouchers exceeds $200,000, with individual certificates issued in denominations of $200, $300 and $500.

    As of press time, Office of the Prime Minister representatives have not issued an official public response to the allegations. When contacted for comment, Communications Director Latrae Rahming confirmed that Prime Minister Philip Davis will address the matter with reporters at a future, unspecified date.

    Pintard argued that the misuse of taxpayer funds for this purpose constitutes a clear criminal offence under Bahamian law. “It is a crime because you’re using government funds for a narrow political perspective,” he stated, adding that “somebody to pay the price” for the violation. He drew a direct parallel between the current controversy and the so-called “Bermuda scandal”, a previous incident where a PLP delegation trip was initially funded through the Public Treasury before the party reimbursed the cost.

    The opposition leader further claimed that the scale of the $200,000 expenditure far exceeds the spending authority granted to the financial secretary, meaning the final approval for the spending would have required sign-off from Prime Minister Davis himself. He added that the situation becomes “even more egregious” with the involvement of Bradley Fox Jr, the PLP’s candidate for Central and South Abaco, who participated in distributing the vouchers despite holding no official government position.

    Voucher copies obtained by The Tribune show the e-vouchers distributed to local residents were signed by both Fox and Preston Roberts, the PLP’s national campaign coordinator who also serves as a board member of the government’s Disaster Reconstruction Authority. “You’re talking about somebody who has no standing in government at all and so on multiple levels, this is wrong,” Pintard said. “Somebody should be held to account, and charges should be brought against them or the sanctions, whatever the sanctions are, as outlined in the law, those sanctions should be carried out.”

    Under the Bahamas’ Parliamentary Elections Act, offering or distributing money, gifts or other benefits to voters to influence their ballot choice, reward specific voting behavior, or secure a candidate’s election is classified as a criminal offence. The law also penalizes anyone who funds or knowingly facilitates these activities, including the provision of funds intended for electoral bribery.

    Critics point out that the incident highlights a longstanding gap in Bahamian election regulation: the country still lacks a comprehensive, enforceable campaign finance framework. There are no binding, clear rules requiring full public disclosure of political campaign spending, nor formal regulations governing the use of public resources during election cycles. Both of the Bahamas’ major political parties have repeatedly pledged to implement a robust campaign finance system over the years, but none have followed through on that promise to date.