分类： politics

The Friends of Democracy (FOD) party has unveiled a comprehensive housing policy framework designed to address what it terms a national housing crisis. During its manifesto launch at Bush Hall, St. Michael, on Sunday, the party detailed a multi-faceted strategy focused on dramatically expanding homeownership and providing financial relief to seniors.

Central to the FOD’s proposal is an aggressive rent-to-own program aimed at breaking the cycle of generational renting. The policy specifically targets public and private sector workers earning between $2,500 and $5,000 monthly, offering them 100% mortgages with no deposit required. Party candidate for St James North, Steffanie Williams, emphasized that these mortgages would be granted at reasonable, market-driven interest rates, effectively removing a significant barrier to entry for first-time buyers.

To oversee this ambitious program, the FOD plans to establish a dedicated Homeowner Authority. This newly mandated agency would be tasked with supervising the entire initiative, ensuring transparency, efficiency, and accountability throughout the process.

For Barbados’ senior population, the party proposed implementing a regulated reverse mortgage system. FOD candidate for St Lucy, Shetland Davis, explained that this financial instrument would allow homeowners aged 60 and over to access equity in their properties without having to sell or vacate their homes. Instead of making monthly mortgage payments, homeowners would receive payments from a lender, with repayment only required when the property is sold or the owner passes away.

The FOD committed to implementing strict regulatory oversight for the reverse mortgage program to ensure transparency and protection against predatory lending practices. The party plans to collaborate with financial institutions and credit unions to develop a safe product aligned with international best practices.

Beyond financing solutions, the FOD’s housing vision includes the construction of quality, low-cost housing units designed for practical and comfortable living. The party also proposed a shared mandatory house replacement insurance scheme for homes built with state assistance, to be managed through a government-backed insurance company with premiums shared between the state and homeowners.

The Friends of Democracy (FOD) political party has unveiled a comprehensive policy platform targeting systemic inequities in Barbados’ public financial systems, featuring significant tax relief for retirees and stringent accountability measures for government payment delays. Party President Karina Goodridge presented the proposals during Sunday’s manifesto launch at Bush Hall, St Michael, framing them as essential corrections to what she termed “long-standing unfairness” in state-citizen relations.

Central to the FOD’s 2026 election platform is a groundbreaking policy that would impose interest penalties on government entities for delayed payments to citizens and businesses. This measure would apply to outstanding pension payments, gratuities for public servants, vendor and contractor invoices, tax refunds, and National Insurance Scheme reimbursements. Goodridge emphasized the principle of reciprocal accountability, stating that equitable repayment practices must govern both citizens and government institutions.

In a major welfare initiative, the party proposed exempting 67% of all pension income from taxation, characterizing this as a “golden handshake” for retirees who have contributed decades of service to Barbados’ development. The policy aims to ensure that retirement years remain financially secure rather than burdened by taxation.

Land tax reform constitutes another pillar of the FOD platform, with presidential advisor Jason Bowen outlining four key objectives: protecting vulnerable homeowners from property loss due to tax burdens, stimulating housing market activity, encouraging land development, and ensuring commercial entities bear their fair tax share. Bowen simultaneously called for eliminating the solid waste tax on properties not connected to sewage treatment systems, arguing that charging for unavailable services constitutes fundamental injustice.

Additionally, the party proposes replacing the 17.5% Value Added Tax on imported food with a 16% Point of Entry Goods Levy collected at ports, a measure positioned as a cost-of-living reduction strategy for Barbadian consumers. Collectively, these proposals represent the FOD’s vision for establishing what they describe as “mutual respect and accountability” between government and citizens.

The Christ Church East Central constituency has transformed into Barbados’s most fiercely contested electoral battleground, with four political factions competing for dominance in this historically marginal seat. As the February 11 polls approach, voters face a complex choice between established parties and emerging coalitions, all promising transformative development for the community.

This constituency’s political significance stems from its five-decade history as a swing district. While the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) maintained control from 1986 to 2013, the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) has held the seat since 2018. The current electoral landscape features an unprecedented four-way competition involving the BLP, DLP, Friends of Democracy (FOD), and the People’s Coalition for Progress (PCP) – an alliance comprising the United Progressive Party, New National Party, and Conservative Barbados Labour Party.

Resident concerns have taken center stage in the campaign, with infrastructure deficiencies emerging as a primary issue. Community members highlight dangerous road conditions, inadequate sidewalks for schoolchildren, poor water quality, and insufficient street lighting. Melon, a long-time resident, emphasized the urgent need for pedestrian safety measures: “Children constantly risk their lives navigating Lodge Road without proper sidewalks. We need protected pathways from Broadside to Oistins Hill.”

Construction worker Matthew criticized the disparity between tourist routes and local infrastructure: “While the highway from the airport receives maintenance, our community roads remain dangerously bumpy and neglected.” Other residents cited pressing issues including rodent infestations from poor garbage disposal, insufficient speed control measures, and inadequate social support for elderly citizens.

The human dimension of these policy failures emerges through personal stories. Samuel Brown, a father of four managing health challenges, described his struggle to find suitable employment: “My illness prevents manual labor, but I still need sustainable income options.” Elderly resident Sylverton Hamblin revealed the harsh reality of pension inadequacy: “With monthly expenses exceeding my $350 pension, I depend on family support for basic necessities.”

Candidates have responded with distinct campaign approaches. BLP incumbent Ryan Straughn, who unseated veteran politician Ronald Jones in 2018, acknowledged the need for greater visibility: “Constituents recognize my work but want more personal engagement. I’m committed to enhancing communication and physical presence.”

DLP candidate Quincy Jones, whose father previously represented the area, emphasized consistent representation: “Effective governance cannot be seasonal. We need constant, dedicated engagement with community needs.” First-time candidates Dominique Yorke (FOD) and Natalie Parris (PCP) focused on grassroots issues, with Yorke prioritizing road repairs and debushing while Parris advocated for safety partnerships and youth mentorship programs.

The election outcome will likely hinge on which candidate can most effectively address the community’s practical concerns while demonstrating commitment to sustainable development in this pivotal constituency.

With one week remaining until Barbados’ February 11 general election, residents across St Philip parish express growing frustration over the absence of political candidates despite a historic number of contenders vying for parliamentary seats. An extensive ground assessment reveals widespread voter disillusionment with the electoral process and candidate accessibility.

Thirteen candidates from multiple parties are competing across three constituencies in St Philip, marking an unprecedented political concentration in the parish. However, voters consistently report minimal engagement with those seeking to represent them.

Seventy-six-year-old Ms. Straughn of Bonita Drive exemplifies the prevailing sentiment: “Not a politician ever did anything for me, not even a biscuit.” The long-term resident, who has encountered elected officials only once in fifteen years, described deteriorating public services despite previous complaints about transportation inadequacies. While appreciative of pension provisions, she emphasizes their insufficiency and advocates for improved housing solutions for homeless citizens.

Political analyst Peter Wickham contextualizes the unusual candidate proliferation as reflecting opposition deficiencies rather than anti-government sentiment. “These emerging parties primarily aim to provide opposition alternatives,” Wickham notes, “indicating greater dissatisfaction with existing opposition parties than with the governing administration.”

St Philip’s strategic significance stems from its historical status as a Democratic Labour Party (DLP) stronghold. Wickham suggests competing parties perceive greater opportunities for displacing the DLP here than elsewhere, though he doubts third-party options genuinely energize the electorate given their limited winning prospects.

Former government minister Dr. David Estwick, the DLP’s returning candidate, expresses confidence in reclaiming his seat based on his legislative record. He maintains active voter engagement despite apathy allegations, asserting: “We’re hearing constituent concerns and explaining our policy approaches to address them.”

Contrasting this perspective, Friends of Democracy leader Karina Goodridge acknowledges representation gaps in recent years. She argues that expanded candidate choices potentially stimulate electoral participation through generated curiosity and conversation, compelling all parties to enhance their public engagement efforts.

Practical challenges complicate voter outreach, Goodridge notes, citing large geographical constituencies, resident availability issues, and candidates’ demanding schedules. She emphasizes continued multi-channel communication efforts despite visibility limitations.

The prevailing analysis indicates that vote splitting among opposition parties likely benefits the dominant Barbados Labour Party, as divided opposition votes traditionally strengthen the ruling party’s position.