分类: politics

  • Gonsalves attempts to revise his 2023 position on bail for murder

    Gonsalves attempts to revise his 2023 position on bail for murder

    St. Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG) Opposition Leader Ralph Gonsalves has walked back widespread interpretations of his past controversial comments about judicial bail grants for murder accused, pushing back against claims he opposes bail access in murder cases entirely amid his high-profile constitutional challenge to SVG’s existing bail legislation.

    Gonsalves, who served as SVG’s prime minister and national security minister when he delivered the original remarks at a 2023 regional crime symposium in Port of Spain, Trinidad, revisited the three-year-old comments during a Wednesday broadcast on Star FM, the radio station owned by his political party. He argues his original criticism has been consistently misrepresented, and that his current position — which calls for judicial discretion to hear bail applications for murder charges, rather than an automatic statutory ban — aligns with what he actually said at the event.

    Recalling his symposium intervention, Gonsalves explained he was responding to data from Trinidad, Barbados and the Bahamas, three Caribbean nations outside the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (of which SVG is a member). At the time, 2023 had seen SVG hit a record high homicide count of 55, amid a regional surge in violent crime. Gonsalves said his concern was not that judges were permitted to consider bail for murder cases at all, but that a subset of judges in the three referenced jurisdictions were granting bail in scenarios where any reasonable assessment would have denied it. He famously compared those decisions to being made by judges “living on Mars,” and also raised concerns about potential unequal treatment of defendants based on their legal representation. Those 2023 remarks drew widespread condemnation from regional legal associations, legal practitioners and media outlets.

    Today, Gonsalves leads a team of attorneys in a landmark constitutional challenge to SVG’s Criminal Procedure Code Section 43, which currently imposes a limited but rigid ban on judicial bail consideration for murder accused: defendants cannot apply for bail until either nine months have passed or their preliminary inquiry concludes, whichever comes earlier. The challenge is brought on behalf of a 16-year-old minor charged with murder, with Gonsalves arguing the automatic statutory pre-trial detention bar violates core constitutional protections, including the right to personal liberty, equal protection under the law, freedom of movement, and the separation of powers. He emphasized that automatic detention by legislative mandate, rather than court-ordered detention following individual assessment, is fundamentally unconstitutional, and that every defendant deserves individualized review of their bail eligibility by the High Court.

    While the broader constitutional question remains pending before the courts, Justice Gertel Thom has already granted bail to the 16-year-old defendant — a decision Gonsalves calls unprecedented in modern SVG history. The bail application was fiercely opposed by the Attorney General’s Chambers and the Director of Public Prosecutions’ Office, but Thom ruled in favor of release after a case-specific risk assessment. The teen was granted bail with a $25,000 Eastern Caribbean dollar bond and two sureties; she is required to check in three times weekly at the Colonarie police station, but does not need to surrender her expired passport. Gonsalves noted the defendant’s circumstances make her a low flight risk: she is a minor with no valid passport, no voter identification, is unemployed and has very limited financial means, with no allegations that she poses a danger to the community or threatens witness testimony. “If she couldn’t get bail, I don’t know who else could have gotten bail,” Gonsalves told radio listeners.

    SVG has recorded 28 homicides so far this year, and on current trend, the 2025 full-year total is projected to surpass 40, keeping violent crime at the forefront of the country’s political and policy agenda.

  • Penny to CoP: Explain leak of court order

    Penny to CoP: Explain leak of court order

    In a press briefing held Wednesday at the Opposition Leader’s Office in Port of Spain, Pennelope Beckles, leader of Trinidad and Tobago’s main opposition People’s National Movement (PNM), is demanding full transparency into a major breach of court protocol that saw legally sealed legal documents related to a funding investigation into the party leaked to the public before they were even officially served. The breach centers on a court order compelling the PNM to turn over full financial records tied to the reconstruction of the party’s Balisier House headquarters in Port of Spain, which has become the latest flashpoint in a long-running political dispute over the party’s financing.

    Beckles laid out the timeline of the controversy to reporters, recalling that the current ruling government first leveled explosive claims against the PNM back in 2025. Shortly after Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar returned from that year’s United Nations General Assembly, she publicly alleged inside Parliament that the PNM’s Balisier House reconstruction fund was fueled by drug trafficking and other illicit activities. Notably, Beckles pointed out, the Prime Minister has never repeated those unsubstantiated claims outside the protected walls of Parliament, where she enjoys parliamentary privilege from defamation claims.

    The formal investigation moved forward on July 16, when PNM General Secretary Foster Cummings was served a court order under the 2019 Civil Asset Recovery and Management and Unexplained Wealth Act, requiring the party to disclose all records detailing the sources of funding for the headquarters project. Beckles confirmed that she was scheduled to receive a copy of the order shortly after Cummings, but what has sparked alarm is the fact that the full contents of the order—including all supporting affidavits and particulars—were published and circulated publicly before Cummings was even officially handed the document.

    Under the legislation that authorized this court action, Beckles emphasized, all court filings related to these types of unexplained wealth investigations are explicitly required to be kept under seal. Section 58.1 of the act mandates sealed filings for all High Court documents in these matters, and Section 74 enforces strict confidentiality requirements for any official involved in administering the legislation—from agency trustees and property managers to legal advisors and contracted experts. All parties are legally required to treat all case-related documents and information as strictly secret.

    The law treats breaches of this confidentiality rule as a serious criminal offense. Anyone who recklessly or intentionally discloses protected information is liable for criminal prosecution, carrying penalties of up to a TT $250,000 fine and five years imprisonment on summary conviction, and up to a TT $500,000 fine and seven years imprisonment for indictment. Compounding the breach, Beckles added, a video of the moment the court order was served to Cummings was also recorded and circulated publicly, a move she called a troubling indicator of the state of governance in the country.

    Beckles has formally called on Commissioner of Police Allister Guevarro to launch a full public investigation and answer for how this leak occurred. The PNM leader stressed that the party is not seeking any special exemption from legal process—only that existing laws and procedures be followed correctly. She argued the leak raises serious questions about the integrity of the rule of law under the current administration, and whether the public can still trust the government to uphold due process.

    “They are more concerned with the drama than they are concerned with the procedure,” Beckles said of the ruling administration, rejecting what she frames as a politically motivated public relations campaign against the PNM. She added that the party has no intention of litigating the case through the media, and will pursue all legal arguments through the proper court channels. The PNM has already assembled a full legal team to respond to the court order, and Beckles reiterated that the party has nothing to hide regarding the Balisier House project.

    Beckles explained that the PNM has owned the land for the headquarters for roughly 65 years, and all funding for the reconstruction has come from a combination of public party fundraisers, car raffles, and voluntary donations from supporters—all of which are a matter of public record. She also urged the public to question the timing of the investigation and the leak, asserting that the high-profile, improper release of the sealed documents was no accidental oversight. “Do not think that the way this matter is going is by accident,” she said.

  • “Cuba is not a threat to the United States, nor does it wish to be its adversary or enemy”

    “Cuba is not a threat to the United States, nor does it wish to be its adversary or enemy”

    In a formal address delivered July 30 at the 7th Ordinary Session of the 10th Legislature of Cuba’s National Assembly of People’s Power, Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla issued a clear, firm statement: Cuba poses no threat to the United States, and has never sought to be an adversary or enemy of the northern power. The address, delivered before senior Cuban leaders including revolutionary leader Army General Raúl Castro Ruz, First Secretary and President Miguel Díaz-Canel, and other top government and party officials, laid out Cuba’s perspective on the deteriorating global geopolitical landscape and escalating U.S. hostility toward the island nation.

    Rodríguez opened by noting that President Díaz-Canel’s July 26 address already detailed what he described as the genocidal actions of the U.S. government against the Cuban people, and the July 7 United Nations General Assembly deliberations on the issue had already clarified global sentiment, reducing the need to rehash well-documented points. He praised the National Assembly, its Council of State, the International Relations Committee, and its deputies for their consistent, critical role in advancing Cuba’s foreign policy and expanding the country’s global ties.

    The foreign minister emphasized that the international context in which Cuba’s revolution defends the interests of its people has worsened dramatically in recent years. He argued that the U.S. government has intentionally sought to dismantle international law, the United Nations Charter, and the 80-year-old framework of state-to-state relations forged after World War II, which was built on the core principles of sovereign respect and equality between nations.

    Rather than abiding by these established norms, Rodríguez said, Washington has leveraged temporary coercive power to force its will on sovereign governments around the world, relying on intimidation, coercion, unilateral sanctions, and punitive trade measures to override constitutional and sovereign rights. He charged that the U.S. has resorted to unprovoked military aggression, unjustified wars, civilian bombing, the abduction of sitting heads of state, political assassination, state-sponsored terrorism, and both overt and cognitive unconventional warfare to achieve its geopolitical goals.

    This behavior, he argued, is rooted in a dangerous doctrine the U.S. calls “peace through force” — a philosophy he traced back to the violent conquest, extermination, slavery, ethnic cleansing, and colonial domination that shaped centuries of Western imperial expansion. He drew parallels between this modern doctrine and the violent expansionist ambitions of Nazi Germany in the 20th century, the 19th-century Monroe Doctrine, and contemporary U.S. efforts to redraw the geopolitical map of the Indo-Pacific, Middle East, and expand NATO influence.

    In recent weeks, Rodríguez noted, the U.S. has revived the anti-communist witch hunts of the McCarthy era as official government policy, after decades of public condemnation of that period of political repression. He pointed to a hastily summoned summit of dozens of foreign ministers in Washington that was dedicated to launching a new campaign against what Washington frames as a “resurgence of far-left terrorism” — a vague new label that follows previous manufactured constructs such as “narco-terrorism,” which he reminded the audience was used to justify brutal U.S.-backed right-wing dictatorships and Operation Condor across Latin America in the Cold War era.

    Shortly after that summit, the U.S. State Department released a sweeping report on Cuba that Rodríguez dismissed as superficial, factually inconsistent, and deliberately dishonest. The report, he said, attempts to frame Cuba as a unique security threat to the United States — a claim he called absurd on its face, given that Cuba is a small island nation facing the world’s largest nuclear military power. Beyond the inherent absurdity of the claim, he argued, the real goal of the report is to criminalize and suppress the widespread solidarity with Cuba that exists across multiple sectors of U.S. society. It also seeks to condemn Cuba’s longstanding support for global justice movements, including civil rights, anti-racism, anti-Zionism, anti-war, and anti-oppression causes, question Cuba’s inherent right to self-defense against imperial aggression, and discredit Cuba’s internationalist and humanitarian work around the world, including its historic efforts to oppose apartheid and support liberation movements across Africa. Ultimately, Rodríguez said, the U.S. labels Cuba a threat simply because it exists as a durable, dignified alternative to unregulated capitalism and imperialism that stands for global social justice.

    Rodríguez recalled a 2021 statement from former Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who praised Cuba’s 62 years of unbowed resistance to U.S. pressure as a historic feat, calling the island “the new Numantia” and arguing the Cuban people deserved recognition for their unwavering defense of national sovereignty. That example of independent resistance, Rodríguez said, is what the U.S. finds dangerous, amplified by the ongoing thirst for revenge from the descendants and allies of the former Batista dictatorship — a regime responsible for the murder of an estimated 20,000 Cubans, and whose allies included the mercenaries defeated at the Bay of Pigs, and perpetrators of terrorist attacks, biological warfare attempts, and efforts to draw the world into a nuclear conflict over Cuba. He drew a direct line between these anti-Cuban forces and 19th-century Spanish colonial general Valeriano Weyler, who oversaw a brutal reconcentration policy that killed hundreds of thousands of Cubans, and Lester Mallory, the U.S. architect of the blockade policy designed to “provoke suffering and despair” to overthrow Cuba’s revolutionary government.

    Today, the U.S. — the world’s largest economic and military power — uses its aggressive posture to force compliance from many nations seeking to conduct their own domestic and foreign policy, Rodríguez said. This coercive power has allowed the U.S. to drastically escalate its decades-long economic war and collective punishment against Cuba, tightening a full energy embargo to strangle Cuba’s ability to trade with third countries and cut the island off from the global economy. Rodríguez rejected U.S. claims that no energy embargo exists, that Cuba previously received free oil, that the decades-long blockade is a myth, or that it does not violate the sovereignty of other nations — calling these claims blatant falsehoods.

    While this scenario of escalating pressure is dangerous and unsustainable in the medium term, Rodríguez said, Cuba has no choice but to endure the growing destructive force of U.S. aggression. He echoed President Díaz-Canel’s recent warning that Cuba is currently fighting a historic battle, a “new Moncada” against a genocidal U.S. policy that seeks to suffocate the entire Cuban population to seize control of the country.

    Even amid this pressure, Rodríguez emphasized, Cuba maintains broad, deep, and largely friendly cooperative relations with nations across the globe, built on mutual respect even with the small number of countries that hold political differences with Havana. Global public opinion overwhelmingly rejects the U.S. blockade, he noted: the 136-9 vote in favor of debating the blockade at the July 7 UN General Assembly, held despite widespread U.S. intimidation of member states, offers clear proof of where the global community stands.

    Recalling the words of Cuban independence hero José Martí, Rodríguez noted that “Whoever rises up for Cuba today, rises up for all time.” Silence, indifference, or the pursuit of narrow self-interest in the face of U.S. aggression against Cuba endangers all of humanity, he warned: any nation could be the next target unless the global community acts collectively to halt this pattern of behavior. If U.S. citizens had access to accurate, unfiltered information about Cuba, he added, they would be able to stop the catastrophe their government is threatening to inflict on the island and the world.

    Rodríguez echoed revolutionary leader Raúl Castro’s January 1, 2024 statement that the U.S.’s permanent hostility and blockade policy remains the primary cause of Cuba’s ongoing economic difficulties, a reality the U.S. spends millions of dollars to obscure. Cuban people understand full well that the U.S. is implementing a deliberate, step-by-step plan to cut off Cuba’s access to foreign revenue, global markets, technology, and essential supplies including food and medicine, he said. Since January 2026, this campaign has included a total energy embargo that blocks imports of fuel, electricity generation components, solar panels, and all related inputs and technology for power production.

    Cubans also remain acutely aware that the threat of direct U.S. military aggression has not gone away, Rodríguez said. While it is difficult to imagine any plausible pretext for such a criminal, irresponsible act, the anti-Cuban lobby in Washington has shown no limit to its aggressive appetite. These are the same actors, he noted, that celebrate the suffering of Cuban people: a mother losing a child for lack of medical supplies, widespread blackouts, water shortages, uncollected garbage, and disrupted public transportation are all framed as policy wins for the anti-Cuba movement.

    Rodríguez emphasized that the U.S. government is fully aware of Cuba’s consistent willingness to resolve bilateral differences through dialogue, based on mutual respect, and that Cuba has exercised extraordinary patience in pursuing diplomatic solutions. He noted that Cuba has even accepted a small U.S. offer of so-called “humanitarian aid,” despite widespread U.S. lies and manipulation, even though the total amount offered only covers five days of the economic and social damage caused by the U.S. blockade. The sum is even smaller than the aid Cuba receives from the World Food Programme — aid the U.S. has repeatedly tried to block. Accepting this aid from a government that is actively working to create a humanitarian crisis on the island demonstrates Cuba’s good faith, he argued.

    At its core, the U.S. government’s true intentions are not revealed by offers of dialogue or token aid, but by its relentless coercion and determination to inflict maximum punishment on the Cuban people to force their surrender, Rodríguez said. He repeated his core message: Cuba is not a threat to the United States, and has no desire to be an enemy or adversary. Cuba’s core vocation is peace, a commitment demonstrated by its broad global relations and the 2023 Proclamation of Peace for Latin America and the Caribbean, signed by all regional heads of state and government in Havana.

    Cuba’s only commitment is to the Cuban people, and its mandate comes directly from the full and absolute sovereignty of the Cuban nation, he said. Cuba has both the right and the duty to reject and confront aggression that threatens its people, and retains the supreme right to defend itself — including by military means — if it is directly attacked. Rodríguez reaffirmed that Cuba continues to aspire to a respectful, constructive relationship with the U.S. in the long term, and is willing to take steps toward that goal, but only on the basis of full, absolute respect for the sovereign rights of both parties, the standard that governs all normal relations between sovereign states.

    Turning to the large community of Cuban compatriots residing in the U.S., Rodríguez said Cuba continues to work to strengthen ties with Cubans living abroad, expand opportunities for them to connect with their homeland and their families. Most government reforms adopted in recent years are designed to support this, he said, based on the shared conviction that Cubans living anywhere in the world can play a valuable role in national development, whether they contribute from abroad or choose to return to Cuba. Ongoing economic and social transformations are expanding these opportunities even further, he added.

    Rodríguez closed by expressing profound gratitude for the widespread international solidarity with Cuba from all continents. He thanked governments, parliaments, international organizations, fraternal groups, social movements, political parties, business leaders, solidarity associations, civil society groups, intellectuals, artists, academics, and ordinary people of all political and ideological backgrounds for their unconditional humanitarian aid and support, and their rejection of the injustice being inflicted on Cuba.

    Recalling a 1963 statement from revolutionary leader Fidel Castro, four years after the triumph of the revolution, Rodríguez repeated Castro’s promise that Cuba would continue to resist the imperialist blockade for as long as necessary, that the revolutionary flag would never be lowered, and that the Cuban nation would never bow its head. Today, on the centennial of Fidel Castro’s birth, Rodríguez reaffirmed Castro’s vision that a better world is possible — a world without cruel blockades that kill men, women, and children “like silent atomic bombs.” Castro’s vision of a better world built through revolutionary and progressive struggle continues to sustain Cuban optimism, and the certainty of eventual victory, even amid the extreme challenges the country faces today.

    Closing with the words of José Martí, Rodríguez repeated that “before giving up the effort to make the Homeland free and prosperous, the South Sea will join the North Sea, and a snake will be born from an eagle’s egg.” He ended with the iconic revolutionary slogans: “Socialism or Death! Homeland or Death, We will prevail!”

  • The 7th Ordinary Session of the Cuban Parliament concludes today

    The 7th Ordinary Session of the Cuban Parliament concludes today

    HAVANA – The 7th Ordinary Session of Cuba’s National Assembly of People’s Power (ANPP), the country’s highest legislative body in its 10th Legislature, entered its second day of deliberations on Thursday, July 30, 2026, with a packed agenda centered on updating the island nation’s legal framework and advancing core governance and economic priorities.

    The session launched the previous day with notable participation across Cuban leadership: Army General Raúl Castro Ruz, leader of the Cuban Revolution, joined the opening proceedings via video conference, while Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba and President of the Republic, attended the session in person.

    One of the opening day’s first formal actions was the swearing-in of 10 newly elected deputies, who will fill vacant legislative seats representing municipalities across Cuba. The new representatives bring diverse professional backgrounds to the national legislature: Alejandro Redondo Ramos, legal director of the ANPP, takes office for San José de las Lajas; Rosabel Gamón Verde, Cuba’s Minister of Justice, will represent Jobabo; Asbel Quintana Siveira for Bayamo; Yoandry Águila Molina for Abreus; Yury Triana Velázquez for Madruga; Yudixa Sarmiento Rodisio, secretary of the Health Workers’ Union, for Pedro Betancourt; William Licourt González, secretary of the Agricultural Workers’ Union, for Consolación del Sur; Jorge Legañoa Alonso, president of Prensa Latina news agency, for Rafael Freyre; Zulma Pila Gálvez for Havana’s Regla municipality; and Elvis Norys Castillo Morales for Amancio Rodríguez. The appointments follow procedures laid out in Cuba’s Electoral Law to fill legislative vacancies.

    Lawmakers also advanced a high-impact rule change on opening day, voting to repeal Law No. 183, enacted in December 2025 and officially titled the Law for the Exceptional Reduction of the Current Term of Office of the Municipal Assemblies of People’s Power. The repeal reverses the previous law’s adjustment to municipal delegate term lengths, restoring the five-year term mandate written into the Cuban Constitution. Legislative officials confirmed that all municipal delegate terms will now proceed along the original five-year timeline, with scheduled elections for municipal delegates and national deputies set to take place in 2027 as planned.

    Another central topic of the opening day deliberations was a progress update delivered by Manuel Marrero Cruz, member of the Political Bureau and Prime Minister of Cuba, on the organizational rollout of national Economic and Social Transformations. The update, part of the 2026 Government Program, allowed deputies to review the actions implemented since the program’s approval and align on upcoming priorities for execution.

    Deputies also received a briefing on the execution of Cuba’s State Budget for the first half of 2026, and formally approved the 2025 budget settlement report submitted by Vladimir Regueiro Ale, Minister of Finance and Prices, alongside a corresponding review report from the ANPP’s Economic Affairs Committee.

    In additional legislative action on Wednesday, parliamentarians passed the new Agricultural and Forestry Land Law, introduced by Ydael Pérez Brito, Cuba’s Minister of Agriculture.

    As the session continues Thursday, lawmakers are set to deliberate on four landmark pieces of legislation that form a core part of Cuba’s ongoing national initiative to update and modernize its legal system: the Law on the Organization of the Central State Administration, the new Housing Law, a revised Labor Code, and the Law on the Identity and Domicile System.

  • The 2026 Budget Progress Report and the 2025 Budget Settlement were presented

    The 2026 Budget Progress Report and the 2025 Budget Settlement were presented

    In a recent presentation to the Seventh Ordinary Session of the Tenth Legislature of Cuba’s National Assembly of People’s Power, Minister of Finance and Prices Vladimir Regueiro Ale delivered an updated assessment of the country’s 2026 state budget execution alongside the final settlement for the 2025 fiscal cycle, outlining both progress achieved and persistent challenges facing the nation’s fiscal framework. The core guiding principle of the country’s budgetary policy remains unchanged: protecting the social programs established by the Cuban Revolution while delivering on the macroeconomic stabilization targets laid out in the national Government Program.

    Turning first to the 2026 mid-year performance, Regueiro Ale confirmed that early implementation of Law 181/2026, the 2026 State Budget Law, has produced better-than-projected results across several key economic indicators, though significant hurdles remain in the areas of tax collection, persistent tax evasion, and the timely execution of targeted public expenditure. A number of Cuban provinces have recorded particularly strong budget outcomes so far this year, including Pinar del Río, Artemisa, Havana, Mayabeque, Matanzas, Villa Clara and Camagüey, with most other regional territories on track to close out 2026 with positive fiscal balances.

    Revenue collection to date has been primarily driven by broad-based tax compliance, but Regueiro Ale stressed the urgent need to more effectively mobilize resources that should be retained at the regional level to fund local development initiatives and underpin ongoing national economic and social transformation efforts. Strengthened fiscal control measures are already being rolled out across the country, the minister noted, but tax evasion and non-compliance remain major barriers to maximizing state revenue, requiring far more coordinated, decisive action from all responsible public institutions. Through the end of the first half of 2026, overall budget execution hit 93% of the projected amount for the period. Minor shortfalls are largely attributed to global and domestic supply chain disruptions that have delayed the delivery of goods for budgeted public activities, as well as missed targets for several government-supported economic plans, most notably in the agricultural procurement sector.

    A large share of first-half 2026 budget resources has already been allocated to three core priority areas: financing strategic domestic economic activities, subsidizing residential electricity rates for Cuban households, and funding capital investments to restore national electricity generation capacity and other critical economic sectors. When preparing full-year 2026 projections, the Ministry of Finance incorporated the expected economic impact of recently approved national economic and social transformation policies, which are forecast to boost domestic goods and services marketing, revive agricultural output, and drive stronger budget revenue performance. At the same time, projections also account for increased fiscal pressure from two new policy measures: a partial salary increase for state-sector workers and a hike to the national minimum wage, both of which will contribute to a wider year-end fiscal deficit. Regueiro Ale confirmed that any necessary adjustments to the 2026 budget will be submitted to the National Assembly for approval in line with the requirements of Law 181/2026, as scheduled.

    Shifting to the final 2025 budget settlement, Regueiro Ale reaffirmed that the year’s fiscal policy centered the same core priorities: protecting revolutionary social programs and meeting the government’s macroeconomic stabilization goals. The 2025 fiscal deficit closed at 67,642 million pesos, a result that beat official projections, driven by total revenues that came in 2% above target and total public spending that came in 2% below planned levels, demonstrating a new level of rigor in public financial management. Total gross revenue for 2025 reached 463,461 million pesos, with tax revenues accounting for 68.6% of all collected funds. The stronger-than-expected revenue performance was fueled by updated tax rates on fuel, cigarettes and tobacco products, as well as increased tax contributions from non-state sector economic actors, particularly from sales and profit taxes.

    Even with this progress, the 2025 settlement report warns that persistent tax evasion and underreporting of income continue to erode the state’s ability to direct additional resources to high-priority social programs. Audits conducted by the National Tax Administration Office uncovered 12.056 billion pesos in outstanding unpaid tax debts in 2025, with 7.14 billion pesos successfully recovered, leaving 4.916 billion pesos still outstanding. The report also highlighted that a small share of taxpayers continue to underutilize mandated tax bank accounts, despite 98% of eligible taxpayers having activated these accounts as part of the national fiscal digitalization process.

    In line with the government’s commitment to centered social spending, 64% of all 2025 public expenditure — totaling 518.543 billion pesos, 97.9% of the total annual budget allocation — went to four core social sectors: Public Health, Education, Social Assistance, and Social Security. More than 75 billion pesos was allocated to public health in 2025, funding more than 103 million primary care consultations, nine million specialist appointments, 23 million dental visits, over 825,000 hospital admissions, and supporting the procurement of essential medicines for the public health system. The education sector received 69.133 billion pesos, which supported a total national enrollment of 1.368 million students across all education levels, 266,198 university students, and funded critical infrastructure upgrades and learning environment improvement projects across the country. A further 11.845 billion pesos was allocated to cultural programs aimed at raising public cultural access and supporting accessible recreational activities, while 7.656 billion pesos went to the development of national sports and physical culture initiatives. For social protection, 2025 social assistance spending focused specifically on addressing the needs of vulnerable populations, including older adults, people living with disabilities, and low-income households, as a core tool to advance national social equity.

    While acknowledging the significant progress made in both fiscal years, Regueiro Ale noted that persistent challenges remain: gaps in budgetary oversight, ongoing tax evasion, shortages of specialized economic and financial personnel, and unaddressed distortions in the relationship between state and non-state economic sectors. “Overcoming these limitations is imperative to enhance the intrinsic fiscal capacity of the Budget as a development tool,” the minister stated. Moving forward, he reaffirmed the government’s commitment to strengthening fiscal discipline, improving regulatory and control mechanisms, and increasing the efficiency of public spending as core components of the national economic and social transformation agenda. Closing his presentation, Regueiro Ale emphasized that the Cuban state budget will remain an essential foundational tool to drive inclusive economic development, guarantee the long-term sustainability of core social policies, and advance the construction of a more just and equitable socialist model for the Cuban people.

  • Prime Minister Updates Cuban Parliament on the Implementation of Economic and Social Transformations

    Prime Minister Updates Cuban Parliament on the Implementation of Economic and Social Transformations

    On July 29, 2026 — a year marking the centennial of revolutionary leader Fidel Castro Ruz — Cuban Prime Minister Manuel Marrero Cruz delivered a landmark address to the 7th Ordinary Session of the National Assembly of People’s Power (Tenth Legislature) at Havana’s Convention Palace, outlining the island nation’s rapid progress on sweeping economic and social modernization reforms even as it confronts intensifying U.S. economic aggression.

    Opening the address by greeting senior Cuban leaders including revolutionary leader Army General Raúl Castro Ruz, Communist Party First Secretary and President Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, and National Assembly President Esteban Lazo Hernández, Marrero Cruz opened by detailing the acute challenges imposed by new U.S. policy. Since May 2026, the implementation of U.S. Executive Order 14404 has expanded secondary sanctions targeting any foreign individual or entity conducting business with Cuba, a measure built on the false pretense that Cuba poses an “unusual and extraordinary” threat to U.S. national security — a claim Cuba has repeatedly and fully refuted with evidence.

    The new sanctions regime has inflicted multidimensional harm across Cuba’s economy and daily life, hitting critical sectors including energy, agriculture, tourism, finance, and public health hardest. Foreign trade has been particularly disrupted: major shipping providers have suspended service to Cuba, leaving thousands of containers loaded with food, medicine, solar energy equipment, and other essential goods stranded at regional ports, a disruption confirmed by Deputy Prime Minister Oscar earlier the same day.

    Against this backdrop of external pressure, Cuba has advanced the most ambitious process of economic and social transformation in the modern history of its socialist model, aligned with the 2026 national government program. Following the National Assembly’s initial approval of the reform package at an extraordinary session on June 18, 2026, leaders launched a broad consultation process to refine the proposals, incorporating guidance from Raúl Castro Ruz (who emphasized that successful, timely implementation with clear priorities and public participation is as critical as the reform’s approval), agreements from the Communist Party Central Committee Plenum, input from leading national economists, and 165 of 171 proposals submitted by sitting deputies. The updated, final version of the transformation framework was published on June 25, opening the door for direct public engagement.

    To kick off implementation, Cuba’s Council of Ministers approved formal organizational guidelines, focused on designing supporting policy and legal frameworks, setting clear timelines and assigning institutional responsibilities. Senior government officials were appointed to lead reform across 19 thematic working groups staffed by leading experts and academics, while national, provincial, and municipal-level training seminars were held to equip party and government leaders with the tools to deliver results. Working with the National Assembly leadership, a compressed legislative timeline was developed to advance 138 new regulatory norms. To date, 110 of the 121 reforms planned for June and July 2026 have been fully approved (representing 90.9% of the stage’s target), with another five partially approved. The remaining reforms for this period will be finalized by the end of the week, with the most complex, high-stakes reforms scheduled for approval by September (except three set for November).

    Breaking down progress across thematic reform areas, Marrero Cruz detailed that 28 of 31 reforms to the economic actor management model have been completed. A new Decree Law on the Cuban State Business System expands autonomy for state-owned enterprises, granting them authority to set internal salary structures, operate any legal commercial activity, set prices, make financial investments, manage employment relationships, and flexibly allocate profits. State enterprises are now organized into targeted business groups to leverage synergies and improve productive, technological, and financial outcomes, while requiring increased worker participation in governance, transparency, and accountability. Parallel reforms updated the national salary system for state enterprises, eliminating previous restrictions on custom salary structures and tying salary funds only to the enterprise’s actual economic and financial capacity, with trade union agreement required for internal salary frameworks — the most significant wage reform in decades, though unprofitable firms cannot access these new flexibilities.

    For non-state economic actors, the number of approved non-agricultural micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) and cooperatives has jumped from just over 3,000 to more than 15,000. A new decree law regulates the creation, operation, and dissolution of MSMEs, private firms, non-agricultural cooperatives, and self-employment, cutting red tape, reducing approval timelines, and simplifying classification criteria. Decree 160, published July 28, eliminated full restrictions on 46 previously prohibited activities and partially lifted restrictions on 36 more, to better integrate the non-state sector into national development. These reforms are designed to unlock productive capacity and expand the supply of goods and services for Cuban citizens.

    Other major reforms already approved include: updating the national economic planning model to increase flexibility, prioritize market signals and business autonomy, and decentralize investment approval authority (only projects exceeding 1 billion pesos require central government approval); restructuring the central state administration to separate state and business functions, reduce redundant administrative positions, with more than 92,000 unfilled administrative posts already cut across public health, education, culture, and sports, with remaining ministries scheduled to complete restructuring by September 2026; expanding territorial decentralization, granting 111 municipalities access to their 2025 revenue surpluses for local development projects.

    In the energy sector, which continues to face acute challenges from prolonged blackouts that disrupt water access, food production, and economic activity, reforms have focused on expanding renewable energy capacity. To date, 1,464 megawatts of renewable capacity have been installed, representing 13.8% of national electricity generation. More than 4,292 state-led photovoltaic systems have been deployed across critical public facilities and isolated households, with an additional 11,000 systems installed in homes of vulnerable groups including children with chronic illnesses, labor heroes, and frontline professionals. Rules have been relaxed to allow MSMEs and foreign firms to import and sell fuel at wholesale and retail, with transparent price requirements, and new tax incentives have been introduced for renewable energy investments in public facilities and vulnerable households, including full tax deductions for qualifying investments and sales tax exemptions for renewable technology sales.

    Agricultural reforms have advanced four of five planned transformations, including updates to the Agricultural and Forestry Land Bill that will open up land use and marketing for all producers, update cooperative governance, and introduce new production incentives. For social protection, a core cross-cutting priority of all reforms, national authorities have identified more than 876,000 vulnerable Cubans prioritized for support, and a new online application portal for social assistance through the Soberanía platform launched this week, allowing citizens to apply for support or submit applications on behalf of other vulnerable residents, complementing existing local government outreach. A national minimum wage increase to 3,210 pesos — covering all workers in state and non-state sectors with incomes below this threshold — took effect in July 2026 and will be paid starting in August, with an estimated annual cost of 42.5 billion pesos.

    Reforms to the banking and financial sector have eliminated administrative barriers to opening foreign currency accounts, allowed non-state actors to deposit and withdraw foreign currency and make international payments for legitimate trade, eliminated the requirement for Central Bank authorization to open foreign bank accounts, and introduced new measures to boost digital payments: eliminating cash payment limits between economic actors, real-time transaction processing, eliminating cash deposit commissions, and raising the monthly transaction limit from 120,000 pesos to 2.5 million pesos. The first private exchange house is set to launch as a pilot project as part of broader exchange rate reforms. Tax system reforms have replaced existing sales and services taxes with value-added tax (VAT), reduced corporate income tax from 35% to 30% to encourage reinvestment, and introduced accelerated depreciation for new production machinery and equipment. Pricing reform decentralizes price-setting authority to all economic actors, with mandatory public price transparency and strengthened inspection to prevent abuse.

    Foreign investment reforms have cut red tape, eliminated requirements for third-party employment of Cuban workers, streamlined documentation and processing times, and approved new policies for foreign investment in real estate, trade, and heritage conservation. Early outcomes already include 13 foreign-invested enterprises directly employing local workers, approval of the first joint venture between a foreign firm and a Cuban private MSME, nearly 200 authorized wholesale fuel distributors, and the creation of Cuba’s first special economic development zone for a fully foreign-owned health tourism project.

    In the tourism sector, which has been brought to near-collapse by U.S. sanctions and fuel shortages, with 73% of hotel rooms closed and 25,000 workers on standby, and seven major international hotel chains (managing 46% of national room capacity) having exited the country, reforms have opened the sector to all economic actors, introducing tax incentives for ecotourism and specialized tourism, and allowing non-state actors to operate car rental, transportation, travel agencies, and guided tour services. Other completed reforms cover transportation (streamlining vehicle import and sales and incentivizing electric mobility), domestic commerce (creating new neighborhood markets and wholesale markets open to all actors), insurance (expanding foreign currency coverage and mandating third-party liability auto insurance), and the digital economy (allowing private sector operation of data center services under regulation).

    Marrero Cruz emphasized that in just over six weeks since the reform package’s approval, the government has delivered on its initial implementation timeline with speed, rigor, and depth, enabled in part by data intelligence and artificial intelligence tools that allow real-time monitoring of all 176 transformations through a centralized dashboard. Moving forward, the government enters its most critical and challenging phase: ensuring effective on-the-ground implementation, monitoring outcomes, addressing gaps, and correcting deviations as they emerge.

    Paying tribute to the Cuban people’s resilience amid prolonged hardship, Marrero Cruz reaffirmed the country’s commitment to its socialist model, citing Raúl Castro Ruz’s 2010 call to break with dogma and update the economic model to strengthen and develop Cuban socialism. “We are not deviating from our socialist model; on the contrary, we will defend it and adopt the necessary measures for its consolidation,” he stated, noting that the 2026 centennial of Fidel Castro Ruz reinforces the revolutionary leader’s call for Cubans to “emancipate ourselves through our own efforts” and defend socialism as the only path for the Cuban people.

    Closing the address, Marrero Cruz led the assembly in traditional revolutionary slogans: “Long live the Revolution! Long live Fidel! Long live Raúl! Always onward to victory! Homeland or Death! We will prevail!”

  • FLASH : Voter registration begins in the West Department

    FLASH : Voter registration begins in the West Department

    Haiti’s Provisional Electoral Council (CEP) has officially kicked off the first phase of voter registration operations in the country’s West Department, marking a key step forward in preparations for upcoming national elections. The initial registration drive, which launched on the morning of Thursday, July 30, 2026, is concentrated across three high-population municipalities: Pétion-ville, Delmas, and Tabarre, with 10 purpose-designated Registration and Voting Centers (CIVs) open to eligible citizens across the region.

    The formal launch ceremony for the initiative was held at 10:00 a.m. local time on July 30 at the Pétion-ville National High School, one of the 10 official registration sites. The five CIVs operating in Pétion-ville include Pétion-ville National High School, Guatemala National School, Meyotte National School, Frères National School, and Benoît Batraville High School in Laboule 13. Three additional sites have been set up in Delmas: Horatius Laventure High School, Antoine and Georges Izmery High School in Petite Place Cazeau, and the Silo CASEC Office. Rounding out the network of registration centers are two locations in Tabarre: Jean-Marie Vincent High School and Tabarre National School (Tabarre 25).

    In its official announcement, the CEP has called on all eligible Haitian citizens holding a valid national identification card to visit their nearest designated center to complete registration and be added to the official electoral roll ahead of the upcoming polls. The electoral body emphasized that successful voter registration is a non-negotiable prerequisite for exercising the fundamental democratic right to vote, and a core requirement for participation in the upcoming electoral process.

    To ensure compliance with national electoral regulations, the CEP has urged all qualified potential voters to finalize their registration within the current phase timeline, following all applicable legal procedures laid out for the process. This initial rollout in West Department paves the way for subsequent registration phases across other regions of Haiti as the country advances toward its scheduled elections.

  • Dean Barrow Challenges Appeal Court Ruling in Cats Caye Battle

    Dean Barrow Challenges Appeal Court Ruling in Cats Caye Battle

    A decades-long controversial land dispute over a 14-acre parcel of prime coastal property at Fisherman’s Caye has reached the region’s highest judicial body, the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), with millions of dollars in potential taxpayer liability hanging in the balance. The conflict traces its roots back to 2008, when the Belizean government issued a formal land grant to Rudolph Ramirez, despite the fact that the disputed property had already been legally transferred to a third party years prior to the grant’s issuance.

    The legal battle has already wound its way through two lower courts: the initial High Court hearing awarded Ramirez and his co-claimant Julius Zabaneh more than $2 million in compensation for the flawed land grant. However, that ruling was later overturned by the Court of Appeal, which voided the original 2008 grant and rejected the multi-million damage award, leaving the claimants entitled only to the $2,878 that Ramirez originally paid for the land. Now, the claimants have brought their challenge to the Court of Appeal’s decision before the CCJ, which wrapped up three hours of oral arguments from both sides this week before reserving judgment for a future date.

    Representing claimants Ramirez and Zabaneh, senior counsel and former prime minister Dean Barrow argued that the Court of Appeal overstepped its authority when it reopened core questions of legal liability that had already been settled in the initial High Court proceedings. Barrow explained that the unusual procedural history of the case worked in his clients’ favor: when the claimants originally moved to strike the government’s defense as legally defective and failing to state a valid claim, the government’s own legal team did not object to the motion. Following the unopposed motion, the High Court struck the defense and entered a default judgment on liability against the government, a procedural outcome Barrow says the Court of Appeal had no legal basis to undo.

    “That notice of intention to vary, cross appeal in short, challenged the award of the two million and odd made by the trial judge on several grounds. One of those is the contract made between the claimant, the defendants, the appellants and the respondents was a nullity and that the court at first instance was therefore wrong to have made judgment and was wrong to have made the liability order,” Barrow told reporters in a post-hearing comment. “The judgment was entered after the claimants made an application to strike the defense on the basis that it was wholly defective, that it did not disclose any proper case. And what is important, slightly peculiar feature of all of this is that the respondents, the defendants in this instance, agreed with the application to strike. The way the judges strike out order framed it is that hearing Mr. Lindo, who was appearing then for the claimants and then being no objection from Ms. Matute, who was appearing then for the defendants, the court would proceed to make the order and enter judgement, Now the strike out application succeeded.”

    On the opposing side, government legal representatives argue that forcing taxpayers to foot a $2 million bill for the error is unfair and legally unjustified. Senior counsel Eamon Courtenay, representing the government, told the CCJ that the government never held legal title to the land at the time it issued the 2008 grant to Ramirez, meaning it had no valid ownership rights to transfer to the claimants. Courtenay further argued that Ramirez was fully aware the land had already been granted to another party when he accepted the second, erroneous grant, and is now improperly seeking massive damages for a transaction he knew was flawed from its inception. Even official government rectification records explicitly confirm the 2008 grant was a bureaucratic mistake, he added.

    “It is impossible for the government to grant title to land that it does not own and on the pleadings, which was the only thing before the court, what the claimants said was that I found that out, I knew it, I told the government and the government gave me a second grant for the same piece of land which it did not own and I am now coming to ask the court for a remedy,” Courtenay stated during his arguments. “The rectification reads your honor, fiat grant 204 of 2008 was erroneously issued to Rudolph Ramirez. So the minister is saying I gave you a title in error.”

    After three hours of detailed submissions from both legal teams, the CCJ opted to reserve its ruling, with no specific date for judgment announced as of July 29, 2026. The outcome of the case will not only resolve a years-long private land dispute but also set a key precedent for government liability and damages for bureaucratic errors in Belize’s land grant system.

  • GOB Promises Reform Soon, Belizeans Demand Accountability Now

    GOB Promises Reform Soon, Belizeans Demand Accountability Now

    Weeks after a high-stakes defense ministry spending scandal broke in Belize, a national debate has emerged over whether the government is prioritizing systemic reform over holding wrongdoers accountable, leaving the public demanding answers for alleged mismanagement and corruption.

    The controversy, which centers on questionable supply contracts and non-compliant spending practices within the Ministry of Defense, has already placed two former defense ministers—Florencio Marin Jr. and Oscar Mira—on administrative leave as the Auditor General completes a full independent audit. When the scandal first emerged in early July 2026, Prime Minister John Briceño offered a clear public guarantee: no one would be shielded from consequences, regardless of their position.

    “The auditor general will carry out a full, unobstructed investigation. If any wrongdoing is uncovered, whether connected to career public officers or elected politicians, those responsible will be held to account. We will not engage in a cover-up,” Briceño stated in a July 3 address to the nation.

    In the weeks that followed, however, the national conversation has shifted steadily toward broad structural changes to Belize’s long-troubled public procurement system, rather than immediate accountability for the current controversy. Cabinet ministers across the ruling People’s United Party (PUP) administration have framed the scandal as a long-overdue opportunity to fix systemic flaws that have plagued successive governments of both major parties for decades.

    Kareem Musa, a senior cabinet minister, noted July 23 that problematic procurement processes have “bedeviled us for decades, not just this PUP administration, past UDP and PUP administrations.” Home Affairs Minister Francis Fonseca echoed that assessment on July 21, acknowledging “we have a broken procurement system and that has been the case for many years. Successive governments under both administrations may have been comfortable with that broken system.”

    Cabinet Minister Henry Charles Usher added July 27 that the priority is to close gaps in oversight and update existing controls, a position that aligns with the government’s growing focus on systemic reform. “I think it’s important that if there are areas that need improvement, that those areas are improved, that if there are additional controls that need to be put in place… What is important is that an audit is done,” Usher said.

    While most political leaders agree that reforming the broken procurement framework is a critical long-term goal, many public figures and ordinary Belizeans argue that accountability for the current scandal is being sidelined. The core unresolved question remains: once the audit is finalized, will any senior officials or public servants actually face consequences for violating the Finance and Audit Reform Act?

    Richard “Dickie” Bradley, a former public service chief executive with decades of experience in government finance, warned that the country’s public financial management framework is already failing at its most basic functions. “We have started to see in the country that something is going terribly wrong with the control of public monies. There is no accountability. There are no checks and balance. There is no transparency. You can’t run a country like that,” Bradley argued.

    Unlike many commentators who have focused blame on the two former defense ministers on leave, Bradley contends that ultimate responsibility for improper spending lies with the career public officers tasked with managing public finances. “There is a pressure on some public officers, but there is also corruption involved because if I defending my invoice to collect money, I can say to you, you know if you speed up my thing, you gonna get something. And then the second time around you say like, I don’t want to speed up nothing because da wa lee slightaz, can’t even pay school fees for that kind of money. I give you more and so,” Bradley explained, using local Kriol phrasing to describe the incremental growth of corrupt practices. “The buck stops at the public officers. The accountants, the finance officers, the chief executive officer. That is where the problem can be resolved and solved. If we find that the procedure is a little outdated and a bit colonial, we have the ability to improve and change it.”

    Bradley’s position rejects the government’s framing that systemic reform must come before accountability, arguing instead that holding individual bad actors responsible is the more urgent priority. The Public Service Union (PSU), the country’s main public sector labor body, has gone even further, openly calling for the permanent removal of former defense minister Oscar Mira from Cabinet. PSU president Dean Flowers stated July 24 that the organization has formally demanded Mira’s permanent ouster from government.

    As calls for broad procurement reform grow louder, the fate of accountability remains unresolved. Belizeans are now watching closely to see whether the government will hold wrongdoers responsible first, or push through systemic changes before any consequences are handed down. Reporting for News Five, Paul Lopez delivered this update from Belize City.

  • Price Gaps in BDF Food Contracts Go Beyond Mayonnaise

    Price Gaps in BDF Food Contracts Go Beyond Mayonnaise

    What began as a public controversy over inflated mayonnaise pricing for military rations has expanded into a broader investigation of Belize Defense Force (BDF) food supply contracts, with newly leaked procurement documents revealing systemic price gaps across multiple staple products that have cost taxpayers millions of extra dollars.

    Local outlet News Five’s months-long review of Ministry of Defense tender records from the 2023-2024 fiscal year confirms that the abnormal markup on mayonnaise was not an isolated incident. In multiple product categories, the ministry awarded contracts to suppliers that submitted far higher bids, even when substantially lower-priced offers from qualified vendors were on the table. The findings have reignited public debate over government procurement transparency, asking whether public funds are being managed to deliver maximum value, or if unstated factors are driving contract awards.

    The mayonnaise scandal first broke when records showed J&J Imports won a BDF supply contract despite pricing its product nearly 400% higher than a competing bid from Mount Pleasant Fresh Produce – and both firms ultimately secured contracts to deliver the condiment. The newly reviewed documents show this pattern repeats across other common ration items.

    Take coconut powder, for example. Belize Imports and Goods (BIG), a firm registered in 2017, offered a 12-packet unit of coconut powder for just $12.84, and supplied 421 units to the BDF each month. By comparison, the Ministry of Defense paid Mount Pleasant Fresh Produce $28.60 per identical unit, for a monthly allocation of 500 units. The highest bidder, A and Y Fresh Vegetables, received a contract at $30 per unit – more than double the price of BIG’s low bid.

    The same pricing discrepancy appears in the procurement of pepper sauce, another staple for military rations. Northern Heat, a food manufacturer founded in 2013, supplied 20 cases of 10-ounce pepper sauce monthly at a contract price of $37.20 per case. Mount Pleasant Fresh Produce, meanwhile, was awarded a contract to supply 3,396 cases annually of 10-ounce Marie Sharp Pepper sauce at $74 per case – a markup that far outpaces even the producer’s current retail price of $56 per case directly to consumers. A third supplier, Elodia Cervantes, was paid $86 per case of the same 10-ounce product. Once again, the highest contracted price was more than double the lowest available bid.

    While the available tender documents do not clarify whether differing product brands or specifications explain any of the markup for items outside of Mount Pleasant’s Marie Sharp line, the sheer scale of the price gaps has prompted serious questions about the bid evaluation and award process. Reporters note that the pattern of awarding contracts to higher bidders across multiple product categories cannot be easily dismissed as a clerical error, leaving taxpayers to wait for answers about how public procurement for the national military is being conducted.