KINGSTON, Jamaica — On Friday, opposition Senator Dr. Maziki Thame launched a scathing attack against ruling Jamaica Labour Party government senators, accusing the administration of consistently embracing autocratic governing practices and systematically sidelining the fundamental rights of Jamaican citizens.
Thame delivered her fiery remarks during parliamentary debate on the National Reconstruction and Resilience Authority (NaRRA) Bill, a piece of emergency recovery legislation that ultimately passed along strict party lines. The bill creates NaRRA, a centralized government body tasked with leading large-scale reconstruction efforts across the island after Hurricane Melissa caused an estimated $12.2 billion USD in damage last October.
From the outset, civil society organizations, faith-based church groups, and the parliamentary opposition have pushed for explicit accountability and oversight mechanisms to be embedded in the legislation. Critics say the government has largely dismissed their repeated calls for amendments and failed to address key concerns raised in formal submissions.
During her address, Thame warned that the government’s handling of the NaRRA Bill marks a dangerous break from the country’s constitutional principles of checks and balances. “The Government claims they consult, but there is no clear evidence they are actually listening to the Jamaican people on this bill,” she told parliament.
She specifically called attention to a second joint submission from two prominent advocacy groups, Jamaicans for Justice (JFJ) and the Jamaica Environment Trust (JET), which confirmed that none of their core concerns had been resolved by the administration. Thame emphasized that opposition lawmakers in the House of Representatives have repeatedly flagged that the bill grants unprecedented, unchecked authority to the new reconstruction agency, concentrating power far beyond what is appropriate for a democratic government.
“This approach to the NaRRA Bill is not an isolated incident—it is part of a broader pattern by this government to concentrate power in the executive branch and steer Jamaica toward autocratic rule,” Thame argued. She pointed to the expanded “super ministry” structure within the Office of the Prime Minister as one clear example of this power grab.
She noted that these authoritarian tendencies have been visible from the prime minister’s early career, recalling the 2013 controversy when he required then-opposition senators to sign undated resignation letters as a condition of taking their seats. In 2015, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the prime minister’s demand was unconstitutional and legally void.
“It is unacceptable that Jamaican citizens have repeatedly been forced to take the government to court to defend rights that should be automatically protected under our constitution,” Thame said. She reminded lawmakers of a string of recent court rulings that have struck down government legislation and actions as unconstitutional. Most notably, the 2019 National Identification System (NIDS) legislation was overturned after legal challenges proved it violated citizens’ right to privacy and other fundamental freedoms.
Just this year, in 2025, the courts ruled that the government’s repeated use of national states of emergency (SOEs) between 2018 and 2023 was unconstitutional. Rather than accepting the ruling, the administration immediately announced plans to appeal the decision. Thame highlighted the human cost of the extended SOE policy, pointing to cases like that of Rushane Clarke, who was awarded millions in compensation after being held in lengthy detention without ever being formally charged.
She also referenced the Supreme Court case brought by Everton Douglas and four other detainees, which found that their months-long detention without trial under a SOE was unlawful and unconstitutional, violating their right to liberty and the constitutional principle of separation of powers. Once again, Thame noted, the government appealed the ruling that vindicated the detainees’ rights. “What kind of government would appeal a ruling that upholds the basic constitutional rights of its own people?” Thame asked.
She went on to criticize the prime minister’s own rhetoric, claiming he has repeatedly threatened Jamaican citizens with violent language, including warnings that critics would “meet your judge or your maker.” Thame added that the current authoritarian shift is also reflected in the sharp rise in police killings recorded starting in 2024, and the government’s response to a recent court ruling on mining rights in the Dry Harbour Mountain/Bengal region.
In that case, the court ruled in favor of protecting communities’ right to a healthy environment, yet the government has again moved to appeal the decision. “What kind of government would appeal a ruling that defends the people’s right to a healthy environment?” Thame questioned.
She closed by reaffirming that the joint submission from JET and JFJ details critical gaps in human rights protections, transparent governance, accountability, and rule of law safeguards that remain unaddressed in the final version of the NaRRA Bill.
