作者： admin

In a decisive judicial ruling that underscores the mandatory nature of court compliance, Justice Frank Seepersad has sentenced New Grant resident Groodial Badal to three days’ imprisonment for deliberate defiance of a court order to compensate an assault victim. The January 15th verdict represents a significant reinforcement of judicial authority against willful non-compliance.

Justice Seepersad delivered a nuanced judgment that balanced judicial empathy with necessary enforcement, stating: ‘The dispensation of justice at times necessitates an empathetic approach to the application of the rule of law. However, where there has been willful disobedience despite having the means to comply, the court must protect and preserve its authority.’

The case originated from a 2012 assault and battery claim filed by fellow New Grant resident Balkaran. After extensive legal proceedings, both parties reached a 2016 consent agreement requiring Badal to pay $70,000—comprising a lump sum payment followed by monthly $1,500 installments. Court records reveal only $23,500 has been paid over eight years, with the debt ballooning to $68,523.10 due to accumulating interest.

Evidence presented demonstrated Badal maintains multiple income streams through home ownership, a roti shop, and a burger cart operation. The judge characterized Badal’s behavior as ‘nonchalance’ and ‘pervicacious disobedience,’ noting his failure to provide substantiated proof of financial hardship.

In a direct address to the defendant, Justice Seepersad declared: ‘You are in contempt for your failure to make any payment. This does not absolve you of payment of the balance owed. I hope it gives you time to reflect.’

The ruling included a broader societal critique, observing that ‘disregard for the law appears entrenched in our society, and far too often, citizens only comply with legal obligations under threat of severe sanction.’ Justice Seepersad lamented what he termed the ‘big stick over your head syndrome’ as the primary catalyst for compliance.

Badal’s defense, represented by attorney Mustapha Khan, cited pandemic-related financial hardships and claimed willingness to continue payments at reduced rates. These arguments were rejected based on evidence of consistent earning capacity and the lengthy duration of non-compliance.

The imprisonment order takes immediate effect, though the outstanding financial obligation remains fully enforceable upon Badal’s release.

A poignant revelation from an 87-year-old Trinidadian writer has unveiled systemic age discrimination permeating financial institutions and social structures. HD Greaves, a published author of twelve books, finds himself denied basic financial services including credit cards and purchase financing solely based on his age, despite maintaining robust health and mental acuity. This case exemplifies a broader pattern of institutional ageism that treats senior citizens as liabilities rather than valuable contributors.

The situation extends beyond financial exclusion into systemic administrative failures. Thousands of elderly citizens face prolonged pension processing delays—some waiting over two years for entitlements—creating unnecessary economic hardship during their most vulnerable years. These bureaucratic inefficiencies represent what experts describe as ‘economic violence’ against the aging population.

More disturbingly, many seniors experience various forms of domestic mistreatment including financial exploitation, emotional neglect, and physical abuse within their own families. These violations often remain hidden behind closed doors, leaving victims without recourse or protection.

Psychology expert Dr. Margaret Nakhid-Chatoor analyzes this crisis as reflecting deeper societal values that prioritize youth and productivity over wisdom and experience. The banking industry’s risk-aversion toward older clients, combined with inadequate social support systems, creates an environment where aging becomes synonymous with irrelevance rather than respected maturity.

The solution requires multidimensional reform: financial institutions must adopt capacity-based assessments rather than age-based discrimination, government agencies need to streamline pension processing systems, and families must recognize elder care as privilege rather than burden. Culturally, societies must reimagine aging as a continuation of contribution through intergenerational knowledge-sharing programs that begin as early as preschool education.

This collective awakening demands policy revisions, corporate responsibility, and cultural transformation to ensure senior citizens receive the dignity and respect their lifetime of contribution deserves.