作者: admin

  • Fidel’s legacy challenges us today with more force than ever

    Fidel’s legacy challenges us today with more force than ever

    On August 10, 2026, at the opening of the first international colloquium *”Fidel: Legacy and Future”* held at Havana’s Convention Center, Miguel Mario Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba and President of the Republic of Cuba, delivered a landmark keynote address marking the centennial of the birth of iconic Cuban revolutionary leader Fidel Castro Ruz.

    Díaz-Canel opened by extending a warm welcome to hundreds of delegates, scholars, activists, and artists who traveled from across the globe to attend the event, defying geographic distance, coordinated Western disinformation campaigns, and official pressure from their home governments. He emphasized that their presence in Cuba, at a time of heightened U.S. economic aggression and diplomatic hostility, constitutes an act of courageous militant solidarity that embodies the core of Fidel’s enduring legacy. *”There is no better or more enduring monument than the one you have erected with your courageous presence here, in Fidel’s Cuba, on its Centennial,”* he told attendees.

    The Cuban leader framed the centennial celebration not as a ceremonial tribute to a historical figure, but as a critical moment to draw on Fidel’s ideas to confront the most severe challenge the Cuban Revolution has faced in its 67-year history: breaking the decades-long U.S. siege that seeks to annihilate Cuba’s socialist project as collective punishment for the nation’s commitment to sovereignty and dignity. He traced Fidel’s revolutionary trajectory from his early days as a rebellious student activist protesting Cuba’s neocolonial inequality, through the 1953 attack on the Moncada Barracks, the founding of the 26th of July Movement, the guerrilla campaign in the Sierra Maestra, and the 1959 triumph of the revolution that ended a pro-imperial dictatorship.

    Díaz-Canel reminded the audience that before the revolution, Cuba was defined by extreme systemic inequality: 600,000 Cubans were unemployed, 37.5% of the population was illiterate, 1.5% of landowners controlled 46% of the nation’s arable land, and nearly all key strategic industries were owned by U.S. corporate monopolies. Even amid the crippling constraints of 66 years of economic, commercial, and financial blockade and a recent seven-month energy embargo, Díaz-Canel noted, Cuba’s revolutionary gains — rooted in Fidel’s vision — have left the country with social indicators that outperform most middle-income nations. Cuba boasts the highest number of doctors per capita in the world (more than 9 per 1,000 inhabitants), ranks among the top 10 countries in the Americas for life expectancy at 77.7 years, and remains a global leader in international medical and educational solidarity, per data from the World Health Organization and UNESCO.

    Díaz-Canel outlined the core pillars of Fidel’s ideological and practical legacy for current and future generations. Fidel bequeathed not rigid dogma, but a living method of revolutionary practice rooted in rigorous analysis of concrete conditions, popular mobilization, and decisive action. Key tenets of this legacy include: unwavering commitment to anti-imperialism and sovereignty; the certainty that dreams of justice are achievable through militant struggle; internationalism as a core defining value of revolution; the conviction that socialism is the only path to save humanity from capitalist exploitation and climate collapse; and the principle that economics and politics are inseparable, with all economic decisions serving collective social good. He also highlighted Fidel’s legacies of ethical leadership, intellectual audacity, revolutionary optimism, and innovative strategy under constraint, noting that Fidel transformed scarcity into a catalyst for national creativity rather than a barrier to progress.

    Against the backdrop of a deeply unstable global order marked by escalating imperial aggression, widening inequality, catastrophic climate change, and rising great power competition, Díaz-Canel emphasized that Cuba remains a primary target of U.S. hostility, with the Biden administration ramping up sanctions and extraterritorial blockade measures in this centennial year. He detailed the devastating human cost of the intensified blockade, which has created unprecedented hardship for the Cuban people: more than 1,400 megawatts of idle electricity generation capacity due to fuel shortages, leaving much of the country coping with 20+ hour daily blackouts; 98,500 patients waiting for urgently needed surgeries, including 12,000 children, due to lack of medical supplies and energy to power operating rooms; 67,000 infants under the age of one missing up-to-date routine vaccinations; 118,200 cancer patients unable to access adequate primary treatment; and only 30% of essential medicines available in the national health system, all as a direct result of U.S. sanctions. The infant mortality rate, once comparable to developed nations at 4-5 per 1,000 live births, has more than doubled to over 9.8 due to blockade-related shortages, he confirmed.

    Díaz-Canel called the intensified blockade an undeclared act of genocidal aggression, noting that United Nations human rights experts have repeatedly confirmed that U.S. unilateral coercive measures against Cuba violate the UN Charter and constitute a crime against humanity. He rejected U.S. claims that Cuba is a “state sponsor of terrorism” or a hub for subversion, pointing out that Cuba has been the victim of decades of U.S.-sponsored state terrorism and covert regime change operations, with recent confirmed increases in CIA subversion activity on the island.

    Despite the unprecedented hardship, Díaz-Canel stressed that Cuba has followed Fidel’s teaching of creative, not passive, resistance. In recent years, Cuba has developed sovereign COVID-19 vaccines, expanded urban and agroecological agriculture to offset fertilizer and fuel shortages, maintained its longstanding commitment to international solidarity, and continues to train thousands of medical professionals from low-income countries at no cost. Just weeks before the colloquium, 30,185 young professionals graduated from Cuban universities, including 735 from 62 foreign nations — among them 20 new Palestinian doctors and five U.S. doctors trained in Cuban institutions.

    Díaz-Canel outlined that Cuba’s ongoing economic and social transformation process is rooted in Fidel’s principles, aimed at building prosperous, sustainable socialism without abandoning core commitments: the fundamental means of production remain under collective ownership, no widespread privatization will be implemented, and national sovereignty and independence will remain non-negotiable. The Communist Party of Cuba retains its role as the leading force guiding the process and safeguarding the social gains won by the revolution over decades.

    Fidel’s legacy, Díaz-Canel argued, belongs not only to Cuba but to all people fighting for justice and sovereignty across the globe. He called on international delegates to take up three core tasks: countering the massive disinformation campaign about Cuba by spreading factual accounts of the nation’s reality — a reality of hardship, but also of resilience, solidarity, and unwavering hope; building concrete solidarity networks to campaign for an end to the blockade, advance scientific and cultural cooperation, and hold imperial powers accountable at international bodies; and deepening critical thinking about 21st-century socialism to answer open questions left by Fidel, from building popular power in the digital age to confronting climate change from a socialist perspective.

    Díaz-Canel closed by reaffirming Cuba’s unwavering commitment to carrying forward Fidel’s vision, emphasizing that the centennial is a starting point, not a conclusion. *”It is not enough to remember him; we must study him! It is not enough to admire him; we must emulate him!”* he declared. Echoing Fidel’s iconic words, he concluded: *”If others compromise, if others allow themselves to be bribed, if others betray, Cuba will know how to remain an example of a revolution that does not surrender… Fidel is a country, Fidel is Cuba! For Cuba, with Fidel, until victory, always! Long live Fidel forever! Socialism or Death! Homeland or Death! We shall overcome!”*

  • Column: Er is geen tweede Borger

    Column: Er is geen tweede Borger

    It was a shock that rippled through Suriname’s media and cultural communities when news broke of Borger Breeveld’s passing on Monday morning. While we all know that life is finite, there are some people who feel as though they should always be with us — and Borger was one of those people for me. A distinct, unforgettable personality, a trailblazer of Suriname’s media sector, and a gifted actor who carved out a unique, permanent place in the nation’s history.

    For most people, mentioning Borger Breeveld immediately brings *Wan Pipel* to mind. His portrayal of Roy in Pim de la Parra’s iconic classic remains etched deep into Suriname’s collective cultural memory, nearly 50 years after the film first premiered, conversations about his performance still continue. Countless Surinamese film and television productions have launched in the decades since, introducing a new wave of local acting talent, but for me, the unmatched impact of *Wan Pipel* has never been equaled — and Borger’s extraordinary acting skill was undeniably a core reason for that lasting legacy.

    My personal memories of Borger extend far beyond his famous role in that film. I first got to know him during a very different chapter of Suriname’s history, when he served as a spokesperson during the country’s military rule. That was no easy era for journalists working in the nation. Power dynamics were fraught, the space for independent journalistic work was tightly constrained, and access to reliable public information was never a given.

    Even in that tense context, Borger remained approachable to reporters. He had empathy for the work journalists needed to do, while also understanding the complexities of the system he operated within. This allowed him to serve as a critical bridge between the press and military leadership. This did not mean all barriers suddenly fell, or every question received an answer — but it meant there was always someone willing to talk, someone who acknowledged that journalists had a job to do. That mattered a great deal in that difficult time.

    Later in his career, I got to see a whole other side of Borger up close: Borger the television producer. When the current affairs program *Suriname Vandaag* launched, he agreed to take on the role of director. I co-led the program and served as one of its co-presenters, so I got to witness his behind-the-scenes talent firsthand.

    *Suriname Vandaag* was broadcast live, a format that anyone working in television knows carries unique pressure. There are no second takes. What happens on air stays on air: a presenter might fumble their lines, a satellite connection could cut out, a segment runs longer than planned, or breaking news can throw the entire run of show completely off schedule. In those moments, you need someone behind the scenes who understands the medium, can make quick, calm decisions, and keep the entire team grounded. That was Borger.

    No one understood the craft of television production better than he did. It was not just knowing where to place a camera or when to cut between angles — he had an intuitive grasp of rhythm, visual storytelling, timing, and on-screen presence. He knew what would resonate with audiences and what would fall flat, and he had a masterful ability to communicate that insight to his team. That last skill is one that should not be underestimated.

    Borger taught the craft to generations of media professionals. An entire cohort of Suriname’s media workers has benefited directly or indirectly from his knowledge and decades of experience. Unlike many people who guard their professional expertise closely, Borger never fit that mold. He was eager to pull others into the field, to help them grow and become better at their work. That is why reducing his legacy to just his role as Roy in *Wan Pipel* does him a deep disservice. He was an actor, yes, but also a director, a producer, a communications strategist, and a teacher. He was part of the pioneering generation that built Suriname’s modern television industry from the ground up, working in an era with far fewer technical resources than we have today.

    Now, almost anyone can shoot footage and stream it live to an audience from a smartphone. But technology alone does not make someone a television professional. Television is a learned craft, and Borger knew that craft inside and out. That is what sticks with me today, alongside the grief of his passing: how much irreplaceable institutional and craft knowledge is lost when a pioneer like Borger leaves us.

    As a country, Suriname has not always done a good job of documenting and passing down the knowledge of the people who built our core industries and cultural sectors. Only when these icons are gone do we realize how much they knew, how many untold stories they carried, how much of our national history is tied to their lives and work. Borger Breeveld was exactly that: a walking, living archive of Suriname’s media and film history.

    For me, I will remember him as I knew him: approachable, deeply knowledgeable, completely at home in every corner of the television industry. He was a man who knew his craft, and dedicated himself to lifting others up along with him.

    *Wan Pipel* will remain, the footage will remain, the memories will remain. And for the many people who learned the craft from him, a part of Borger will live on through their work. But Borger himself is gone. There will never be another like him.

    I send my deepest strength to Borger’s family and all his loved ones as they navigate this enormous loss. Thank you for everything you left to us, and to all of Suriname’s media community. Rest easy, Borger.

  • NIKOS perceptieonderzoek: Wantrouwen beheer olierijkdom; corruptie grootste bedreiging

    NIKOS perceptieonderzoek: Wantrouwen beheer olierijkdom; corruptie grootste bedreiging

    On August 11, new findings from the third national perception survey in Suriname revealed a stark gap between the country’s impending oil and gas-driven economic opportunity and widespread public distrust in how the government will manage and distribute this new wealth. Commissioned by Suriname’s Ministry of Oil, Gas and Environment, the study delivered sobering insights into public attitudes toward governance and natural resource management ahead of the country’s expected energy boom.

    Conducted between June 25 and July 21 by local research firm NIKOS, the survey gathered responses from 1,786 adults aged 18 and older across 49 regional jurisdictions spanning nine of Suriname’s 10 districts. The remote interior district of Sipaliwini was excluded from the sample due to accessibility challenges. Researchers note that the random sampling method used produces a representative snapshot of public opinion across the country.

    The core finding of the report is that 61% of respondents hold little to no confidence that future oil and gas revenues will be managed responsibly. Broken down, 36% reported having little trust, while an additional 25% said they have no trust at all. Just 12% of respondents expressed any meaningful level of confidence: 11% said they had moderate trust, and only 1% reported having high trust. The remaining 27% of respondents took a neutral stance, which researchers frame as further evidence of broad systemic doubt in the government’s ability to steward new energy revenues for the public good.

    This distrust is not limited to any specific demographic or region of the country. A majority of respondents across all education levels hold little or no confidence in government management, with the share rising to two-thirds among respondents with tertiary or university education. District-level data also reflects consistent doubt: 81% of respondents in Brokopondo, 67% in Saramacca, and 66% in Marowijne reported low or no trust, all above the national average of 61%. Even in districts with the highest levels of trust – Nickerie at 47% and Coronie at 50% – nearly half of all respondents still expressed distrust. Researchers conclude that low public confidence is a nationwide phenomenon, not an isolated concern.

    When asked to identify the greatest threats to Suriname’s future development, 65% of respondents named corruption and poor governance – far outpacing the second-most cited risk, political instability, which was selected by just 32%. Crime and economic instability tied at 26%, while brain drain, inadequate education, and a lack of skilled workforce each drew 22% of responses. Overdependence on oil and gas was cited by only 17% of respondents, and climate change by just 10%. The report emphasizes that this makes clear: the public does not see a lack of economic opportunity as Suriname’s biggest challenge; instead, it sees mismanagement and corruption as the primary barrier to progress. This concern grows with education level, with higher-skilled respondents more likely to name poor governance as a top risk.

    Public doubt extends beyond questions of competent management to fairness of distribution. Seven out of 10 respondents expect that the benefits of oil and gas development will accrue almost entirely to a small, elite group. This deep-seated expectation of unequal distribution reinforces the public’s demand for accountable governance and anti-corruption action, researchers say. That demand is underscored by another striking finding: 91% of respondents agree that good governance and reduced corruption are more important than generating new oil and gas revenues themselves. This is one of the most widely shared positions captured in the entire survey.

    Notably, the survey found that Surinamese do not reject the economic opportunity of new oil and gas development. In fact, 37% of respondents identified natural resources as one of Suriname’s greatest strengths for the future, outranking the country’s tropical rainforest and biodiversity (28%) and its multicultural society (23%).

    The overarching takeaway from the survey is clear: as Suriname prepares to enter a new era of energy-led economic growth, the government faces a far greater challenge than developing its resource reserves. The public does not need to be convinced that oil and gas can deliver growth; instead, the government must prove it can manage revenues transparently, distribute benefits fairly, and govern in the broad public interest. Right now, the survey confirms, most Surinamese remain unconvinced.

  • Technology : Roadmap for the responsible adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Haiti

    Technology : Roadmap for the responsible adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Haiti

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely regarded as the most transformative disruptive technology of the 21st century, with industry analysts projecting its global economic and societal impact will match the combined influence of the Industrial Revolution’s electrification and the 1990s rise of the internet. For the first time in modern history, advanced cognitive capabilities are becoming broadly accessible, deployable at low cost, and available to communities across every income level. Recognizing both the transformative opportunities and the governance challenges of this technological shift, four Haitian institutions have formalized a historic partnership to craft the country’s first national plan for responsible AI integration.

    On August 10, Banj, which leads the ProIA project funded by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), joined with the Internet Society Haiti Chapter (ISOC Haiti), the Higher School of Infotronics of Haiti (ESIH), and the Association for Responsible AI (ARAI) to sign a collaboration agreement for the co-development of Haiti’s national AI adoption roadmap. The signed protocol outlines clear working methodologies, role assignments, and decision-making frameworks for the cross-institutional initiative, establishing operational coordination between partners without creating binding financial obligations or formal contractual relationships.

    Each partner brings unique, complementary expertise to the project. Banj serves as the lead organization for the ProIA initiative, under the direction of Marc Alain Boucicault. ISOC Haiti, led by Max Larson Henry, is the author of a foundational reference guide for AI rollout in resource-constrained nations. ESIH, represented by Patrick Attié, contributes academic and technical infrastructure to the effort, while ARAI, led by Sindy Obed, brings global expertise in ethical AI governance. All partners commit to contributing their institutional knowledge, professional networks, and specialized skills, and will share project deliverables to advance collective progress.

    The core shared vision uniting the four organizations is that Haiti’s AI integration must be guided by principles of national sovereignty, responsibility, practicality, and gradual progress. The roadmap will be built on Haiti’s existing domestic technical capacities, and adapted from global lessons learned to fit the specific context of resource-limited developing nations. To lay the groundwork for the final roadmap, partners unveiled two preliminary foundational documents during the agreement signing event.

    The first document, *Mapping the AI Ecosystem in Haiti*, marks the first-ever comprehensive survey of Haiti’s emerging AI sector. It structures the national ecosystem into 8 actor groups organized across three functional layers: Foundations (encompassing the public sector, digital infrastructure, and data management), Drivers (including education and research, private sector entrepreneurship, and venture capital), and Amplifiers (covering the Haitian diaspora, civil society, media, and the broader enabling environment). The mapping identifies more than 40 distinct active stakeholders, each with a clearly defined role within the ecosystem, and outlines 8 high-priority sectors for targeted AI adoption: health, agriculture, fintech, education, disaster risk management, commerce, public governance, and energy.

    The second preliminary document, *The International Reference Guide for Developing a National Artificial Intelligence Strategy in Resource-Limited Countries*, was co-created by ISOC Haiti, ESIH, and ARAI with support from ProIA. Designed for use by policymakers and international donor organizations, the guide addresses a critical gap in global AI governance: how can low-resource nations proactively and responsibly guide AI development without waiting to build advanced capacities they do not currently hold?

    The guide promotes an agile governance model centered on learning through pilot experimentation, rapid iteration, and continuous policy adjustment. It is structured around five core components: a strategic framework built on two critical foundations (robust data governance and strengthened institutional capacity), a phased implementation architecture with clear accountability mechanisms, targeted prioritization of high-impact AI use cases, proportionate ethical governance anchored by a national AI focal point, and a continuous system for monitoring, evaluation, and learning. It is not a technical manual, a one-size-fits-all solution catalog, or a proposal for large-scale capital investment; rather, it is a practical public governance tool that draws on on-the-ground Haitian experience and successful models from Rwanda, Benin, and Egypt. It is also aligned with Haiti’s 2025–2035 National Digital Strategy (SNNH) and UNESCO’s regional AI roadmap for the Caribbean.

    A dedicated cross-institutional working group, led by ESIH’s Patrick Attié as coordinator and Ben-Manson Toussaint as deputy coordinator, will steer the roadmap development process. Working group members also include Marc Arold Rosemond, Christelle Vaval, Schallum Pierre, and Luckny Zéphyr.

    Both preliminary documents are classified as “living documents,” meaning they remain open for input and revisions from all Haitian AI ecosystem stakeholders ahead of finalization. All interested groups — including public and private sector institutions, educational providers, civil society organizations, media outlets, Haitian diaspora members, and independent AI experts — are invited to submit feedback and recommendations via procedures that will be announced through ProAI’s official communication channels.

    The ProAI initiative, formally launched on March 11, 2026, is the Program for Creating Digital Opportunities in Haiti through AI. It is organized by the Inter-American Development Bank and led by Banj as a three-year national platform for AI research, skills training, and public outreach. Structured around four core pillars, ProAI focuses on AI workforce development, building a national connected AI network, running national public awareness campaigns, and developing the national AI adoption roadmap that the current partnership advances. By the end of its three-year mandate, ProAI aims to train at least 125 Haitian professionals in AI-relevant skills, establish a cross-sector network connecting developers, government institutions, policymakers, academics, and diaspora experts, and run three national AI literacy campaigns.

    ARAI, the Association for Responsible AI, is an international non-profit organization dedicated to advancing ethical, safe, and human-centered AI development and deployment. Founded in Dayton, Ohio, U.S., ARAI unites a global community of experts, researchers, policymakers, industry professionals, private companies, and civil society groups to promote AI governance frameworks rooted in transparency, fairness, accountability, and universal human rights. Beyond developing global standards and advocating for responsible practice, ARAI supports AI research and innovation, builds governance frameworks, industry standards, certification pathways, and professional training programs, and raises public awareness of both the opportunities and risks of AI adoption and its broader societal impacts. The organization also contributes to global AI policy discussions and supports public and private institutions worldwide in transitioning to responsible AI use.

  • Three Killed in Mahogany Street Motorcycle Crash

    Three Killed in Mahogany Street Motorcycle Crash

    On a quiet Sunday morning in early August 2026, three Belize City families received devastating news that no grieving relative could ever be prepared for. Allan Arnold, Darwin Monroy, and Theodore Swasso lost their lives in a high-impact collision between two motorcycles on Mahogany Street, leaving loved ones shattered and local law enforcement working to untangle the exact circumstances that led to the tragedy. Local outlet News Five’s senior reporter Britney Gordon breaks down the details of the incident and the broader policy shift that has followed.

    The crash unfolded at approximately 2:00 a.m. near the intersection of Mahogany Street and Tibruce Street, according to official statements from Belize Police Department Assistant Superintendent Stacy Smith. Investigations have so far confirmed that Arnold was traveling westbound on his motorcycle, while Monroy was moving in the opposite direction, with Swasso riding as his pillion passenger. When the two vehicles collided at the intersection, all three men suffered catastrophic injuries that proved fatal at the scene.

    When pressed for details on helmet use and fault for the collision, Smith confirmed that only one helmet was recovered from the crash site, and investigators have not yet determined which driver bore responsibility for the incident. Preliminary accounts suggest Arnold had removed his helmet and was attempting to park his vehicle when the collision occurred.

    Arnold was an active member of the local Hell Boy Motorcycle Club, and his sudden death has left his older brother – also named Allan Arnold – grappling with an unthinkable loss. Arnold Jr. shared in an interview that the two siblings were nearly inseparable, raised by their mechanic father to share a deep passion for motorcycles and all motor vehicles. He pushed back against assumptions that his brother was a reckless rider, emphasizing that the Hell Boy Motorcycle Club explicitly prohibits drinking while riding, and that his brother always operated his bike responsibly.

    “They took away something precious from me, that’s my little brother, my baby brother,” Arnold Jr. said. “No one can bring him back.”

    For Swasso’s family, the grief carries equally sharp pain. His grandmother, Delphina Brooks, told reporters she was awakened in the early hours by Swasso’s friends, who informed her that his helmet had fallen off just moments before the fatal collision. Brooks recalled that Swasso was known affectionately to everyone as “Smiley” for his constant warm demeanor, and that just two days before the crash, he had brought his young daughter to visit her at her home. He left her house Friday afternoon, she said, and she never saw him alive again before identifying his body at a local hospital.

    The tragedy comes as Belize’s Department of Transport already faces growing pressure to address rising rates of motorcycle-related offenses and fatalities across the country. Deputy Transport Officer Peter Williams told News Five that the department is now ramping up joint enforcement operations and targeted safety training, focusing on the most common high-risk violations: reckless riding, failure to wear helmets, overloading bikes, and driving under the influence of alcohol. Williams noted that public complaints about dangerous motorcycle operation – from excessive noise to reckless speeding – have surged in urban centers across Belize, prompting a shift in how authorities approach violations.

    Gone are the days when most offenders only received small, slap-on-the-wrist traffic tickets, Williams confirmed. Authorities are now pushing for harsher legal penalties, more frequent court prosecution for repeat offenders, and expanded public road safety education to reduce preventable fatal crashes. The goal, he said, is straightforward: to create safer roads for all users and hold dangerous riders accountable for their actions.

    As of Tuesday, police investigations into the Mahogany Street crash remain ongoing, with investigators still working to confirm the sequence of events and assign fault for the collision that cut three lives short. This report by Britney Gordon for News Five.

  • Autopsy Concludes Samuel Chi Died From Drowning

    Autopsy Concludes Samuel Chi Died From Drowning

    Nearly a week after 32-year-old fisherman Samuel Chi was found dead off the coast of Belize following a failed voyage from Caye Caulker to the mainland, official autopsy results have finally confirmed the cause of his death: drowning. However, critical questions surrounding the circumstances of the incident remain unanswered, leaving Chi’s grieving family still searching for clarity. Chi and his traveling companion Albert Vaccaro were both reported missing during their cross-water trip, and while Chi’s body was recovered, Vaccaro survived the incident but has so far failed to provide a full, coherent account of what unfolded. On August 10, 2026, law enforcement offered an update on the ongoing probe, confirming that while forensic pathologists have ruled asphyxia by drowning as the official cause of death, toxicology test results are still pending to rule out any contributing factors. In a press briefing with local reporters, Staff Officer ASP Stacy Smith of the Belize Police Department addressed lingering public and family questions about the case. When asked whether Vaccaro has since given a formal, detailed statement to investigators, Smith acknowledged that immediately after the incident, Vaccaro was severely disoriented and unable to share any usable information. She added that she had not yet confirmed with lead investigators whether they have since been able to interview him to obtain a full statement, but committed to following up on that request. Reporters also pressed Smith for updates on two key pieces of evidence: the status of search operations for the missing vessel, which would serve as the core crime scene if foul play is later confirmed, and whether Chi’s body showed any signs of trauma or violence that could point to foul play. In response, Smith pushed back on framing the incident as a confirmed crime, noting that such a label is premature at this stage of the investigation. She confirmed that she did not have any current updates on whether the vessel has been located, and added that the official autopsy report did not note any signs of external trauma on Chi’s body, aligning with the conclusion that drowning was the cause of death. The investigation remains open as law enforcement continues to piece together the events that led to Chi’s death, with relatives still demanding answers about how the seasoned fisherman died while traveling with a companion who survived. This report is adapted from a transcript of an evening television newscast covering the incident.

  • Suriname threatens ferry MV Canawaima with sailing ban over safety concerns

    Suriname threatens ferry MV Canawaima with sailing ban over safety concerns

    The Maritime Authority of Suriname (MAS) has delivered a formal final ultimatum to Canawaima Management Company NV, giving the firm one last chance to address critical outstanding safety and operational deficiencies on the cargo vessel MV Canawaima, according to official correspondence dated August 7, 2026.

    The ultimatum comes after a months-long process of regulatory follow-up that began with an initial inspection that identified multiple gaps in the vessel’s compliance with international and national maritime safety standards. In a July 26, 2026 notice, MAS first ordered the company to submit a formal corrective action plan within seven days of receiving the original inspection report. When the deadline passed without a complete response, regulators scheduled a follow-up inspection on August 5, 2026. That re-inspection confirmed that the vast majority of the previously flagged deficiencies had not been remedied, prompting the agency to issue the final warning.

    Under the terms of the new ultimatum, Canawaima Management Company NV must submit a comprehensive corrective action plan that includes a clear, time-bound schedule for addressing all identified deficiencies, completing required major structural repairs, and scheduling mandatory drydocking for the vessel. MAS has set a hard deadline of August 13 for all core safety requirements to be brought into full compliance.

    Key non-negotiable requirements laid out by the regulator cover multiple domains of vessel safety. First, all legally mandated safety equipment must be fully on board, tested, and ready for immediate deployment at all times. All fire-fighting tools and systems must be present, up to date on required inspections, and fully operational, including the vessel’s fire detection and suppression infrastructure.

    The regulator also added documentation and personnel certification requirements to the compliance checklist. All crew members must hold valid, up-to-date Basic Safety Training and Crowd Management certification. For any crew members who have not yet completed the required training and obtained their certificates, the company must provide formal written proof that the relevant training courses will be finished within 30 days.

    Additionally, MAS requires an independent, internationally recognized ship surveyor to conduct a full inspection and risk assessment of the watertight integrity of the MV Canawaima’s hull and cofferdams. A positive, passing assessment from this independent inspection is a prerequisite for the company to be considered for a temporary exemption from the mandatory drydocking requirement.

    MAS has clearly outlined the severe consequences that will take effect if the company fails to meet all requirements by the August 13 deadline. Starting at midnight on August 14, 2026, the MV Canawaima will be placed under a full sailing ban that will remain in force until every single compliance requirement is fully satisfied and verified by MAS regulators.

    In its official communication, MAS emphasized that the safety of the vessel, its crew, and all other commercial shipping traffic in Suriname’s waters is the agency’s top priority. The regulator has called on Canawaima Management Company NV to immediately prioritize and implement all required corrective measures to avoid the upcoming sailing ban.

  • Xue Liu’s Death Sparks Autism Safety Conversation

    Xue Liu’s Death Sparks Autism Safety Conversation

    In August 2026, a devastating drowning incident along the Belize River claimed the life of 18-year-old Xue Liu, a young person on the autism spectrum, and sparked a much-needed national and international dialogue about the unaddressed safety risks facing neurodiverse communities and the relentless burdens shouldered by their caregivers.

    According to initial reports, Liu broke free from her caregiver while fleeing a sudden bee attack and ran directly toward the river, where her body was later recovered. In the aftermath of the tragedy, public discussion quickly turned to criticism of caregiver Shisong Liu, who ran in the opposite direction during the chaotic emergency. But disability advocates argue that blaming the already grieving family misses the larger, systemic gaps in safety support that set the stage for this preventable loss.

    Christy Almeida, founder of the Belize-based advocacy organization Autism Belize, pushed back against widespread condemnation of the Liu family, emphasizing that emergency situations trigger unpredictable instinctive responses even for the most prepared caregivers.

    “I have a really hard time casting blame to any parent, especially parents who have children with special needs, children with disabilities,” Almeida shared in a recent televised interview. “You don’t know what they are dealing with on a daily basis. You don’t know the nights that we don’t sleep. You’re not gonna catch me blaming any family at all because we don’t know what they’re dealing with – their mental health, the toll it takes to be a caregiver.”

    Almeida went on to note that even for neurotypical people, life-threatening crises like a swarm of bee attacks trigger the primal “fight or flight” response, and no one can accurately predict how they will react until they are in the moment. “If you are being chased by a swarm of bees and you’re trying to hold on and this person breaks free, what do you do in that situation? I would like to think if it was my own child, I would throw myself over him and never let go of his hand. But in reality, I don’t know how I would actually react,” she said.

    Beyond the question of caregiver response, the tragedy has brought a little-discussed safety hazard to mainstream attention: the innate attraction many autistic and neurodiverse children have to water, which makes drowning the leading cause of death for young people on the autism spectrum globally. Unlike other common health threats, drowning does not cut life expectancy for neurodiverse people because of inherent disability – it stems from a combination of sensory attraction, limited risk perception, and lack of access to adaptive safety resources.

    “For our neurodiverse community, water is a huge attraction,” Almeida explained. “The floating and the feeling of freedom in the water gives their body a sensation that it is not intellectually realizing that this is danger. When an emergency like a bee attack triggers a flight response, they’re not going to stop and think, ‘Wait a minute, I can’t swim. I can’t do this.’”

    Data from autism advocacy organizations across the globe backs up Almeida’s claim: elopement – the tendency for an autistic person to wander away from a caregiver or safe space – is a common trait, and nearly 90% of deaths related to elopement are caused by drowning. Just in recent months, multiple similar incidents have been reported in the United States, where wandering autistic children have been found dead in nearby bodies of water.

    In response to this tragedy, Almeida is calling for systemic changes to improve autism safety, starting with expanded access to adaptive swimming lessons for neurodiverse children. She is urging local communities, swimming coaches, lifeguard associations, and recreational organizations to develop specialized, accessible swimming programs tailored to the needs of autistic people, to reduce the risk of future fatalities. She also emphasized that constant, proactive safety planning is a non-negotiable necessity for families caring for neurodiverse children, a responsibility that most communities do not provide enough support for.

    This incident has also opened a broader conversation about the lack of public understanding of the daily challenges facing caregiver families of children with disabilities. Advocates note that greater public empathy and systemic support for caregiver mental health are just as critical as safety programming to prevent similar tragedies in the future.

  • Young Rescuers Carry the Weight of Belize River Tragedy

    Young Rescuers Carry the Weight of Belize River Tragedy

    On a Friday in August 2026, a group of young, trained lifeguards from Belize’s 501 Lifeguard Rescue Team answered an urgent call that would leave a lasting emotional mark: a 13-year-old special needs teenager, identified as Xue Liu, had disappeared under the surface of the Belize River after fleeing an attacking swarm of bees. What followed was three and a half hours of grueling work against harsh conditions, as the team pushed through murky, fast-moving water in a desperate bid to bring the teen home alive. The search ultimately ended in tragedy, when the rescuers recovered Liu’s lifeless body, a outcome that still weighs heavily on the young team days later.

    Even amid the danger and heartbreak, the dedication of the rescuers has stood out. Sixteen-year-old Shaun Eck, a high school student who joined the search, cut his foot on an underwater wire holding loose stones within minutes of entering the river. Instead of pulling out to seek treatment, Eck chose to stay and continue the search, saying his team needed extra support and his training prepared him for the challenge. “I didn’t feel the injury at the time, so I just had to push through and do my job,” Eck explained.

    For these young men, rescue work is an extension of the community-focused swimming instruction they provide through Coach Andrew Swimming Club, where they spend their summers teaching children — including kids with special needs — how to be safe in the water. Eck himself learned to swim through the program, and now he works alongside the instructors who taught him: head coach Andrew Gentle and coach Tevon Conorque.

    Gentle, who launched the club’s public classes in 2014, says his commitment to patient, inclusive teaching grew from watching his mother work for 18 years at Stella Maris School, a local institution serving students with disabilities. The club travels across Belize to partner with community organizations including the Hub and YWCA, operating on the core belief that every child, regardless of ability, can learn to swim. That philosophy has earned deep trust from families: Rhonisha Waight, aunt of 7-year-old autistic student Alistaire Gillett, says the instructors’ approach has helped her nephew make incredible progress. Learning to swim is not just a fun activity for children with disabilities, Waight notes, it is a critical life skill that empowers them when caregivers cannot be nearby.

    Conorque, who has worked with the program from its early days, says the work is deeply rewarding. “Some of them might not learn right away for the first class, but due to muscle memory and the strength they gain as they get older, they learn,” he explained. “For me, by the fact that I could give a kid the skill of swimming that makes me feel happy, because probably in the future I save that kid’s life.”

    That same drive to protect the community led the team to join the Belize Coast Guard for the search operation on the Belize River. Even with professional training and prior experience responding to drowning incidents, recovering the teenager’s body was an unprecedented emotional blow for the group. Conorque admitted he felt “a bit lost” in the immediate aftermath of the recovery; while he had prepared himself mentally for a potential negative outcome, the experience was still disorienting. For Eck, the tragedy hit especially close to home: “It hurts to think about because I also have a sister, siblings close to that age. So it really hurts me, especially since I saw it firsthand. But I am getting through it slowly, which is good.”

    Despite the heavy grief the team carries from the incident, their commitment to serving Belize’s local community has not wavered. They have returned to their swimming lessons, continuing to teach young people critical water safety skills one class at a time, guided by the same compassion that pushed them into the dangerous river last Friday.

  • ‘No one will save us’: Caribbean must be self-reliant for economic survival – professor

    ‘No one will save us’: Caribbean must be self-reliant for economic survival – professor

    As the global trading system fractures into competing blocs and large powers increasingly embrace protectionist policies, small island nations of the Caribbean cannot count on outside powers to rescue their economies, leading regional economist Professor Justin Robinson has warned. Delivering a stark message at the Central Bank of Barbados 46th Annual Review Seminar, Robinson emphasized that only deliberate self-reliance and tangible, practical regional integration can secure the Caribbean’s economic future.

    Robinson, who serves as principal of the University of the West Indies at Five Islands in Antigua, opened his address by repeating his widely shared regional mantra: “no one is coming to save us.” He challenged the Caribbean’s long-standing habit of waiting for international markets to stabilize and rebound, arguing that the era of depending on external economic safety nets has definitively ended. For Caribbean societies, he said, a fundamental psychological shift is required to take full control of collective financial destinies.

    For decades, small Caribbean states have operated within a global trading system designed entirely by larger, wealthier major economies. The decades of rapid globalization opened access to affordable foreign goods and services for small open Caribbean economies, but it also left them dangerously dependent on global economic powerhouses. Today, as geopolitical shifts split the global economy into competing trade blocs, with major powers prioritizing protectionism, higher tariffs, and supply chain nationalism, the Caribbean faces disproportionate exposure to economic disruption.

    Contrary to common regional framing of this shift as an unprecedented crisis, Robinson noted that global fragmentation is actually a return to historical norms for the region. “The Caribbean didn’t build the global trading system that is currently fragmented. We were incorporated into it on other people’s terms. So fragmentation is really not a departure from our history, it’s really a return to the normal condition,” he explained. He added that the global trading architecture was never structured to accommodate the unique vulnerabilities of small island states, meaning even minor disruptions have outsized consequences.

    When a large industrial economy imposes new trade barriers, it typically only faces a small dip in overall efficiency. For small island nations, however, trade disruptions strike immediately at the baseline of daily economic survival. “When large economies fragment, they lose efficiency. But when small economies like ours are fragmented against, we really risk actually losing viability, and I think this is really what is at stake for us at this point,” Robinson said.

    The real-world impacts of this global shift are already being felt across the Caribbean, manifesting in sharp spikes in the cost of everyday goods. The region imports the vast majority of its food, fuel, and consumer products, so external supply chain and trade disruptions translate directly to higher domestic prices. Robinson stressed that the urgency of the moment cannot be overstated: while a 0.5% increase in inflation is just a minor data point for large economies, it makes the difference between working households being able to afford groceries across most Caribbean islands. “The costs are real, they are already arriving,” he noted.

    Compounding this economic pressure, the traditional safety nets that long buffered Caribbean economies from domestic hardship are rapidly disappearing. For generations, the region’s development model has relied heavily on outward migration and remittances from citizens living in the Global North. But as wealthy Northern nations implement stricter immigration controls and tighten border policies, this historic escape valve is closing. Robinson framed the current moment as a fundamental crisis of the Caribbean’s long-standing externally dependent development model.

    “Our own failure to develop has been cushioned by the fact that we could export people. That gap is closing. The remittances from those persons again have supported levels of consumption that our economies cannot support,” he explained. Against this backdrop, the core question facing the region is whether leaders and societies will fall back on old patterns of waiting and passive adjustment, or embrace the radical changes needed to build a more resilient economic future.

    To navigate this new reality, Robinson argued that Caribbean nations must move beyond treating regional integration as an ideological ideal and turn it into a practical, everyday tool for economic survival. Though the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) has signed dozens of regional trade agreements on paper, persistent barriers still block meaningful cross-border commerce between member states. High internal transport costs, convoluted border bureaucracy, uncoordinated port management, and conflicting national product standards all make trade between neighboring Caribbean economies unnecessarily difficult and expensive.

    “Regional integration is not a panacea for our problems, but it is one of the areas we have where we can respond and somewhat reduce our vulnerability and negative impact. So regional integration is really no longer a sentiment, I think it becomes a necessity,” Robinson said. He called on national governments and regional institutions to take immediate targeted action to remove these internal frictions, prioritizing modernization of port infrastructure, streamlining of customs clearance processes, and harmonization of product and trade standards across the region.

    Robinson also laid out a clear pathway for retaining more economic value within local communities: strengthening domestic links between key sectors, such as connecting local agriculture and manufacturing directly to the foreign exchange generated by the region’s massive tourism industry. This approach would reduce reliance on costly imported goods and keep more revenue circulating within regional economies, he explained.

    As a working model of successful integration driven by necessity, Robinson highlighted the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS). The sub-regional bloc’s member states are all micro-states with extremely small domestic markets, leaving them no choice but to integrate deeply to achieve economic scale. The OECS has already implemented genuine free movement of labor across member states, shared cross-border regulatory frameworks, and a common regional Supreme Court – levels of integration that have not been achieved across the wider Caribbean. “They don’t have a choice but to integrate, and they have levels of integration that are not present in the rest of the region… that comes out of the fact that because of their small size, they view integration as a necessity,” Robinson noted.