BELIZE CITY – A significant political controversy is intensifying surrounding the proposed acquisition of Speednet by Belize Telemedia Limited (BTL), with United Democratic Party leader Tracy Taeger-Panton issuing strong warnings about the increasingly partisan nature of the debate. The UDP leader has emerged as a prominent opponent of the telecommunications deal, recently culminating in a high-visibility protest outside BTL’s headquarters in Belize City.
The political landscape shifted notably when the PUP Northern Caucus publicly endorsed the acquisition, a move that Panton interprets as revealing “serious internal conflict” within the ruling party. According to the opposition leader, Prime Minister John Briceño’s apparent reliance on his northern caucus for support indicates significant divisions within the PUP ranks.
Panton emphasizes that the fundamental concerns transcend partisan politics, characterizing the matter as a national issue with profound implications for Belizean citizens. Central to her argument is the claim that the working class could potentially shoulder an additional financial burden exceeding one hundred million dollars without adequate transparency or justification.
“When you attempt to burden the working class with an additional hundred million or more for an acquisition for which no valid information has been provided to the citizens who happen to be the owners of this public entity, then something is absolutely wrong,” Panton stated during a recent media appearance.
The opposition leader’s critique extends beyond party politics to include substantive concerns about procedural transparency. Panton, along with union leaders and independent senators who have voiced similar apprehensions, argues that the acquisition process has lacked the necessary openness and public disclosure expected for a transaction of this magnitude involving a public entity.
Panton maintains that while both government and opposition have legitimate political prerogatives, the BTL-Speednet acquisition demands a non-partisan approach focused on transparency, fiscal responsibility, and the public interest rather than political maneuvering.









