作者： admin

Trinidad and Tobago’s Prime Minister Kamla Persad Bissessar has vehemently dismissed claims by St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves that her party’s financiers are meddling in the upcoming SVG elections. In a statement on X (formerly Twitter), Persad Bissessar refuted the allegations, calling them baseless and ironic, given Gonsalves’ family’s involvement in a luxury apartment acquisition controversy in Trinidad. She urged Gonsalves to address his 24-year tenure in power instead of deflecting attention onto her United National Congress (UNC). Persad Bissessar also criticized the trend of Caribbean leaders interfering in neighboring countries’ elections, warning that such actions could destabilize the Caribbean Community (CARICOM). The dispute stems from Gonsalves’ accusations that UNC operatives are supporting his political opponents in SVG’s November 27 general election, allegedly motivated by access to land deals. Persad Bissessar denied these claims, emphasizing that the UNC does not engage in such practices. Meanwhile, Gonsalves has reiterated his allegations at campaign events, accusing the UNC of seeking to exploit SVG’s economic growth for personal gain. The controversy has intensified as regional leaders, including those from Barbados and Dominica, have openly supported Gonsalves’ re-election bid, further fueling tensions between the two nations.

Amid the relentless wave of political discourse dominating media and social platforms, I initially intended to remain a passive observer. However, the troubling narratives emerging from the campaign trails of the Unity Labour Party (ULP) in constituencies traditionally held by the opposition New Democratic Party (NDP) have compelled me to speak out. The ULP’s repeated assertion that these communities have endured “neglect” for 25 years due to opposition representatives is not only misleading but also a damning admission of the ruling party’s failure to fulfill its constitutional obligations. While I may harbor personal reservations about the performance of certain opposition MPs, it is crucial to clarify that public assistance and constituency development fall under the purview of the executive branch, not the opposition. Opposition MPs lack control over budgets, ministries, social programs, or state resources. Civil servants are tasked with serving the public, not political parties. Thus, when ULP politicians boast that constituencies were denied assistance because they “did not vote ULP,” they are not critiquing the NDP but confessing to 25 years of deliberate neglect—a blatant form of corruption. A government is elected to serve all citizens, not just its supporters. By strategically withholding attention, projects, and social support from communities based on their voting patterns, the administration not only penalizes its political opponents but also inflicts harm on the nation. This selective neglect exacerbates poverty, widens inequality, and undermines national development. High poverty rates, far from being confined to specific constituencies, permeate every sector—education, health, crime, taxation, and the economy—straining national resources and weakening the middle class. Independent reports have highlighted persistently high youth unemployment and rising poverty levels in several areas of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG) over the past two decades. When a government deems entire constituencies unworthy of development due to their political allegiances, it erodes the foundations of democracy and good governance. Worse, it abandons its own supporters within these communities, treating them as collateral damage. This strategy has predictably backfired, as evidenced by the ULP’s declining support across multiple election cycles. Citizens who feel marginalized and undervalued do not forget neglect; they endure it daily. The irony of the ULP’s campaign slogans, such as “Labour Loves You, Labour Is Wuking Fo We,” is stark. How can a government claim to “love” and work for the people while openly admitting to withholding public assistance from entire communities? These phrases, designed to project care and unity, are deployed in constituencies where the government has confessed to denying development and support solely because the people “did not vote for them.” This is not love; it is propaganda aimed at controlling the narrative and shifting blame onto the very citizens who were deprived. Such messaging seeks to convince people that their hardships stem from a lack of loyalty, when the true betrayal lies with those who exploited public office for personal gain rather than national progress. A government that exacts political retribution on its citizens for exercising their constitutional right to vote demonstrates a dangerous disregard for public integrity. It is an affront to the hardworking people of SVG who strive to build stable lives under systems that should protect, not hinder, them. Like Sanballat and Tobiah, who sought to obstruct the rebuilding of Jerusalem’s walls, we are witnessing leadership more focused on obstruction than nation-building. SVG needs leaders who refuse to weaponize public resources and instead commit to uplifting every community without malice, favoritism, or conditions. Silence is not an option. These issues demand public scrutiny, honest discourse, and accountability. Democracy cannot flourish where citizens are punished for their votes. Public office is a sacred trust, and when it is wielded as a tool of exclusion, it becomes treason.