A significant institutional standoff has emerged between Trinidad and Tobago’s Children’s Authority board and its overseeing minister, with board members firmly rejecting resignation demands despite revelations of substantial financial liabilities. Minister of People, Social Development and Family Services Vandana Mohit publicly called for the board’s resignation during a Sunday news conference, citing a troubling $77 million liability and alleged operational mismanagement within the agency.
Board Chairman Marsha Bailey explicitly stated the board’s intention to serve through its appointed term until October 2026, countering the minister’s demands. The authority’s governing body expressed astonishment at Mohit’s public statements, revealing that numerous formal requests for ministerial meetings had gone unanswered throughout their tenure.
The conflict appears rooted in fundamental disagreements regarding financial oversight and operational responsibilities. The board emphasized its compliance with the Children’s Authority Act, which establishes that presidential appointees serve fixed terms, suggesting the minister lacks direct authority to demand resignations.
Financial constraints have significantly hampered the Authority’s operations, affecting critical areas including personnel costs, foster care programs, facility maintenance, and infrastructure upgrades. These challenges were formally communicated to the ministry following the 2026 national budget passage, yet the board claims it received inadequate ministerial support.
The current confrontation escalated after the board implemented disciplinary measures regarding non-payment of statutory deductions—a violation of national law. Minister Mohit subsequently requested a comprehensive report on these actions, which the board provided within 24 hours despite having received only a brief five-minute meeting with the minister in February.
The board maintains that operational management falls under the director or chief executive officer’s purview, while their role focuses on governance and oversight. They expressed concern that public criticism potentially damages the Authority’s reputation and undermines the professionals serving on the board.
Both parties have committed to providing additional clarifications regarding the $77 million liability, though neither side had issued further statements by press time. The minister indicated a response would be forthcoming regarding potential government actions should the board maintain its position.