In an unprecedented legal challenge, two families from Trinidad and Tobago have initiated federal litigation against the United States government following the fatal military strikes that claimed the lives of their relatives off the coast of Venezuela. The lawsuit, filed in a Massachusetts district court, centers on the deaths of 26-year-old Chad Joseph and 41-year-old Rishi Samaroo from Las Cuevas, Trinidad, who were killed alongside four others during an October 14th maritime operation conducted by U.S. forces.
The plaintiffs, represented by prominent civil liberties organizations including the ACLU, Seton Hall University Law School, and the Center for Constitutional Rights, allege that the strikes form part of a systematic and legally unjustifiable campaign targeting vessels in international waters. According to court documents, this operational pattern has resulted in approximately 125 fatalities across 36 separate incidents since September 2nd, all executed without congressional authorization.
The 23-page complaint presents a damning indictment of the administration’s conduct, characterizing the killings as ‘premeditated and intentional’ acts lacking plausible legal justification. The document specifically names President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, accusing them of publicly celebrating the operations through online video dissemination.
Administration officials have defended the strikes as necessary interventions against narcotics trafficking, asserting that congressional approval was not required for such military actions. The victims’ families counter that their relatives were engaged in legitimate agricultural work—Joseph had traveled for fishing and farming purposes, while Samaroo was employed on a Venezuelan agricultural farm specializing in dairy production.
The legal action invokes two distinct statutory frameworks: the Death on the High Seas Act, which provides recourse for wrongful maritime fatalities, and the Alien Tort Statute, enabling foreign nationals to seek redress for human rights violations in U.S. courts. Legal representatives emphasize the historic nature of the case, noting that never before has the U.S. government asserted such extensive lethal authority in international waters. The White House has declined commentary, citing the ongoing judicial proceedings.