A scathing editorial critique has emerged targeting the Trump administration’s military intervention in Venezuela and Trinidad and Tobago’s perceived complicity in the operation. The opinion piece, authored by Simon Wright of Chaguanas, condemns the abrupt escalation that resulted in approximately 80 casualties, including civilian deaths, and the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
The editorial highlights the stark contrast between Maduro’s expressed willingness to engage in diplomatic discussions and the United States’ decision to employ military force instead. The author characterizes the operation as one that bypassed established diplomatic channels and disregarded due process, with President Maduro being apprehended ‘like a trophy’ rather than through lawful international procedures.
The piece particularly scrutinizes Trinidad and Tobago’s stance, accusing the nation of facilitating the intervention while maintaining a facade of neutrality. The author argues that permitting use of territory or airspace for military operations constitutes active participation, regardless of direct involvement in combat. The core argument asserts that neutrality becomes impossible when a country allows its resources or silence to be exploited for military actions.
The editorial concludes with the powerful assertion that ‘to permit is to participate,’ suggesting that nations providing logistical support or turning a blind eye to military interventions share responsibility for the consequences. This perspective challenges traditional interpretations of neutrality in international conflicts and raises questions about regional accountability in geopolitical power struggles.