As global attention shifts between the fragile Israel-Hamas peace agreement and geopolitical tensions in Venezuela and the Pacific, a reflection on an ancient quote by Tacitus becomes strikingly relevant: ‘Rome creates a desert and calls it peace.’ This sentiment, first articulated by the Scottish chieftain Calgacus in 83 AD, continues to resonate through centuries of military interventions. Calgacus’ critique of Roman imperialism—where conquest was masked as civilization and subjugation as peace—reveals a pattern that persists in modern geopolitics. The powerful have long justified military action as liberation, violence as order, and domination as peace, often leaving behind devastation rebranded as stability. This cycle is perpetuated by the allure of decisive military action, the political safety of appearing strong, and the deferred costs borne by distant populations. The aftermath of such interventions often sees power vacuums, radicalized generations, and destabilized regions—deserts created in the name of peace. Yet, the rhetoric of victory and mission accomplished continues to overshadow the long-term consequences. Breaking this pattern requires acknowledging that military force is not a panacea, investing in diplomacy, and redefining success not by enemies killed but by conflicts resolved and societies rebuilt. The question remains: will we continue to prove Calgacus right, or will we choose a different path?