In a contentious move, the Senate has passed legislation on November 15, reinstating the power of Justices of the Peace (JPs) to issue search warrants. This decision marks a reversal of a two-year-old policy that had stripped JPs of this authority. Historically, JPs held this power from 1917 until 2023, but its removal was seen as a necessary reform. The recent legislative action has sparked significant debate, with critics labeling it a regressive step in the evolution of the criminal justice system. While the government has been praised for codifying Justice Carol Gobin’s ruling on station bail, the restoration of JP search warrant powers has drawn widespread criticism. Attorney General John Jeremie defended the bill, citing its urgency and the police’s preference for JP assistance. However, concerns remain about the lack of stringent regulations and training for JPs, with one currently facing legal charges. The bill, which still requires House approval, has been criticized for potentially expanding police authority and undermining property and privacy rights. Critics argue that JPs, often rubber-stamping warrants without proper oversight, lack the judicial rigor necessary for such decisions. Instead of reinstating JP powers, the recommendation is to assign more judges to handle emergency applications, ensuring a more robust and accountable judicial process.