The recent actions of our Prime Minister have highlighted a troubling decline in the quality of public discourse within our nation. Attempts to justify his behavior as mere ‘political jest’ or ‘Caribbean tradition’ are not only misguided but represent a moral abdication that must be unequivocally rejected. Framing this as ‘satire’ consistent with our political culture deliberately ignores the stark distinction between harmless political banter and the use of the highest office to demean and humiliate a woman by focusing on her body. This is not clever commentary; it is outright bullying. My stance is not partisan but a universal call to address and rectify a toxic and destructive culture. Both the UPP and other political entities have been guilty of similar behavior, and my condemnation is directed at the culture itself. To argue that the Prime Minister is not targeting women because he is ‘confrontational with all opponents’ is to deliberately overlook the gendered nature of his attack. When male opponents are critiqued on policy or competence, but female opponents are targeted based on their appearance, it is undeniably misogynistic. Excusing this behavior by citing the ‘high-pressure environment’ of politics or claiming it was seen as ‘political ribbing’ by his supporters is an attempt to normalize toxicity. I am justified in demanding better from our leader. This incident, which diverted attention from a serious issue—the multi-million dollar vehicle scandal—occurred while the opposition was calling for transparency and accountability. The Prime Minister’s defensive, aggressive, and unapologetic tone throughout this saga has been consistent. Particularly troubling was the spectacle of women ‘standing with MP Maria Browne’ against a call for an inquiry into her ministry, coinciding with the Prime Minister’s shameful post. What were these women standing for? Good governance and the accountability the Prime Minister claims to champion would dictate that an inquiry is the right course of action. This ‘stand’ was, by definition, a contradiction. I am left to wonder if these women know something that needs to be kept hidden, prompting their premature support for the Minister. Even more concerning was the presence of the Minister, her husband, and children during this counter-protest. Was the Prime Minister there in his personal capacity as a husband or as the head of government? His presence, regardless of capacity, elevated the event, transforming a matter of departmental accountability into a dramatic political spectacle framed as a personal attack on a family. This strategy blurs the lines between governance and personal persecution, making it harder for the public to demand institutional oversight. This selective outrage, concentrated in a single news cycle, reveals a deep moral flaw in our community’s political compass: protection and respect are granted based on party affiliation, not shared gender or human dignity. The message this sends to our girls is clear and cruel: if you dare to lead or disagree, your appearance will be weaponized. As the global theme for the upcoming 16 Days of Activism is to ‘Unite to End Digital Violence Against All Women and Girls,’ our leader is modeling the very behavior we should be campaigning against. Our community is better than this base and vulgar spectacle. I must reject the low standards of apologists and the deafening silence of those in power who privately disagree but are too afraid to speak. Their silence is tacit approval and self-preservation, allowing this toxic culture to thrive. We must demand that our leaders, regardless of party, model integrity, not juvenile rage. The future of our nation’s character depends on it.
OPINION: The Shameful Erosion of Dignity in Our Public Life: A Call to End Toxic Political Culture
