In a recent development surrounding a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, Prime Minister John Briceño has cast doubt on the authority of the Office of the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman had previously directed the Attorney General to release information sought by social activist Jeremy Enriquez. However, during a press interaction on Monday, the Prime Minister refrained from confirming whether the Ombudsman possesses the legal mandate to issue such directives.
When questioned about the matter, Briceño stated, ‘I think that’s a question to ask the Attorney General, because I don’t know. I’m not a lawyer. I don’t know if the Ombudsman even has that authority, but that’s a matter for I don’t know, so I don’t want to, so don’t twist anything that I am saying.’
The Prime Minister’s comments have sparked debate over the extent of the Ombudsman’s powers and the broader implications for government transparency. While Briceño affirmed his general support for transparency, he emphasized that the responsibility for public accountability extends beyond his office. ‘As much as you do,’ he remarked to a reporter, adding, ‘But you do give a public good. So, you also have a responsibility.’
This incident highlights the ongoing tension between government institutions and the public’s right to access information, raising questions about the mechanisms in place to ensure accountability and openness in governance.