Experts sound alarm over sexualised behaviour among schoolchildren

Two prominent Caribbean child welfare leaders have issued an urgent public warning following the spread of multiple viral videos showing uniformed school students engaging in explicit sexual activity, calling attention to a worrying trend of growing sexualisation among minors that risks causing long-term harm to young people’s futures.

Sean Clarke, chief executive officer of Supreme Counselling for Personal Development, and Melissa Savoury-Gittens, president of the National Organisation of Women (NOW), say three key factors are driving increasingly risky sexual behaviour among youth: unregulated social media consumption, heightened peer pressure, and critical gaps in consistent parental guidance.

Clarke emphasized that social media has grown to become one of the most powerful forces shaping how young people think, interact, make decisions, and understand the world around them. While peer pressure predates digital platforms, he explained that social media has amplified the problem by creating a culture where young people chase external validation through likes, shares and view counts. Many minors are willing to put themselves in compromising, explicit situations simply to gain online attention, a dynamic that would have been unthinkable for previous generations.

This risky behaviour is often rooted in low self-esteem, Clarke added. Young people grappling with feelings of inadequacy will frequently go to great lengths to fit in with peer groups and gain acceptance from popular classmates, even if that means participating in activities they know are inappropriate.

Savoury-Gittens echoed these concerns, noting that mainstream entertainment and television programming also normalize constant sexual content that shapes children’s expectations of behaviour from a young age. She also pointed out the stark gender double standard that emerges when explicit content of minors spreads online: while boys often face little social backlash and may even gain social status from the attention, girls are far more likely to face public shaming that leaves long-lasting emotional damage.

Both leaders acknowledge that underage sexual activity is not a new phenomenon, but stress that modern technology has completely transformed the scope and consequences of the issue. The widespread availability of smartphones and the virality of social media mean explicit content can spread across communities in hours, and once posted, it never truly disappears. Clarke warned that content shared as a child can follow people into adulthood, limiting educational and employment opportunities and undermining their ability to build the lives they want.

The advocates agree that families serve as the first and most critical line of defence against these harmful trends. Conversations about sexuality, self-worth, and personal responsibility need to start early in the home, with Clarke arguing that girls must be taught from a young age to value themselves and respect their bodies, while boys must learn to respect both their own boundaries and the boundaries of the girls around them. He also stressed that parents must model healthy behaviour for their children, noting that young people absorb the norms they see practiced by the adults in their lives.

Crucially, Clarke added that education about the risks of social media cannot be limited to children: many parents lack a full understanding of how digital platforms operate and the unique dangers they pose to minors, so adult-focused education programmes are also urgently needed.

Savoury-Gittens expanded on this framework, noting that schools, faith institutions and community organizations also have vital roles to play in supporting children. Many young children, especially those in primary school, hold deep trust in their teachers, giving educators unique access to have open conversations about healthy boundaries and safe online behaviour that children may not be as receptive to when coming from parents. Churches and community groups can also fill gaps in support by offering age-appropriate guidance beyond what is covered in standard school curricula.

Both leaders called for early intervention to identify at-risk children before they engage in harmful behaviour, urging parents and educators to watch for key warning signs: sudden shifts in behaviour including increased aggression, withdrawal from social activities, excessive secrecy around online activity, emotional instability, dropping grades, reduced motivation, and increased absenteeism from school. Clarke noted that these changes can often signal that a child is grappling with peer pressure, bullying, emotional distress, substance use, gang influence, or online manipulation.

Savoury-Gittens also pushed for greater participation in existing parenting support programmes, noting that while free resources are available, uptake remains consistently low. She shared an example of a local parenting initiative that saw attendance surge after organizers offered small financial incentives to participants, proving that removing barriers to access can dramatically increase engagement. Most importantly, she added, adults must not shy away from having difficult conversations with young people about inappropriate behaviour: the goal should be to protect children from harm rather than shame them for their mistakes, while still being clear about what boundaries exist to keep them safe.