A significant divergence of perspectives has emerged within Belize’s Cabinet regarding the proposed merger between telecommunications giants BTL and Speednet. Minister of Infrastructure Development and Housing Julius Espat has publicly challenged assertions from his cabinet colleague that the consolidation would not establish a monopoly.
Public Utilities Minister Michel Chebat recently contended that with over twenty internet service providers operating nationally, the merger would not create monopolistic conditions. Espat has firmly rejected this interpretation, presenting a contrasting analysis focused on local market dynamics.
‘Locally yes, you can’t run away from that concept,’ Espat stated, addressing the fundamental disagreement. ‘You are arguing about two separate things. On the international level you won’t have a monopoly. But at a local level you do.’
The Infrastructure Minister elaborated on consumer concerns, acknowledging legitimate fears that government-dominated telecommunications could potentially target critics. He emphasized the necessity of protective legislation should the merger proceed, while maintaining that competition ultimately serves consumer interests best.
Espat highlighted the critical importance of consumer choice: ‘If BTL gave me bad service but if the price alright I will consider to go to the guy that gave me a better service. You have an option. With what is happening, you won’t have an option. And I believe that option is always a good thing.’
Despite characterizing his position as ‘just a personal opinion,’ Espat stressed the value of comprehensive consultation, noting that while BTL representatives are ‘convinced that it is the best thing since toast bread,’ external stakeholders remain apprehensive about the proposed changes.
The minister concluded that meaningful public dialogue remains essential before any final determination is made regarding the controversial telecommunications merger.