VIDS: erkenning in preambule Grondwet is slechts symbolisch en onvoldoende

The Association of Indigenous Village Leaders in Suriname (VIDS) has issued a formal response to the proposed constitutional amendment that would recognize Indigenous peoples as the original inhabitants of Suriname in the preamble. While acknowledging this as a preliminary symbolic recognition of their historical presence and contributions, VIDS emphasizes that the amendment fails to establish concrete rights or address the structural legal challenges Indigenous communities have faced for decades.

In its communication to the National Assembly, VIDS clarifies that constitutional preambles hold explanatory and symbolic significance but do not create enforceable rights. The proposed modification notably excludes recognition of collective rights to land, territory, and natural resources, alongside omitting the right to self-determination and the principle of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC).

The organization expresses profound concern that the initiative was developed without prior consultation or input from Indigenous peoples and their representative bodies. VIDS contends this approach violates international human rights standards that Suriname has committed to uphold, including rulings from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

VIDS stresses that symbolic recognition must not be presented as a substitute for genuine legal security. “Indigenous peoples require not merely symbolic gestures but concrete, time-bound constitutional and legislative reforms that effectively recognize and protect our collective rights,” stated the document signed by Cylene France, Director of the VIDS Office.

The association urges the National Assembly to view the proposal not as an endpoint but as an extremely limited initial step. VIDS advocates for a structured and inclusive consultation process with Indigenous peoples through their traditional governance structures rather than representatives selected by third parties. Additionally, the organization requests a clear timeline with specific objectives for constitutional and legal recognition of Indigenous rights aligned with international standards and judicial decisions.

VIDS concludes by warning against presenting symbolic changes as adequate solutions to deeply rooted legal issues while reaffirming its commitment to constructive participation in a transparent and equitable process leading to full recognition of Indigenous rights in Suriname—both in principle and in practical legal application. The parliamentary debate on this initiative is scheduled for today’s legislative agenda.