In a significant development within Suriname’s ongoing forestry sector controversy, the Public Prosecutor’s Office has refused to register a criminal complaint filed by representatives of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (LVV) and state attorney Diepak Jairam regarding alleged document falsification in timber exports.
The attempted complaint, targeting officials involved in issuing phytosanitary certificates with incorrect timber designations, was rejected following coordination between the Fraud Department and public prosecutors. Alice Saki, Head of the Fraud Department, engaged in extensive discussions with LVV representatives and made multiple attempts to obtain authorization from the Public Prosecutor’s Office, all of which were ultimately denied.
According to attorney Jairam’s explanation to Starnieuws, the Public Prosecutor’s Office justified its refusal by considering the matter ‘settled’ due to a previous civil summary proceeding. In that case, the court had ordered the State to issue phytosanitary certificates on a one-time basis. Jairam strongly contests this interpretation, stating: ‘This is not a civil matter but involves potential criminal offenses, specifically the deliberate placement of false designations on authentic international documents.’
The attorney expressed shock at the refusal, emphasizing that Suriname’s legal system contains no barriers to pursuing criminal prosecution alongside civil proceedings. ‘A civil judgment does not preclude criminal prosecution. On the contrary: when a crime has been committed, it must be investigated,’ Jairam argued, calling it ‘unthinkable’ that a potential criminal case could be averted by invoking a civil ruling.
In a separate but related development, after intensive negotiations and repeated insistence, authorities granted permission to file a complaint against a specific timber company alleged to have used forged or misleading documentation. This company had initially received approval to treat wood destined for China but subsequently shipped it to India while making alterations to official documents. Notably, this company was not among the six exporters who had filed the summary proceeding against the State.
Jairam confirmed that further actions are being prepared, including directly addressing the Attorney General. ‘This is a serious matter. We are determined to see this case through to the end,’ the attorney emphasized, indicating that the dossier will be forwarded to the leadership of the Public Prosecutor’s Office.