In a compelling defense of Trinidad and Tobago’s growing partnership with the United States, Dr. Errol N. Benjamin outlines significant strategic benefits emerging from the bilateral cooperation. The commentary, originally published as a letter to Newsday, highlights three pivotal advantages: the removal of tariffs on agricultural inputs like fertilizer, recognition as a key coalition partner in combating narcotics trafficking from Venezuela, and positioning the nation at the forefront of US security concerns in the region.
The analysis emphasizes how President Donald Trump’s acknowledgment of TT’s role in anti-trafficking operations, combined with historical US investment in the country’s energy sector through companies like Shell, establishes foundation for continued American involvement in developing oil and gas reserves. Additionally, Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s high-profile meeting with General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signifies elevated security collaboration that places Trinidad and Tobago prominently on Washington’s strategic radar.
Dr. Benjamin notes the influential role TT plays in regional dynamics, with numerous Latin American nations reportedly following its lead in supporting US counter-narcotics initiatives. This leadership position potentially grants TT preferential status in American foreign policy considerations for the Caribbean.
Despite these advantages, the author expresses concern over domestic criticism directed at the government’s alliance with the US. Anti-Trump activists and ideologues have disparaged the partnership, with some labeling the nation as a ‘lackey’ and criticizing high-level visits from US officials. Dr. Benjamin characterizes the alliance as fundamentally military in nature, noting that associated developments—including warship port calls in Trinidad, US personnel and aircraft presence in Tobago, and installation of military equipment like radar systems—represent expected components of such cooperation. The commentary concludes by urging critics to adopt a more open-minded perspective toward the strategic benefits of the US partnership, leaving final judgment to readers’ critical assessment.