In a significant legal development, the Court of Appeal has overturned a High Court order that directed the Registrar of the Supreme Court to forward documents from Eastman Enterprises Ltd’s lawsuit to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). The Appeal Court, on November 21, ruled that the referral was premature and ‘plainly wrong,’ citing the absence of fact-finding and untested allegations as key factors in its decision. The panel, comprising Justices Peter Rajkumar, James Aboud, and Ricky Rahim, emphasized that the allegations had ‘not been tested’ and could not properly ground a referral. Despite this reversal, the court upheld the trial judge’s decision to stay Eastman’s claim, affirming that the company must first comply with the contract’s alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedure before pursuing litigation. In a letter to DPP Roger Gaspard, SC, attorney Kareem Marcelle urged the discontinuation of any consideration of the referred material, asserting that the documents were ‘null, void, unlawful, and of no effect.’ Cepep has stated its commitment to pursuing all legitimate avenues in the interest of justice and public administration, seeking legal advice on alleged fraudulent misrepresentation.
Lawyer tells DPP: Disregard Cepep lawsuit files sent by High Court
