On November 11, 2025, the Belizean Senate engaged in a heated debate over the proposed Safe Third Country Agreement, a contentious deal that would see Belize accepting asylum seekers from Central America and the Caribbean who have been denied entry by the United States. The Opposition, led by Senator Patrick Faber, vehemently opposes the agreement, arguing that it undermines Belize’s sovereignty and dignity. Faber accused the Briceno administration of prioritizing diplomatic favors over national interests and demanded greater transparency and public consultation before proceeding.
In contrast, Government Senator Hector Guerra defended the agreement, emphasizing that it is an exercise of Belize’s sovereignty rather than a surrender of it. Guerra highlighted that the agreement allows Belize to retain control over its immigration policies, including the right to accept, reject, suspend, or terminate the deal at any time. He framed the agreement as a compassionate response to human rights concerns, countering the Opposition’s portrayal of Belize as a ‘dumping ground’ for refugees.
The debate underscores deep political divisions over Belize’s role in regional migration and its relationship with the United States. While the administration views the agreement as a humanitarian and diplomatic necessity, the Opposition insists it requires broader public scrutiny and accountability. The Senate’s decision will have significant implications for Belize’s immigration policies, international standing, and domestic political landscape.